A randomized, multicenter trial assessing the effects of rapastinel compared to ketamine, alprazolam, and placebo on simulated driving performance.

N-methyl-D-aspartate ionotropic glutamatergic receptor (NMDAR) modulators, including rapastinel and ketamine, elicit rapid and sustained antidepressant responses in patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. This phase I, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, five-period, crossover, single-dose study evaluated simulated driving performance of healthy participants (N = 107) after single doses of rapastinel slow intravenous (i.v.) bolus 900 and 1800 mg, alprazolam oral 0.75 mg (positive control), ketamine i.v. infusion 0.5 mg/kg (clinical comparator), and placebo ~ 45 min before driving. The primary end point was SD of lateral position (SDLP) during the 60-min 100-km simulated driving scenario. Additional measures of driving performance, sleepiness, and cognition were also evaluated. To assess effects over time, mean SDLP was calculated for each 10-min interval of driving. Sensitivity of the assays was confirmed with alprazolam (all placebo comparisons p < 0.02). Rapastinel 900 and 1800 mg did not significantly affect simulated driving performance compared to placebo (both p > 0.5). Both rapastinel doses resulted in significantly less impaired driving compared to alprazolam or ketamine (all p < 0.002); ketamine significantly impaired driving compared to placebo (p = 0.0001). Results for the additional measures were similar to the primary end point. No new safety signals were observed for any study interventions. This first study of rapastinel effects on simulated driving found that rapastinel 900 and 1800 mg did not impair driving performance, but ketamine 0.5 mg/kg resulted in significantly impaired driving performance. Ketamine's effects on driving were maintained for at least 105 min, indicating that clinicians should be vigilant to prevent or postpone driving in patients after ketamine treatment.

Atogepant and sumatriptan: no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in a randomized, open-label, crossover trial.

Aim: To evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions of atogepant with sumatriptan, an open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted. Patients & methods: Thirty healthy adults received atogepant 60 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or coadministered drugs. Primary end point was geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs of interventions for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC0-t) or infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax). Results: Atogepant GMRs for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ versus with sumatriptan were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25, indicating no interaction; atogepant Cmax was reduced by 22% (GMR: 0.78; 90% CI: 0.69-0.89) with sumatriptan. Sumatriptan GMRs for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax versus with atogepant were within 90% CI 0.80-1.25. Conclusion: Atogepant with sumatriptan had no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions.

We evaluated the possibility of interactions between atogepant, a new drug for the prevention of migraine, and sumatriptan, a commonly used drug to treat active migraines. A group of 30 healthy adults received atogepant alone, sumatriptan alone or the two drugs taken together, and we measured how the body absorbed, distributed and got rid of the two drugs when given together compared with each drug given alone. There was no indication of any clinically important interactions between atogepant and sumatriptan.

A Single Supratherapeutic Dose of Atogepant Does Not Affect Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adults: Results From a Randomized, Single-Dose, Phase 1 Crossover Trial.

