Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Better Pain Control and Patient Outcomes with Liposomal Bupivacaine than Bupivacaine.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are a safe and effective way to provide immediate postoperative pain relief in surgical patients, and have been shown to decrease narcotic requirements. Concerns about complications of narcotics, increase in hospital length of stay (LOS), and health-care costs make this of particular interest. We compared standard bupivacaine TAP blocks with those carried out using liposomal bupivacaine to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Fifty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy received laparoscopic liposomal bupivacaine TAP blocks using 80 cc of local anesthetic, and data were collected prospectively during hospitalization. Data collected included amount of narcotic medication used during hospitalization, number of days to ambulation, number of days to bowel function, and LOS. These patients were compared with the last 50 patients recruited to the control/bupivacaine TAP block arm of the study. The same data parameters were collected and all patients were on an enhanced recovery protocol, which included scheduled acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and gabapentin by mouth, as well as clear liquid diet starting on postoperative day zero. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Patients treated with liposomal bupivacaine needed less narcotics (5.06 vs 18.75 mg, P = 0.0002), had earlier bowel function (1.7 vs 2.4 days, P = 0.0002), and shorter LOS (2.7 vs 3.4 days, P = 0.0146). Patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resections seem to require fewer narcotics and have better patient outcomes with liposomal bupivacaine TAP blocks. Based on our data, liposomal bupivacaine seems to be superior to bupivacaine for TAP blocks.

Comparison of Therapeutic Benefit of Bupivacaine HCl Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway versus Traditional Oral and Intravenous Pain Control after Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs), when combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, have been proven to reduce the length of stay (LOS) and improve quality outcomes. Nonopioid pain management is an essential component of this pathway, leading to a reduction in immobility, postoperative ileus, and an increase in patient satisfaction. TAP block variations have been studied in general and gynecologic surgery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of laparoscopic TAP blocks in conjunction with the benefit of an ERP. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery patients received TAP blocks under laparoscopic guidance while under anesthesia, randomized to a placebo, bupivacaine TAP block, or bupivacaine TAP block with an ERP arm of the trial. Patient demographics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software. Our main objective was to determine short-term benefits of TAP blocks on reducing total narcotic consumption. Secondary objectives included effects of TAP blocks on time to ambulation, time to bowel function, and LOS. To isolate the effect of the TAP blocks, no efforts were made to control nursing or patient education in patients managed without an ERP. Of 137 patients, 14 were withdrawn. All cases were elective, with the main diagnosis colon cancer or dysplastic polyps (47.1%). The median age in each group was comparable (P = 0.12), with female majority in both groups (58.5%). Most procedures were segmental colon resections (74.7%). Thirty-one patients received a placebo, 41 bupivacaine TAP, and 51 bupivacaine TAP plus ERP. In terms of primary endpoints, the bupivacaine plus ERP arm used statistically significant less IV narcotics on postoperative day 1 and in total (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). All patients ambulated on average within the first 24 hours postoperatively, with the TAP plus ERP group approximately 0.5 days sooner (P = 0.001). The TAP plus ERP group also had a return of bowel function and LOS approximately 24 hours early (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001). This study shows that a laparoscopically placed bupivacaine TAP block when used as part of an ERP can reduce LOS, postoperative narcotics, time to ambulation and bowel function, and LOS. Defined pain regimens with auxiliary staff teaching can add to the improvement in quality outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and, with the addition of the TAP block, can add to patient satisfaction and lower hospital costs.

Impact of medical or surgical admission on outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Although acute cholecystitis (AC) is a surgical disease, patients with the condition may be admitted to medical-related services (MS). This may lead to delayed cholecystectomy thereby affecting outcomes and quality of care. METHODS: Between July 2010 and March 2013, 329 patients under 70 years old presented to a community-based tertiary care hospital with AC and underwent same admission cholecystectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients admitted to MS and surgical services (SS). RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients (65.3%) were admitted to a MS. Patients under the MS had longer LOS (3.0 days vs. 2.0 days, p < 0.001), waiting time to surgical consultation (7.3 h vs. 5.0 h, p < 0.001) and to cholecystectomy (1.0, 0-2 days vs. 1.0, 0-1 day, p < 0.001), and increased hospital costs ($3685 vs. $4,688, p < 0.001) compared to the SS. Readmission and mortality rates were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients under 70 years old with AC undergoing cholecystectomy admitted to MS had increased LOS, delay to the operation, and hospital costs compared to those admitted to a SS. Admission of patients with AC to a SS needs to be emphasized to reduce costs and improve quality of care.

Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques.

AIM: Anorectal fistulas have been a common surgical problem since ancient times. Age-old seton techniques are still practiced successfully in the treatment of complex anal fistulas. Many variations in materials and techniques are described in the literature. The selection of a seton type and technique depends on personal preferences. Our aim was to put together all the available variations in materials and techniques for seton treatment. This comprehensive review will help the surgeon to become more familiar with the various options available with regard to materials and techniques. METHODS: A review of the literature using Medline was done using the Key Words 'anal fistula' and 'seton'. All articles published in English were reviewed. The articles which had variations in materials and techniques for seton treatment were studied. RESULTS: Various aspects of variations in materials, insertion techniques, maintenance of tension, mechanisms of action, drainage techniques and changing the seton have been elaborated in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout this paper we present the various available variations in setons with regard to materials, placement and maintenance techniques. This study will help clinicians in choosing a new seton variation or modifying their current method of treatment with setons.

Non-cutting setons for progressive migration of complex fistula tracts: a new spin on an old technique.

AIM: We introduced a modification of the loose seton for high transsphincteric fistula which involved daily self-rotation of the seton by 360°, which we call the progressive migration technique. The outcomes were evaluated. METHOD: A retrospective review was undertaken of all operations for anal fistula performed by a single colorectal surgeon from Jan. 2002-Dec. 2007. Twenty-four patients with high transsphincteric fistulas were treated with loose, 0-silk setons. Patients were asked to rotate the seton daily, one revolution in each direction, pulling the knot through the fistula tract. Follow-up was done by phone with questionnaires to address incontinence pain scores, satisfaction, and recurrence. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 48 years (range, 22-77 years), with M/F ratio of 3:1. The mean duration for seton in place was 14 months (range, 2-40 months). Follow-up ranged from 12-81 months (mean, 45 months). The progressive migration technique resulted in the gradual healing of the fistula tract in 75% of patients (n = 18), with no recurrence (setons completely worked their way to the surface [n = 9], or tract migration was extensive to allow a safe completion fistulotomy [n = 9]). All were fistula free. Twenty-five percent (n = 6) had Crohn's disease. Reported incontinence rates were 0% for solid and liquid stool and 8% (n = 2) for flatus. Twenty-five percent (n = 6) tolerated the setons poorly, and an alternative procedure was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Simple daily self-rotation of a heavy silk seton, resulting in progressive migration of the fistula tract, is an alternative technique for treating complex, high transsphincteric anal fistulas.