Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Neuroradiol J ; 35(2): 203-212, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34340623

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Observational studies utilising diffusion tractography have suggested a common mechanism for tremor alleviation in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: the decussating portion of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract. We hypothesised that directional stimulation of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract would result in greater tremor improvement compared to sham programming, as well as comparable improvement as more tedious standard-of-care programming. METHODS: A prospective, blinded crossover trial was performed to assess the feasibility, safety and outcomes of programming based solely on dentato-rubro-thalamic tract anatomy. Using magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-tractography, the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract was identified and a connectivity-based treatment setting was derived by modelling a volume of tissue activated using directional current steering oriented towards the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract centre. A sham setting was created at approximately 180° opposite the connectivity-based treatment. Standard-of-care programming at 3 months was compared to connectivity-based treatment and sham settings that were blinded to the programmer. The primary outcome measure was percentage improvement in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marín tremor rating score compared to the preoperative baseline. RESULTS: Among the six patients, tremor rating scores differed significantly among the three experimental conditions (P=0.030). The mean tremor rating score improvement was greater with the connectivity-based treatment settings (64.6% ± 14.3%) than with sham (44.8% ± 18.6%; P=0.031) and standard-of-care programming (50.7% ± 19.2%; P=0.062). The distance between the centre of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the volume of tissue activated inversely correlated with the percentage improvement in the tremor rating score (R2=0.24; P=0.04). No significant adverse events were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Using a blinded, crossover trial design, we have shown the technical feasibility, safety and potential efficacy of connectivity-based stimulation settings in deep brain stimulation for treatment of essential tremor.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Temblor Esencial , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Temblor Esencial/cirugía , Temblor Esencial/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Temblor/cirugía
2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 89: 151-154, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34303201

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Accumulation of polyglutamine (polyQ) ataxin-3 (ATXN3) contributes to the pathobiology of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). Recently, we showed that polyQ ATXN3 is elevated in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of SCA3 patients, and has the potential to serve as a biological marker for this disease [1]. Based on these findings, we investigated whether polyQ ATXN3 can also be detected in urine samples from SCA3 patients. METHODS: We analyzed urine samples from 30 SCA3 subjects (including one pre-symptomatic subject), 35 subjects with other forms of ataxia, and 37 healthy controls. To quantify polyQ ATXN3 protein levels, we used our previously developed immunoassay. RESULTS: PolyQ ATXN3 can be detected in the urine of SCA3 patients, but not in urine samples from healthy controls or other forms of ataxia. There was a significant statistical association between polyQ ATXN3 levels in urine samples and those in plasma. Further, the levels of polyQ ATXN3 urine associated with an earlier age of SCA3 disease onset. CONCLUSION: As clinical trials for SCA3 advance, urine polyQ ATXN3 protein has potential to be a useful, non-invasive and inexpensive biomarker for SCA3.


Asunto(s)
Ataxina-3/orina , Enfermedad de Machado-Joseph/orina , Péptidos/orina , Proteínas Represoras/orina , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
3.
Trials ; 21(1): 964, 2020 Nov 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spine metastasis is a common occurrence in cancer patients and results in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastasis from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients will be treated with EBRT to a dose of 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions. The target parameters will be measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments. DISCUSSION: The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastasis, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04375891 . Registered on 5 May 2020.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia
4.
Neurotherapeutics ; 17(4): 1665-1680, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910414

RESUMEN

Myoclonus can cause significant disability for patients. Myoclonus has a strikingly diverse array of underlying etiologies, clinical presentations, and pathophysiological mechanisms. Treatment of myoclonus is vital to improving the quality of life of patients with these disorders. The optimal treatment strategy for myoclonus is best determined based upon careful evaluation and consideration of the underlying etiology and neurophysiological classification. Electrophysiological testing including EEG (electroencephalogram) and EMG (electromyogram) data is helpful in determining the neurophysiological classification of myoclonus. The neurophysiological subtypes of myoclonus include cortical, cortical-subcortical, subcortical-nonsegmental, segmental, and peripheral. Levetiracetam, valproic acid, and clonazepam are often used to treat cortical myoclonus. In cortical-subcortical myoclonus, treatment of myoclonic seizures is prioritized, valproic acid being the mainstay of therapy. Subcortical-nonsegmental myoclonus may be treated with clonazepam, though numerous agents have been used depending on the etiology. Segmental and peripheral myoclonus are often resistant to treatment, but anticonvulsants and botulinum toxin injections may be of utility depending upon the case. Pharmacological treatments are often hampered by scarce evidence-based knowledge, adverse effects, and variable efficacy of medications.


Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía/métodos , Electromiografía/métodos , Fenómenos Electrofisiológicos/fisiología , Mioclonía/fisiopatología , Mioclonía/terapia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Fenómenos Electrofisiológicos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Mioclonía/diagnóstico , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 54(3): 218-219, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32602934

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cervical dystonia is a form of focal dystonia characterised by tilting and turning of the head and neck. This can cause significant disability in affected patients. Botulinum toxin injections are the mainstay of therapy. However, approximately 30% of patients discontinue treatment. CLINICAL REFLECTIONS: Tyslerowicz et al. have provided a comprehensive review of the factors contributing to treatment failure. Such factors include appropriate identification of dystonia patterns, accurate injection of muscles, and addressing non-motor features of cervical dystonia. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A systematic approach is needed to identify and address the potentially modifiable factors that contribute to treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Tortícolis/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...