RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metastatic spinal tumors represent 90% of spinal masses and present variably with slow progression and/or rapid symptomatic worsening. Several prognostic scoring systems have been proposed. However, patients presenting acutely and requiring emergent surgery represent a unique subset of patients with different prognostic indicators. METHODS: All cases of symptomatic spinal metastases requiring emergent surgery between 2010 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Survival time from date of surgery to death or last follow-up was calculated. Patients were stratified on the basis of survival for more or less than 6 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting probability of mortality at 6 months. RESULTS: Forty-four patients satisfied inclusion criteria. Mean age at presentation was 60.4 ± 11.8 years with a median survival time of 6.5 [1.9-19.5 interquartile range] months. On univariate analysis, higher Tokuhashi score, Karnofksy performance scale (KPS), and lower modified McCormick scale were significantly associated with 6-month survival (P = 0.018, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Preoperative American Spinal Injury Association grade and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score scores were not associated with survival. Multivariate analysis found KPS significantly correlated with survival (0.91 odds ratio, 0.85-0.98, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.011) at 6 months and that a stepwise regression model derived from KPS and Tokuhashi score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for 6-month survival (area under the curve = 0.843, Akaike information criterion = 37.1, P = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS: KPS and Tokuhashi scores most strongly correlated with 6-month survival in patients presenting with acutely symptomatic spinal metastases. These findings underscore the importance of baseline functional status and overall tumor burden on survival and may be useful in preoperative evaluation and surgical decision making for acutely presenting spinal metastases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pronóstico , Descompresión QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of perioperative evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon on outcomes after severe open-globe injury (OGI). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study. SUBJECTS: Open-globe injury cohorts from 2 academic United States ophthalmology departments with disparate OGI management protocols and vitreoretinal referral patterns. METHODS: Patients with severe OGI (presenting visual acuity [VA] of counting fingers or worse) from the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) were compared with patients with severe OGI from the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI). At UIHC, almost all cases of OGI were repaired by anterior segment surgeons, with postoperative vitreoretinal referral at the surgeon's discretion. In contrast, at BPEI, all OGIs were both repaired and managed postoperatively by a vitreoretinal surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of vitreoretinal surgeon evaluation, rate of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (either primary or secondary), and VA at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 74 subjects from UIHC and 72 subjects from BPEI met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences in preoperative VA or rates of vitreoretinal pathology. The rate of vitreoretinal surgeon evaluation was 100% at BPEI and 65% at UIHC (P < 0.001), and the rate of PPV was 71% at BPEI and 40% at UIHC (P < 0.001). Median VA at the last follow-up in the BPEI cohort was 1.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (interquartile range [IQR], 0.53-2.30, corresponding to a Snellen VA of â¼ 20/500) compared with a median VA of 2.70 logMAR (IQR, 0.93-2.92, corresponding to a Snellen VA of light perception) in the UIHC cohort (P = 0.031). Overall, 68% of patients in the BPEI cohort had an improvement in VA from presentation to last follow-up versus 43% in the UIHC cohort (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Automatic perioperative evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon was associated with a higher rate of PPV and improved visual outcomes. Prompt evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon, either preoperatively or in the early postoperative period, should be considered, when logistically feasible, in severe OGIs because PPV is frequently indicated and may result in significant visual improvement. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vitrectomía , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes after open-globe injury (OGI) with those predicted by the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS), and to investigate the effect of treatment with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients presenting with OGI to an academic United States ophthalmology department from 2017 to 2020. METHODS: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measurements at the most recent follow-up were compared with final VA predicted by the OTS, based on preoperative injury characteristics. The most recently measured VA of patients treated with PPV during initial OGI repair (primary PPV group) was compared with patients treated with PPV after initial OGI repair (secondary PPV group) and patients never treated with PPV (No PPV group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected VA in the injured eye at last follow-up; secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage at any time, occurrence of retinal detachment at any time, rates of additional surgery, and rates of enucleation. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-three subjects with OGI were identified and analyzed. The overall rate of PPV was 32%. Predictors of worse VA at last follow-up included older age (P = 0.047) and worse presenting VA (P < 0.001). Visual acuity outcomes for eyes in OTS categories 2 to 5 did not significantly differ from OTS predictions. However, eyes in OTS category 1 had a higher likelihood of last follow-up VA of light perception (LP) to hand motion (46% in the study cohort vs. 15% predicted by the OTS, P = 0.004) and a lower likelihood of no LP (33% vs. 74%, P < 0.001). The secondary PPV group had the worst VA at presentation among the 3 groups (P = 0.016), but VA at last follow-up did not significantly differ between the study groups (P = 0.338). CONCLUSIONS: The most severe OGIs (i.e., OTS category 1) had better visual outcomes than predicted by the published OTS expectations, and secondary PPV was associated with significant visual improvement despite poor prognostic predictions. Evaluation by a vitreoretinal surgeon should be considered for all patients with severe OGI, especially those in OTS category 1. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Lesiones Oculares/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Investigate whether the incidence of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing spinal fusion surgery is associated with postoperative muscle relaxant administration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Baclofen and cyclobenzaprine are muscle relaxants frequently used for pain management following spine surgery. Muscle relaxants are known to cause central nervous system side effects in the outpatient setting and are relatively contraindicated in individuals at high risk for delirium. However, there are no known studies investigating their side effects in the postoperative setting. METHODS: Patients over 65 years of age who underwent elective posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease were stratified into two treatment groups based on whether postoperative muscle relaxants were administered on postoperative day one as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. Doubly robust inverse probability weighting with cox regression for time-dependent covariates was used to examine the association between postoperative muscle relaxant use and the risk of delirium while controlling for variation in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence of delirium was 17.6% in the 250 patients who received postoperative muscle relaxants compared with 7.9% in the 280 patients who did not receive muscle relaxants ( P=0.001 ). Multivariate analysis to control for variation in baseline characteristics between treatment groups found that patients who received muscle relaxants had a 2.00 (95% CI: 1.14-3.49) times higher risk of delirium compared with controls ( P=0.015 ). CONCLUSION: Postoperative use of muscle relaxants as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen was associated with an increased risk of delirium in older adults after lumber fusion surgery. Although muscle relaxants may be beneficial in select patients, they should be used with caution in individuals at high risk for postoperative delirium.