Atogepant is a selective, oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist in development for preventive treatment of migraine. This randomized, double-blind, phase 1 crossover study evaluated the cardiac repolarization effect of a single supratherapeutic (300 mg) atogepant dose vs placebo in healthy adults. Moxifloxacin 400 mg was the open-label active control. The primary end point was a change from baseline in Fridericia-corrected QT intervals (ΔQTcF). Sixty participants were randomized to atogepant 300 mg, placebo, and moxifloxacin; 59 (98.3%) completed all interventions. Assay sensitivity was confirmed: lower 90% confidence interval limit for QTcF interval change from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) for moxifloxacin was >5 millisecond vs placebo at prespecified 2-, 3-, and 4-hour time points. Following single-dose atogepant 300 mg, mean atogepant ΔΔQTcF and upper 90% confidence interval limits were lower than the 10-millisecond threshold at all time points. Atogepant mean peak plasma concentration was 3197 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t was 16 640 ng • h/mL, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours was 16 607 ng • h/mL, and median time to peak plasma concentration was 2.1 hours. The incidence of adverse events was low; no serious adverse events or elevations of liver enzymes were reported. Overall, a single supratherapeutic dose of atogepant was safe and did not impact cardiac repolarization in healthy participants.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of ubrogepant when coadministered with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted monoclonal antibody migraine preventives in participants with migraine: A randomized phase 1b drug-drug interaction study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), erenumab and galcanezumab, on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, safety, and tolerability of ubrogepant. BACKGROUND: People taking CGRP-targeted mAbs for migraine prevention sometimes take ubrogepant, an oral small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist, for acute treatment of breakthrough migraine attacks. DESIGN: In this two-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 1b trial, adults with migraine were randomized to arm 1 (ubrogepant ± erenumab) or arm 2 (ubrogepant ± galcanezumab). The PK profile of ubrogepant was characterized for administration before and 4 days after CGRP-targeted mAb injection. Participants received single-dose ubrogepant 100 mg on day 1, subcutaneous erenumab 140 mg (arm 1) or galcanezumab 240 mg (arm 2) on day 8, and ubrogepant 100 mg once daily on days 12-15. In each study arm, serial blood samples were drawn on days 1 and 12 for measurement of plasma ubrogepant concentrations. The primary outcomes were area under the plasma ubrogepant concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to t post-dose (AUC0- t ) and from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf ), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of ubrogepant when ubrogepant was administered before or after a single dose of erenumab or galcanezumab. Vital signs and laboratory parameters were monitored. RESULTS: Forty participants enrolled (20 per arm; mean [standard deviation] ages, 32.2 [8.9] and 38.4 [8.8] years; 50% [10/20] and 60% [12/20] female in arms 1 and 2, respectively). There were no significant differences in ubrogepant Cmax after versus before erenumab administration (geometric least-squares mean [LSM] ratio, 1.04 [90% CI, 0.93-1.16]), and no significant differences in AUC0- t (1.06 [0.96-1.16]) or AUC0-inf (1.05 [0.96-1.15]). Similarly, ubrogepant Cmax (1.00 [90% CI, 0.82-1.20]), AUC0- t (1.05 [0.90-1.23]), and AUC0-inf (1.05 [0.90-1.22]) geometric LSM ratios were statistically equivalent after galcanezumab versus ubrogepant alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar to those reported with each treatment alone. No serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, or clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The PK profile of ubrogepant was not significantly changed and no safety concerns were identified when ubrogepant was coadministered with erenumab or galcanezumab.

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Atogepant in Adults With Hepatic Impairment: Results From an Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial.

Atogepant is a selective oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist in development for migraine prevention. Here, we report the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-dose 60 mg atogepant in participants with severe, moderate, or mild hepatic impairment and matched participants with normal hepatic function from an open-label, parallel-group, single-dose phase 1 trial. Thirty-two participants aged 45 to 72 years were enrolled, which included 8 each with severe, moderate, mild, or no hepatic impairment. All participants completed the study. Atogepant was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration, ∼2 hours) with an apparent terminal elimination half-life of ∼11 hours. Compared with participants with normal hepatic function, the change in maximum plasma concentrations of atogepant were -4%, -12%, and +9% in participants with severe, moderate, or mild hepatic impairment, respectively. Overall systemic exposures to atogepant were 15% to 38% higher in participants with hepatic impairment compared with those with normal hepatic function, but these differences are not expected to be clinically relevant given the established safety profile of atogepant. Only 1 adverse event was reported: mild rhinorrhea in a participant with moderate hepatic impairment. Overall, atogepant was safe and not associated with any clinically relevant change in PK in participants with severe, moderate, or mild hepatic impairment.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Cariprazine and its Major Metabolites.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cariprazine, a dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor partial agonist, is approved for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia (1.5-6 mg/day) and manic/mixed (3-6 mg/day) episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. This population pharmacokinetic analysis describes the concentration-time profiles of cariprazine and its two major active metabolites, desmethyl-cariprazine (DCAR) and didesmethyl-cariprazine (DDCAR). Additionally, the potential impact of patient characteristics, creatinine clearance, and cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolizer status on the pharmacokinetics of cariprazine and its metabolites was evaluated. METHODS: Data from three phase 1 and ten phase 2/3 studies in adult patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania were included. Nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using the NONMEM software package. Compartmental modeling was performed sequentially with the cariprazine elimination rate used as the DCAR formation rate and likewise the elimination rate of DCAR used with a delay as the DDCAR formation rate. RESULTS: Cariprazine pharmacokinetics were described by a three-compartment model with zero-order input of the dose to a depot compartment followed by first-order absorption and first-order elimination. DCAR and DDCAR pharmacokinetics were described by two-compartment models with linear elimination. Statistically significant predictors of pharmacokinetic parameters included weight, sex, and race, though differences in exposures were not large enough to require an adjustment in dose. Creatinine clearance was not a statistically significant predictor of drug clearance, and a post hoc analysis found that CYP2D6 metabolizer status was not associated with changes in exposure levels for cariprazine, DCAR, or DDCAR. The median time to 90% of steady state was approximately 1 week for cariprazine and DCAR and 3 weeks for DDCAR. CONCLUSIONS: Population pharmacokinetic modeling provided a quantitative description of the concentration-time profile of cariprazine and its metabolites.

