Menopause in Plastic Surgery Patients: an Underrecognized and Undertreated Comorbidity.

SUMMARY: Nearly half of all plastic surgery patients are middle-aged cis-gender women, all of whom will experience menopause. While plastic surgeons do not treat menopause directly, it can be a concern-and even a motivating factor-for patients seeking plastic surgery. Additionally, the changes associated with menopause underlie problems that many plastic surgeons seek to address, including in facelifts, breast surgery, and vaginal rejuvenation. Hormone therapy has the potential to improve quality of life for women by treating bothersome symptoms and delaying the physical changes brought on by loss of estrogen. However, recent reports in the media highlight that women face significant barriers to accessing menopause care due to a lack of trained providers willing to manage hormone therapy, as well as historical fears regarding increased cancer risk, which recent evidence suggests were overestimated. Plastic surgeons may be the first, or only, providers with whom women discuss how their bodies change with age. As a result, plastic surgeons should consider menopause as an underlying risk factor or comorbidity for any woman presenting with ageing-related complaints, and to ensure that these patients have access to appropriate menopause care in their communities. This is especially important for surgeons offering vaginal rejuvenation therapies, given that locally-acting topical estrogen is a safe and highly-effective treatment. Here we present guidance and recommendations for how plastic surgeons should take menopause into account when evaluating and advising patients. Additionally, we present a treatment algorithm for safe prescribing of locally-acting hormone therapy for vaginal rejuvenation.

Use of Cosmetic Facial Injectables After Facial Aesthetic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 2 decades, both invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic procedures have proliferated. Aesthetic surgeons often recommend injectable treatments after cosmetic facial surgery for multiple reasons. However, literature is lacking on how cosmetic surgery affects postoperative facial injectable use. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of facial injectable use after cosmetic facial surgery. METHODS: All adult patients operated on by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had any of the following cosmetic facial surgeries were included: rhytidectomy, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, or genioplasty. Patient demographics, clinical history, intraoperative factors, and use of cosmetic facial injectables (neurotoxin, facial fillers, deoxycholic acid, poly-l-lactic acid) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients who underwent facial cosmetic surgery were reviewed, of whom 158 were included. Of these, 89 patients had rhytidectomy (56.3%), 112 had blepharoplasty (70.9%), 28 had rhinoplasty (17.7%), and 7 had genioplasty (4.4%). Injectables were administered to 44.3% of patients after their surgery (n = 73), compared with only 17.7% before surgery (n = 28) (P < 0.001). The most common postoperative injectables were neurotoxins (48.5%) and facial fillers (46.0%), followed by deoxycholic acid (2.7%) and poly-l-lactic acid (2.7%). Multivariate regression revealed factors positively correlated with future injectable use were index blepharoplasty or rhinoplasty, and history of preoperative neurotoxin injection (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic facial injectables are an important consideration in achieving and maintaining optimal facial aesthetics. Their use, especially neurotoxins and facial fillers, has increased among patients postoperatively. These results highlight the contribution of injectable procedures in the context of multidimensional care for augmenting facial aesthetics.

A Systematic Review of Aesthetic Surgery Training Within Plastic Surgery Training Programs in the USA: An In-Depth Analysis and Practical Reference.

