Altered serum concentrations of IL-8, IL-32 and IL-10 in patients with lung impairment 6 months after COVID-19.

Post-COVID symptoms are reported in 10-35 % of patients not requiring hospitalization, and in up to 80 % of hospitalized patients and patients with severe disease. The pathogenesis of post-COVID syndrome remains largely unknown. Some evidence suggests that prolonged inflammation has a key role in the pathogenesis of most post-COVID manifestations. We evaluated a panel of inflammatory and immune-mediated cytokines in individuals with altered HRCT features and in patients without any long-term COVID symptoms. Blood samples of 89 adult patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 were collected and stratified as patients with and without HRCT evidence of fibrotic lung alterations. Serum analyte concentrations of IL-4, IL-2, CXCL10 (IP-10), IL-1ß, TNF-α, CCL2 (MCP-1), IL-17A, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p70 and TGF-ß1 (free active form) were quantified by bead-based multiplex assay. Clinical and functional data were recorded in a database. With the use of machine learning approach, IL-32, IL-8, and IL-10 proved to be associated with the development of HRCT evidence of lung sequelae at follow-up. Direct comparison of cytokine levels in the two groups showed increased levels of IL-32 and decreased levels of IL-8 in patients with lung impairment. After further stratification of patients by severity (severe versus mild/moderate) during hospitalization, IL-10 emerged as the only cytokine showing decreased levels in severe patients. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the immune response and potential prognostic markers in patients with lung sequelae after COVID-19.

Predictive Role of Cytokine and Adipokine Panel in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Evaluation of Disease Severity, Survival and Lung Sequelae.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may determine a multisystemic chronic syndrome after resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a significant percentage of patients. Persistent cytokine dysregulation can contribute to long-lasting inflammation and tissue damage, resulting in the diverse, often debilitating symptoms experienced by some patients (so-called long COVID syndrome). The aim of our study was to evaluate the value of a panel of serum biomarkers of severity and prognosis in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and also as predictive factors for the development of post-COVID lung sequelae after discharge from the hospital. All blood sampling was performed in the first 24 h after admission to the hospital. Serum analyte concentrations of IL-4, IL-2, CXCL10 (IP-10), IL-1ß, TNF-α, CCL2 (MCP-1), IL-17A, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p70 and TGF-ß1 were quantified by bead-based multiplex LEGENDplex™ analysis and commercially available ELISA kits. A total of 108 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study. Comparative analysis of these proteins showed higher levels of TGF-ß and IL-6 and lower levels of RBP-4 and IL-10 in the severe group. Age, adiponectin, IL-8 and IL-32 resulted as the best predictors for survival. Moreover, IL-1ß, IL17A, TNF-α, TGF-ß, IL-4 and IL-6 were significantly higher in patients who showed HRCT evidence of fibrotic interstitial alterations at follow-up than patients who did not. The initial inflammatory status of patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19, as reflected by the present panel of adipose tissue-related biomarkers and cytokines, offered insights into medium-term prognosis.

Exploring the Interaction between Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Biologic Treatment in Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a biomarker of airway inflammation associated with airway hyper-responsiveness and type-2 inflammation. Its role in the management of severe asthmatic patients undergoing biologic treatment, as well as FeNO dynamics during biologic treatment, is largely unexplored. PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate published data contributing to the following areas: (1) FeNO as a predictive biomarker of response to biologic treatment; (2) the influence of biologic treatment in FeNO values; (3) FeNO as a biomarker for the prediction of exacerbations in patients treated with biologics. METHODS: The systematic search was conducted on the Medline database through the Pubmed search engine, including all studies from 2009 to the present. RESULTS: Higher baseline values of FeNO are associated with better clinical control in patients treated with omalizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. FeNO dynamics during biologic treatment highlights a clear reduction in FeNO values in patients treated with anti-IL4/13 and anti-IL13, as well as in patients treated with tezepelumab. During the treatment, FeNO may help to predict clinical worsening and to differentiate eosinophilic from non-eosinophilic exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline FeNO levels appear to be associated with a greater benefit in terms of clinical control and reduction of exacerbation rate, while FeNO dynamics during biologic treatment remains a largely unexplored issue since few studies have investigated it as a primary outcome. FeNO remains detectable during biologic treatment, but its potential utility as a biomarker of clinical control is still unclear and represents an interesting research area to be developed.