Impact of pretransplant CMV-specific T-cell immune response in the control of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Although solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with pretransplant serology for cytomegalovirus (CMV-R+) are considered at intermediate risk for CMV infection post transplantation, CMV infection remains a major cause of morbidity in this population. We prospectively characterized whether having pretransplant CMV-specific cellular immunity is independently associated with controlling infection after transplantation in R + SOT recipients. METHODS: A prospective cohort of consecutive R + SOT recipients that received pre-emptive treatment for CMV infection was monitored after transplantation and variables were recorded during the follow-up. The cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell immune response was characterized by intracellular cytokine staining and viral loads determined using real-time PCR. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five R + SOT recipients were included (67 kidney, 64 liver, four liver-kidney). Only one-third of the patients (42; 31.85%) had CMV-specific T-cell immunity (CD8+CD69+INF-γ+ T cells >0.25%) before transplantation. Patients with negative pretransplant immunity had more CMV infection (49, 52.7% vs. 15, 35.7%; p 0.07) and received more antiviral therapy than those with immunity (32, 34.4% vs. 6, 14.3%, p 0.016). Having CMV specific immunity was an independent factor for protection from developing viraemia ≥2000 IU/mL (OR 0.276, 95% CI 0.105-0.725, p < 0.01) and lower administration of treatment (OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.175-0.905, p 0.028). Only patients with no pretransplant CMV-specific T-cell response were diagnosed with CMV-disease (8, 8.6% vs. 0, 0%, p 0.05). DISCUSSION: Our results show that having a pretransplant CMV specific T-cell response may be associated with a lower rate of CMV viraemia and less antiviral treatment after transplantation; however, more prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccination in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on biological therapy using the microneutralization assay.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza virus vaccination should be considered in all pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Few studies have addressed influenza vaccination safety and efficacy in this group. We aim to prospectively evaluate immunogenicity and safety of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine including A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B strains in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) receiving biological therapy. METHODS: Thirty-five children diagnosed with JIA and 6 healthy siblings were included. Serum samples were collected prior to, 4-8 weeks and one year after vaccination. Microneutralization assays were used to determine neutralizing antibody titers. The type and duration of therapy were analyzed to determine its effect on vaccine response. Clinical data of the participants were collected throughout the study including severe adverse events (SAE) and adverse events following immunization (AEFI). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (74.3%) received biological treatment for JIA; anti TNF-α was prescribed in 15, anti IL-1 receptor in 4 and anti IL-6 receptor therapy in 6 children. The seroprotection rate 4-8 weeks after vaccination in the JIA group was 96% for influenza A/(H1N1)pdm and influenza A/H3N2, and 88% for influenza B. No differences were found in GMT, seroprotection and seroconversion rates for the three influenza strains between the control group and patients receiving biological therapy. Furthermore, long-term seroprotection at 12 months after vaccination was similar in patients receiving either biological or non-biological treatments. No SAEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, influenza vaccination was safe and immunogenic in children with JIA receiving biological therapy.

Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication of solid organ transplantation. Because of management of CMV is variable among transplant centers, in 2011 the Spanish Transplantation Infection Study Group (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) developed consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Since then, new publications have clarified or questioned the aspects covered in the previous document. For that reason, a panel of experts revised the evidence on CMV management, including immunological monitoring, diagnostics, prevention, vaccines, indirect effects, treatment, drug resistance, immunotherapy, investigational drugs, and pediatric issues. This document summarizes the recommendations.

Clinical validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of Acinetobacter baumannii colonization.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based approaches have not been assessed in terms of their ability to detect patients colonized by Acinetobacter baumannii during active surveillance. This prospective, double-blind study demonstrated that a real-time PCR assay had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91.2%) compared with conventional culture for detecting A. baumannii in 397 active surveillance samples, and provided results within 3h. Receiver-operator curve analyses demonstrated that the technique has diagnostic accuracy of 97.7% (95% confidence interval 96.0-99.3%). This method could facilitate the rapid implementation of infection control measures for preventing the transmission of A. baumannii.

