Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
Agri ; 31(4): 183-194, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31741346

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate any comorbid psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic pain and to examine the effects of sociodemographic details and the level of somatic sense perception on the severity of these diseases. METHODS: In this study, 51 chronic pain patients were evaluated in a consultation with a psychiatrist. Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, such as age, gender, education level, and marital status were recorded, and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV results were assessed. The patients' chronic pains were classified as idiopathic or secondary to organic etiology. In addition, the Symptom Checklist-90, Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) were used. RESULTS: The incidence of psychiatric disorders in chronic pain patients was found to be 74.5%. Somatoform disorders were the most frequently diagnosed, at 37.3%. The rate of depressive and anxiety disorders was, respectively, 29.4% and 23.5%. Comorbid anxiety scores (p=0.019) and SSAS scores (p=0.046) were significantly higher in chronic pain patients with a somatoform disorder. HAM-A scores were found to be significantly higher in patients with depression (p=0.004). A positive and linear relationship was determined between the SSAS score and depression, anxiety, and the severity of mental symptoms. CONCLUSION: Structured or semi-structured interviews can be performed in pain polyclinics or psychiatric outpatient clinics to determine the level of perception of somatic sensations. This could be beneficial in the treatment of chronic pain and comorbid psychiatric disorders.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Intratable/epidemiología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/complicaciones , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Intratable/complicaciones , Dolor Intratable/psicología , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía/epidemiología
3.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 68(3): 274-279, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-958289

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: Providing sufficient information during a preanesthetic interview may help improve patient understanding and decrease anxiety related to spinal anesthesia. We investigated the effect of video-based education on anxiety and satisfaction in patients about to undergo spinal anesthesia. Methods: A total of 198 patients scheduled for minor elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were prospectively enrolled. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait) questionnaires and visual analog scale were used to measure anxiety levels before the standard anesthesia evaluation was initiated. Then, 100 patients in Group 1 received written, verbal, and video-based education, whereas 98 patients in Group 2 received only written and verbal instructions regarding spinal anesthesia. Then all participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State and visual analog scale to evaluate anxiety. Finally, a 5-point Likert scale was used to measure satisfaction during postoperative period. Results: No differences were found in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait, or visual analog scale scores between the two groups before the information period. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State scores evaluating anxiety during the post-information period were differed in both groups and they found as 36.5 ± 10.0 in Group 1 and 39.6 ± 8.6 in Group 2 (p = 0.033). The 5-point Likert scale scores to measure satisfaction were stated as 4.5 ± 0.6 in Group 1 and 3.5 ± 1.2 in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Providing video-based information during the preanesthetic interview alleviated anxiety and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.


Resumo Justificativa: Fornecer informação suficiente durante uma consulta pré-anestesia pode aumentar a compreensão do paciente e diminuir a ansiedade relacionada à anestesia espinhal. Investigamos o efeito do fornecimento de informação via vídeo sobre a ansiedade e satisfação em pacientes prestes a serem submetidos à anestesia espinhal. Métodos: Foram inscritos prospectivamente 198 pacientes agendados para cirurgias eletivas de pequeno porte sob anestesia espinhal. Os questionários de avaliação de estado e traço de ansiedade (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State e State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait) e uma escala visual analógica foram usados para medir os níveis de ansiedade antes de a avaliação-padrão da anestesia ter sido iniciada. Em seguida, 100 pacientes do Grupo 1 receberam informação por escrito, verbal e via vídeo, enquanto 98 pacientes do Grupo 2 receberam apenas informação por escrito e verbal sobre a anestesia espinhal. Em seguida, todos os participantes responderam os inventários de estado e traço de ansiedade e a escala visual analógica para avaliar a ansiedade. Por fim, a escala de Likert de 5 pontos foi usada para medir a satisfação durante o período pós-operatório. Resultados: Não houve diferença nos escores dos questionários de estado e traço de ansiedade e da escala visual analógica entre os dois grupos antes do período de informação. Os escores de estado e traço de ansiedade que avaliam a ansiedade durante o período pós-informação foram diferentes em ambos os grupos: 36,5 ± 10,0 no Grupo 1 e 39,6 ± 8,6 no Grupo 2 (p = 0,033). Os escores da escala Likert de 5 pontos para medir a satisfação foram: 4,5 ± 0,6 no Grupo 1 e 3,5 ± 1,2 no Grupo 2 (p < 0,001). Conclusão: Fornecer informação via vídeo durante a consulta pré-anestésica aliviou a ansiedade e aumentou a satisfação em pacientes submetidos à anestesia espinhal.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Consulta Remota/métodos , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Ansiedad , Satisfacción Personal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 68(3): 274-279, 2018.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29636177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Providing sufficient information during a preanesthetic interview may help improve patient understanding and decrease anxiety related to spinal anesthesia. We investigated the effect of video-based education on anxiety and satisfaction in patients about to undergo spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 198 patients scheduled for minor elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were prospectively enrolled. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait) questionnaires and visual analog scale were used to measure anxiety levels before the standard anesthesia evaluation was initiated. Then, 100 patients in Group 1 received written, verbal, and video-based education, whereas 98 patients in Group 2 received only written and verbal instructions regarding spinal anesthesia. Then all participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State and visual analog scale to evaluate anxiety. Finally, a 5-point Likert scale was used to measure satisfaction during postoperative period. RESULTS: No differences were found in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/Trait, or visual analog scale scores between the two groups before the information period. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/State scores evaluating anxiety during the post-information period were differed in both groups and they found as 36.5±10.0 in Group 1 and 39.6±8.6 in Group 2 (p=0.033). The 5-point Likert scale scores to measure satisfaction were stated as 4.5±0.6 in Group 1 and 3.5±1.2 in Group 2 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Providing video-based information during the preanesthetic interview alleviated anxiety and increased satisfaction in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

