The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement.

The articular surface of the normal humeral head has a variable posterior and medial offset with respect to the central axis of the humeral shaft. Recreation of the normal humeral head shaft offset is postulated to be an important consideration during shoulder arthroplasty. However, the effect of humeral head malposition is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. Twenty-one human cadavers were dissected and tested with the use of an active or passive shoulder model. Range of motion and translation were recorded by means of an electromagnetic tracking device. The experiment was performed in 2 phases. For kinematics study, 11 cadaver shoulders were positioned both passively and actively from maximum internal rotation to maximum external rotation at 90 degrees of total elevation in the scapular plane. Three rotator cuff and 3 deltoid muscle lines of action were simulated for active joint positioning. Passive joint positioning was accomplished with the use of a torque wrench and a nominal centering force. The testing protocol was used for the natural joint as well as for 9 prosthetic head locations: centered and 2- and 4-mm offsets in the anterior, posterior, inferior, and superior directions. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in the range of motion and translation between active and passive positioning of the natural joint as well as all prosthetic head positions. (2) For impingement study, 10 cadaver shoulders were used in a passive model, loading the tendons of the rotator cuff with a 30-N centering force. The humerus was passively rotated from maximum internal rotation (1500 Nmm) to maximum external rotation (1500 Nmm) by means of a continuous-recording digital torque wrench. Trials were performed with the use of centered, 4-, 6-, and 8-mm offset heads in the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior positions before and after removal of the acromion and coracoacromial ligament. The relation between change in mean peak torque (with and without acromion), passive range of motion, and humeral head offset was analyzed by means of repeated-measures analysis of variance. In the kinematics study, total range of motion and all humeral translations were greater with passive joint positioning than with active positioning (P =.01) except for total superior-inferior translation and superior-inferior translation in external rotation. Anterior to posterior humeral head offset was associated with statistically significant changes in total range of motion (P =.02), range of internal rotation (P =.02), range of external rotation (P =.0001), and total anterior-posterior translation (P =.01). Superior to inferior humeral head offset resulted in statistically significant changes in total range of motion (P =.02), range of internal rotation (P =.0001), anterior-posterior translation during external rotation (P =.01), and total superior-inferior translation (P =.03). In the impingement study, there was a significant increase in torque from centered to 4-mm inferior offset (P =.006), 6-mm inferior offset (P <.001), and 8-mm inferior offset (P <.001). There was no significant increase in torque with superior, anterior, and posterior offsets. Glenohumeral motion significantly decreased from 129 degrees for centered head to 119 degrees for 8-mm superior (P =.002), 119 degrees for 8-mm anterior (P =.014), 118 degrees for 8-mm inferior (P <.001), and 114 degrees for 8-mm posterior (P =.001). Humeral articular malposition of 4 mm or less during prosthetic arthroplasty of the glenohumeral joint may lead to small alterations in humeral translations and range of motion. Inferior malposition of greater than 4 mm can lead to increased subacromial contact; offset of 8 mm in any direction results in significant decreases in passive range of motion. Therefore if subacromial contact is to be minimized and glenohumeral motion maximized after shoulder replacement, anatomic reconstruction of the humeral head-humeral shaft offset to within 4 mm is desirable.

Well-leg compartment pressures during hemilithotomy position for fracture fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the well-leg compartment pressures and time during hemilithotomy position for fracture fixation. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of a fractured femur in the hemilithotomy position (with a well-leg holder). INTERVENTION: Continuous pressure monitoring was achieved with in-dwelling slit catheters inserted into the calf compartments of the well leg. Baseline measurements were obtained in the supine position. After the leg was placed in the hemilithotomy position, compartment pressures were monitored throughout surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Calf compartment pressures at baseline, during hemilithotomy position, and post-hemilithotomy were compared. The association between body mass index and compartment pressure was analyzed. RESULTS: A consistent pattern was observed between compartment pressures and time. The curve was that of a step function in which the pressure increased as soon as the leg was placed in the well-leg holder and remained elevated until the leg was taken down. The pressure jumped from a baseline of 9.2 to 27.3 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (p<0.0001). While in the hemilithotomy position, the leg pressure trended slightly upward. Once the leg was taken down, the pressure immediately returned to a near-baseline level of 8.1 mm Hg (p<0.0001). A significant correlation was also found between the body mass index and leg pressure (R2 = 0.713; F = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the well-leg holder to maintain hemilithotomy position increases the calf compartment pressures dramatically and significantly. Therefore, we recommend avoiding this position for fracture fixation in at-risk patients.

