Increasing and sustaining blood-borne virus screening in Spain and Portugal throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-center quality improvement intervention.

Background: Around 57,000 people in Spain and Portugal currently living with HIV or chronic hepatitis C are unaware of their infection. The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted screening efforts for these infections. We designed an intervention to increase and sustain opportunistic blood-borne virus (BBV) screening and linkage to care (SLTC) by implementing the TEST model. Methods: The Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) method of quality improvement (QI) was implemented in 8 healthcare organizations (HCOs), including four hospitals, two clusters of community health centers, and two community-based organizations (CBOs). Baseline assessment included a review of BBV SLTC practices, testing volume, and results 12 months before the intervention. Changes in BBV testing rates over time were measured before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020. A mixed ANOVA model was used to analyze the possible effect on testing volumes among HCOs over the three study periods. Intervention: BBV testing was integrated into normal clinical flow in all HCOs using existing clinical infrastructure and staff. Electronic health record (EHR) systems were modified whenever possible to streamline screening processes, implement systemic institutional policy changes, and promote QI. Results: Two years after the launch of the intervention in screening practices, testing volumes increased by 116%, with formal healthcare settings recording larger increases than CBOs. The start of the COVID-19 lockdowns was accompanied by a global 60% decrease in testing in all HCOs. Screening emergency department patients or using EHR systems to automate screening showed the highest resilience and lowest reduction in testing. HCOs recovered 77% of their testing volume once the lockdowns were lifted, with CBOs making the fullest recovery. Globally, enhanced screening techniques enabled HCOs to diagnose a total of 1,860 individuals over the research period. Conclusions: Implementation of the TEST model enabled HCOs to increase and sustain BBV screening, even during COVID-19 lockdowns. Although improvement in screening was noted in all HCOs, additional work is needed to develop strong patient linkage to care models in challenging times, such as global pandemics.

Introducción a los antisépticos / Introduction to antiseptics

Los antisépticos son agentes antiinfecciosos de uso local sobre piel o mucosas, lo cual los distingue de los desinfectantes, que se usan sobre superficies inanimadas, debido normalmente a su toxicidad. En este capítulo explicamos las diferencias entre los múltiples posibles antisépticos, prestando especial atención a los más comunes como el alcohol, la clorhexidina, la povidona yodada y el agua oxigenada. Finalmente hacemos hincapié en las diferentes formulaciones de los antisépticos, que los hacen más útiles para indicaciones determinadas

Antiseptics are anti-infectious agents for local use on the skin or mucosa, which distinguishes them from disinfectants, which are used on inanimate surfaces usually because of their toxicity. The present article explains the differences among the multiple possible antiseptics; special attention is paid to the most common, such as alcohol, chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and oxygenated water. Finally, we stress the different antiseptic formulations, which increase the usefulness of these agents in specific indications

Uso de los antisépticos en atención primaria / Antiseptic use in primary care

Las heridas se pueden clasificar, según el mecanismo de acción, en quirúrgicas o traumáticas (que pueden ser incisas, como las provocadas por un objeto cortante; contusas, causadas por un objeto romo; punzantes, provocadas por objetos afilados y largos; por desgarro, causadas por tracción de los tejidos; por mordedura, que tienen alto riesgo de infección, por lo que no se deben suturar) o, por la evolución del proceso de cicatrización, en agudas o crónicas (úlceras por presión, úlceras vasculares, úlceras neuropáticas, heridas agudas con tórpida evolución). El empleo de antisépticos en cualquiera de los casos suele estar limitado a la limpieza y cuidados iniciales (48-72 h) y al lavado de manos e instrumental, y su uso en heridas crónicas o cronificadas es más discutible. En el caso de quemaduras sucede lo mismo, y es más recomendable el empleo de formulaciones que favorezcan la hidratación. En población pediátrica se suele recomendar el empleo de antisépticos con un perfil de seguridad conocido y baja absorción, especialmente en el caso del cuidado del cordón umbilical, donde la evidencia recomienda el empleo de gluconato de clorhexidina. Otro uso de los antisépticos es el cuidado de heridas producidas por la implantación de objetos dentro de la estética corporal (piercing y similares), siendo recomendable el empleo de antisépticos transparentes que permitan observar la evolución de la técnica

