Duke Activity Status Index and Liver Frailty Index predict mortality in ambulatory patients with advanced chronic liver disease: A prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: There remains a lack of consensus on how to assess functional exercise capacity and physical frailty in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD) being assessed for liver transplantation (LT). Aim To investigate prospectively the utility of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Liver Frailty Index (LFI) in ambulatory patients with CLD. AIM: To investigate prospectively the utility of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Liver Frailty Index (LFI) in ambulatory patients with CLD. METHODS: We recruited patients from outpatient clinics at University Hospitals Birmingham, UK (2018-2019). We prospectively collated the DASI and LFI to identify the prevalence of, respectively, functional capacity and physical frailty, and to evaluate their accuracy in predicting overall and pre-LT mortality. RESULTS: We studied 307 patients (57% male; median age 54 years; UKELD 52). Median DASI score was 28.7 (IQR 16.2-50.2), mean LFI was 3.82 (SD = 0.72), and 81% were defined either 'pre-frail' or 'frail'. Female sex and hyponatraemia were significant independent predictors of both DASI and LFI. Age and encephalopathy were significant independent predictors of LFI, while BMI significantly predicted DASI. DASI and LFI were significantly related to overall (HR 0.97, p = 0.001 [DASI], HR 2.04, p = 0.001 [LFI]) and pre-LT mortality (HR 0.96, p = 0.02 [DASI], HR 1.94, p = 0.04 [LFI]). CONCLUSIONS: Poor functional exercise capacity and physical frailty are highly prevalent among ambulatory patients with CLD who are being assessed for LT. The DASI and LFI are simple, low-cost tools that predict overall and pre-LT mortality. Implementation of both should be considered in all outpatients with CLD to highlight those who may benefit from targeted nutritional and exercise interventions.

Addressing extreme size mismatch in pediatric intestinal transplantation: Outcomes of intestinal length reduction.

BACKGROUND: Bench liver reduction, with or without intestinal length reduction (LR) (coupled with delayed closure and abdominal wall prostheses), has been a strategy adopted by our program for small children due to the limited availability of size-matched donors. This report describes the short, medium, and long-term outcomes of this graft reduction strategy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis of children that underwent intestinal transplantation (April 1993 to December 2020) was performed. Patients were grouped according to whether they received an intestinal graft of full length (FL) or following LR. RESULTS: Overall, 105 intestinal transplants were performed. The LR group (n = 10) was younger (14.5 months vs. 40.0 months, p = .012) and smaller (8.7 kg vs. 13.0 kg, p = .032) compared to the FL group (n = 95). Similar abdominal closure rates were achieved after LR, without any increase in abdominal compartment syndrome (1/10 vs. 7/95, p = .806). The 90-day graft and patient survival were similar (9/10, 90% vs. 83/95, 86%; p = .810). Medium and long-term graft survival at 1 year (8/10, 80% vs. 65/90, 71%; p = .599), and 5 years (5/10, 50% vs. 42/84, 50%; p = 1.00) was similar. CONCLUSION: LR of intestinal grafts appears to be a safe strategy for infants and small children requiring intestinal transplantation. This technique should be considered in the situation of significant size mismatch of intestine containing grafts.

Long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation using organ donation after circulatory death: Comparison between full and reduced grafts.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of donors' livers for pediatric recipients inspired the search for alternatives including donation after cardiac death (DCD). METHODS: Retrospective review of pediatric liver transplant (PLT) using DCD grafts. Patients were divided into either FLG or RLG recipients. Pre-transplant recipient parameters, donor parameters, operative parameters, post-transplant recipient parameters, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 14 PLTs from DCD donors between 2005 and 2018 were identified; 9 FLG and 5 RLG. All donors were Maastricht category III. Cold ischemia time was significantly longer in RLG (8.2 h vs. 6.2 h; p = .038). Recipients of FLG were significantly older (180 months vs. 7 months; p = .012) and waited significantly longer (168 days vs. 22 days; p = .012). Recipients of RLG tended to be sicker in the immediate pre-transplant period and this was reflected by the need for respiratory or renal support. There was no significant difference between groups regarding long-term complications. Three patients in each group survived more than 5 year post-transplant. One child was re-transplanted in the RLG due to portal vein thrombosis but failed to survive after re-transplant. One child from FLG also died from a non-graft-related cause. CONCLUSIONS: Selected DCD grafts are an untapped source to widen the donor pool, especially for sick recipients. In absence of agreed criteria, graft and recipient selection for DCD grafts should be undertaken with caution.