Use of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection to diagnose patients at risk for CMV Disease after transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Although a CMV-specific T-cell response is associated with reduced risk for infection after transplantation, some patients still develop CMV disease. Thus, the characterization of additional parameters of the CMV-specific immune response that correlate with the control of CMV infection and disease and their use in defining thresholds that can be applied to clinical practice is of interest. METHODS: In a cohort of high risk solid organ transplant recipients we characterized CMV-specific T-cell responses using intracellular cytokine staining upon stimulation with pp65 and IE-1 peptides, and levels of CMV-specific antibodies neutralizing infection in fibroblast (MRC-5) and epithelial (ARPE-19) cells using microneutralization assays. RESULTS: Although patients with a positive (≥0.25%CD8(+)CD69(+)IFN-γ+) T-cell response were 6.4 fold more protected (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6-25.3; p < 0.001) from CMV infection than patients without a response, 2 (4.2%) patients developed disease. We defined a cut-off titer for epithelial cell neutralizing antibodies of ≥480 that correlated with disease protection. Thus, patients with a CMV-specific T-cell response and titers ≥480 were 14.2 fold more protected from CMV infection (OR 14.2, 95% CI 5-40.2; p < 0.001) and had no episodes of CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection may have an important role in long-term protection. Quantification of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cells, in addition to the T-cell response, may be useful for identifying patients with lower risk for CMV disease.

Influenza vaccination during the first 6 months after solid organ transplantation is efficacious and safe.

Preventing influenza infection early after transplantation is essential, given the disease's high mortality. A multicentre prospective cohort study in adult solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) receiving the influenza vaccine during four consecutive influenza seasons (2009-2013) was performed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccination in SOTR before and 6 months after transplantation. A total of 798 SOTR, 130 of them vaccinated within 6 months of transplantation and 668 of them vaccinated more than 6 months since transplantation. Seroprotection was similar in both groups: 73.1% vs. 76.5% for A/(H1N1)pdm (p 0.49), 67.5% vs. 74.1% for A/H3N2 (p 0.17) and 84.2% vs. 85.2% for influenza B (p 0.80), respectively. Geometric mean titres after vaccination did not differ among groups: 117.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) 81.52, 168.83) vs. 87.43 (95% CI 72.87, 104.91) for A/(H1N1)pdm, 120.45 (95% CI 82.17, 176.57) vs. 97.86 (95% CI 81.34, 117.44) for A/H3N2 and 143.32 (95% CI 103.46, 198.53) vs. 145.54 (95% CI 122.35, 174.24) for influenza B, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, time since transplantation was not associated with response to vaccination. No cases of rejection or severe adverse events were detected in patients vaccinated within the first 6 months after transplantation. In conclusion, influenza vaccination within the first 6 months after transplantation is as safe and immunogenic as vaccination thereafter. Thus, administration of the influenza vaccine can be recommended as soon as 1 month after transplantation.

Immunogenicity of pandemic influenza A H1N1/2009 adjuvanted vaccine in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

The aim of this study was to assess the immunogenicity of a vaccine against this virus in a prospective cohort of transplanted pediatric patients without previous influenza infection who received one dose of MF59®-adjuvanted pandemic H1N1/2009 vaccine. Seventeen patients who were being regularly followed up at the Outpatient Clinic of the Children's Transplant Unit (liver and kidney transplantation) in Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona) were included. Seroconversion was demonstrated in 15 of 17 (88.2%) vaccinated children. There were no rejection episodes or major adverse events. The MF59(®) -adjuvanted pandemic H1N1/2009 vaccine was safe and elicited an adequate response.

