Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 96
Filtrar
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 112(8-9): 485-493, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31353279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term outcome of heart transplantation in patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) are scarce. AIM: To evaluate long-term outcome after heart transplantation in patients with a VAD compared with no mechanical circulatory support. METHODS: Consecutive all-comers who underwent heart transplantation were included at a single high-volume centre from January 2005 until December 2012, with 5 years of follow-up. Clinical and biological characteristics, operative results, outcomes and survival were recorded. Regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 1-year and 5-year mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with bridge to transplantation by VAD (VAD group) and 289 patients transplanted without a VAD (standard group) were enrolled. The mean age was 46±11 years in the VAD group compared with 51±13 years in the standard group (P=0.01); 17% of the VAD group and 25% of the standard group were women (P=0.21). Ischaemic time was longer in the VAD group (207±54 vs 169±60minutes; P<0.01). There was no difference in primary graft failure (33% vs 25%; P=0.22) or 1-year mortality (17% vs 28%; P=0.12). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative VAD was an independent protective factor for 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.97; P=0.04). Independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were recipient age>60 years, recipient creatinine, body surface area mismatch and ischaemic time. The VAD and standard groups had similar long-term survival, with 5-year mortality rates of 35% and 40%, respectively (P=0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to transplantation by VAD was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality, leading critically ill patients to similar long-term survival compared with patients who underwent standard heart transplantation. This alternative strategy may benefit carefully selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Adulto , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 42(5): 416-426, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29655525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatic dysfunction is often associated with advanced heart failure. Its impact on complications following heart transplantation is not well known. We studied the influence of preoperative hepatic dysfunction on the results of heart transplantation with a specific priority access for critical patients. METHODS: Consecutive heart transplantation patients were retrospectively analyzed at listing to detect predictive factors for early complications and survival following heart transplantation. RESULTS: Among heart transplant candidates (n=384), median age was 52 years, dilated and ischemic cardiopathies were present in 44% and 32%, respectively. Clinical ascites was present in 15.6% and median MELD score was 13. A temporary circulatory support and a national priority access were necessary in 14.8% and 35% respectively. Whereas 12% of the global cohort died on the waiting list, 321 patients were transplanted, 34.2% suffered from severe early complications, 26.3% needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in postoperative period, 27.7% died before 3 months with a 5-year survival rate of 56%. At listing, clinical ascites, and creatinine were independently associated with specific early complications i.e. primary graft dysfunction and septic shock respectively. Bilirubin level was also an independent marker of other early complications. Finally, need for postoperative circulatory support and postoperative 90-day mortality were strongly and exclusively associated with clinical ascites and creatinine at listing. In a subgroup analysis, we predicted more accurately the postoperative survival at 3 months by combining MELD score and ascites. CONCLUSION: At listing, hepatic and renal dysfunctions are independent risk factors that could predict severe early complications and mortality following heart transplantation in the most severe patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Hepatopatías/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28784326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Organized atrial arrhythmias (OAAs) are common after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Some controversies remain about their clinical presentation, relationship with atrial anastomosis and electrophysiologic features. The objectives of this retrospective study were to determine the mechanisms of OAAs after OHT and describe the outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS: Thirty consecutive transplanted patients (mean age 48 ± 17 years, 86.6% male) underwent 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping and RFCA of their OAA from 2004 to 2012 at our center. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had biatrial anastomosis and 8 had bicaval anastomosis. Macro-reentry was the arrhythmia mechanism for 96% of patients. The electrophysiologic diagnoses were: cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) in 93% of patients (n = 28); perimitral AFL in 3% (n = 1); and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) in 3% (n = 1). In 5 patients with biatrial anastomosis, a right FAT was inducible. Primary RFCA success was obtained in 93% of patients. Mean follow-up time was 39 ± 26.8 months. Electrical repermeation between recipient and donor atria, present in 20% of patients (n = 6), did not account for any of the OAAs observed. Survival without OAA relapse at 12, 24 and 60 months was 93%, 89% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CTI-dependent AFL accounted for most instances of OAA after OHT, regardless of anastomosis type. Time from transplantation to OAA was shorter with bicaval than with biatrial anastomosis. RFCA was safe and provided good long-term results.

