The Need for the Closer Monitoring of Novel Drugs in MS: A Siponimod Retrospective Cohort Study (Realhes Study).

BACKGROUND: Severe cases of lymphopenia have been reported during siponimod clinical trials, which may negatively impact its benefit/risk profile. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of lymphopenia following the initiation of siponimod treatment in clinical practice. The secondary objectives included the analysis of factors predisposing to and the clinical relevance of lymphopenia events. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, information collected from the medical records of 129 patients with MS from 15 tertiary hospitals in Spain who initiated treatment with Siponimod were followed-up for at least 3 months, including at least one lymphocyte count evaluation per patient. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients, 121 (93.6%) reported lymphopenia events, including 110 (85.3%) with grade ≤ 3 and 11 (8.5%) with grade 4 lymphopenia, higher than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial (73.3% and 3.3% for grade ≤ 3 and grade 4 lymphopenia, respectively). The study included an unexpectedly high proportion of male subjects (72.9%), which might have led to an underestimation of the actual magnitude of the risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after starting siponimod treatment were higher than those reported in previous clinical trials. Therefore, our results reinforce the need for the closer monitoring of novel MS drugs in clinical practice, as well as larger and longer follow-up studies to properly characterize this risk.

Combination of Tocilizumab and Steroids to Improve Mortality in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Spanish, Multicenter, Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the impact of tocilizumab use on severe COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 19) pneumonia mortality. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study in 18 tertiary hospitals in Spain from March to April 2020. Consecutive patients admitted with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab were compared to patients not treated with tocilizumab, adjusting by inverse probability of the treatment weights (IPTW). Tocilizumab's effect in patients receiving steroids during the 48 h following inclusion was analysed. RESULTS: During the study period, 506 patients with severe COVID-19 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 268 were treated with tocilizumab and 238 patients were not. Median time to tocilizumab treatment from onset of symptoms was 11 days [interquartile range (IQR) 8-14]. Global mortality was 23.7%. Mortality was lower in patients treated with tocilizumab than in controls: 16.8% versus 31.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.514 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.355-0.744], p < 0.001; weighted HR 0.741 (95% CI 0.619-0.887), p = 0.001. Tocilizumab treatment reduced mortality by 14.7% relative to no tocilizumab treatment [relative risk reduction (RRR) 46.7%]. We calculated a number necessary to treat of 7. Among patients treated with steroids, mortality was lower in those treated with tocilizumab than in those treated with steroids alone [10.9% versus 40.2%, HR 0.511 (95% CI 0.352-0.741), p = 0.036; weighted HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.449-0.804), p < 0.001] (interaction p = 0.094). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that survival of patients with severe COVID-19 is higher in those treated with tocilizumab than in those not treated and that tocilizumab's effect adds to that of steroids administered to non-intubated patients with COVID-19 during the first 48 h of presenting with respiratory failure despite oxygen therapy. Randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS Register) identifier, EUPAS34415.

Lactic acidosis associated with metformin in patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease: study protocol for a multicenter population-based case-control study using health databases.

BACKGROUND: The use of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with lactic acidosis. However, the information available in patients with moderate-severe chronic kidney disease is scarce. METHODS: The ALIMAR-C2 study is a case-control study to assess the association between metformin and lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate-severe chronic kidney disease. The study will be performed with computerized registered electronic health records from eight Spanish hospitals linked to their corresponding primary care health areas from 2010 to 2016, comprising approximately 22.1 million person-years of follow-up. Logistic regression will be used to assess the crude and adjusted risk of lactic acidosis associated with metformin use overall and stratifying by use and dose categories, and chronic kidney disease stage. The overall case fatality rate of lactic acidosis, as well as the case fatality rate stratified by chronic kidney disease stage, will be calculated. DISCUSSION: The ALIMAR-C2 study will provide useful information about the risk of lactic acidosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with renal impairment using metformin.

