Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation for treating single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis in the osteoporotic spine.

The present study examined the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients with single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis.Fifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates of fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS).The operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to those in the PMMA-PS group. The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA-PS group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between the 2 groups. The initial and last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI scores improved significantly in the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the 2 groups at each time point. The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with those preoperatively. In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate. Nine patients in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage. There was no screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups. The use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

Non-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea-hemiballismus with Fahr's disease in a Chinese family: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Non-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea-hemiballismus (NHHH) is often secondary to middle-aged and elderly diabetic people with poor-controlled diabetes; Fahr's disease (FD) is another rare neurological disorder characterized by abnormal calcified deposits in the brain that control movement. We described a rare case of NHHH combined with a heterozygous mutation (SLC20A2) resulting in one family with FD. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient has a 30-day history of involuntary choreic movements of the left limbs and left face. In addition, he had a bit of speech slurred and walked unsteadily. He was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus two months ago. Over the past two months, he had noticed that urination, appetite, and water volume increased obviously and weight loss drastically. Other problems such as dizziness, headache, difficulty swallowing, nausea, and vomiting did not occur. T1- weighted MRI indicts characteristic contralateral basal ganglia hyper-intensity. During hospitalization, he was injected insulin and oral haloperidol. And the clinical symptoms improved, but parkinsonism symptoms emerge soon after discharge. The parkinsonism symptoms were gradually improved after adjusting medications. Combined with the subsequent genetic test results, we attribute it to NHHH with FD. CONCLUSION: It is relatively rare that NHHH or FD is both presents. We should use antipsychotics with caution in these patients to avoid parkinsonism symptoms.

Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screws with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is commonly used for cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI) to improve the fixation stability and reduce the risk of screw loosening in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine. Biomechanical researches have shown that various dose of cement (1-3 ml) can be injected to enhance screw stability. To date, there have been no studies on the relationship between adjacent segment degeneration and the volume of PMMA. This study aimed to explore the influence of CAPSI with different volumes of PMMA in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae over adjacent segments by using finite element analysis. METHODS: Seven different finite element models were reconstructed and simulated under different loading conditions, including (1) an intact model, (2) three single-level CAPSI models with different volumes of PMMA (1, 1.73, and 2.5 ml), and (3) three double-level CAPSI models with different volumes of PMMA (1, 1.73, and 2.5 ml). To improve the accuracy of the finite element analysis, the models of the injectable pedicle screw and bone cement were created by using a three-dimensional scanning machine and the CAPSI patient's CT data, respectively. The range of motion (ROM), the stress of intervertebral discs, and the stress of facet in the adjacent segment were comparatively analyzed among the different models. RESULTS: The ROMs of the different segments were compared with experimental data, with good agreement under the different load conditions (21.3°, 13.55°, 13.99°, and 6.11° in flexion, extension, bending, and rotation at L3-S1 level, respectively). Compared with the intact model, the ROM, disc stresses, and facet stress in adjacent segments were found to be higher in the six operative models. Otherwise, with a larger volume of PMMA injected, the ROM, disc stresses, and facet stress slightly increased at the adjacent segment. However, the differences were insignificant with the biggest difference less than 3.8%. CONCLUSIONS: CAPSI could increase the incidence of disk degeneration in the adjacent segment, while within a certain range, different volumes of PMMA provided an approximate impact over the adjacent segment degeneration.