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Ubrogepant Coadministered With Sumatriptan and of the Safety of Ubrogepant With Triptans.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction and the safety and tolerability when ubrogepant and sumatriptan are coadministered in a Phase 1 study in healthy participants, and to inform the safety and tolerability of ubrogepant alone and in combination with triptans in Phase 3 trials in participants with migraine. BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a potent vasodilatory neurotransmitter believed to play a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Ubrogepant (UBRELVY™) is a potent and selective antagonist of the human calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor approved for the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan is a serotonin receptor agonist and the most commonly used triptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Ubrogepant could be prescribed with triptans. DESIGN: The Phase 1 study was a single-center, open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover, single-dose, pharmacokinetic interaction study, where participants received each of 3 oral treatments with a 7-day washout period between treatments: single dose of ubrogepant 100 mg, single dose of sumatriptan 100 mg, and ubrogepant 100 mg plus sumatriptan 100 mg. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a model-independent approach. The ACHIEVE I and II trials were 2 multicenter, single-attack, randomized, Phase 3 trials in adults with a history of migraine with or without aura. Participants had the option to take a second dose of study medication or rescue medication to treat a nonresponding migraine or a migraine recurrence from 2 to 48 hours after the initial dose of study medication. Rescue medication options included acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, anti-emetics, or triptans. Treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated up to 30 days after the last dose in the Phase 1 and Phase 3 studies. RESULTS: Ubrogepant median time to maximum plasma concentration was delayed (3 hours [range: 1-5 hours] vs 1.5 hours [range: 1-4 hours]), mean maximum plasma concentration was reduced by 24% (coefficient of variation: 37.4%) when ubrogepant was coadministered with sumatriptan (n = 29) compared with ubrogepant administered alone (N = 30). No significant effect was observed on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ubrogepant. Sumatriptan area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration showed no significant change when sumatriptan was coadministered with ubrogepant (n = 29), but the sumatriptan time to maximum plasma concentration was delayed (1 hour [range: 0.5-5 hours] vs 3 hours [range: 0.5-6 hours]. No treatment-emergent adverse events were reported with the coadministration of ubrogepant 100 mg and sumatriptan 100 mg in the Phase 1 study. The pooled safety data from ACHIEVE trials (N = 1938) showed similar rates of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events between participants who took ubrogepant alone and participants who took ubrogepant and a triptan as a rescue medication (14.9% [53/355] vs 12.8% [5/39] in the ubrogepant 100 mg treatment group, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were slight alterations in ubrogepant pharmacokinetic parameters when coadministered with sumatriptan, such changes are expected to have minimal clinical relevance, especially because no changes were seen in sumatriptan area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration when coadministered with ubrogepant. Coadministration of ubrogepant with sumatriptan was well tolerated in healthy participants in the Phase 1 study, and coadministration of ubrogepant with triptans was well tolerated in participants with migraine in the Phase 3 trials. No new safety concerns for ubrogepant were identified across all trials.