Wounds can be classified according to their mechanism of action into surgical or traumatic (which may be incision wounds, such as those provoked by a sharp object; contusions, caused by a blunt force; puncture wounds, caused by long, sharp objects; lacerations, caused by tears to the tissue; or bites, which have a high risk of infection and consequently should not be sutured). Wounds can also be classified by their healing process into acute or chronic (pressure ulcers, vascular ulcers, neuropathic ulcers, acute wounds with torpid clinical course). The use of antiseptics in any of these wounds is usually limited to cleaning and initial care -up to 48 hours- and to washing of hands and instruments. The use of antiseptics in chronic or persistent wounds is more debatable. The same is true of burns, in which the use of formulations that encourage hydration is recommended. In the pediatric population, the use of antiseptics with a known safety profile and low absorption is usually recommended, especially in the care of the umbilical cord, in which evidence supports the use of chlorhexidine gluconate. Another use of antiseptics is the care of wounds produced by procedures used in body esthetics, such as piercings; in these procedures, it is advisable to use transparent antiseptics that allow visualization of the technique

Consejos para pacientes / Patient advice

En el cuidado de las heridas es tan importante saber qué hacer como saber qué no hacer. Lo primero es valorar la gravedad de la lesión y saber si es necesario acudir a un centro sanitario o no. Si la herida es simple, lo más recomendable es hacer una buena limpieza con suero o agua tras lavado de manos, realizando la desinfección de esta con el antiséptico más adecuado. Los antisépticos no deben usarse para la limpieza de las heridas (usar suero fisiológico o agua del grifo) ni para la cura de heridas con tejido de granulación. No hay que usarlos en el oído o cerca de los ojos; en caso de aplicación accidental en el ojo lavar abundantemente con agua. No usar povidona yodada en gestantes, ni utilizar preparados yodados en neonatos, en pacientes con alteraciones del tiroides o en alérgicos al yodo. Hoy en día, tampoco se debe usar la merbromina/mercurocromo a causa de su contenido en mercurio. Antes de usar un antiséptico han de eliminarse todos los residuos inorgánicos (cuerpos extraños) y los orgánicos desvitalizados, detritus, esfacelos, exudado purulento, escaras, etc. Esta acción facilitará la cicatrización y la acción de los antisépticos, ya que se inactivan en presencia de materia orgánica

In wound care, knowing what to do is as important as knowing what not to do. The first step is to evaluate the severity of the lesion and to know whether it is necessary to attend a health center or not. If the wound is simple, the recommended course of action is cleansing with serum or water after washing one's hands, followed by wound disinfection with the most appropriate antiseptic. Antiseptics not should be used for wound cleansing (physiological serum or tap water should be used) or for wound healing with granulation tissue. Equally, antiseptics should not be used in the ear or near the eyes; if there is accidental application, the eye should be washed in abundant water. Povidone iodine should not be used in pregnant women, nor should iodine preparations be used in neonates, in patients with thyroid alterations or in those allergic to iodine. Currently, merbromine/mercurochrome is not used because of its mercury content. Before an antiseptic is applied, all inorganic residues (foreign bodies) and dead tissue should be removed; detritus, slough, purulent exudate, scabs… This will aid healing and the action of antiseptics, since they become inactive in the presence of organic material

HIV testing and counselling for migrant populations living in high-income countries: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The barriers to HIV testing and counselling that migrants encounter can jeopardize proactive HIV testing that relies on the fact that HIV testing must be linked to care. We analyse available evidence on HIV testing and counselling strategies targeting migrants and ethnic minorities in high-income countries. METHODS: Systematic literature review of the five main databases of articles in English from Europe, North America and Australia between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS: Of 1034 abstracts, 37 articles were selected. Migrants, mainly from HIV-endemic countries, are at risk of HIV infection and its consequences. The HIV prevalence among migrants is higher than the general population's, and migrants have higher frequency of delayed HIV diagnosis. For migrants from countries with low HIV prevalence and for ethnic minorities, socio-economic vulnerability puts them at risk of acquiring HIV. Migrants have specific legal and administrative impediments to accessing HIV testing-in some countries, undocumented migrants are not entitled to health care-as well as cultural and linguistic barriers, racism and xenophobia. Migrants and ethnic minorities fear stigma from their communities, yet community acceptance is key for well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Migrants and ethnic minorities should be offered HIV testing, but the barriers highlighted in this review may deter programs from achieving the final goal, which is linking migrants and ethnic minorities to HIV clinical care under the public health perspective.

