Head & neck melanoma: A 22-year experience of recurrence following sentinel lymph node biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinicopathologic factors that contribute to regional and distant recurrence in intermediate to high risk head and neck melanoma patients after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). METHODS: This study is a retrospective review from an academic tertiary care center. Patients treated with SLNB for head and neck melanoma from 1997 to 2019 were reviewed and characterized by sentinel lymph node (SLN) status. Clinical variables were examined for the impact on regional and distant recurrence in SLNB-negative patients using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four patients were included. Of note, 127 (82.5 %) were men, and the average age was 61.3 years. Median follow-up was 68.6 weeks. Pathologic review of SLNs found 3.9% positive for metastatic melanoma; 96.1% were negative. Regional recurrence was significantly associated with tumor stage and age on multivariate analysis. A total of 4.5% of patients recurred in a previously labeled negative basin. Scalp subsite accounted for 30.5% of primary tumors and was more likely to yield a positive SLN on univariate analysis (P = .023). Tumor stage and age were significantly associated with distant metastasis on multivariable analysis (P = .026, P < .001 respectively). CONCLUSION: We report a number of prognostic trends in head and neck melanoma. SLN positivity was found more often in patients with a primary tumor of the scalp. Regional recurrence was significantly associated with age and tumor stage, whereas distant recurrence was significantly associated with tumor staging and scalp subsite. Scalp subsite was associated with an increased risk for nodal metastasis and distant recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Paneled Saphenous Vein Grafts Compared to Internal Jugular Vein Grafts in Venous Reconstruction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for the excision of pancreatic cancer allows for a more complete resection with negative margins, which increases survival. When the resected vein is greater than 3 cm, reconstruction with an interposition graft is recommended. However, consensus regarding the optimal venous conduit has not been reached. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes between the paneled saphenous vein graft (SVG) and internal jugular vein graft (IJVG) in portomesenteric venous reconstructions after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy requiring an interposition graft for venous reconstruction between 2011 and 2019. Patients were stratified based on the type of conduit used (paneled SVG or IJVG). Preoperative patient characteristics, reconstruction details, and postoperative outcomes including graft patency were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 18 patients met inclusion criteria (10 female, mean age: 63 years, age range: 41-82 years). Thirteen patients underwent reconstruction with paneled SVG and five with IJVG. Comparing SVG and IJVG groups, there were no significant differences in venous resection length, venous diameters at the resection margins, or splenic vein ligation rate. For the paneled SVG, the average length of harvested vein was 168 mm which rendered 3-paneled grafts with an average diameter of 12 mm. The time to complete the venous reconstructions did not differ between the two groups (SVG: 263+/-204 min, IJVG: 216+/-77 min, P = 0.63). There were five graft thrombosis, three in the SVG group (mean follow-up time of 17 months) and two in the IJVG group (mean follow-up time of 8 months). All but one of the graft thromboses occurred during the index hospitalization. There was one donor site seroma and wound dehiscence in the SVG group and none in the IJVG group. Hospital length of stay was longer for the IJVG group (IJVG: 15.2 days, SVG: 10.2 days, P = 0.03). However, in-hospital and late mortality did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Paneled SVG and IJVG are both versatile and durable conduits for venous reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy, able to accommodate a wide range of venous defects. In this small series, SVG has comparable outcomes to IJVG. Paneled SVG is a suitable alternative to IJVG for portomesenteric reconstruction.

Vibroacoustographic System for Tumor Identification.

Oral and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. The primary management of OSCC relies on complete surgical resection of the tumor. Margin-free resection, however, is difficult given the devastating effects of aggressive surgery. Currently, surgeons determine where cuts are made by palpating edges of the tumor. Accuracy varies based on the surgeon's experience, the location and type of tumor, and the risk of damage to adjacent structures limiting resection margins. To fulfill this surgical need, we contrast tissue regions by identifying disparities in viscoelasticity by mixing two ultrasonic beams to produce a beat frequency, a technique termed vibroacoustography (VA). In our system, an extended focal length of the acoustic stress field yields surgeons' high resolution to detect focal lesions in deep tissue. VA offers 3D imaging by focusing its imaging plane at multiple axial cross-sections within tissue. Our efforts culminate in production of a mobile VA system generating image contrast between normal and abnormal tissue in minutes. We model the spatial direction of the generated acoustic field and generate images from tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex vivo specimens with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue to qualitatively demonstrate the functionality of our system. These preliminary results warrant additional validation as we continue clinical trials of ex vivo tissue. This tool may prove especially useful for finding tumors that are deep within tissue and often missed by surgeons. The complete primary resection of tumors may reduce recurrence and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Detection of surgical margins in oral cavity cancer: the role of dynamic optical contrast imaging.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The quantity of tissue removed during an oncologic surgical procedure is not standardized and there are numerous reports of local recurrence despite histologically adequate resection margins. The oral cavity is one of the sites in the head and neck with high chances of recurrence following negative margins. To address this need, this article reviews the recent applications of Dynamic Optical Contrast Imaging (DOCI) towards both oral screening and the intraoperative evaluation of tumor margins in head and neck surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Human ex-vivo and in-vivo trials suggest DOCI is well tolerated, low-cost, and sensitive for differentiating cancerous from normal tissues throughout the head and neck, in addition to the oral cavity. Ex-vivo imaging of OSCC specimens generated histologically verified image contrast. Furthermore, in-vivo intraoperative results demonstrate significant potential for image-guided detection and resection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). SUMMARY: DOCI augments tissue contrast and may enable surgeons to clinically screen patients for oral cancer, make histologic evaluations in vivo with fewer unnecessary biopsies, delineate clinical margins for tumor resection, provide guidance in the choice of biopsy sites, and preserve healthy tissue to increase the postoperative functionality and quality of life of the patient.