BACKGROUND: The importance of aesthetic surgery exposure for plastic and reconstructive trainees has been recently validated by the expansion of case requirements for aesthetic procedures from 50 to 150, as well as resident-driven desire for increased cosmetic exposure throughout training. We aim to systematically review the literature at a national level to report on overall trends in aesthetic surgery training within PRS residencies. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified all English articles published in the USA between 2000 and 2020, using a combination of "aesthetic surgery", "cosmetic surgery", "plastic surgery", "residency and internship", "education", and "training." RESULTS: Our initial search resulted in 415 articles. After review of inclusion and exclusion criteria, in addition to cross-referencing, 41 studies remained, including 15 studies discussing resident and/or program director surveys, eight studies discussing teaching methods, sixteen studies discussing dedicated resident clinics, four studies discussing cosmetic/aesthetic fellowships, three studies discussing cosmetic practice patterns, and eleven studies discussing patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Current literature demonstrates that there are gaps in aesthetic surgery training for PRS residents in the USA, including facial and neck surgeries and non-surgical interventions. Resident clinics have clear benefits for resident education, without sacrificing patient outcomes. Residency programs should consider the development of a resident cosmetic clinic and/or dedicated cosmetic center to increase surgical exposure and increase trainee comfort in providing this subset of procedures. Published literature is limited in consistency of methods of evaluation, and further in-depth analysis of case volume and diversity at training programs within the USA and internationally is indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 19 Patients Undergoing Clitoral and Labial Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is the intentional alteration, removal, or injury of female genitalia for non-medical reasons. Approximately 200 million females have been victims of FGM/C, and genital reconstructive procedures are increasing in demand. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess clinical and patient-reported outcomes after FGM/C reconstruction to help guide treatment practices. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing anatomic reconstruction after FGM/C were retrospectively identified. Outcomes included clitoral, labial, and donor site surgical site occurrences (SSO) and the need for revision operations. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using an adapted version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a validated outcomes instrument that assesses sexual function through 6 domains, with each domain having a maximum score of 6. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified in our review. Patients presented for reconstruction due to dyspareunia, inability to orgasm, chronic infections, to normalize appearance, and/or to "feel normal." There were no SSOs and two revision operations for adhesions. 74% of patients completed the FSFI postoperatively. Despite most patients seeking repair for inability to orgasm and/or dyspareunia, the median scores for these domains were 4.6 and 5.2. Patients' desire to engage in sexual activity scored lowest (3.9), and patients reported concerns over the appearance of their genitalia (50%) that affected self-confidence (85.7%). CONCLUSION: FGM/C reconstruction is safe and contributes to improvements in physical sexual health. Psychological trauma may contribute to lessened sexual desire and self-confidence even after reconstruction. Multidisciplinary treatment is important to address the long-term psychological effects of this practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Modern Fat Grafting Techniques to the Face and Neck.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand age-related changes to the face and neck and pertinent anatomy and discuss important aspects of fat graft harvesting, processing, and infiltration. 2. Recognize key differences between common techniques for fat processing and infiltration and develop a plan for patients based on site-specific facial anatomical zones. 3. Appreciate the utility of fat grafting as an adjunct to other facial rejuvenating procedures such as face lift and blepharoplasty procedures and list the potential complications from fat grafting to the face and neck. SUMMARY: Fat grafting to the face and neck aids in volume restoration, thereby addressing soft-tissue atrophy associated with the aging face, acquired conditions, or congenital malformations. Often, fat grafting may sufficiently restore facial volume alone or in conjunction with other facial rejuvenation procedures. Facial/neck fat grafting requires a systematic and thoughtful approach, with special care to atraumatic technique. This CME article covers the principles and techniques for modern facial fat grafting to the face and neck. Increasing data support the ability of autologous fat to produce significant and sustainable appearance-related changes. The authors follow the general principles of the Coleman technique for facial fat grafting and have observed tremendous success over the years. Other techniques for facial fat grafting are also discussed including microfat and nanofat processing. As the understanding of facial fat compartments continues to evolve, the authors may better predict fat grafting outcomes following augmentation. Finally, the technique described as "lipotumescence" has been successfully used in the breast and other regions of the body that have radiation damage and is discussed in this article specifically for the face and neck.

The Role of Plastic Surgeons in Female Genital Mutilation Reconstructive Surgery.

The World Health Organization defines female genital mutilation (FGM) as any procedure involving partial or total removal of female external genitalia or other injury to genital organs for non-medical indications. Despite prohibitory legislation in the United States and significant morbidity related to FGM procedures, the practice continues throughout the globe with three million women at risk annually. Surgical care for women with FGM has historically been in the hands of obstetrician and Gynaecologists (OB GYNs), and mainly focused to help safe labor and delivery. Recent awareness of the need for improved reconstructive surgical care for FGM has developed in the plastic surgical literature. This Current Opinion article highlights the historical surgical care for FGM and the opportunity for plastic surgeons to get more involved in the multidisciplinary care of these patients.

Influence of Self-Perceived Vulvar Appearance on Female Sexual Function.