Trabajando con nuestros pacientes fumadores en atención primaria. Un análisis de coste-efectividad / Working with our smoker patients in primary care. Analysis of cost-effectiveness

Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar una evaluación económica de las intervenciones sobre tabaquismo en atención primaria. Diseño: Análisis de coste-efectividad (ACE) comparando 2 estrategias de intervención: intensiva y breve. Emplazamiento: Pacientes de una consulta de medicina de familia en un centro de salud (CS) periurbano. Participantes: Todas las historias con etiqueta de fumadores; 235 y 37 en el grupo de intervención breve e intensiva, respectivamente. Intervenciones: La intervención breve (IB) se realizó en el contexto de otro motivo de consulta (1-5 min). La intervención intensiva (II) fue exclusivamente para tabaquismo (10-15 min). Mediciones principales: Los datos de efectividad son obtenidos de la evaluación de la intervención sobre los fumadores de dicha consulta después de 6 años. Empleamos costes sanitarios directos. Excluimos fármacos, costes no sanitarios e indirectos. Aplicamos la tasa de coste-efectividad incremental (ICER) de las intervenciones breve, intensiva y total (breve + intensiva), comparando no intervenir con cada tipo de intervención e II respecto a la IB y análisis probabilístico para tratar la incertidumbre. Resultados: El coste por paciente abstinente, globalmente, fue 406,74 €. Para la IB fue de 129,83 € y para la II, 1.034,99 €. ICER intervención total=498,87 €/paciente que deja de fumar. ICER IB=235,32 €/paciente que deja de fumar. ICER II=1.232,85 €/paciente que deja de fumar. ICER II/IB=7.772,25 €/paciente que deja de fumar. Conclusiones: Las intervenciones sobre tabaquismo en AP son eficientes. Una propuesta para el abordaje del tabaquismo en AP, desde una perspectiva coste-efectiva, podría ser la IB sobre todos los fumadores e II sobre aquellos con más dificultad para abandonar(AU)

Objective: The aim of this work is to realize an economic evaluation of the smoking interventions in Primary Care (PC). Design: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis comparing two intervention strategies; intensive and brief. Setting: Patients in a general practitioner's list in a peri-urban Health Centre. Participants: All the medical histories labelled as smokers; 235 and 37 in the group of brief and intensive intervention respectively. Interventions: The brief intervention (BI) was made in the context of consultation for another purpose (1-5minutes). The intensive intervention (II) was exclusively for smoking consultation (10-15minutes).Main measurements The effectiveness data are obtained by the evaluation of intervention for smokers, in a general practitioner's list, after 6 years. We employ direct sanitary costs. We exclude drugs, non- sanitary and indirect costs. We apply the valuation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the brief interventions, intensive and total (brief + intensive) to compare not taking part with each type of intervention and II with regard to BI and probabilistic analysis to treat the uncertainty. Results: The total cost per abstinent patient was 406,74 €: 129,83 € for BI and 1.034,99 € for I.I.ICER Total intervention = €498, 87/patient who stops smoking. ICER BI = €235, 32/patient who stops smoking. ICER II=€1.232, 85/patient who stops smoking. ICER II/BI= €7.772,25/patient who stops smoking. Conclusions: Smoking interventions in PC are efficient. A proposal for smoking intervention in PC from an effective cost perspective could be an BI for smokers and an II on those who find more difficult to leave the habit(AU)