A comparison of various angles of halo pin insertion in an immature skull model.

STUDY DESIGN: A basic science biomechanical study involving an animal model. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of varying angles of halo pin insertion on the force generated at the pin-bone interface, and thereby the stability of the halo pin-bone interaction during insertion. BACKGROUND DATA: Because of variations in the shape and size of the pediatric skull, halo pins often are inserted at various angles rather than perpendicular to the skull. Concern exists that the high complication rate associated with pediatric halo use may result in part from less than ideal structural properties at the halo pin-bone interface. METHODS: The authors used a fetal calf skull model to simulate the thickness and structural properties of the pediatric skull. Halo pins were inserted at angles of 0 degree (perpendicular), 10 degrees, 15 degrees, and 30 degrees into skull segments via a halo ring. Load generated at the pin-bone interface was measured using a modified mechanical testing device. Twenty trials were conducted per angle, with the endpoint being specimen failure, pin penetration, or maximum load. RESULTS: Mean maximum loads per unit thickness were 82.15 +/- 7.54 N/mm at 0 degree, 68.80 +/- 4.79 N/mm at 10 degrees, 51.49 +/- 5.08 N/mm at 15 degrees, and 42.38 +/- 3.51 N/mm at 30 degrees, There was a significant difference between perpendicular insertion (0 degree) and 15 degrees angles of insertion. There was also a significant difference between the 10 degrees and 30 degrees angles of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Perpendicular halo pin insertion in an immature skull model was shown to result in increased load at the pin-bone interface. This improved structural behavior may help to reduce the incidence of complications of halo application in children.

The significance of the three volar spaces in forearm compartment syndrome: a clinical and cadaveric correlation.

The goal of this study was to assess the importance of the 3 volar spaces in forearm compartment syndrome in a prospective manner. A cadaveric model was developed to correlate with our clinical experience. All but 1 of 21 volar compartments (superficial volar, deep volar, and pronator quadratus spaces) in 7 patients in our clinical series decompressed adequately after release of the superficial volar fascia. One patient needed further release of the pronator quadratus compartment; he had suffered a combined crush and vascular injury. All volar compartments in our cadaveric model decompressed with superficial fasciotomy. Prefasciotomy and postfasciotomy pressures should be obtained from all 3 compartments of the volar forearm. Superficial fasciotomy usually adequately decompresses the entire volar forearm; however, in the event that deep compartment pressures remain high after superficial fasciotomy, release of the affected space is indicated.

A comparative evaluation of halo pin designs in an immature skull model.

To design an improved halo pin for use in pediatric patients, three commonly used halo pins were evaluated with a mechanical testing apparatus and segments of prepared fetal calf skull. The pins were driven through the bone segments while the load at the bone-pin interface was measured. New pins were designed with respect to pin tip and flange width and similarly compared. Mean maximum loads to penetration, normalized for bone segment thickness, were 55.6 N/mm for the PMT Corporation pin, 61.5 N/mm for the Bremer pin, and 73.6 N/mm for the Ace pin. Four new, short tipped pins were designed and compared with the Ace pin, and there was no significant difference. Finally, four new pins were designed with varying flange widths. Mean maximum loads, normalized for bone segment thickness, were 68.9 N/mm for the 4.2 mm flange, 72.2 N/mm for the 4.7 mm flange, 92.9 N/mm for the 5.2 mm flange, and 96.4 N/mm for the 5.7 mm flange. The findings of this investigation are clinically important because they may help to explain the variability in the complication rates seen with the use of different halo systems in children. The three halo pins currently on the market have different pin designs, including tip lengths and flange distances, which contribute to the difference in load to penetration for each pin. The new, wide flanged, short tipped halo pin design might decrease the complication rate of halo use in children by providing an improved capacity to resist penetration despite increased loads of application.