Adverse drug reactions leading to urgent hospital admission in an elderly population: prevalence and main features.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of urgent hospitalization due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients aged ≥ 65 years, to compare the in-hospital mortality rates between patients admitted for ADRs and those admitted for other causes, and to describe the ADRs, the used and suspected drugs, and the drug-reaction associations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by using the institutional database of the Pharmacovigilance Programme of Bellvitge University Hospital, a 750-bed tertiary care hospital, with information corresponding to a 7-year period. ADR-related admissions of patients aged ≥ 65 years prospectively identified through a systematic daily review of all admission diagnosis were reviewed. RESULTS: ADRs were suspected to be the main reason for urgent admission in 1976 out of 60,263 patients aged ≥ 65 years (prevalence of ADR-related hospitalization 3.3 % [95 % CI 3.1-3.4 %]). The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 10.2 % in patients with ADR-related admission and 9 % in patients admitted for other causes (p = 0.077). Most patients (86 %) were exposed to polypharmacy, and a drug-drug interaction was suspected in 49 % of cases. The most frequent drug-reaction associations were acute renal failure related to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, gastrointestinal bleeding caused by antithrombotics and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and intracranial bleeding induced by vitamin K antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: One out of every 30 urgent admissions of patients aged ≥ 65 years is ADR-related. These ADRs can be as serious and life-threatening as any other acute pathology that merits urgent hospital admission. Most cases involve patients exposed to polypharmacy and result from well-known reactions of a few commonly used drugs.

Anticoncepción hormonal y tromboembolia venosa / Hormonal contraception and venous thromboembolism

No disponible

Prevalence, risk factors and main features of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of hospital admission related to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in a third-level hospital, to analyse the associated factors, and to describe the reactions and the drugs involved. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted for a 120-day period. Patients that were urgently hospitalized entered the study. The primary endpoint was the ADR-related urgent admission. A descriptive analysis of demographic, clinical, and drug-related variables was performed. The association between the likelihood of urgent admission due to ADRs and age, gender, and number of drugs used was analysed. A descriptive analysis of the suspected drugs and the reactions in ADR-related admissions was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 186 out of 4,403 hospital admissions were due to ADRs (prevalence: 4.2 % [95 % CI 3.7-4.8 %]). Age (≥65 years: OR 1.59 [95 % CI 1.10-2.29]) and number of drugs used at the time of admission (3-5 drugs: OR 5.07 [95 % CI 2.71-9.59]; 6-9 drugs: OR 5.90 [95 % CI 3.16-11.0]; ≥10 drugs: OR 8.94 [95 % CI 4.73-16.89]), but not gender, were identified as independent factors associated with ADR-related hospitalization. The overall in-hospital stay for patients admitted with ADRs amounted to 1,785 days. The ADRs were mainly type A reactions (92 %). Acute renal failure related to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, haemorrhage due to anticoagulants, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding related to antiplatelet drugs and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent. CONCLUSION: Over 4 % of urgent hospitalizations are caused by ADRs, which are dose-related and predictable in more than 90 % of cases. The main risk factors are advanced age and polypharmacy.

Levetiracetam-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of levetiracetam-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. CASE SUMMARY: A 31-year-old white male with a low-grade astrocytoma presenting with tonic-clonic seizures was treated with levetiracetam 1 g twice daily and dexamethasone (initial dosage 12 mg/day, tapered down to 2 mg/day). On day 45 after levetiracetam initiation, dexamethasone was discontinued and levetiracetam continued. The patient developed fever and dyspnea on day 46 and was admitted to the hospital on day 49. A chest X-ray showed bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates, and laboratory tests showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 288 U/L [reference range <204]), ferritin (223 ng/mL [13-178]), and C-reactive protein (CRP; 3.1 mg/dL [<0.5]). Neurologic fever was suspected and the reinitiation of dexamethasone at 6 mg/day was followed by improvement of all symptoms; the patient was discharged on day 55 with dexamethasone 4 mg/day for 2 more days. On day 59, 2 days after the withdrawal of dexamethasone for the second time, the patient presented with a pruritic erythematous maculopapular rash along with recurrence of fever and dyspnea, and was admitted to the hospital. A chest X-ray showed reappearance of the bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates, and laboratory tests showed impaired liver function (alanine aminotransferase 60 U/L [reference range <56], aspartate aminotransferase 53 U/L [<30], LDH 516 U/L, ferritin 419 ng/mL, and CRP 2.6). A diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was suspected and levetiracetam was discontinued. Upon levetiracetam withdrawal, the patient's symptoms resolved by day 66, and radiological images showed resolution of the interstitial infiltrate by day 68. The patient was discharged on day 68. Low-grade fever persisted until day 71, with no other symptoms. During a 2-month follow-up period, liver function test results returned to normal. DISCUSSION: DRESS is a hypersensitivity reaction to several drugs, mainly antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), characterized by cutaneous, hematologic, and visceral involvement. Levetiracetam is structurally and pharmacologically unrelated to other AEDs. Previously, only one case of levetiracetam-induced DRESS syndrome had been reported, which required corticosteroids to control symptoms. We describe a case of levetiracetam-induced DRESS syndrome presenting with pneumonitis and hepatitis that resolved with levetiracetam withdrawal. Our patient was classified as a definitive DRESS case according to the RegiSCAR scoring system, which grades DRESS cases. According to the Naranjo probability scale, the adverse drug reaction was considered probable. CONCLUSIONS: Although levetiracetam is usually well tolerated, clinicians should be aware of the potential for it to cause DRESS syndrome.