Determination, validation and standardization of a CMV DNA cut-off value in plasma for preemptive treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients at lower risk for CMV infection.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir preemptive therapy guided by the viral load is the current strategy recommended for preventing CMV disease in CMV-seropositive Solid Organ Transplant Recipients (SOTR) at lower risk for developing CMV infection. However, universal viral load cut-off has not been established for initiating therapy. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to define and validate a standardized cut-off determined in plasma by real-time PCR assay for initiating preemptive therapy in this population. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of consecutive cases of CMV-seropositive SOTR was carried out. The cut-off value was determined in a derivation cohort and was validated in the validation cohort. Viral loads were determined using the Quant CMV LightCycler 2.0 real-time PCR System (Roche Applied Science) and results were standardized using the WHO International Standard for human CMV. RESULTS: A viral load of 3983 IU/ml (2600 copies/ml) was established as the optimal cut-off for initiating preemptive therapy in a cohort of 141 patients with 982 tests and validated in a cohort of 252 recipients with a total of 2022 test. This cut-off had a 99.6% NPV indicating that the great majority of patients at lower risk will not develop CMV disease without specific antiviral therapy. The high sensitivity and specificity (89.9% and 88.9%, respectively) and the relatively small numbers of patients with CMV disease confirm that real-time PCR was optimal. CONCLUSIONS: We have established a cut-off viral load for starting preemptive therapy for CMV-seropositive SOT recipients. Our results emphasized the importance of a mandatory follow-up protocol for CMV-seropositive patients receiving preemptive treatment.

Reduced incidence of pneumonia in influenza-vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients with influenza disease.

Whether influenza vaccination influences the severity of illness in cases of clinical failure in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receiving influenza vaccine has not been extensively studied. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency of influenza vaccination among SOT recipients with influenza disease and its impact on the illness severity during the 2010-2011 season. Adult SOT recipients with confirmed influenza infection were included from December 2010 to April 2011. Follow-up data were recorded and antibody titres were determined using a microneutralization assay. Sixty-four SOT recipients were included in the study, ten (15.6%) with severe disease, requiring admission to intensive care units, of whom four (6.3%) died. In all, 34 (53.1%) received the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine and 32 (50.0%) received the 2009-H1N1 pandemic vaccine, and none had detectable antibodies against influenza at the time of diagnosis of influenza infection. Twenty-three (67.6%) of the patients that received the vaccine required hospital admission and presented less dyspnoea (10, 29.4% versus 14 (50.0%), p 0.09) and pneumonia (8, 23.8% versus 15, 50.0%, p 0.03, relative risk 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) than unvaccinated patients, with relative risk reductions of 60% and 70%, respectively. Although influenza vaccination confers protection on SOT recipients against developing influenza pneumonia, the rate of clinical failure is still high. New strategies to improve influenza immunization are needed for this group of patients.

Influenza A H1N1/2009 infection in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

AIM AND METHOD: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcome of pandemic influenza A H1N1/2009 (pH1N1) infection, in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with kidney and/or liver transplant and confirmed pH1N1 infection from June to December 2009, diagnosed in 2 Spanish teaching hospitals. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 4 patients (8.2%), and 3 of them required respiratory support. There were no related deaths. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment within 48 h was associated with a lower likelihood of pneumonia (0/38, 0%) than treatment started after 48 h (4/11, 36.3%) (P < 0.01).

Unexpected severity of cases of influenza B infection in patients that required hospitalization during the first postpandemic wave.

OBJECTIVES: After the last pandemic the knowledge regarding influenza A infection has improved however, the outcomes of influenza B infection remain poorly studied. The aim of this study was to compare the features of influenza B versus influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infections during the 2010-2011 epidemic-season. METHODS: A prospective, observational-cohort of adults with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection during the 2010-2011 epidemic-season was studied RESULTS: Fifty cases of influenza B and 80 of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection were enrolled. Among patients with influenza B, the median age was 34 years-old (23-64), 30% pregnant, 24% obese, 34% transplant recipients and 14% with bacterial co-infection. Twenty-eight percent of patients had pneumonia with alveolar localized pattern and five (10%) died. Pneumonia was associated with delayed antiviral therapy, older age, higher Charlson score, invasive mechanical ventilation and bacterial co-infection. Obesity and pregnancy were not associated with complicated influenza B infection. The proportion of pneumonia, admission to the ICU and mortality did not differ between cases of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza B infection. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza B infection causes severe infection and it is associated with pneumonia or death, similar to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection. Rapid diagnosis and early antiviral therapy are necessary for managing influenza pneumonia during epidemic periods.

Pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: impact of viral and non-viral co-infection.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are at risk of serious influenza-related complications. The impact of respiratory co-infection in SOTR with 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) is unknown. A multicentre prospective study of consecutive cases of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in SOTR was carried out to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome and the risk factors for co-infection. Overall, 51 patients were included. Median time from transplant was 3.7 years, 5.9% of the cases occurred perioperatively and 7.8% were hospital-acquired. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 15 (29.4%) patients. Ten cases were severe (19.6%): 13.7% were admitted to intensive care units, 5.9% suffered septic shock, 5.9% developed acute graft rejection and 7.8% died. Co-infection was detected in 15 patients (29.4%): eight viral, six bacterial and one fungal. Viral co-infection did not affect the outcome. Patients with non-viral co-infection had a worse outcome: longer hospital stay (26.2 ± 20.7 vs. 5.5 ± 10.2) and higher rate of severe diseases (85.7% vs. 2.3%) and mortality (42.8% vs. 2.3%). Independent risk factors for non-viral co-infection were: diabetes mellitus and septic shock. Other factors associated with severe influenza were: delayed antiviral therapy, diabetes mellitus, time since transplantation <90 days and pneumonia. In conclusion, pandemic influenza A can cause significant direct and indirect effects in SOTR, especially in the early post-transplant period, and should be treated early. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of non-viral co-infection, mainly in diabetic patients and severe cases. An effort should be made to prevent influenza with immunization of the patient and the environment.

First face composite-tissue transplant recipient successfully treated for cytomegalovirus infection with preemptive valganciclovir treatment.

Little is known about cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after face transplantation, since only two of the 11 cases of face transplantation reported worldwide have documented a CMV infection after transplantation. Herein, we present the first report of a composite-tissue face allotransplant recipient at high risk for CMV infection (D(+)/R(-) [CMV serpositive donor positive/CMV seronegative receptor]) undergoing preemptive treatment. Preemptive treatment was safe and effective for controlling CMV infection and thus promoting early acquisition of a CMV-specific immune response that protected the patient from late-onset CMV disease.

Therapy with m-TOR inhibitors decreases the response to the pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients.

Concern has been raised regarding the response to vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) undergoing immunosuppressant regimens and the possibility of rejection related to the immune response associated with pandemic influenza H1N1-2009 vaccination. The goal of this study was to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of the pandemic vaccine in SOTR. We performed a multicenter prospective study in SOTR receiving the pandemic vaccine. Immunological response was determined in serum 5 weeks after vaccination by microneutralization assays, and immunoglobulins were measured by ELISA. Three hundred and forty-six SOTR were included. Preexisting seroprotection was detected in 13.6% of cases and rates of seroconversion and seroprotection after vaccination were 73.1% and 82.9%, respectively. Patients with baseline antibody titers had better geometric mean titers (GMT)-post after pandemic vaccination (339.4 vs. 121.4, p < 0.001). Younger age, liver disease and m-TOR inhibitor therapy were independently associated with lower seroprotection and GMT-post. There were no major adverse effects or rejection episodes. Pandemic vaccine was safe in SOTR and elicited an adequate response, although lower than in healthy individuals. This is the first study describing a decreased response after vaccination in patients receiving mTOR inhibitors who presented lower seroprotection rates and lower GMT-post.

Clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction to quantify cytomegalovirus replication in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with different prevention strategies.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ disease is a serious, frequent complication after allogenic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). There are two prevention strategies: universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Preemptive therapy is administered based on the results of sensitive techniques that detect the viral infection. We analyzed 41 peripheral blood Allo-SCT recipients: 34 received prophylaxis and seven preemptive treatment. Viral infections determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays occurred at an overall incidence of 65.8%. The viral loads quantified by RT-PCR were compared among the prophylaxis versus the preemptive group. Overall, the median viral load was significantly higher in the preemptive compared with the prophylaxis group (P=.002). Furthermore, within the first 100 days posttransplantation, viral load values were higher among patients undergoing preemptive therapy (P=.009).

