Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Scott Med J ; 55(3): 32-4, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20795515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Local steroid injection is a common procedure and not without risks. AIM: To establish the current practice of obtaining informed consent for local steroid injection among shoulder and elbow surgeons in the UK. METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was distributed to 176 orthopaedics surgeons in UK who were members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. RESULTS: 68% of the surgeons considered local steroid injection invasive. 88% of the surgeons obtained verbal consent only. Of these, only 19% recorded the discussion. Almost all the surgeons (96%) explained the desired effects and 26% provided statistical evidence of local steroid injection. About 88% of the surgeons mentioned other drugs included in the injection. Only 13% of them mentioned the dose of the steroid used. 82% and 77% of the surgeons offered alternative treatment options and the right to refuse injection respectively. 85% and 59% of the surgeons discussed local and systemic risks of steroid injection, respectively. The most common risk mentioned by the surgeons is short term increase of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the surgeons used verbal consent only for local steroid injection. The consent discussion was not regularly documented in case notes and the information delivered varies.


Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Consentimiento Informado/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortopedia , Documentación , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Reino Unido
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 58(1): 19-21, 2004 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14994965

RESUMEN

We performed a prospective study on 247 consecutive patients attending our arthroplasty pre-admission clinic over six months, to compare the accuracy of dipstick urinalysis with the standard microbiological test for excluding urinary tract infection. There were 22 positive culture results and 43 positive dipstick results, with 16 true positives and 198 true negatives. Sensitivity was 72.7%, lower then the 88.0% figure for specificity. The positive predictive value was 37.2%, and the negative predictive value was 97.1%. Dipstick urinalysis is ideally suited to the busy pre-admission setting and would have resulted in a 90% reduction in the number of samples sent for laboratory analysis. In view of these results, we have changed our working practise from performing cultures to dipstick urinalysis on all patients prior to arthroplasty.


Asunto(s)
Tiras Reactivas , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Anciano , Artroplastia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 84(5): 334-7, 2002 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12398127

RESUMEN

Posterior shoulder dislocations are uncommon, with frequent delays in the diagnosis. Three missed posterior dislocations within our hospital caused us to review the standard radiographs taken and the knowledge of this condition. A total of 40 radiographers and 40 casualty officers were surveyed. Of the radiographers, 63% felt it unnecessary to perform two views, they complained that laterals were difficult to obtain because of patient distress. All the radiographers surveyed knew of alternative views, but would not perform them unless specifically requested. Casualty officers claimed always to request two views, but did not in 75% of cases. Only 20% were aware of alternative views, all would accept one view for exclusion of a dislocation and none were aware of the radiographic signs associated with a posterior dislocation. Increased education and a change of view would assist in decreasing the rate of missed diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Luxación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Competencia Clínica/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Inglaterra , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Práctica Profesional , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía
4.
Injury ; 25(4): 221-2, 1994 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8206651

RESUMEN

Many patients apparently believe there is a difference between a fracture and a break. In a survey of 100 patients, 81 thought there was a difference. Of these, 71 thought a fracture was better than a break, and 65 believed that bone was undisplaced in a fracture and displaced in a break. These results suggest that greater care, including visual means, should be used in informing patients of their injuries.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Fracturas Óseas , Terminología como Asunto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Fracturas Óseas/psicología , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Semántica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA