Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Saudi J Anaesth ; 18(1): 70-76, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313701

RESUMEN

Background: Activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and inflammatory processes are common forms of stress response. The increased stress response is associated with a higher chance of complications. Open hearth surgery is one of the procedures with a high-stress response. Pectointercostal fascial block (PIFB), as a new pain management option in sternotomy, has the potential to modulate the stress response. Objective: To determine the effect of PIFB on stress response in open heart surgery. Methods: This study was a Randomized Controlled Trial on 40 open heart surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, control (20 patients) and PIFB (20 patients). Primary parameters included basal and postoperative TNF-α, basal and post sternotomy ACTH, and basal, 0, and 24 hours postoperative NLR. Secondary parameters include the amount of opioid use, length of the post-operative ventilator, length of ICU stay, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperative. Results: The PIFB group had a decrease in ACTH levels with an average change that was not significantly different from the control group (-57.71 ± 68.03 vs. -129.78 ± 140.98). The PIFB group had an average change in TNFα levels and an average increase in NLR 0 hours postoperative that was not significantly lower than the control group (TNFα: -0.52 ± 1.31 vs. 0.54 ± 1.76; NLR: 12.80 ± 3.51 vs. 14.82 ± 4.23). PIFB significantly reduced the amount of opioid use during surgery, NRS at 6, 12, and 24 hours, and the length of post-operative ventilator use (P < 0.05, CI: 95%). Conclusion: PIFB has a good role in reducing the stress response of open heart surgery and producing good clinical outcomes.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0290964, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indonesia's national response to COVID-19 evolved rapidly throughout 2020. Understanding pandemic response and outcomes is crucial for better mitigation strategies ahead. This study describes the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to ICU during the early stages of the pandemic. METHODS: This is a multi-centre prospective observational study including patients from twelve collaborating hospitals in Indonesia. All patients were clinically suspected or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases admitted to ICU between January 2020 and March 2021. The primary outcome was monthly ICU mortality. Descriptive statistics of patient characteristics and treatment were generated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: From 559 subjects, the overall mortality was 68% and decreased over the study period, while the mortality of patients that received mechanical ventilation was 92%, consistently high over the study period. Fatal cases showed 2- and 4-day delays from symptoms onset to hospital admissions and ICU admissions, respectively. Evidence-backed approaches which could influence patient outcome, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prone positioning, renal replacement therapy, and neuromuscular blockade were scarcely administered. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate of COVID-19 patients in Indonesia was extremely high during the first major outbreak of disease, particularly in those mechanically ventilated. Delayed admission and unavailability of evidence-based approaches due to high burden on health facility during COVID-19 crisis could be addressed by efficient public health measures and enhancing health infrastructure to improve the future pandemic response.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal Continuo , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Brotes de Enfermedades
3.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 29(8): 717-728, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653154

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the benefit of methylene blue as an adjunct treatment by assessing hemodynamic, morbidity rate, intensive care unit length of stay, and mortality rate outcomes in adult patients with vasoplegic syndrome. METHODS: A systematic search through electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Medline for studies assessing the use of methylene blue in patients with vasoplegic syndrome compared to control treatments. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool was used for observational studies, and Jadad Scale was used for controlled trials to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: This systematic review included six studies for qualitative synthesis and five studies for quantitative synthesis. Pooled analysis revealed that mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, heart rate, and hospital stay were not statistically significant in methylene blue administration compared to control. However, administration of methylene blue in vasoplegic syndrome patients significantly reduces renal failure (OR = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.08-0.75), development of multiple organ failure (OR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.02-0.51), and mortality rate (OR = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03-0.46). CONCLUSION: Adjunct administration of methylene blue for vasoplegic syndrome patients significantly reduces renal failure, multiple organ failure, and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Vasoplejía , Adulto , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Azul de Metileno , Resistencia Vascular , Vasoplejía/diagnóstico , Vasoplejía/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoplejía/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...