Asunto(s)
Baclofeno , Delirio del Despertar , Anciano , Humanos , Baclofeno/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Delirio del Despertar/inducido químicamente , Delirio del Despertar/complicaciones , Músculos/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a popular nonopioid pain intervention. However, the treatment failure rate for SCS remains significantly high and many of these patients have poor sagittal spinopelvic balance, which has been found to correlate with increased pain and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to determine if poor sagittal alignment is correlated with SCS treatment failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative retrospective analysis was performed between two cohorts of patients who had undergone SCS placement, those who had either subsequent removal of their SCS system (representing a treatment failure cohort) and those that underwent generator replacement (representing a successful treatment cohort). The electronic medical record was used to collect demographic and surgical characteristics, which included radiographic measurements of lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Also included were data on pain medication usage including opioid and nonopioid therapies. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met inclusion criteria, 31 had complete removal, and 50 had generator replacements. Measurement of sagittal balance parameters demonstrated that many patients had poor alignment, with 34 outside normal range for LL (10 vs 24 in removal and replacement cohorts, respectively), 30 for PI (12 [38.7%] vs 18 [36.0%]), 46 for PT (18 [58.1%] vs 28 [56.0%]), 38 for SS (18 [58.1%] vs 20 [40.0%]), and 39 for PI-LL mismatch (14 [45.2%] vs 25 [50.0%]). There were no significant differences in sagittal alignment parameters between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective cohort analysis of SCS patients did not demonstrate any relationship between poor sagittal alignment and failure of SCS therapy. Further studies of larger databases should be performed to determine how many patients ultimately go on to have additional structural spinal surgery after failure of SCS and whether or not those patients go on to have positive outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Lordosis , Vértebras Lumbares , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Dolor/prevención & control , Pelvis , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Médula Espinal , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify perioperative risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) in patients aged 65 or older undergoing lumbar spinal fusion procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion over an approximately three-year period at a single institution. Demographic and perioperative data were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative delirium assayed by the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data. RESULTS: Of the 702 patients included in the study, 173 (24.6%) developed POD. Our analysis revealed that older age (p < 0.001), lower preoperative hemoglobin (p < 0.001), and higher ASA status (p < 0.001), were significant preoperative risk factors for developing POD. The only significant intraoperative risk factor was a higher number of spinal levels that were instrumented (p < 0.001). Higher pain scores on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), and lower postoperative hemoglobin (p < 0.001) were associated with increased POD; as were ICU admission (p < 0.001) and increased length of ICU stay (p < 0.001). Patients who developed POD had a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) with lower rates of discharge to home as opposed to an inpatient facility (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for POD in older adults undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery include advanced age, diabetes, lower preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin, higher ASA grade, greater extent of surgery, and higher postoperative pain scores. Patients with delirium had a higher incidence of postoperative ICU admission, increased length of stay, decreased likelihood of discharge to home and increased mortality, all consistent with prior studies. Further studies may determine whether adequate management of anemia and pain lead to a reduction in the incidence of postoperative delirium in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Fusión Vertebral , Anciano , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/etiología , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the reoperation rate and cervical sagittal alignment of patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical sagittal balance has been correlated with postoperative clinical outcomes. Previous studies have shown worse postoperative sagittal alignment and higher reoperation rates in patients with high BMI undergoing anterior decompression and fusion. Similar evidence for the impact of obesity in postoperative sagittal alignment for patients with (CSM) undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 198 patients who underwent PCF for cervical myelopathy due to degenerative spine disease was performed. Demographics, need for reoperation, and perioperative radiographic parameters were collected. Cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope (T1S) was measured on standing lateral radiographs. Comparative analysis of the patient cohort was performed by stratifying the sample population into three BMI categories (<25, 25-30, ≥30). RESULT: Of the 198 patients that met inclusion criteria, 53 had BMI normal (<25), 65 were overweight (25-30), and 80 were obese (≥30). Mean SVA increased postoperatively in all groups, 4 mm in the normal group, 13 mm in the overweight group, and 13 mm in the obese group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the postoperative change of cervical lordosis or T1 slope between the groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated fusions involving the cervicothoracic junction and those involving 5 or more levels significantly affected alignment parameters. There were 27 complications requiring reoperation (14%) with no significant differences among the groups stratified by BMI (p = 0.386). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight patients (BMI>25) with CSM undergoing PCF had a greater increase in SVA than normal weight patients while reoperation rates were similar. In addition, preoperative CL increased with increasing BMI, although this trend was not Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation significant and there was not found to be a significant difference between the change in CL from baseline to post-fusion between BMI cohorts. This study further highlights the importance of considering BMI when attempting to optimize sagittal alignment in patients undergoing PCF.