Relationship Between Plasma Concentrations and Clinical Effects of Cariprazine in Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Mania.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling (via NONMEM) was used to describe longitudinal exposure-response relationships for total cariprazine (sum of cariprazine and its major active metabolites) in 2,558 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania. Drug exposure metrics were explored for potential relationships with efficacy and safety end points. Total cariprazine exposures were significantly related to reductions in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) or Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores in schizophrenia or bipolar mania, respectively, via a maximum effect (Emax )-type relationship. Typical steady-state plasma concentrations after 3 and 4.5 mg/day were associated with 50% of maximum typical reductions in PANSS and YMRS total scores, respectively. Time-weighted cariprazine exposures had significant relationships with the probability of common adverse events (AEs). Dose increase was associated with increased efficacy but was also associated with an increase in AEs. Results of these pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses support that the recommended dose range (1.5-6 mg/day for schizophrenia and 3-6 mg/day for bipolar mania) provides an appropriate benefit-risk balance between cariprazine efficacy and safety.

Single Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Ubrogepant Do Not Affect Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adults: Results From a Randomized Trial.

Ubrogepant is a novel, oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist currently under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. This double-blind, four-period crossover study compared the cardiac repolarization effect of therapeutic (100 mg) and supratherapeutic (400 mg) ubrogepant doses vs. placebo in healthy adults. Moxifloxacin 400 mg was used as an open-label active control, and the primary end point was change from baseline in Fridericia-corrected QT intervals (ΔQTcF). Assay sensitivity was demonstrated via statistically significant QTcF prolongation with moxifloxacin vs. placebo. After single oral doses of ubrogepant, the least squares mean placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) did not exceed the 10-millisecond regulatory threshold at any timepoint. The 90% CI upper bounds were 2.46 milliseconds and 2.69 milliseconds for ubrogepant 100 and 400 mg, respectively. Categorical and concentration-based analyses were consistent with the primary result, showing no significant impact of ubrogepant on cardiac repolarization.

Relationship between the timing of relapse and plasma drug levels following discontinuation of cariprazine treatment in patients with schizophrenia: indirect comparison with other second-generation antipsychotics after treatment discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the timing of relapse following drug discontinuation and its relationship to estimated plasma levels and elimination half-life by comparing data from a randomized, placebo-controlled discontinuation study of cariprazine with those from similarly designed and conducted randomized control trials of other oral atypical antipsychotics (AAPs). METHODS: Data from a long-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled relapse prevention study in participants with schizophrenia (NCT01412060) were analyzed. Similarly designed, published studies of other AAPs were used for comparison. Time to drug-placebo relapse separation and relapse rates were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves and evaluated descriptively. Separation was defined as a sustained difference of ≥5% incidence of relapse between the AAP and placebo curves. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curve for cariprazine showed a time to drug-placebo relapse separation at 6-7 weeks after randomization, compared to the Kaplan-Meier curves for the other AAPs, which showed earlier separation at 1-4 weeks. The placebo relapse rates at 4 weeks after randomization were 5% for cariprazine and 8-34% for other AAPs. Geometric mean values of model-predicted plasma concentrations for total active cariprazine moieties (sum of cariprazine, desmethyl-cariprazine, and didesmethyl-cariprazine) were 20.0 and 6.1 nM at 2 and 4 weeks after discontinuation, respectively. Elimination half-lives of other AAPs and their active metabolites (<4 days) suggest that plasma concentrations would be low or negligible at 2-4 weeks after last dose. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of cariprazine treatment appeared to be associated with a delayed incidence of relapse compared with other AAPs, which may be due to the longer half-life of cariprazine and its active metabolites.

Preferential binding to dopamine D3 over D2 receptors by cariprazine in patients with schizophrenia using PET with the D3/D2 receptor ligand [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO.

RATIONALE: Second-generation antipsychotics occupy dopamine D2 receptors and act as antagonists or partial agonists at these receptors. While these drugs alleviate positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, they are less effective for treating cognitive deficits and negative symptoms. Dopamine D3 receptors are highly expressed in areas of the brain thought to play a role in the regulation of motivation and reward-related behavior. Consequently, the dopamine D3 receptor has become a target for treating negative symptoms in combination with D2 antagonism to treat positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the cariprazine receptor occupancies in brain for D2 and D3 receptors in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Using [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO as a radioligand, positron emission tomography (PET) scans were performed in eight patients at baseline and postdose on days 1, 4, and 15. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analyzed for cariprazine concentrations. RESULTS: A monotonic dose-occupancy relationship was observed for both receptor types. After 2 weeks of treatment, near complete (∼100 %) occupancies were observed for both receptors at a dose of 12 mg/day. At the lowest cariprazine dose (1 mg/day), mean D3 and D2 receptor occupancies were 76 and 45 %, respectively, suggesting selectivity for D3 over D2 receptors at low doses. An exposure-response analysis found a ∼3-fold difference in EC50 (D3 = 3.84 nM and D2 = 13.03 nM) in plasma after 2 weeks of dosing. CONCLUSION: This PET imaging study in patients with schizophrenia demonstrated that cariprazine is a D3-preferring dual D3/D2 receptor partial agonist.