Use of a Novel Polymer in an Animal Model of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Objective To evaluate the adverse effects and therapeutic efficacy of our biocompatible polymer platform delivering targeted local therapy of cytokine CCL21 and cisplatin in a partially resected xenograft animal model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, to evaluate the efficacy of cotreatment with radiotherapy and assess the biocompatibility of the cisplatin-eluting polymer in the murine neck. Study Design Experimental animal study. Setting Academic research laboratory. Subjects and Methods SCCVII/SF cell injection established head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors in C3H/HeJ mice. Subjects underwent surgery, and a chemokine-eluting polymer was implanted into the resected site. Subjects treated with cisplatin received radiation or no radiation, and tissue was harvested after 8 weeks to assess polymer biocompatibility. Results Our results with the polymer platform significantly ( P < .05) reduced SCCVII/SF tumor size in C3H/HeJ mice with cisplatin (49% ± 8.7%, Δ3.4 ± 0.6 cm3 [95% CI]), CCL21 (42% ± 4.8%, Δ3.5 ± 0.4 cm3), and cisplatin/CCL21 dual-agent polymer (82% ± 4.4%, Δ8.0 ± 0.4 cm3) as compared with controls. Cisplatin polymer with high-dose (16 Gy) and low-dose (4 Gy) radiation reduced tumor mass (respectively, 92% ± 7.2%, Δ6.1 ± 0.5 cm3; 85% ± 7.4%, Δ5.7 ± 0.5 cm3) as compared with the reduction from high-dose radiotherapy alone (70% ± 7.9%, Δ4.7 ± 0.5 cm3). No significant toxicity or inflammation was noted on histopathology after radiotherapy and cisplatin-eluting polymer treatment. Conclusion Cisplatin, CCL21, and cisplatin/CCL21 dual-agent polymer all exhibit significant antitumor effects and decrease tumor burden. Moreover, combination cisplatin polymer with radiotherapy may permit a decrease in intensity of radiation therapy in patients having received the cisplatin polymer. Histopathologic analysis suggests that the polymer is free from significant adverse effects in this model and warrants clinical trial.

Prognostication of prostate cancer based on TOP2A protein and gene assessment: TOP2A in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: TOP2A encodes for topoisomerase IIα, a nuclear enzyme that controls DNA topological structure and cell cycle progression. This enzyme is a marker of cell proliferation in normal and neoplastic tissues; however, little information is available about its expression in prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was automated using mouse monoclonal antibody against TOP2A (clone SWT3D1; DAKO, Carpenteria, CA, USA) at dilution 1:800 and Flex Plus detection system in autostainer 48Ultra (DAKO). FISH was performed using TOP2A (17q21)/ CEP17 probe kit (Kreateck Biotechnology, San Diego, CA, USA). Biochemical and pathological data from 193 patients with PCa were retrieved for the analysis, whose significance was considered when p < 0.05. Also, fractal analysis was performed in a subset of 20 randomly selected cases. RESULTS: TOP2A protein expression correlated with higher Gleason scores and higher levels of preoperative PSA (p = 0.018 and p = 0.011). Patients with higher levels of TOP2A presented shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, we found that TOP2A remained an independent prognostic factor of BRFS, with a relative risk of 1.98 (p = 0.001; 95% CI, 1.338-2.93); thus, cases that expressed high levels of this enzyme had a shorter BRFS compared with TOP2A-negative or TOP2A-low cases. No alterations in TOP2A gene status nor correlation between FISH and IHC results were observed. Concerning fractal analysis, patients who expressed higher levels of TOP2A have angiolymphatic invasion and presented higher Gleason scores (p = 0.033 and p = 0.025, respectively). Also, patients with higher expression of TOP2A presented shorter BRFS (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to perform TOP2A protein and gene digital assessment and fractal analysis in association with BRFS in a large series of PCa. Also, we show that TOP2A gene copy number alterations are not observed in this type of tumor. So, higher protein expression of TOP2A is not related to gene amplification in PCa. Furthermore, TOP2A protein assessment has prognostic importance and, due to its relation with poor outcome, TOP2A IHC evaluation in the biopsy can represent an important tool for selecting the most suitable surgical and clinical approach for patients with PCa.