Comparative effectiveness of glycyrrhizic acid preparations aimed at preventing and treating anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury: A network meta-analysis of 97 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines and expert consensus do not yet recommend glycyrrhizic acid (GA) preparations, such as compound glycyrrhizin, diammonium glycyrrhizin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MGIG), et al., for the prevention of anti-tuberculosis(anti-TB) drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to insufficient evidence. Although these GA preparations are recommended for the treatment of anti-TB DILI, which one performs best is unclear. Previous conventional meta-analyses did not summarize the results of simultaneous comparisons of different glycyrrhizinate preparations. Therefore, we aimed to compare and rank different GA preparations on preventing and treating the anti-TB DILI by network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Chongqing VIP and, the Wanfang Database was performed up to December 19, 2020. The literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract important information. The outcomes were the incidence of liver injury (prevention section) and treatment response rate (treatment section). The NMA was conducted with a random-effects model under the Bayesian framework to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) using R software (version 3.6.1). RESULTS: From 1,411 publications, we included 97 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (10,923 participants). In terms of preventing anti-TB DILI (33 RCTs, comprising 5,762 patients), CGC, DGC, DGEC, and DGI, but not CGI, significantly reduced the incidence of liver injury than control group (RRs ranged from 0.26 to 0.58); CGC and DGEC were superior to DGC (RRs = 0.50 and 0.58, respectively). In terms of treating anti-TB DILI (64 RCTs, comprising 5,161 patients), MGIG was most effective among all regimens (RRs ranged from 1.15 to 1.72) while DGC ranked last (RRs ranged from 0.58 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: All GA preparations except for CGI were effective in preventing the incidence of anti-TB DILI and CGC was superior to DGC. MGIG seems to be the best choice among all GA preparations for the treatment of anti-TB DILI. Future clinical practice guidelines should factor in these novel findings to improve patient outcomes; however, further high-quality trials are needed to validate these results.

The combination of fibrinogen concentrations and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR-TKIs.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify a predictive marker of response to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A cohort of 190 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the optimal cutoffs for fibrinogen levels, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to identify factors correlated with PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: High NLR was associated with worse performance status. In univariate analysis, fibrinogen levels, NLR, and PLR were correlated with OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, all three variables remained predictive of OS, whereas only fibrinogen levels and PLR were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Furthermore, the combination of fibrinogen levels and PLR (F-PLR score) could stratify patients into three groups with significantly different prognoses, and the score was independently predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: The F-PLR score predicted the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received EGFR-TKIs, and this score may serve as a convenient blood-based marker for identifying high-risk patients.

Evaluating the role of GSTP1 genetic polymorphism (rs1695, 313A>G) as a predictor in cyclophosphamide-induced toxicities.

ABSTRACT: The association between Glutathione S-transferase Pi 1(GSTP1) genetic polymorphism (rs1695, 313A>G) and cyclophosphamide-induced toxicities has been widely investigated in previous studies, however, the results were inconsistent. This study was performed to further elucidate the association.A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wan Fang database up to January 5, 2020. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the association between GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and cyclophosphamide-induced hemotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, infection, and neurotoxicity.A total of 13 studies were eventually included. Compared with the GSTP1 rs1695 AA genotype carriers, patients with AG and GG genotypes had an increased risk of cyclophosphamide-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.18-2.19; P = .003) and infection (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.00-2.48; P = .05) in the overall population. In the subgroup analyses, there were significant associations between GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism and the risk of cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.60-2.76; P < .00001), gastrointestinal toxicity (RR, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.25-2.53; P = .001), and infection (RR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.14-3.54; P = .02) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or lupus nephritis syndrome patients, but not in cancer patients.Our results confirmed an essential role for the GSTP1 rs1695 polymorphism in the prediction of cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and infection in SLE or lupus nephritis syndrome patients. More studies are necessary to validate our findings in the future.