All-cause and liver-related mortality in HIV positive subjects compared to the general population: differences by HCV co-infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed at comparing overall and liver-related mortality rates, observed in HIV positive subjects followed-up in the Cohorts of Spanish Network on HIV/AIDS Research stratified by HCV co-infection status, with the expected mortality of the general population of same age and sex in Spain, for the period 1997 - 2008. METHODS: We estimated standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and excess mortality, comparing death rates from our cohort (globally and by HCV co-infection) with death rates from the general population standardized by sex in 5 year-age bands. RESULTS: Overall, 5914 HIV positive subjects were included, 37.3% of which were co-infected with HCV; 231 deaths occurred, 10.4% of which were liver-related. SMR for all causes mortality for the HIV positive subjects was 5.6 (CI 95% 4.9-6.4), 2.4 (1.9-3.1) for HCV negative subjects and 11.5 (9.9-13.4) for HCV positive ones. Having HCV co-infection and AIDS yielded an SMR of 20.8 (16.5-26.1) and having AIDS and being HCV negative had an SMR of 4.8 (3.5-6.7). SMR for liver-related mortality was 1.8 (0.6-5.7) for HCV negative subjects vs. 22.4 (14.6-34.3) for HCV positive ones. Overall, both mortality rates as SMR and excess mortality rates were higher for injecting drug users (IDUs) than men having sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals, patients with AIDS, with and without cART and for subjects included between 1997 and 2003. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excess of all-cause and liver-related mortality in our cohorts compared with the general population. Furthermore, HCV co-infection in HIV positive patients increased the risk of death for both all causes and liver-related causes.

[Working with our smoker patients in primary care. Analysis of cost-effectiveness]. / Trabajando con nuestros pacientes fumadores en atención primaria. Un análisis de coste-efectividad.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to realize an economic evaluation of the smoking interventions in Primary Care (PC). DESIGN: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis comparing two intervention strategies; intensive and brief. SETTING: Patients in a general practitioner's list in a peri-urban Health Centre. PARTICIPANTS: All the medical histories labelled as smokers; 235 and 37 in the group of brief and intensive intervention respectively. INTERVENTIONS: The brief intervention (BI) was made in the context of consultation for another purpose (1-5 minutes). The intensive intervention (II) was exclusively for smoking consultation (10-15 minutes). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The effectiveness data are obtained by the evaluation of intervention for smokers, in a general practitioner's list, after 6 years. We employ direct sanitary costs. We exclude drugs, non- sanitary and indirect costs. We apply the valuation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the brief interventions, intensive and total (brief + intensive) to compare not taking part with each type of intervention and II with regard to BI and probabilistic analysis to treat the uncertainty. RESULTS: The total cost per abstinent patient was 406,74 €: 129,83 € for BI and 1.034,99 € for I.I. ICER Total intervention = €498, 87/patient who stops smoking. ICER BI = €235, 32/patient who stops smoking. ICER II = €1.232, 85/patient who stops smoking. ICER II/BI = €7.772,25/patient who stops smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking interventions in PC are efficient. A proposal for smoking intervention in PC from an effective cost perspective could be an BI for smokers and an II on those who find more difficult to leave the habit.

[Cardiovascular risk in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Spain. CoRIS cohort, 2011]. / Riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en España. Cohorte CoRIS, 2011.

INTRODUCTION: Current information on cardiovascular risk (CVR) in HIV-infected patients in Spain is limited. METHODS: An analysis was made of a prospective multicentre cohort of Spanish HIV-infected patients (CoRIS) between January-2010 and July-2011. CVR was evaluated using Framingham, REGICOR and SCORE equations. RESULTS: The study included 1019 patients (76% males, mean age 40 years) recruited from 13 hospitals belonging to 10 autonomous communities in Spain. Almost two-thirds (65.4%) of patients were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), 36.7% with non-nucleoside analogs, 24% with protease inhibitors (PIs) (52% with atazanavir/r or darunavir/r) and 4,6% with raltegravir. More than half (56.2%) of the patients had an HIV viral load <50 copies/ml. Smoking prevalence was 46%, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) <40mg/dl 36.1%, total cholesterol (total-C) >200mg/dl 27.8%, age >45years 27.2%, metabolic syndrome 11.5%, hypertension 9.4%, cocaine use 7%, and diabetes 2.9%. ART was associated with higher total-C and LDL-C concentrations, although also higher HDL-C and lower total-C/HDL-C ratio; patients receiving PIs boosted with a high ritonavir dose showed higher total-C levels and higher total-C/HDL-C ratio. According to Framingham cardiovascular, and coronary, REGICOR, and SCORE equations, 15.2%, 6.4%, 4.2% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, were classified as having moderate or high CVR. CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected patients from CoRIS, prevalence of modifiable CVR factors is still high. Commonly used scores identify a relatively low number of patients with high CVR.