Levomilnacipran Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers Versus Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Implications for Norepinephrine and Serotonin Reuptake Inhibition.

PURPOSE: Levomilnacipran, a selective serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. The objectives of this investigation were to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of levomilnacipran in healthy subjects and in patients with MDD and to compare the plasma concentrations observed at clinically effective doses (40-120 mg daily) in MDD patients versus in vitro inhibitory concentration values for NE and 5-HT transporters. METHODS: Data from 2 trials were analyzed: a Phase I trial (healthy volunteers received a single dose of levomilnacipran extended-release capsule [ER; 25, 50, or 100 mg], escalating multiple doses of levomilnacipran ER [25-300 mg once daily], or placebo); and a Phase III trial (adults with MDD received a fixed dose of levomilnacipran ER [40, 80, or 120 mg once daily for 8 weeks]). Plasma samples of participants were assayed to determine levomilnacipran concentrations, and PK analyses were performed. Unbound plasma concentrations of levomilnacipran in MDD patients were estimated, and inhibitory concentration values were determined by curve fitting of the in vitro data. FINDINGS: Cmax and AUC were dose proportional after single dosing (25-100 mg) and multiple dosing (across the 25-300 mg dose range) of levomilnacipran ER in healthy subjects. Dose-proportional steady-state Cmax (93, 180, and 297 ng/mL) and AUC0-τ (1520, 2935, and 4799 ng*h/mL) were also observed in patients with MDD who received levomilnacipran ER (40, 80, and 120 mg daily). Tmax was ~6 hours and was similar after single and multiple oral doses of levomilnacipran ER. Estimates of levomilnacipran concentration at 50%, 80%, and 90% inhibition were 19, 91, and 237 nM, respectively, for the 5-HT transporter, and 10, 41, and 92 nM for the NE transporter. Average unbound plasma concentrations for levomilnacipran in MDD patients treated with levomilnacipran ER 40, 80, or 120 mg daily exceeded the estimated concentration at 80% and 90% inhibition for 5-HT and NE. IMPLICATIONS: Levomilnacipran PK was dose proportional after single and multiple dosing and was similar between healthy subjects and patients with MDD. Steady-state unbound plasma concentrations of levomilnacipran across the approved dose range (40, 80, and 120 mg daily) in MDD patients were estimated to be comparable or greater than the concentrations that inhibited reuptake of NE and 5-HT by >90% and >80%, respectively, in vitro.

Evaluation of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-Based Interactions of Levomilnacipran with Ketoconazole, Carbamazepine or Alprazolam in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Levomilnacipran is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with balanced potency for the reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin, approved in the USA for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. We conducted studies in healthy human subjects to investigate pharmacokinetic interactions when levomilnacipran extended-release (ER) is administered in combination with an inhibitor (ketoconazole), an inducer (carbamazepine), or a substrate (alprazolam) of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. METHODS: Randomised, open-label studies were conducted in healthy volunteers (n = 34 ketoconazole, n = 34 carbamazepine, n = 30 alprazolam) and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined when levomilnacipran was administered alone or together with the relevant study drug. RESULTS: Co-administration of ketoconazole with levomilnacipran ER increased levomilnacipran maximum concentration (C max) by 39% [90% confidence interval (CI) 31-47%] and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 57% (90% CI 47-67%), whereas carbamazepine reduced the C max and AUC of levomilnacipran by 26% (90% CI 22-30%) and 29% (90% CI 26-32%), respectively. Levomilnacipran at steady state had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of a single 1 mg dose of alprazolam extended release (XR); neither did single-dose alprazolam XR affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran. No new safety concerns were noted in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the levomilnacipran ER dose should not exceed 80 mg once daily when used with ketoconazole, compared to 120 mg once daily in the absence of ketoconazole. No dose adjustment for levomilnacipran is suggested when levomilnacipran ER is co-administered with carbamazepine or other CYP3A4 inducers. Co-administration with levomilnacipran of drugs metabolised by CYP3A4, such as alprazolam, requires no dose adjustment due to pharmacokinetic considerations.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran following a single oral dose of levomilnacipran extended-release capsule in humans.

