Structure Drawing at the Heart of Teaching Chemistry.

Chemistry is all about structures. There are myriads of structural representations that are required for the students to become familiar with when learning chemistry. Structural formula, skeletal formula, Lewis and resonance structures, three-dimensional representations are just a few examples of the drawing styles that should be readily interpreted by a chemistry student. In order to gain the necessary knowledge to understand and manipulate chemical structures, students must extensively solve problems with structural illustrations and practice drawing chemical structures themselves. Here we present Zosimos, an online chemistry educational tool with comprehensive structure-drawing capabilities that allows chemistry teachers to create real chemistry quizzes, share them with their students and get immediate feedback on their learning progress. 5th grade students at Kantonsschule Zug have been learning chemistry with Zosimos since September 2019 and this article also shares insights on how to implement this learning tool in a real classroom setting.

Modeling Polypharmacological Profiles by Affinity Fingerprinting.

Single target based approaches often proved to be unsuccessful in complex multigenic diseases such as cancer or schizophrenia. Multi-target drugs can be more efficacious in this regard by modulating multiple processes in the organism. According to the theory of polypharmacology, bioactive molecules possess characteristic interaction patterns that are responsible for their effects and side-effects and getting acquainted with this typical profile is increasingly desired to promote pharmaceutical research and development. There is a novel way of approaching polypharmacology that takes into account the interaction of molecules to a set of proteins that are not necessarily known biological targets of the compounds. Applying a carefully selected panel of proteins that can model the possible interactions a molecule can exert when administered to a human body, holds out a promise of biological activity prediction. This review aims to summarize a number of such bioactivity profiling-based approaches set up recently and present their application areas within the drug discovery field.

Experimental confirmation of new drug-target interactions predicted by Drug Profile Matching.

We recently introduced Drug Profile Matching (DPM), a novel affinity fingerprinting-based in silico drug repositioning approach. DPM is able to quantitatively predict the complete effect profiles of compounds via probability scores. In the present work, in order to investigate the predictive power of DPM, three effect categories, namely, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, cyclooxygenase inhibitor, and dopamine agent, were selected and predictions were verified by literature analysis as well as experimentally. A total of 72% of the newly predicted and tested dopaminergic compounds were confirmed by tests on D1 and D2 expressing cell cultures. 33% and 23% of the ACE and COX inhibitory predictions were confirmed by in vitro tests, respectively. Dose-dependent inhibition curves were measured for seven drugs, and their inhibitory constants (Ki) were determined. Our study overall demonstrates that DPM is an effective approach to reveal novel drug-target pairs that may result in repositioning these drugs.

Virtual affinity fingerprints for target fishing: a new application of Drug Profile Matching.

We recently introduced Drug Profile Matching (DPM), a novel virtual affinity fingerprinting bioactivity prediction method. DPM is based on the docking profiles of ca. 1200 FDA-approved small-molecule drugs against a set of nontarget proteins and creates bioactivity predictions based on this pattern. The effectiveness of this approach was previously demonstrated for therapeutic effect prediction of drug molecules. In the current work, we investigated the applicability of DPM for target fishing, i.e. for the prediction of biological targets for compounds. Predictions were made for 77 targets, and their accuracy was measured by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Robustness was tested by a rigorous 10-fold cross-validation procedure. This procedure identified targets (N = 45) with high reliability based on DPM performance. These 45 categories were used in a subsequent study which aimed at predicting the off-target profiles of currently approved FDA drugs. In this data set, 79% of the known drug-target interactions were correctly predicted by DPM, and additionally 1074 new drug-target interactions were suggested. We focused our further investigation on the suggested interactions of antipsychotic molecules and confirmed several interactions by a review of the literature.

Contribution of 2D and 3D structural features of drug molecules in the prediction of Drug Profile Matching.

Drug Profile Matching (DPM), a novel virtual affinity fingerprinting method capable of predicting the medical effect profiles of small molecules, was introduced by our group recently. The method exploits the information content of interaction patterns generated by flexible docking to a series of rigidly kept nontarget protein active sites. We presented the ability of DPM to classify molecules excellently, and the question arose, what the contribution of 2D and 3D structural features of the small molecules is to the intriguingly high prediction power of DPM. The present study compared the prediction powers for effect profiles of 1163 FDA-approved drug compounds determined by DPM and ChemAxon 2D and 3D similarity fingerprinting approaches. We found that DPM outperformed the 2D and 3D approaches in almost all therapeutic categories for drug classification except for mechanically rigid structural categories where high accuracy was obtained by all three methods. Moreover, we also tested the predictive power of DPM on external data by reducing the parent data set and demonstrated that DPM can overcome the common screening problems of 2D and 3D similarity methods arising from the presence of structurally diverse molecules in certain effect categories.

Drug effect prediction by polypharmacology-based interaction profiling.

Most drugs exert their effects via multitarget interactions, as hypothesized by polypharmacology. While these multitarget interactions are responsible for the clinical effect profiles of drugs, current methods have failed to uncover the complex relationships between them. Here, we introduce an approach which is able to relate complex drug-protein interaction profiles with effect profiles. Structural data and registered effect profiles of all small-molecule drugs were collected, and interactions to a series of nontarget protein binding sites of each drug were calculated. Statistical analyses confirmed a close relationship between the studied 177 major effect categories and interaction profiles of ca. 1200 FDA-approved small-molecule drugs. On the basis of this relationship, the effect profiles of drugs were revealed in their entirety, and hitherto uncovered effects could be predicted in a systematic manner. Our results show that the prediction power is independent of the composition of the protein set used for interaction profile generation.

Relating the shape of protein binding sites to binding affinity profiles: is there an association?

BACKGROUND: Various pattern-based methods exist that use in vitro or in silico affinity profiles for classification and functional examination of proteins. Nevertheless, the connection between the protein affinity profiles and the structural characteristics of the binding sites is still unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between virtual drug screening results (calculated binding free energy values) and the geometry of protein binding sites. Molecular Affinity Fingerprints (MAFs) were determined for 154 proteins based on their molecular docking energy results for 1,255 FDA-approved drugs. Protein binding site geometries were characterized by 420 PocketPicker descriptors. The basic underlying component structure of MAFs and binding site geometries, respectively, were examined by principal component analysis; association between principal components extracted from these two sets of variables was then investigated by canonical correlation and redundancy analyses. RESULTS: PCA analysis of the MAF variables provided 30 factors which explained 71.4% of the total variance of the energy values while 13 factors were obtained from the PocketPicker descriptors which cumulatively explained 94.1% of the total variance. Canonical correlation analysis resulted in 3 statistically significant canonical factor pairs with correlation values of 0.87, 0.84 and 0.77, respectively. Redundancy analysis indicated that PocketPicker descriptor factors explain 6.9% of the variance of the MAF factor set while MAF factors explain 15.9% of the total variance of PocketPicker descriptor factors. Based on the salient structures of the factor pairs, we identified a clear-cut association between the shape and bulkiness of the drug molecules and the protein binding site descriptors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate complex multivariate associations between affinity profiles and the geometric properties of protein binding sites. We found that, except for few specific cases, the shapes of the binding pockets have relatively low weights in the determination of the affinity profiles of proteins. Since the MAF profile is closely related to the target specificity of ligand binding sites we can conclude that the shape of the binding site is not a pivotal factor in selecting drug targets. Nonetheless, based on strong specific associations between certain MAF profiles and specific geometric descriptors we identified, the shapes of the binding sites do have a crucial role in virtual drug design for certain drug categories, including morphine derivatives, benzodiazepines, barbiturates and antihistamines.