Incremental value of the signal-averaged ECG for diagnosing arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is currently diagnosed using a combination of clinical features, imaging, electrocardiography, and genetic investigations. An abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) is defined as a minor diagnostic criterion by the 2010 Task Force Criteria, but doubts remain about the value of this investigation. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the utility of the SAECG in diagnosing ARVC using the Canadian Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Registry, a population representative registry of probands with ARVC and relatives, less influenced by referral bias. METHODS: Probands with ARVC and family members from the Canadian Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Registry underwent phenotype review. SAECG parameters were compared individually and in combination between those with varying degrees of ARVC severity and healthy controls (family members of probands with ARVC and unexplained sudden death, free of evidence of cardiac disease). RESULTS: A total of 196 patients with ARVC and 205 controls were included (mean age 44 ± 15 years; 186 of 401 men [46%]). SAECG abnormalities were seen in 83 of 205 controls (40%), 33 of 68 patients with ARVC and mild disease (51%), and 31 of 42 with severe disease (74%). The SAECG associated strongly with imaging abnormalities (major: odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-6.9; minor: odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 0.7-16.5) but not with other aspects of phenotype. Patients carrying pathogenic variants but with minimal phenotype had similar SAECGs to healthy controls (filtered QRS duration 111.2 ± 11.2 ms vs 111 ± 7.6 ms, P = .93; duration of low amplitude signals < 40 µV 32.3 ± 8.9 ms vs 34.2 ± 7.2 ms, P = .32; root mean square of the terminal 40 ms of the filtered QRS complex 43.1 ± 25.2 ms vs 38.2 ± 20.2 ms, P = .38). CONCLUSION: The SAECG appears to be a surrogate marker for structural abnormalities seen on imaging in those with ARVC. Great caution is required in interpreting SAECG findings in those without other corroborating evidence of an ARVC phenotype.

The clinical utility of procainamide-induced late potentials on the signal averaged ECG.

BACKGROUND: Late potentials (LPs) identified on the signal averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) are a marker for an increased risk of arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome (BrS). Procainamide is a sodium channel blocker used to diagnose BrS. The effects of Procainamide on the SAECG in those with BrS and the significance of Procainamide-induced LPs are unknown. METHODS: Procainamide provocation was performed for suspected BrS with 12-lead and SAECG pre- and post-infusion. Filtered QRS duration (fQRSd), duration of low amplitude signals <40 µV (LAS40) and root-mean-square voltage in the terminal 40 ms (RMS40) were determined. RESULTS: Data from 150 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 44.5 years, 109 males). Procainamide increased fQRSd (Pre 118.8 ± 10.5 ms, post 121.2 ± 10.2 ms, p < 0.001) and LAS40 (Pre 38.7 ± 9.8 ms, post 40.2 ± 10.5 ms, p = 0.005) and decreased RMS40 (Pre 24.6 ± 12 ms, post 22.8 ± 12 ms, p = 0.002). LPs were present in 68/150 (45%) at baseline. Fifteen patients with negative baseline SAECGs had LPs unmasked by Procainamide, but six patients had LPs at baseline that were no longer present following Procainamide. Comparing those with normal hearts (n = 48) to those with a final diagnosis of BrS (n = 38), Procainamide prolonged fQRSd to a greater extent in those with BrS. Comparing those with Procainamide-induced LPs to those with no LPs at any time did not highlight any aspect of phenotype and did not correlate with a history of ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Procainamide influences the SAECG, provoking LPs in a small proportion of patients. However, there is no evidence that Procainamide-induced LPs provide additional diagnostic information or aid risk stratification.