Differences in cytomegalovirus replication quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and antigenemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Fifty percent of allogeneic stem cell recipients develop cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first 100 days posttransplantation. Various methods have been used to determine CMV infections, including antigenemia assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Although antigenemia assay has been used more frequently, this technique is less sensitive than RT-PCR. In contrast, RT-PCR has a low positive predictive value for CMV end-organ disease. Cytomegalovirus infections were analyzed in 41 peripheral blood samples from allogeneic stem cell recipients using both antigenemia assay and RT-PCR; results were discordant in 36.6% of patients. Although the antigenemia assay detected CMV replication in 29.2% of cases, RT-PCR was positive in 65.8%. In 83.3% of patients, results detected using the antigenemia assay were delayed by a median (range) of 5 (2-20) weeks compared with positive RT-PCR results. Within the first 100 days posttransplantation, higher levels of viral replication measured using RT-PCR were observed in patients with vs without antigenemia. In addition, in patients with antigenemia, viral load was significantly higher before day 100 than after (P=.01 and P=.008, respectively) compared with those without antigenemia.

A new strategy based on recombinant viruses for assessing the replication capacity of HIV-1.

OBJECTIVE: In heavily pretreated patients, resistance mutations arise in both protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences; however, the relative impact of PR and RT mutations on viral fitness cannot be evaluated with the majority of systems. To address this issue we have developed a model based on recombinant viruses (RVs) that allows the analysis of the replication capacity (RC) of viral populations in which PR and RT are cloned either in combination or separately. METHODS: RVs were generated for full-length polymerase (pol) gene, PR or RT sequences from nine naïve and 14 heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients in therapeutic failure. The relative RC was assessed by comparing luciferase activity between mutant RV and wild-type (wt) isolates. RESULTS: A strong decrease (>60%) in the RC of the pol RV population was observed in the 14 heavily pretreated patients as compared with the wt RVs. The analysis of PR and RT RVs from these patients showed that the decrease in RC was mainly attributable to PR sequences in three of these 14 patients and to RT sequences in seven of these patients. In the four remaining patients, PR and RT sequences independently reduced the RC of the RVs to similar extents. CONCLUSIONS: Different patterns of mutations in either PR or RT have a strong impact on RC in highly experienced HIV-infected patients.

Different stop codon usage in two pseudohypotrich ciliates.

Based on rRNA phylogeny, morphologic and morphogenetic characters, two major groups of hypotrich ciliates can be distinguished: euhypotrichs and pseudohypotrichs. Through the sequencing of actin genes, we show here that, interestingly, the pseudohypotrichs Dyophrys sp. and Euplotes vannus have a different stop codon usage. In fact, the stop codon usage of the former species resembles that of euhypotrichs. This unexpected result is used to discuss the origin and acquisition of genetic code deviations in ciliates.

Unusual characteristics of ciliate actins.

Actin is a cytoskeletal protein that is ubiquitous in eukaryotes, hence the corresponding genes and proteins have been isolated from numerous organisms as different as animals, plants, fungi and protozoa. Several atomic models are available for the monomeric as well as the filamentous form, and more than 70 proteins that bind actin and control filament dynamics have been isolated from diverse eukaryotes. Moreover, the function and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton in several eukaryotic systems have been depicted in depth. Unlike other protozoa, such as amoeba, actin is not an abundant protein in ciliates, whose cytoskeleton is mainly composed of microtubular arrays. Ciliate actin has been studied in several species, and it was established early on that this ciliate protein is very different from that of other eukaryotes. Similarly, the actin-binding proteins studied in ciliates display great differences with those of other eukaryotes. Consequently, ciliate actin has been considered as "unconventional," and this review focuses on molecular data leading to this conclusion.

Actin of Histriculus cavicola: characteristics of the highly divergent hypotrich ciliate actins.

A macronuclear gene-sized molecule carrying an actin gene from the hypotrich ciliate, Histriculus cavicola, was characterized. Southern blot analysis using a coding region probe suggested that actin in H. cavicola is encoded by a single gene. A comparison of the promoter regions indicated that the H. cavicola actin gene has a TATA box in the 5' flanking region in a position identical to those in other oxytrich ciliates. The coding sequence of this gene is not interrupted by any introns, and codes for a protein of 375 amino acid residues. This protein shares a high degree of similarity with other oxytrichid actins, and a relatively low similarity with actins from other eukaryotes. Comparative analyses of sequences indicated that most of the amino acid substitutions in hypotrich actins are found in surface loops, while the core structures are well-conserved. The sites that interact with DNase I and several regions involved in actin-actin contact have diverged considerably in hypotrich actins, while nucleotide-binding sites are the best-conserved interaction motif.