An update on adenosine A2A receptors as drug target in Parkinson's disease.

Adenosine receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate the physiological functions of adenosine. In the central nervous system adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)Rs) are highly enriched in striatopallidal neurons where they form functional oligomeric complexes with other GPCRs such us the dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R). Furthermore, it is assumed that the formation of balanced A(2A)R/D(2)R receptor oligomers are essential for correct striatal function as the allosteric receptor-receptor interactions established within the oligomer are needed for properly sensing adenosine and dopamine. Interestingly, A(2A)R activation reduces the affinity of striatal D(2)R for dopamine and the blockade of A(2A)R with specific antagonists facilitates function of the D(2)R. Thus, it may be postulated that A(2A)R antagonists are pro-dopaminergic agents. Therefore, A(2A)R antagonists will potentially reduce the effects associated with dopamine depletion in Parkinson's disease (PD). Accordingly, this class of compounds have recently attracted considerable attention as potential therapeutic agents for PD pharmacotherapy as they have shown potential effectiveness in counteracting motor dysfunctions and also displayed neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in animal models of PD. Overall, we provide here an update of the current state of the art of these A(2A)R-based approaches that are under clinical study as agents devoted to alleviate PD symptoms.

Educational sessions in pharmacovigilance: What do the doctors think?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine physicians' opinion regarding pharmacovigilance feedback sessions. A survey was conducted in a teaching hospital, and the physicians who attended the sessions were invited to participate by filling out a structured questionnaire. All sessions included a review of adverse drug reactions identified at the hospital and information on pharmacovigilance issues (news on warnings released by regulatory agencies or drug toxicity problems identified by recently published studies in medical journals). The survey questions were related to the interest, satisfaction, and belief in the utility of the sessions. A Likert scale (0-10 points) was used to assess physicians' opinions. FINDINGS: A total of 159 physicians attended the sessions and 115 (72.3%) participated in the survey. The mean (SD) age was 38.9 (12.1) years, and 72 (62.6%) were men. The mean (SD) scores of interest, satisfaction with the information provided, and belief in the utility of these sessions were 7.52 (1.61), 7.58 (1.46), and 8.05 (1.38) respectively. Significant differences were observed among physicians according to medical category and speciality in terms of interest, satisfaction, and belief in the utility of those sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Educational activities for physicians, such as feedback sessions, can be integrated into the pharmacovigilance activities. Doctors who attend the sessions are interested in and satisfied with the information provided and consider the sessions to be useful. Additional studies on the development and effectiveness of educational activities in pharmacovigilance are necessary.

Effect of an intervention on the features of adverse drug reactions spontaneously reported in a hospital.

OBJECTIVES: A continuous intervention based on healthcare management agreements was associated in our hospital with an increase in the absolute number of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and also with an increase in the number of reports of serious or unexpected ADRs and ADRs associated with new drugs. The objective was to analyse the effect of this intervention on the features of ADRs spontaneously reported in a hospital, the drugs involved and the number of signals identified. METHODS: A longitudinal study with two periods, the 1st period without intervention from 1998 to 2002 and the 2nd period with intervention from 2003 to 2005, was carried out in a tertiary teaching hospital. Changes between the two periods with regard to the following variables were analysed: the patients' characteristics, such as gender and age; the reported ADRs, and the medical assistance required; the suspected drugs involved in the ADRs; the main signals identified. RESULTS: Gender and age distribution of patients described in the spontaneous reports were no different in the two periods. During the second period, spontaneously reported cases requiring hospital admission and those occurring in hospital increased (236 from 2 in the first period and 277 from 99 in the first period respectively) and cases from outpatient hospital consultations began to be reported (13.9% of reports). The spontaneous reporting on all kinds of ADRs and drugs increased during the second period. Cutaneous reactions were the most frequently spontaneously reported ADRs in both periods followed by cardiovascular and neurological reactions in the first period, and haematological and gastrointestinal reactions in the second one. However, during the second period the higher increase was for endocrinological, urinary and hepatic reactions. Systemic antibiotics, anti-thrombotics and cardiac therapy drugs were the most common therapeutic subgroups reported to be suspected drugs in both periods, but in the second period the proportion of immunostimulants, beta blocking agents, immunosuppressants and psychoanaleptics increased. No signals were recognised during the first period; however, two signals and one additional safety concern were identified during the second. CONCLUSION: An intervention based on healthcare management agreements, was associated with an important increase in spontaneous reporting of ADRs by hospital physicians and also with a change in terms of the type of ADRs identified affecting different organs or systems, and the therapeutic groups of drugs involved. Future studies should analyse the effect of different types of intervention on the spontaneous reporting of ADRs in hospitals.

