RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of C-peptide levels in the differentiation of monogenic forms of diabetes from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice. Subjects and Methods: A total of 104 patients aged >16 who visited the Dicle University's Faculty of Medicine between April 2011 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with monogenic diabetes by genetic analysis or with T1DM and T2DM were randomly selected for retrospective evaluation. The C-peptide levels of these patients at the time of diagnosis of diabetes were compared. Results: Of the 104 patients, 24 (23%) were diagnosed with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), 40 (38.5%) with T1DM, and 40 (38.5%) with T2DM. Median C-peptide levels (ng/mL) (interquartile range) were 1.78 (1.24-2.88) in MODY group, 0.86 (0.34-1.22) in T1DM group, and 2.38 (1.58-4.27) in T2DM group. Conclusions: There was a difference in C-peptide levels between MODY and T1DM groups but not between MODY and T2DM groups. As per clinical evaluations, although C-peptide levels of patients with MODY are similar to those of patients with T2DM patients, the possibility of C-peptide levels being similar to those required for T1DM diagnosis should also be considered.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the potential relationship between plasma alarin levels and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHOD: We included 154 participants, divided into four groups in a cross-sectional study design. The first group includes patients with T2DM without complications (n=30), the second group patients with T2DM with microvascular complications (T2DM-noC n=32), the third group patients with T2DM with macrovascular complications, T2DM-MV (n=32) and the last group is the healthy control group (n=60). RESULTS: In our study 94 patients were diabetic; 47 females and 47 males. The control group consists of 60 people, 30 women and 30 men. It was found that these had a significant (p>0.05) variation in serum alarin levels among the T2DM (T2DM-noC=3.1±0.7 ng/mL T2DM-mV=2.8±0.4 ng/mL, T2DM-MV= 3.6±0.4 ng/mL) versus control group (15.6±2.6).We failed to find a significant variation of serum alarin levels (p>0.05) between T2DM subgroups. Serum alarin levels were significantly higher among control patients (p<0.05). There was no difference between diabetic sub-groups. CONCLUSION: We concluded that serum alarin levels in patients with T2DM are lower than in normal people. Further studies are needed to investigate the possible prognostic value of alarin in clinical practice in T2DM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is routinely measured by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).Positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose combined with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is a valuable assessment tool for patients with cancer or staging tumors. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging can also be utilised to detect the metabolic activity of glucose in the adipose tissue, liver and muscles. The aim of this study was to determine insulin sensitivity in the liver, muscle visceral adipose and subcutaneous adipose tissue separately via18F-FDG PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixty three adult patients who underwent whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for clinical purposes (diagnosis or staging of cancer) between July and August of 2016 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their BMI (Group 1: BMI<25kg/m2, Group 2: BMI>25kg/m2). HOMA-IR,fasting glucose,insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL levels were measured. We calculated SUV as the tissue activity of the ROI (MBq/g)/(injected dose [MBq]/ body weight [g]) on PET images and measured the maximum SUVs (SUVmax) of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT),liver and rectus muscle ROIs (2 cm). SUV corrected by blood glucose level (SUVgluc) was calculated as SUVmax×blood glucose level/100. Student-t test, Chi-square test and Pearson correlation test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean glucose,insulin,HOMA-IR levels of the group-2 were statistically higher than of group-1. Muscle SUVmax and liver SUVmax of group-1 were statistically higher than of group-2. Muscle SUVgluc of group-1 was statistically higher than of group-2. HOMA-IR was negatively correlated with both SUVmax(r=-0.340, p=0.01) and muscle SUVmax(r=-0.373, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT has shown that the muscle tissue maximum FDG uptake was lower in the insulin resistance group. Therefore, 18-FDG PET/CT could be a valuable tool for diagnosing insulin resistance.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common brain tumor in adults and has a very aggressive course. Median survival is as short as 2 years with standard treatment (chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant temozolomide). The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) addition to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of GBM. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed GBM between March 2004-May 2009 were evaluated. After surgical intervention (total, subtotal resection or only biopsy) all of them were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (2 Gy daily, 5 days a week, 30 fractions, total tumor dose 60 Gy; and 75 mg/m² temozolomide, 7 days a week), followed by adjuvant temozolomide (6 cycles, 150-200 mg/m², 5 days every 28 days), with or without LMWH (4000 IU/day, 7 days a week, concomitant with radiotherapy) because of risk of thrombosis. The primary endpoint was the determination of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were 1- and 2-year OS survival. RESULTS: 30 patients (13 patients in the group non receiving LMWH (LMWH-) and 17 patients in the group receiving LMWH (LMWH+)) were included in the study. Median age was 54 years (range 24-75). Median PFS was 57 and 38 weeks in LMWH+ and LMWH- groups, respectively (p=0.068). Median OS was 69 and 44 weeks (p=0.095), 1-year OS survival 84.6 and 41.2% (p=0.016), and 2-year OS survival 38.5 and 5.9% in LMWH+ and LMWH-, respectively (p=0.061). No significant difference was noted between the two groups for grade 3-4 toxicity (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Better PFS, OS and 2-year OS survival were obtained in present study with the addition of LMWH to concomitant chemoradiation for GBM but without statistical significance. One-year OS survival was statistically significant favoring the LMWH group. The addition of LMWH did not increase temozolomide toxicity.