Aortic Root Dimension Using Transthoracic Echocardiography: Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Findings regarding the relation between aortic size and risk factors are heterogeneous. This study aimed to generate new insights from a population-based adult cohort on aortic root dimensions and their association with age, anthropometric measures, and cardiac risk factors and evaluate the incidence of acute aortic events. Participants from the fifth examination round of the Copenhagen City Heart study (aged 20 to 98 years) with applicable echocardiograms and no history of aortic disease or valve surgery were included. Aorta diameter was assessed at the annulus, sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and the tubular part of the ascending aorta. The study population comprised 1,796 men and 2,316 women; mean age: 56.4 ± 17.0 and 56.9 ± 18.1 years, respectively. Men had larger aortic root diameters than women regardless of height indexing (p <0.01). Age, height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and smoking were positively correlated with aortic sinus diameter in the crude and gender-adjusted analyses. However, after full adjustment, only height, weight, and diastolic blood pressure remained significantly positively correlated with aortic sinus diameter (p <0.001). For systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure, the correlation was inverse (p <0.001). During follow-up (median 5.4 [quartile 1 to quartile 3 4.5 to 6.3] years), the incidence rate of first-time acute aortic events was 13.6 (confidence interval 4.4 to 42.2) per 100,000 person-years. In conclusion, beyond anthropometric measures, age, and gender, diastolic blood pressure was the only cardiac risk factor that was independently correlated with aortic root dimensions. The number of aortic events during follow-up was low.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes in a nationwide population of patients with acute type A and type B aortic dissection. METHODS: All patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection between 2006 and 2015 were identified by national registries. The main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term survival in hospital survivors. RESULTS: The study population comprised 1157 (68%) patients with type A aortic dissection and 556 (32%) patients with type B aortic dissection, median age of 66 (57-74) years and 70 (61-79) years, respectively. Men accounted for 64%. Median follow-up was 8.9 (6.8-11.5) years. Of patients with type A aortic dissection, 74% were managed surgically, whereas 22% of the patients with type B aortic dissection were managed with surgery or endovascular technique. In-hospital mortality was 27% for type A aortic dissection overall (surgery, 18%; no surgery, 52%) and 16% for type B aortic dissection (surgery or endovascular treatment, 13%; conservative treatment, 17%; P < .001, type A vs type B). Of patients discharged alive, survival was persistently better for type A aortic dissection than for type B aortic dissection (P < .001). Unadjusted 1- and 3-year survival of patients with type A aortic dissection discharged alive was 96% and 91%, respectively, for surgically managed and 88% and 78% without surgery. For type B aortic dissection, the numbers were 89% and 83% for endovascular/surgically managed and 89% and 77% for conservatively managed. CONCLUSIONS: We found higher in-hospital mortality for type A and type B aortic dissection than is reported from referral center registries. Type A aortic dissection had the highest mortality rate during the acute phase, whereas for patients who were discharged alive, the mortality rate was higher for patients with type B aortic dissection.

Rehospitalisations, repeated aortic surgery, and death in initial survivors of surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection and the significance of age - a nationwide registry-based cohort study.

AIMS: Describe and compare incidences across age groups of rehospitalization, repeated aortic surgery, and death in patients who survived surgery and hospitalization for type A aortic dissection. METHODS AND RESULTS: From Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients hospitalized with Stanford type A aortic dissections (2006-2018). Survivors of hospitalization and surgery on the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch comprised the study population (n = 606, 36 (38.9%) <60 years old (group I), 194 (32.0%) 60-69 years old (group II), and 176 (29.1%) >69 years old (group III)). During the first year, 62.5% were re-hospitalized and 1.4% underwent repeated aortic surgery with no significant differences across age groups (P = 0.68 and P = 0.39, respectively). Further, 5.9% died (group I: 3.0%, group II: 8.3%, group III: 7.4%, P = 0.04). After 10 years, 8.0% had undergone repeated aortic surgery (group I: 11.5%, group II: 8.5%, group III: 1.6%, P = 0.04) and 10.2% (group I), 17.0% (group II), and 22.2% (group III) had died (P = 0.01). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we described long-term outcomes comparing age groups. No age differences were found in one-year outcomes, while age > 69 years compared with age < 60 years was associated with a lower rate of repeated aortic surgery [hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.78] and a higher rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.44, 95% CI 1.37-4.34) in the 10-year analyses. CONCLUSION: Rehospitalisations in the first year after discharge were common in all age groups, but survival was high. Repeated aortic surgery was significantly more common among younger than older patients.