4.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 153(3): 622-630, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27938903

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of cardiac arrest-resuscitated donors (CARDs) on the outcome of heart recipients. METHODS: Patients transplanted between July 2004 and December 2012 were divided into 2 groups according to the history of cardiac arrest in donors and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 584 heart transplantations were performed during the study period, and 117 recipients received an organ from a CARD. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to recipient age, sex, cardiomyopathy, preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, national high emergency waiting list, and redo surgery. Donors who sustained a cardiac arrest were significantly younger (44 [32-51] vs 49 [41-56] years; P < .001), their main cause of death was anoxia (57% vs 1%; P < .001), and they had significantly greater troponin T peak levels (0.51 [0.128-3.108] vs 0.11 [0.04-0.43] ng/mL; P < .001). Median cardiac arrest duration was 15 minutes (5-25). No difference was noted in donors with regards to left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement (62% ± 8% vs 63% ± 8%; P = .2). There were no differences between the 2 groups with regards to ischemic time (179 ± 60 vs 183 ± 59 minutes; P = .43), need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary graft failure (31% vs 30%; P = .993) and 30-days mortality. Recipients receiving an organ from a CARD had a significantly better 10 year survival (69.4% vs 50.4%; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: History of cardiac arrest in donors with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction at time of organ procurement doesn't affect outcome of heart recipients.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera/mortalidad
8.
Eur Heart J ; 36(42): 2921-2964, 2015 Nov 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26320112
9.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 48(5): 785-91, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564216

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices provide temporary mechanical circulatory assistance and are usually implanted under emergency conditions in critical patients. If weaning off ECLS is not possible, heart transplantation or implantation of long-term mechanical circulatory support (LTMCS) is required. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the bridge-to-bridge (BTB) concept. METHODS: Between 1 January 2004 and 1 August 2010, 97 patients were assisted by LTMCS. The implantation was the first-line intervention in 48 patients (the bridge group), and was performed after a period of ECLS support in 49 others (the BTB group). RESULTS: The long-term survival rate was 51.6%, with a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, and there were no differences for biological parameters between the two groups. Patients in the BTB group whose condition was initially more severe, improved under ECLS support, and those in whom biological parameters did not revert to normal died after LTMCS. Risk factors for mortality in the BTB group were total bilirubin and lactate before LTMCS, and alkaline phosphatase before ECLS support. CONCLUSIONS: The BTB concept allows the implementation of LTMCS in severe patients, for whom it was not originally envisaged, with the same long-term survival as in first-line settings. ECLS in the evolution of patients is predictive of survival after LTMCS.


Asunto(s)
Circulación Extracorporea/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Circulación Extracorporea/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
10.
Bull Acad Natl Med ; 199(6): 835-847, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29901884

RESUMEN

Coronary revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus. Macrovascular complications of diabetes mellitus and particularly difuse coronary artery atherosclerosis, confer a high risk of morbidity and mortality to this population. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred mode of coronary revasculari- zation in acute coronary syndromes withlwithout ST elevation, due to the availability of this procedure in emergency situations and to the fact that the benefit is similar in patients with or without diabetes. In symptomatic stable coronary artery disease, large clinical trials including BARI-2D and FREEDOM have clarified the respective role of PCI and of Coronary Artery By-Pass Surgery (CABG) in patients with multiple vessel disease. The superiority of CABG over PCI is clearly demonstrated in multivessel disease, particu- larly with a high SYNTAX score related to complex lesions. The optimal surgical approach should use the two internal mammary arteries in order to ensure a complete revascularization and to reduce delayed scar healing and infection. The surgical approach in this context improves mortality, reduces the risk of repeat revascularization and preserves cardiac function. The decision of the type of procedure should be taken as recommended by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) by a heart team including an interventional cardiologist, a cardiac surgeon anda diabetologist, and shouldfollow international recommendations such as those of the European Society of Cardiology (Class 1A).

12.
Transpl Int ; 27(9): 931-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24853579

RESUMEN

Renal insufficiency (RI) is a frequent complication in heart transplant (HT) patients. The main objectives of the Cardiac trAnsplantation and Renal INsufficiency (CARIN) study were to follow the evolution of renal function after heart transplantation (HTx), to identify the factors associated with the decline of renal function, to describe the impact of RI on mortality during 3 years after the HT, and to observe the renal profile of the prescriptions. CARIN was a French retrospective, multicentric, study. Data were collected for patients who received a HT between 2000 and 2005. Data collection was performed at five time points: before HTx (T0), 1(T1), 6(T6), 12 (T12), and 36 (T36) months after HTx. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with aMDRD formula. RI was defined as GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². Four hundred and forty-one patients from five HT centers were included. The prevalences of RI were 28.8% (T0), 54.0% (T1), 50.4% (T6), 51.6% (T12), and 59.6% (T36). Age and cyclosporine were independently linked to the decline of renal function. Hypertension and GFR < 60 at T0 were independent risk factors of mortality. 48.7-64.7% of the nonimmunosuppressive prescriptions were drugs that required dosage adjustment in RI patients or for which no data were available concerning administration in RI patients. RI is highly frequent after HTx. Because RI is a risk factor of mortality, any sparing renal strategies have to be undertaken.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacocinética , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
13.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 30(5): 959-60, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24715438

RESUMEN

We report a case of severe mitral stenosis caused by Libman-Sacks endocarditis, as an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a 20-year-old woman. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a thickening of the mitral valve with basal endocardial thickening exhibiting defect on first-pass perfusion short-axis acquisition and delayed enhancement in keeping with extensive fibrous endocarditis. The patient underwent successful mechanical mitral valve replacement. This case illustrates that MRI is useful in diagnosing this recognised but uncommon cardiac complication of SLE and excluding differential diagnosis such as valve tumour and infective endocarditis with perivalvular abscesses.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endocarditis/cirugía , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Adulto Joven
14.
Transpl Int ; 27(6): 576-82, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24606025

RESUMEN

To evaluate outcome and quality of life (QoL) in ≥ 20 years survivors after heart transplantation. Patients surviving ≥ 20 years with a single graft were retrospectively reviewed. Heterotopic, multiorgan and retransplantations were excluded. QoL was evaluated using the SF-36 survey. Eight hundred and twenty-seven heart transplants were performed from 1981 to 1993, and among these, 131 (16%) patients survived ≥ 20 years; 98 (75%) were male and mean age at transplant was 43 ± 13 years. Conditional survival in these 20 years survivors was 74.1 ± 4.3% at 23 years and 60.9 ± 5.3% at 25 years (45 deaths, 34%). Forty-four (34%) patients suffered rejection ≥ 2R. Conditional survival free from rejection ≥ 2R was 68 ± 4.1% at 5 years and 66.4 ± 4.2% at 10 years. Thirty-five (27%) patients had cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) grade 2-3. Conditional CAV-free survival was 76 ± 3.8% at 20 years and 72.1 ± 4% at 25. Sixty-nine (53%) patients developed malignancy, mostly skin cancers. Conditional malignancy-free survival was 53.5 ± 4.4% at 20 years and 45.2 ± 4.6% at 25 years. At latest follow-up, 24.0 ± 3.0 years after transplantation, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 62 ± 11% and mean physical and mental scores were 57 ± 23 and 58 ± 21, respectively. Sixteen per cent of heart recipients survived ≥ 20 years with good ventricular performance and QoL. CAV and malignancies account for late morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Calidad de Vida , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Trasplante de Corazón/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 19(1): 49-55, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24659551