Association of Patients' Geographic Origins with Viral Hepatitis Co-infection Patterns, Spain.

To determine if hepatitis C virus seropositivity and active hepatitis B virus infection in HIV-positive patients vary with patients' geographic origins, we studied co-infections in HIV-seropositive adults. Active hepatitis B infection was more prevalent in persons from Africa, and hepatitis C seropositivity was more common in persons from eastern Europe.

Transmission of HIV drug resistance and non-B subtype distribution in the Spanish cohort of antiretroviral treatment naïve HIV-infected individuals (CoRIS).

CoRIS is an open multicentre cohort of HIV seroprevalent ARV-naïve subjects who began treatment at 32 Spanish healthcare centres from January 2004. Up to November 2008, a total of 683 FASTA format sequences, encoding the HIV protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) derived from plasma samples at entry into the cohort, had been obtained for examination of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and HIV clade. TDR was found in 8.5% of the patients (4.4% NRTIs, 4% NNRTIs, 2.2% PIs). The most prevalent resistance mutations were: T215 revertants (3.8%), D67NG (1.3%), K219QENR (1.2%) and M41L (1%), for NRTIs; K103N (3.2%), for NNRTIs; I54VLMSAT, M46I and L90M (0.7%), for PIs. Non-B subtypes were recognized in 104 patients (15.2%) and were more common in Sub-Saharan Africans (15/17, 88.2%), Eastern Europeans (7/12, 58.3%) and Northern Africans (8/16, 50%) than among Spaniards (53/479, 11%) (p<0.001). The most prevalent non-B subtype was CRF02_AG (4.4%), followed by subtype D (1.9%), CRF03_AB (1.5%), CRF07_BC and subtype F1 (1%). A trend was observed for the transmission of non-B subtypes to increase and for TDR to decrease.

Sensitivity of seven HIV subtyping tools differs among subtypes/recombinants in the Spanish cohort of naïve HIV-infected patients (CoRIS).

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 group M is classified into 9 subtypes and recombinants (CRFs/URFs). Variants other than subtype B (non-B) cause 90% of infections worldwide. HIV is often subtyped using automated tools instead of the gold-standard phylogenetic analysis. We evaluated the reliability of subtyping tools vs. phylogeny in a panel of HIV-1 pol sequences from the cohort of naïve patients of the HIV/AIDS Spanish Research Network (CoRIS). METHODS: HIV-1 subtyping was performed using seven automated subtyping tools (Stanford, Geno2pheno, Rega, NCBI, EuResist, STAR, TherapyEdge) in HIV-1 pol sequences from 670 CoRIS patients previously subtyped by phylogeny (587 subtype B/83 non-B). Sensitivity with respect to phylogeny was assessed. RESULTS: Most tools correctly classified subtype B, although up to 15% of non-B sequences were wrongly identified as B depending on the tool. For subtype B and CRF02_AG identification, Stanford/NCBI and Geno2pheno/Rega presented the highest/lowest sensitivities, respectively. EuResist and Geno2pheno correctly classified all 13 non-B "pure"subtypes at pol. The efficacy of all subtyping tools dropped clearly when identifying recombinants different from CRF02_AG. Only NCBI05, Rega and STAR identified URF, but with very low sensitivities. NCBI classified the highest number of subtypes B as non-B, and overestimated recombinants, especially when including references of 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Automated tools are useful for subtype B identification, although they present serious limitations in classifying variants uncommon in developed regions, especially recombinants. Their sensitivity depends on the prevalence of non-B variants in the population, and decreases drastically when the frequency of recombinants increases. Furthermore, HIV-1 variant distribution differs according to the tool used.

