Palmitoylethanolamide Does Not Affect Recovery from Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Healthy Males.

INTRODUCTION: Strenuous eccentric exercise (EE) induces microstructural muscle damage, which decreases muscle performance. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) exerts analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in clinical pain conditions and preclinical models of experimentally induced-inflammation. This might hold clues for improved recovery from EE. Therefore, the current study evaluates the effect of PEA supplementation on functional and molecular responses to a single EE bout. METHODS: Eleven healthy male participants were included in a double-blind crossover study in which they received PEA (350 mg Levagen+) or placebo (maltodextrin) supplements, in a randomized order. In each experimental condition participants performed an acute bout of EE (24x10 eccentric contractions of the knee extensors on an isokinetic dynamometer). At baseline, 24 (D1), 48 (D2), 72 (D3) and 120 h (D5) following EE, maximal voluntary contraction and jump height were measured. Blood samples were collected at baseline and on D1-D5, and muscle biopsies were collected at baseline and on D2. Perceived muscle soreness, sleep quality and food intake were recorded daily. RESULTS: Muscle strength and jump height decreased following EE (up to ~40 and ~ 17% respectively; Ptime < 0.05) in both conditions. This drop was accompanied by an increase in plasma creatine kinase and perceived muscle soreness (Ptime < 0.05). Furthermore, EE, but not PEA, increased the expression of the myogenic marker Pax7 and of the catabolic markers p-FoxO1-3a, p62 and LC3BII/I (Ptime < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PEA supplementation does not improve muscle soreness, muscle strength and jump performance following a single EE bout. Additionally, PEA supplementation had no effect on local or systemic markers of muscle damage, catabolism or regeneration.

Neuritis ossificans mimicking a malignancy in a child: case report and literature review.

We present the case of a child with neuritis ossificans after acute trauma, treated conservatively. The aim of the review is to compare several parameters in this disease. Emphasis is placed on the clinical-radiological features distinguishing neuritis ossificans from malignancy to avoid unnecessary biopsy and surgery.A literature review was performed. Only 18 cases were described. Except for one, all describe adults, and none had acute trauma. Nearly all were treated surgically.Our 13-year-old patient presented with posterior knee pain after trauma. MRI demonstrated a mass within the tibial nerve with oedema, some lymph nodes and increased avidity on 18fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. These findings can be reactive but also associated with malignancy. However, eggshell-like calcifications in the periphery of the mass were seen on CT. Biopsy and resection were proposed. Follow-up visits over the next weeks showed remarkable clinical improvement. Wait-and-scan was advised after international discussion. Follow-up imaging after 2 months showed resolution of the oedema and volume reduction of the mass, suggesting a benign pathology. Diagnosis of neuritis ossificans was proposed based on the clinical and radiological features. There was a favorable course with no complaints after two months. Imaging after seven months showed an almost complete regression.Neuritis ossificans should be considered within a painfull (mono)neuropathy. The initial inflammatory phase may mimic malignancy, misleading clinicians toward biopsy or surgery with the risk of nerve damage. As seen in our case, neuritis ossificans can be a self-limiting process. Therefore, conservative therapy should be considered with a wait-and-scan approach.

Defining tibial anterior muscle morphology in first-ever chronic stroke patients using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Drop foot is common post-stroke, elevating fall risks and mobility limitations. It is caused by weakness and lack of control of the tibialis anterior muscle (TA), for which various rehabilitation treatments are used. A reliable objective estimate of changes in TA muscle morphology and composition can enhance treatment optimization. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to ascertain 3D freehand ultrasound (3DfUS) reliability in measuring TA muscle volume, length, and echo intensity in stroke patients and healthy controls and its validity by comparing these features across legs, between patients and controls, and between clinical subgroups (i.e. patients with and without ankle contracture, spastic muscle overactivity, and foot dorsiflexor paresis). METHODS: We included 9 stroke patients and 9 healthy controls to define reliability and 26 stroke patients and 28 healthy controls to define validity. For reliability, data were collected and processed by 2 different operators and processors. For inter- and intra-rater reliability, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used. For validity, Wilcoxon-Signed-Ranked and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons between groups and subgroups. RESULTS: All measurements showed good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.816 to 0.997, SEM: 0.5% to 7.8%). Comparison analyses revealed no differences in muscle features among legs, groups, or subgroups. CONCLUSION: While the 3DfUS is a reliable method to define TA morphology and composition, its clinical validity needs further investigation into factors influencing muscle property changes across various age groups and post-stroke time points. MESH TERMS: Stroke; Skeletal muscle morphology; muscle composition; 3D freehand ultrasonography, Anterior Tibial Muscle.

Safety of dry needling in stroke patients: a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Spasticity is a common problem in stroke patients. Treatments of spasticity often have side effects or are insufficiently effective. Dry needling (DN) has been proposed as a potential additional option to consider in the multimodal treatment of post-stroke spasticity, although questions about its safety remain. The goal of this study is to assess the safety of DN in stroke patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search in Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CIHNAL and PEDro was conducted in June 2023. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts according to the eligibility criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five articles were included in this review. Only six studies reported adverse events, all of which were considered minor. None of the included studies reported any serious adverse events. In four of the included studies anticoagulants were regarded as contra-indicative for DN. Anticoagulants were not mentioned in the other included studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature concerning the safety of DN in stroke patients. This review is the first to investigate the safety of DN in stroke patients and based on the results there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of DN in stroke patients. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Although DN could be a promising treatment in post-stroke spasticity, further research is indicated to investigate its mechanism of action and its effect on outcome. However, before conducting large clinical trials to assess outcome parameters, the safety of DN in stroke patients must be further investigated.

Comparison of immediate versus optional delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injury through a parallel, multicentric, pragmatic randomized controlled trial - IODA trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomized controlled trials [1, 2] (RCT) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to verify these results and assess whether patient-specific parameters determine if a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other. METHODS: This is a pragmatic, multi-center RCT with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomized to conservative treatment (rehabilitation + optional delayed surgery) or immediate ACL reconstruction (< 12 weeks). The primary outcome is the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 7 months (short term) and 1-year long term) post-injury. These following additional outcomes will be administered at 4 and 7 months (short term) and 1, 2, and 3 years post-injury (long term): patient-reported outcomes concerning knee symptoms, knee function and quality of life, functional knee tests, time to return to pre-injury activity level and return to work, structural knee joint damage and cartilage health (only at 4 months and 3 years post-injury), as well as adverse events such as re-rupture rates. Furthermore, the secondary objective is to identify (through a predictive analysis) individuals who would benefit the most from early reconstruction versus those who should rather be treated conservatively. DISCUSSION: This large RCT will assess the clinical effectiveness of both surgical and conservative treatment. In addition, it will be the first study that provides insights into which patient-specific factors predict successful outcomes after conservative treatment of ACL injuries. These results will be the first step toward early patient identification regarding treatment decisions. This is urgently needed to avoid (1) delayed surgeries and prolonged rehabilitation and (2) unnecessary surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: this trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05747079) on 10/02/2023.