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular failure (RVF) after implantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a dramatic complication. We compared retrospectively two techniques of temporary right ventricular support after LVAD (HeartMate II, Thoratec Corp, Pleasonton, CA, USA) implantation. METHODS: From 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2012, 78 patients [mean age 52 ± 1.34 years; 15 women (19%)] received a HeartMate II at our institution. Among these, 18 patients (23%) suffered postimplant RVF treated by peripheral temporary right ventricular support. Aetiology of heart failure was ischaemic in 12 (67%) and dilated cardiomyopathy in 6 (33%) patients. The preimplant RV risk score averaged 5.1 ± 0.59. Ten patients were treated using a femorofemoral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and 8 patients were treated using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) established between a femoral vein and the pulmonary artery via a Dacron prosthesis (RVAD). RESULTS: Duration of RV support was 7.12 ± 5.4 days and 9.57 ± 3.5 days in venoarterial ECLS and vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD groups, respectively (P = 0.32). Three patients (17%) died while under RV support (venoarterial ECLS, n = 2; and vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD, n = 1, P = 0.58). In the venoarterial ECLS group, 6 (60%) patients suffered major thromboembolic complications including thrombosis of the ECLS arterial line (n = 2), ischaemic stroke (n = 2) and thrombosis of the ascending aorta (n = 2). No major complication was observed in the vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD group (P = 0.01). RV support was successfully weaned in 8 (80%) patients of the venoarterial ECLS group and in 7 (87.5%) of the vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD group (P = 0.58). The duration of postimplant intensive care unit stay was not different (respectively, 27.5 ± 18.7 days and 20.0 ± 12.0 days; P = 0.38) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary support of the failing RV after LVAD implantation using temporary vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD is a promising therapeutic option. This approach provides adequate LVAD pre- and afterload and is associated with significantly less thromboembolic complications.


Asunto(s)
Circulación Extracorporea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Función Ventricular Derecha , Adulto , Anciano , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Circulación Extracorporea/efectos adversos , Circulación Extracorporea/mortalidad , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Femenino , Vena Femoral/fisiopatología , Vena Femoral/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/mortalidad , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Arteria Pulmonar/cirugía , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología
16.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 45(1): 47-54, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23616484

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The twin aims of this study were to identify the independent predictors of 30-day mortality and to analyse the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and necessitating extracorporeal life support (ECLS). METHODS: The investigation was a single-centre, retrospective study of 77 patients who required ECLS for AMI with CS. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent variables associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Between February 2006 and November 2009, 745 patients in our establishment received ECLS. In the single-centre cohort, we retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had required ECLS support for AMI with CS. The delay between AMI and CS ECLS was 15 ± 4 h. PCI was performed in 58 patients (75.3%) and isolated emergency CABG in 12 (15.6%). The remaining 7 patients (9.1%) did not undergo revascularization. ECLS duration averaged 9.8 ± 7.1 days. Nineteen patients were successfully weaned from ECLS (24%). Fifty-eight patients did not undergo or did not tolerate the weaning trial (76%). Forty patients died during ECLS support, 13 were implanted with a mono-ventricular (n = 9) or biventricular assist device (n = 4) and 5 were bridged to heart transplantation. Complications consisted primarily in pneumonia (51.3%) and acute renal failure requiring haemofiltration (46.1%). Pulmonary oedema occurred in 24 patients (31.6%) and major bleeding in 16 (21.33%). 30-day and in-hospital survival rates were, respectively, 38.9 and 33.8%. Multivariable analysis identified preimplantation lactate serum level, preimplantation creatinine serum level and previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt ECLS support is an effective strategy and provides a reasonable chance of survival in patients with AMI associated with profound CS. As shown in our results pertaining to predictive risk factors for 30-day mortality, reducing the duration of end-organ ischaemia is the keystone to management of this patient population. A major remaining challenge will consist in preventing pulmonary oedema following peripheral ECLS.


Asunto(s)
Circulación Extracorporea/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Femenino , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico/epidemiología , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Análisis de Supervivencia
18.
Int J Artif Organs ; 36(9): 605-11, 2013 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23918265

