Comorbidities in Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Positive At-Risk Individuals Do Not Differ from Those Patients with Early Inflammatory Arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare comorbidities in a cohort of cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positive patients without or prior to onset of inflammatory arthritis (IA) to those in patients with early IA. METHODS: Baseline data from two established cohorts were used. The first recruited people at risk of IA: CCP antibody positive cases without IA (CCP Cohort, n = 296). The second cohort [the Inflammatory Arthritis CONtinuum study (IACON)] recruited patients with early IA (n = 725). Proportions of patients with given comorbidities were compared between cohorts and then logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) for the CCP cohort having specific comorbidities, compared to IACON patients. Analyses adjusted for gender, age, smoking status, and body mass index. RESULTS: Patients from the CCP cohort were younger (mean age 50, compared to 53 years). The proportion of patients with at least one comorbidity was higher in the IACON than the CCP cohort: (40% compared to 24%, respectively). Results of logistic regression analyses suggested the odds of hypertension, taking a lipid-lowering agent, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, lung disease, and diabetes were not increased in either cohort. However, patients in the CCP cohort were more likely to be taking an antidepressant (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.03, 2.56, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in comorbidities among people with CCP antibodies but without IA, compared to those of patients with established IA.

The initiation of autoimmunity at epithelial surfaces: a focus on rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

It is well established that the autoantibodies that characterize both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are present systemically years before patients develop disease. In both these autoimmune rheumatic diseases, evidence is growing that local autoimmune processes occur at epithelial surfaces potentially initiating localized autoimmunity. For RA, these are mucosal surfaces including the oral mucosa, lung, and gut. At the oral mucosa and lung, risk factors such as periodontal disease and smoking may contribute to autoimmunity by driving the local generation of citrullinated autoantigens. For SLE, the skin may be integral in pathogenesis. It is proposed that defective clearance of apoptotic debris leads to initial innate immune responses preceding autoimmunity. Many tissues may be implicated but the frequency of skin disease, even without autoantibodies, and the role of UV light as a trigger suggest that keratinocytes may be a key site of initiation. In both diseases, a local break in immune tolerance could lead to systemic autoimmunity, and, in the gut, bacterial organisms that colonize the intestine may influence the localized gut immune response through T-cells and promote the development of systemic autoimmunity. In this review, we discuss the evidence for localized epithelial autoimmunity in those at risk of RA and SLE and early disease. Localized autoimmunity at the oral mucosa, lung, gut, and skin will be considered as potential initiating sites of ARD-related autoimmunity.

Achieving serum urate targets in gout: an audit in a gout-oriented rheumatology practice.

AIM: To assess the proportion of patients with gout who achieve target serum urate levels, the drug regime required and the reasons for failing to do so. METHODS: We reviewed the files of all patients with gout who presented to a gout-oriented rheumatology practice between January 2010 and September 2014. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty patients agreed to commence urate lowering therapy (ULT); 73% achieved their urate target, including 74% with non-tophaceous gout (target ≤ 0.36 mmol/L) and 71% with tophi (target ≤ 0.30 mmol/L). Of the 62 who failed to reach target, in 61 it was due to non-adherence and in one due to inefficacy. CONCLUSION: Adherence remains the major challenge to successful long-term gout management.

A practical approach to vaccination of patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Australia.

Autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD), such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis are often complicated by infection, which results in significant morbidity and mortality. The increased risk of infection is probably due to a combination of immunosuppressive effects of the AIIRD, comorbidities and the use of immunosuppressive conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and more recently, targeted synthetic DMARDs and biologic DMARDs that block specific pro-inflammatory enzymes, cytokines or cell types. The use of these various DMARDs has revolutionised the treatment of AIIRD. This has led to a marked improvement in quality of life for AIIRD patients, who often now travel for prolonged periods. Many infections are preventable with vaccination. However, as protective immune responses induced by vaccination may be impaired by immunosuppression, where possible, vaccination may need to be performed prior to initiation of immunosuppression. Vaccination status should also be reviewed when planning overseas travel. Limited data regarding vaccine efficacy in patients with AIIRD make prescriptive guidelines difficult. However, a vaccination history should be part of the initial work-up in all AIIRD patients. Those caring for AIIRD patients should regularly consider vaccination to prevent infection within the practicalities of routine clinical practice.