BACKGROUND: Female sexual function is a complex model of biological and nonbiological factors. The impact of self-perceived vulvar appearance on female sexual function is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of vulvar appearance on sexual function in adult women. The primary aim was to assess the relation between self-perceived vulvar appearance and sexual function. The secondary aim was to assess the influence of prior genital procedures on vulvar appearance and sexual function. METHODS: An observational study of adult women was conducted utilizing Amazon Mechanical Turk, an online crowdsourcing platform. The survey instrument included demographic information, subjective vulvar appearance measures, and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of 398 respondents, 148 (37.2%) reported concern about their vulvar appearance and 134 (33.7%) reported a history of genital cosmetic procedures. Women who were uncomfortable with their vulvar appearance had lower FSFI scores than those comfortable with their vulvar appearance, 24.6 vs 27.0 (P = 0.01), respectively. Among women uncomfortable with their vulvar appearance, 70.9% of subjects met the criteria for sexual dysfunction. Women who were uncomfortable with their vulvar appearance were significantly more at risk of sexual dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.46-4.10; P < 0.001). Women with a history of cosmetic genital procedures were significantly more at risk of sexual dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.43-4.23). CONCLUSIONS: Women who are uncomfortable with their vulvar appearance had higher rates of sexual dysfunction. Women seeking cosmetic genital procedures should be screened for sexual dysfunction to facilitate realistic expectations and optimal care.

Better Results in Facial Rejuvenation with Fillers.

Facial rejuvenation is a rapidly advancing field in aesthetic medicine. Minimally invasive techniques represent a powerful tool for rejuvenation, and fillers are a popular modality with which to restore and optimize facial proportions. Currently, our filler armamentarium is characterized by products with an increasing variety of biochemical compositions warranting tailored injection approaches. An intimate knowledge of anatomy, product characteristics, and appropriate injection techniques is essential to achieve optimal results while maintaining patient safety. Here, we review facial anatomy, structural changes secondary to aging, appropriate filler selection, safe injection techniques, and complications.

Safety in Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, participants should be able to: (1) Identify the most appropriate type of anesthesia for the female genital plastic surgical patient and minimize risks of nerve injury and thromboembolic event through proper preoperative evaluation and knowledge of positioning. (2) Define the vulvovaginal anatomy, including common variants, and assess vulvovaginal tissues after childbirth and menopause. (3) Apply surgical techniques to minimize complications in female genital plastic surgery. (4) Classify the types of female genital mutilation/cutting and design methods of reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting. SUMMARY: Female genital plastic surgery is growing in popularity and in numbers performed. This CME article covers several aspects of safety in the performance of these procedures. In choosing the best candidates, the impact of patient motivation, body mass index, parity, menopause and estrogen therapy is discussed. Under anesthesia, consideration for the risks associated with the dorsal lithotomy position and avoidance of compartment syndrome, nerve injury, deep venous thromboses, and pulmonary embolus are covered. Anatomical variations are discussed, as is the impact of childbirth on tissues and muscles. Surgical safety, avoidance of complications, and postoperative care of a variety of vulvovaginal procedures are discussed. Videos showing anatomical variations and surgical techniques of the most common female genital procedures with recommendations to reduce the complication rate are included in the article. Finally, female genital mutilation/cutting is defined, and treatment, avoidance of complications, and postoperative care are discussed.

National Survey of US Plastic Surgeon Experience with Female Genital Mutilation.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a growing problem in the United States, with the past few decades showing a dramatic increase in prevalence. This study aims to understand the plastic surgeon experience with FGM and inform preparedness for this rising problem. METHODS: A 26-question survey was developed and electronically distributed to a random cohort of 2,508 active American Society of Plastic Surgeons members. It was sent three times over a 3-week period in 2018. χ2 statistical tests were used to analyze outcomes, assuming a P < 0.05 level for statistical significance. RESULTS: There was a 7% survey response rate (n=180). Demographic profiles reflected a range of practice types, geographical distribution, and years of experience. Ninety-five percent of respondents had heard of FGM (n=169). Sixty-seven percent were aware that surgical reconstructive options exist for FGM (n=115), with only 5% reporting any formal training on the topic (n=10). Only 13.6% of those surveyed felt prepared to care for a woman with FGM (n=23). CONCLUSIONS: After surveying plastic surgeons, responses demonstrate that while the majority are familiar with FGM, very few are comfortable or prepared for the care and surgical management of this patient population. Although this study is limited by a low response rate, we believe that the results reflect an existing knowledge gap and demonstrate the need for formal training. This may help to bridge this gap and prepare surgeons to care for this population.