An intervention to improve spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting by hospital physicians: a time series analysis in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitals is scarce and several obstacles to such reporting have been identified previously. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention based on healthcare management agreements for improving spontaneous reporting of ADRs by physicians in a hospital setting. METHODS: In 2003, the spontaneous reporting of ADRs was included as one of the objectives of hospital physicians at the Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, within the context of management agreements between clinical services and hospital managers. A continuous intervention related to these management agreements, including periodic educational meetings and economic incentives, was then initiated. We carried out an ecological time series analysis and assessed the change in the total number of spontaneous reports of ADRs, and the number of serious ADRs, unexpected ADRs, and ADRs associated with new drugs between a period previous to the intervention (from 1998 to 2002) and the period during the intervention (from 2003 to 2005). A time series analysis with ARIMA (Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average) models was performed. RESULTS: The median number of reported ADRs per year increased from 40 (range 23-55) in the first period to 224 (range 98-248) in the second period. In the first period, the monthly number of reported ADRs was stable (3.47 per month; 95% CI 1.90, 5.03), but in the second period the number increased progressively (increase of 0.74 per month; 95% CI 0.62, 0.86). In the second period, the proportion of reported serious ADRs increased nearly 2-fold (63.1% vs 32.5% in the first period). The absolute number of previously unknown or poorly known ADRs increased 4-fold in the second period (54 vs 13 in the first period). There was also an increase in the absolute number of suspected pharmacological exposures to new drugs (97 vs 28) and in the number of different new drugs suspected of causing ADRs (50 vs 19). CONCLUSION: A continuous intervention based on healthcare management agreements with economic incentives and educational activities is associated with a quantitative and qualitative improvement of spontaneous reporting of ADRs by hospital physicians.

Hepatotoxicidad por extracto etanólico seco de Camellia sinensis / Liver toxicity of Camellia sinensis dried atanolic extract

No disponible

Stimulating adverse drug reaction reporting: effect of a drug safety bulletin and of including yellow cards in prescription pads.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of voluntary reporting systems in pharmacovigilance highly depends on the number of assembled reports. AIM: The aim of this study was to measure the effect of the periodical distribution of a bulletin on drug safety issues and of including yellow cards in prescription pads on the rate of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Catalan Centre of Pharmacovigilance began its activities at the end of 1982. Since 1985, an ADR bulletin (ADRB) has been mailed approximately quarterly to all physicians in its catchment area, with one yellow card enclosed. Additionally, from 1991-1994, a yellow card was included in the prescription pads of the Catalan Health Service. Time series methodology, with adjustment of the monthly number of reports to an Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, was used to evaluate the effect of these two measures. RESULTS: From January 1983-October 1995, 6240 spontaneous ADR reports were received, and 41 issues of the ADRB were sent out. Initially, the mean monthly spontaneous ADR reporting rate was 34.4 (SD = 14.1; n = 106 months). After the inclusion of yellow cards in prescription pads, the mean monthly spontaneous ADR reporting rate increased to 53.9 (SD = 14.4; n = 48 months). According to an ARIMA model, when a bulletin was send out (MONTH1), a mean increase of 9.4 reports was produced in that month, plus 12.3 additional reports in the following month (MONTH2), and 6.3 in the second month after sending the ADRB (MONTH3). A yellow card in the prescription pads elicits a monthly mean increase of 19.8 in the number of reports. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that ADRBs elicit a temporal increase of the ADR reporting rate. Including a yellow card in prescription pads was followed by an even greater increase in the reporting rate, possibly because it guarantees that yellow cards are available at the workplace.