The epidemiology of HIV and AIDS reports in migrants in the 27 European Union countries, Norway and Iceland: 1999-2006.

BACKGROUND: To describe the epidemiology of HIV and AIDS by geographical origin in the EU, 1999-2006. METHODS: AIDS and HIV cases from the EU 27, Norway and Iceland reported to European Centre for Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS were analysed. RESULTS: Of 75,021 AIDS reports over 1999-2006, 35% were migrants. Of 2988 heterosexual AIDS reports in 2006, 50% were migrants, largely from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), 20% of 1404 AIDS cases in men who have sex with men (MSM) were migrants from Latin-America and Western Europe. Of 57 mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) AIDS cases, 23% were from SSA. AIDS cases decreased from 1999 to 2006 in natives (42%), Western Europeans (40%) and North Africa and Middle East (34%), but increased in people from SSA (by 89%), Eastern Europe (by 200%) and Latin-America (50%). Of 17,646 HIV infections in men and 9066 in females in 2006, 49 and 76% were migrants, largely from SSA. Of 169 MTCT infections, 41% were from SSA. CONCLUSION: Migrants, largely from SSA, represent a considerable proportion of AIDS and HIV reports in EU, especially among heterosexual and MTCT infections. Their contribution is higher among female reports. A substantial percentage of diagnoses in MSM are migrants, largely from Western Europe and Latin-America.

HIV infection and aging.

The median age of HIV-infected patients is increasing all over the world. Age has a significant impact on some aspects of HIV-infection when compared to younger patients. Diagnostic delay and late presentation are more frequent in older patients because some of the initial symptoms are masked by age and because older people are not considered to be a risk group for HIV infection. Despite the clinical, immunological, and virologic benefits of HAART, most studies suggest that older patients have a poorer immunological and clinical response to HAART than younger patients, despite a similar virologic response. Other problems include the frequent presence of comorbid conditions and medications that can affect the efficacy and safety of HAART as well as its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Because no guidelines recommend a specific HAART regimen for older people, specific clinical trials and pharmacological studies should be designed to optimize HAART in these patients.

Spanish experience in autologous chondrocyte implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Ministry of Health commissioned the Galician Agency for Health Technology Assessment to monitor and follow-up Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) used to treat chondral lesions of the knee in Spain. The objective of this monitoring was to assess efficacy and safety of the technique. DESIGN: One-hundred and eleven consecutive patients with knee chondral lesions were included in a multi-center study between January 2001 and January 2005. ACI was used in these patients as a second-line treatment option (or a first-line treatment option if the cause was Osteocondritis dissecans). The Cincinnati score and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were used to assess the patients' self-reported satisfaction with the outcomes of ACI. A descriptive analysis was performed and non-parametric tests were used to establish correlations and compare results among subgroups. A multivariate analysis was also performed to measure the effect of different variables on changes in the condition of the knee. RESULTS: Eighty men (72%) and 31 women (21%) with an age range from 16 to 49 years, underwent ACI surgery. Among these subjects, the most common previous first-line treatment was debridement (64 individuals, 74.4%). The mean size of the lesion treated with ACI was 3.82 cm(2), and the most frequent location of the lesion was the inner femoral condyle (53.6%). The patient satisfaction was high or very high in 36 subjects (66.7%). Overall knee joint assessment improved from 4.32 points to 6.78. All SF-36 questionnaire categories improved, notably those related to physical condition. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that ACI is safe; however, further studies are mandated to assess the efficacy of ACI compared to alternative treatment options.

Decrease in serial prevalence of coinfection with hepatitis C virus among HIV-infected patients in Spain, 1997-2006.

The prevalence of injection drug use decreased from 67.3% in 1997 to 14.5% in 2006 among Spanish patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). A parallel decrease in the prevalence of coinfection with hepatitis C virus was observed, from 73.8% in 1997 to 19.8% in 2006. This steady decrease in the prevalence of coinfection among Spanish patients was caused by a change in transmission routes of HIV infection.