The Impact of Race, Age, Gender, Income, and Level of Education on Motivations to Pursue Cosmetic Surgery and Surgeon Selection at an Academic Institution.

BACKGROUND: Aesthetic surgery is a personal choice that appeals to a wide population of individuals. The authors investigated how race and ethnicity, age, gender, income, and education level affect patient motivation to pursue cosmetic surgery and selection of a plastic surgeon. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two consecutive patients from two surgeons (an African American man and a Caucasian woman) completed surveys from 2016 to 2017 that assessed their decision to pursue cosmetic surgery. Univariable cumulative logit models with odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated with the survey data. RESULTS: African American patients were more likely to be willing to travel greater than 100 miles for a surgeon who shared the same ethnicity or race, to consider international surgery, to report that social standards did not influence their decision for surgery, and to view the buttocks as the female feature that best defines attractiveness within their race or ethnicity. Patients with incomes over $125,000 and those over the age of 50 years were more likely to seek a surgeon of the same gender, think a same-gender surgeon could provide better results, be influenced by societal standards to pursue surgery, and view the face as the defining attractive female feature within their race or ethnicity. Patients with college or graduate degrees were more likely to believe a gender- and racially concordant surgeon would provide them with better a result and believed societal standards were unrealistic to obtain with diet and exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons encounter patients of varying demographics, all of whom have differing perspectives about cosmetic surgery and motivations for its pursuit. Recognizing and defining these differences could enable surgeons to provide a more individualized cosmetic experience and inform future marketing strategies to attract a diverse patient population.

An Objective, Quantitative, Dynamic Assessment of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers That Adapt to Facial Movement.

BACKGROUND: Objective dynamic assessments are central to the evaluation of facial rejuvenation treatments. This study used three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry to generate a quantitative dynamic assessment of facial strain and hyaluronic acid filler efficacy. METHODS: Thirty women (aged 41 to 65 years) with moderate to severe bilateral nasolabial folds and marionette lines received Restylane Refyne, Restylane Defyne, or both, and were compared to a "younger" untreated group (n = 20; aged 25 to 35 years). Three-dimensional videos were collected at baseline and at day 42. Dynamic strain was analyzed at the marionette lines and nasolabial folds as subjects went from a neutral position through a series of facial expressions. RESULTS: Baseline nasolabial folds and marionette lines showed statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in the level of stretch between younger and older untreated subjects, with higher stretch profiles observed in the older cohort. In the older cohort, filler treatment reduced peak strain (stretch) in the nasolabial folds and marionette lines compared with baseline across all tested expressions, resembling the youthful strain profile of the younger untreated control group. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative dynamic strain analysis is an innovative method for evaluating the dynamic face following dermal fillers and provides objective evidence that such treatment results in stretch levels resembling a younger phenotype in areas prone to the effects of facial aging. The strain reduction following filler treatment objectively conveys a dermal tightening effect, likely secondary to the volumization of treated areas. Additional studies will refine the technology and associated procedures to optimize quantitative dynamic strain analysis for treatment planning and patient outcome optimization. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Fibroblasts Derived From Human Adipose Stem Cells Produce More Effective Extracellular Matrix and Migrate Faster Compared to Primary Dermal Fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) to improve wound healing has been extensively investigated. Unfortunately, no consistent reports have described significant improvements in healing time or outcomes in large-scale clinical trials utilizing human ASCs. Primarily, these studies examined undifferentiated ASCs as opposed to specific cells differentiated from ASCs. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine the properties of fibroblasts differentiated from human ASCs (dFib cells) compared with those of primary dermal fibroblasts. METHODS: ASCs were isolated from healthy female patients, differentiated into dFib cells, and compared with intra-patient primary dermal fibroblasts for morphology, extracellular matrix (ECM) marker expression, and cell migration employing qPCR, western blot, and scratch test assays. RESULTS: De novo differentiated fibroblasts produce higher levels of the healthy ECM markers Elastin, Fibronectin, and Collagen 1 compared with primary fibroblasts. In contrast, dFib cells have reduced expression of the scar tissue markers αSMA, Collagen 3, and MMP-1. Further, dFib cells close scratch defects more quickly than primary dermal fibroblasts (32 ± 12.85 hours vs 64 ± 13.85 hours, P < 0.01) in a scratch test assay. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that fibroblasts newly differentiated from human ASCs migrate well and produce a robust ECM, the combination of which may contribute to improved wound healing, and thus should be further investigated.