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Impella 5.0 is a short-term left ventricle assist device (LVAD), inserted retrograde into the left ventricle across the aortic valve through a surgical peripheral access. Impella has been utilized for various indications but in the setting of bridge-to-bridge application there are limited reports. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of Impella utilization at our institution as bridge to long-term LVADs. The primary end-point was survival during Impella support. RESULTS: Between December 2010 and February 2012, we implanted 20 Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock and, among these, 5 were implanted as bridge to long-term LVADs. In this latter group, mean age at the time of implantation was 44 ± 15.6 (range 27-68) years and there was a prevalence of males (80%). Etiology of cardiogenic shock was: decompensated anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (n = 1), myocardial infarction (n = 4). There was no major bleeding requiring surgical revision or infectious complications at the right axillary access. One patient required Impella replacement due to a pump stop. After a mean period of 14.2 ± 9.0 (range 6-27) days of Impella support, patients were switched to a long-term LVAD (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 3). One patient died 70 days after implantation of the long-term LVAD due to multi-organ failure, while the remaining patients are still alive after a mean period of follow-up of 108.6 ± 66.2 (range 19-191) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that an Impella 5.0 implanted through the right axillary artery approach is a valid option as bridge to long-term LVADs.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Axilar/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 106(4): 209-19, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, several anatomical approaches and intervention sites can be used to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVIs), often with no clinical indications for choosing one or another. While these choices can have an impact on resource consumption, no costing study is available in the European context to provide information on resource use and assist decision-making. AIMS: To provide comparative data on the cost of the TAVI procedure, depending on anatomical approach and intervention site used, from a hospital perspective, and to analyze factors associated with cost of hospital stay. METHODS: Multicentre national registry data were collected in 16 centres between January and October 2009. For 287 patients, a descriptive costing study and a multivariable analysis of hospital stay cost were performed. RESULTS: The mean cost of the TAVI procedure was €22,876 and the mean initial hospital stay cost was €35,164. The procedure cost, excluding valve cost, did not differ between anatomical approaches and was highest in the hybrid room and lowest in the catheterization laboratory. Factors associated with higher hospital stay cost were transapical approach, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score>10%, warfarin use at inclusion, complications during procedure and pacemaker implantation following valve implantation. CONCLUSIONS: If clinical considerations do not interfere, hospital staff may find it economically favorable to opt for the catheterization laboratory and against the hybrid room. The mean hospital stay cost is higher than the tariff paid in 2011, a difference that has grown since the change in tariff in 2012, representing an economic disincentive for the uptake of TAVI in France.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/economía , Costos de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/economía , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Francia , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/economía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Marcapaso Artificial/economía , Admisión y Programación de Personal/economía , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/economía , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
20.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 95(5): 1640-6, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23562468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The SynCardia temporary total artificial heart (t-TAH) provides complete circulatory support by replacing both native cardiac ventricles and all cardiac valves. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of demographics, clinical characteristics and survival of patients bridged to transplantation using the SynCardia t-TAH (SynCardia Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ). RESULTS: From 2000 to 2010, the SynCardia t-TAH was implanted in 90 consecutive patients (80 males; mean age, 46 ± 13 years) suffering cardiogenic shock secondary to idiopathic (n = 40, 46%) or ischemic (n = 24, 27%) cardiomyopathy or other causes. Before implantation, 7 (9%) patients had cardiac arrest, 27 (33%) were on ventilator, and 18 (22%) were on extracorporeal life support. Pre-implant creatinine values were 1.7 ± 0.97 mg/dL and total bilirubin levels were 45 ± 32 µmol/L; mean duration of support was 84 ± 102 days. Thirty-five (39%) patients died while on support after a mean of 62 ± 107 days. Actuarial survival on device was 74% ± 5%, 63% ± 6%, and 47% ± 8% at 30, 60, and 180 days after implantation. While on support, 9 (10%) patients suffered stroke, 13 (14%) had mediastinitis, and 35 (39%) required surgical reexploration for bleeding, hematoma, or infection. Multivariate analysis revealed that older recipient age and preoperative mechanical ventilation were risk factors for death while on support. Fifty-five (61%) patients were transplanted after a mean of 97 ± 98 days of support. Actuarial survival rates were 78% ± 6%, 71% ± 6%, and 63% ± 8% at 1, 5, and 8 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The SynCardia t-TAH provided acceptable survival to transplantation rates with a remarkably low incidence of neurologic events. Posttransplant survival was similar to that of patients undergoing primary heart transplantation in France.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Artificial , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...