Pedicle Screw Fixation in Single-Level, Double-Level, or Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Fusion for Osteoporotic Spine: A Retrospective Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw loosening is a common postoperative complication for osteoporotic patients, and several studies have identified the important role of fusion length in internal fixation failure, but the relationship between the number of fusion segments and the potential risks remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the rate and risk factors of screw loosening in osteoporotic patients with different levels of degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: The total cohort of 217 patients was divided into 3 groups according to the different fusion levels: single-level (group A; 100 cases), double-level (group B; 73 cases), and multilevel group (group C; 44 cases). Patient baseline demographic characteristics and assessments with a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before operation and at the last follow-up were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: Compared with preoperative values, VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up were significantly improved in all 3 groups. Operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, screw loosening rate, fusion rate, and VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up obviously increased with the increasing number of fusion segments (group C> group B> group A). Of note, all the screw loosening was observed in cranial and caudal vertebra. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified lumbosacral fixation, larger pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) difference (PT-LL), and greater postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) as independent predictors of screw loosening. However, sex, bone mineral density, body mass index, LL, sacral slope, PI, the change in LL, and preoperative PT were not relevant to screw loosening (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the high rate of screw loosening in cranial and caudal vertebra, osteoporotic patients with double-level or multilevel pedicle screw fixation benefited less than those with single-level pedicle screw fixation. Larger PI-LL, larger PT, and lumbosacral fixation are other risk factors for screw loosening. An instrument with stronger holding strength at cranial and caudal pedicle screws is recommended for those high-risk patients.

Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease.

BACKGROUND: The increase of augmented level and bone cement dose are accompanied by the rising incidence of cement leakage (CL) of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation (CAPSI). But the effect and potential risks of the application of CAPSI to osteoporotic lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) have not been studied in the case of multilevel fixation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and potential complications of using multilevel CAPSI for patients with osteoporotic LDD. METHODS: A total of 93 patients with multilevel LDD were divided into the CAPSI group (46 subjects) and the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group (47 subjects), including 75 cases for three levels and 18 cases for four levels. Relevant data were compared between two groups, including baseline data, clinical results, and complications. RESULTS: In the CAPSI group, a total of 336 augmented screws was placed bilaterally. The CL was observed in 116 screws (34.52%). Three cemented screws (0.89%) were found loosened during the follow-up and the overall fusion rate was 93.47%. For perioperative complications, two patients (4.35%) experienced pulmonary cement embolism (PCE), one patient augmented vertebral fracture, and three patients (6.52%) wound infection. And in the CPS group, thirty-three screws (8.46%) suffered loosening in cranial and caudal vertebra with a fusion rate of 91.49%. The operation time and hospital stay of CAPSI group were longer than the CPS group, but CAPSI group has a lower screw loosening percentage (P<0. 05). And in terms of blood loss, perioperative complications, fusion rate, and VAS and ODI scores at the follow-up times, there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with osteoporotic LDD underwent multilevel CPS fixation have a higher rate of screw loosening in the cranial and caudal vertebra. The application of cemented pedicle screws for multilevel LDD can achieve better stability and less screw loosening, but it also accompanied by longer operating time, higher incidence of CL, PCE and wound infections. Selective cement augmentation of cranial and caudal pedicle screws may be a worthy strategy to decrease the complications.

Stability Evaluation of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: A Finite Element Analysis Based on Three-Dimensional Scanning Models.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the biomechanical performance of various fixation constructs after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). This study aimed to explore the stability of various fixation options for OLIF by using finite element analysis based on three-dimensional scanning models. METHODS: Six validated finite element models of the L3-L5 segment were reconstructed via computed tomography images, including (1) intact model, (2) stand-alone model with no instrument, (3) lateral rod-screw model, (4) lateral rod-screw plus contralateral translaminar facet screw (LRS-CTLFS) model, (5) unilateral pedicle screw model, and (6) bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) model. Models of the OLIF cage and pedicle screw were created with three-dimensional scanning to improve the accuracy of finite element analysis. Range of motion, stress of the cage, and stress of fixation were evaluated in the different models. RESULTS: Range of motion increased from least to greatest as follows: BPS, LRS-CTLFS, unilateral pedicle screw, lateral rod-screw, stand-alone. Differences in range of motion between BPS and LRS-CTLFS were not significant for all loading cases. Compared with the other 3 models, the stress of the cage was found to be lower in BPS and LRS-CTLFS under all loading conditions, especially in BPS. Stress exerted on the fixation was the greatest in LRS-CTLFS, and the stress experienced by the translaminar facet screw was concentrated in part of the facet joint. CONCLUSIONS: The BPS model provided the best biomechanical stability for OLIF; the stand-alone model could not provide sufficient stability. The LRS-CTLFS procedure increases the approximate stability and reduces stress at the cage-endplate interface; however, it causes an increase in screw stress.