Identification of a mesenchymal progenitor cell hierarchy in adipose tissue.

Metabolic health depends on the capacity of adipose tissue progenitor cells to undergo de novo adipogenesis. The cellular hierarchy and mechanisms governing adipocyte progenitor differentiation are incompletely understood. Through single-cell RNA sequence analyses, we show that the lineage hierarchy of adipocyte progenitors consists of distinct mesenchymal cell types that are present in both mouse and human adipose tissues. Cells marked by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4)/CD26 expression are highly proliferative, multipotent progenitors. During the development of subcutaneous adipose tissue in mice, these progenitor cells give rise to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1)/CD54-expressing (CD54+) committed preadipocytes and a related adipogenic cell population marked by Clec11a and F3/CD142 expression. Transforming growth factor-ß maintains DPP4+ cell identity and inhibits adipogenic commitment of DPP4+ and CD142+ cells. Notably, DPP4+ progenitors reside in the reticular interstitium, a recently appreciated fluid-filled space within and between tissues, including adipose depots.

Dynamics of hyaluronic acid fillers formulated to maintain natural facial expression.

BACKGROUND: Subjects seeking facial rejuvenation want the results to appear natural. Currently, however, there is no consensus definition of, or assessment scale for, "naturalness." AIMS: This open-label pilot study explored evaluation techniques and criteria to assess naturalness of facial movement and expression following optimal bilateral correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds and marionette lines with soft-tissue hyaluronic acid fillers formulated with XpresHAn Technology™. METHODS: Primary efficacy was investigator assessed naturalness of dynamic expressions using baseline and Day 42 posttreatment 2D video. Other evaluations included investigator assessed naturalness using static images, wrinkle severity, investigator and subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale assessments, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty Caucasian females (41-65 years) received either Restylane® Refyne, Restylane® Defyne or both. Naturalness of dynamic expressions was at least maintained in all subjects. Naturalness of static expressions was not negatively affected in most subjects (96.7%). For dynamic expressions, 83.3% of subjects showed enhanced attractiveness, younger appearance and maintained naturalness. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nasolabial folds and marionette lines improved significantly based on severity and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, with high subject satisfaction and favorable safety profile. Based on subject satisfaction and investigator assessments, using highly flexible hyaluronic acid dermal fillers did not compromise naturalness of lower facial expressions while achieving the desired improvements in attractiveness and youthfulness. The preliminary results obtained in this pilot study suggest that dynamic and static assessments of facial animation may aid the evaluation of natural outcomes in facial rejuvenation procedures.

Ageism and Health in Patients Undergoing Cosmetic Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Ageism is a common form of prejudice that negatively affects the health of older adults. Anti-aging procedures are increasingly popular among patients seeking aesthetic surgery and minimally invasive treatments. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the prevalence of age-based discrimination, and its relationship to health, among patients seeking cosmetic procedures. METHODS: Patients from a university-based, single-surgeon, aesthetic plastic surgery clinic completed the Everyday Discrimination Scale, which assesses the frequency with which individuals have experienced "microaggressions" and the main reason(s) for discrimination (including age). Participants also completed: measures of perceived age discrimination across interpersonal, romantic, work, and healthcare contexts and anticipation of age-based discrimination in the future; a single-item measure of self-rated health (rated 1-5); and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. RESULTS: Fifty patients consented to participate in the study (94% women, 78% white, mean age 49.4 ± 13.5 years). More than 30% of participants reported age as the main reason for everyday discrimination. Participants who reported experiencing age-based discrimination, compared with those who did not, had worse self-rated health, lower self-esteem, and greater anticipated age-based discrimination. Participants most frequently endorsed experiencing age-based discrimination in an interpersonal context (36.0%) followed by work settings (20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of patients seeking cosmetic procedures may experience age-based discrimination, which could negatively affect their health and well-being. Patients might benefit from expectation management about how their procedure may or may not address their concerns about age-based discrimination. More research is needed to determine whether cosmetic procedures help to mitigate discrimination in aging patients.