5.
Pain Physician ; 20(3): 197-206, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28339432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic knee pain is a major widespread problem causing significant impairment of daily function. Pulsed radiofrequency has been shown to reduce severe chronic joint pain as a non-pharmacological and less invasive treatment method. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of unipolar and bipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency methods in chronic knee pain control. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Pain clinic in Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine. METHODS: One hundred patients, aged 20 - 70 years with grade 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive either unipolar (group U, n = 50) or bipolar (group B, n = 50) intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency (IAPRF) with a 45 V voltage, 2 Hz frequency, 42° C temperature, 10 msec pulse width, and 10 minute duration. We recorded visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index LK 3.1WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index LK 3.1) scores of patients at baseline and one, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in knee pain at 12 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the groups according to VAS scores at all post-intervention time points. In group B, 84% of patients, and in the group U, 50% of patients achieved at least 50% knee pain relief from the baseline to 3 months. In group B, WOMAC scores were significantly lower than the group U at one and 3 months. LIMITATIONS: Lack of long-term clinical results and supportive laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: Bipolar IAPRF is more advantageous in reducing chronic knee pain and functional recovery compared with unipolar IAPRF. Further studies with longer follow-up times, laboratory-based tests, and different generator settings are required to establish the clinical importance and well-defined mechanism of action of PRF. This study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02141529), on May 15, 2014. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval date: January 16, 2014, and number: 26/9Key words: Chronic pain, intraarticular, knee joint, knee osteoarthritis, pain management, pulsed radiofrequency treatment, quality of life, recovery of function.


Asunto(s)
Electrocoagulación/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Rodilla/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Pain Pract ; 15(8): 706-11, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25469794

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors having a role in the occurrence of acute back pain following spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-nine patients who underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients' age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, educational status, history of back pain, spinal needle radius, spinal interspace level of intervention, method of approach for spinal anesthesia, position during spinal anesthesia, angle of puncture with respect to the spinal ligaments, magnitude of pain during intervention, number of lumbar punctures, number of bony contacts, amount of bupivacaine administered intrathecally, type of surgical procedure, surgical position, duration of the surgery, and duration of anesthesia parameters were recorded. Patients were inquired for existence and magnitude of back pain on the 1st day and the 4th week postoperatively. Multivariate analysis is performed via logistic regression model to parameters that are found to be significant in univariate analysis. RESULTS: Assessment of the data from the postoperative 1st day showed 29.3% of the patients suffered back pain. Postspinal acute back pain was related to the number of bony contacts (P = 0.016), history of back pain (P = 0.0001), spinal needle radius (P = 0.022), and duration of the surgery (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the common belief, it is demonstrated in this study that number of lumbar punctures, method of approach and position of the spinal anesthesia, age, sex, surgical position, and the type of the surgery did not correlate with occurrence of acute back pain following spinal anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
J Anesth ; 29(2): 165-9, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25033745

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effects of irrigation solutions, administered at either 21 or 37 °C in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), on hypothermia and related postoperative complications such as late emergence and late recovery from anesthesia, shivering, lactic acidosis, and excess bleeding. METHODS: Sixty patients who were scheduled for PCNL were enrolled in this prospective randomized double-blind study. Irrigation solutions at room temperature were administered to patients in group R (30 patients), and warmed irrigation solutions were administered to patients in group W (30 patients). The two groups were compared for core and peripheral body temperature, incidence of hypothermia, duration of emergence from anesthesia, duration of recovery from anesthesia, shivering, lactic acidosis, and hemoglobin levels. RESULTS: Hypothermia was incident in 19 patients (63.3 %) in group W and in 27 patients (90 %) in group R at the end of surgery. The difference between the initial and the final core body temperature was 0.9 ± 0.6 °C group W and 1.4 ± 0.7 °C in group R (p = 0.003). The extubation time was 4.4 ± 2.2 min in group W and 5.9 ± 3 min in group R (p = 0.032). Shivering was detected in seven patients (23.3 %) in group W and in 15 patients (50 %) in group R (p = 0.032). The recovery duration was 49.8 ± 24.6 min in group W and 67.6 ± 33.9 min in group R (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of irrigation solutions at room temperature in PCNL operations causes the body temperature to decrease significantly, which results in postoperative complications such as late emergence from anesthesia, late recovery from anesthesia, and shivering.


Asunto(s)
Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal , Nefrostomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Acidosis Láctica/epidemiología , Adulto , Retraso en el Despertar Posanestésico/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipotermia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiritona , Soluciones , Temperatura , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...