PURPOSE: Levomilnacipran extended-release (ER) is indicated for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. We evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of levomilnacipran ER in individuals with impaired renal function. METHODS: A total of 32 individuals participated in four groups (eight in each group) with normal, mild, moderately, or severely impaired renal function. Each participant received one dose of levomilnacipran ER 40 mg. Blood and urine were assayed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Results between normal and renally impaired groups were compared using analysis of variance. Safety measures included adverse events, laboratory evaluations, vital signs, suicidality, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Following administration of levomilnacipran, mean (standard deviation) maximum plasma concentration in participants with normal renal function, and mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment was 83.9 (21.0), 81.8 (23.4), 98.7 (18.1), and 122.1 (35.1) (ng/mL), respectively; area under the curve from time zero to infinity was 2,101.0 (516.9), 2,587.8 (649.9), 4,016.4 (995.4), and 5,900.8 (1,799.3) (h · ng/mL), respectively; terminal elimination half-life was 13.5 (2.8), 17.3 (3.5), 19.1 (4.6), and 27.7 (7.4) (hours), respectively; and renal clearance was 175.9 mL/min, 114.7 mL/min, 69.9 mL/min, and 28.6 mL/min, respectively. Levomilnacipran ER was generally well tolerated with no safety issues of concern identified. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment was associated with increased plasma levels of levomilnacipran and prolonged half-life. No dose adjustment is required for individuals with mild renal impairment; the recommended maximum daily maintenance dose of levomilnacipran ER should not exceed 80 mg for individuals with moderate renal impairment and 40 mg for individuals with severe renal impairment.

A novel once-daily fixed-dose combination of memantine extended release and donepezil for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: two phase I studies in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Combining two standard-of-care medications for Alzheimer's disease (AD) into a single once-daily dosage unit may improve treatment adherence, facilitate drug administration, and reduce caregiver burden. A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) capsule containing 28 mg memantine extended release (ER) and 10 mg donepezil was evaluated for bioequivalence with co-administered commercially available memantine ER and donepezil, and for bioavailability with regard to food intake. METHODS: Two phase I, single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover studies were conducted in 18- to 45-year-old healthy individuals. In MDX-PK-104 study, fasting participants (N = 38) received co-administered memantine ER and donepezil or the FDC. In MDX-PK-105 study, participants (N = 36) received three treatments: intact FDC taken while fasting or after a high-fat meal, or FDC contents sprinkled on applesauce while fasting. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters for memantine and donepezil were calculated from the plasma concentration time-curve using non-compartmental analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare: (a) FDC versus co-administered individual drugs; (b) FDC fasted versus with food; and (c) FDC sprinkled on applesauce versus FDC intact, both fasted. Safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: The FDC capsule was bioequivalent to co-administered memantine ER and donepezil. There was no significant food effect on the bioavailability of the FDC components. There were no clinically relevant differences in time to maximum plasma concentration or safety profiles across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: An FDC capsule containing 28 mg memantine ER and 10 mg donepezil is bioequivalent to commercially available memantine ER and donepezil, and bioavailability is not affected by food intake or sprinkling of capsule contents on applesauce.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Vilazodone in Hepatic Impairment.

Vilazodone, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder, is extensively hepatically metabolized. The pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of vilazodone were investigated in 2 trials comparing participants with hepatic impairment with healthy controls. In these phase 1, open-label, parallel-group, single-dose pharmacokinetic studies, vilazodone (20 mg) was administered to participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment or individually matched healthy controls. Vilazodone and M17 (the major metabolite) concentrations in plasma were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Forty-eight participants (8 each in mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment groups with matched healthy controls) were evaluated for pharmacokinetic analyses. All pharmacokinetic parameters in participants with mild and moderate hepatic impairment were similar to those in healthy controls. Mean Cmax and AUC0-∞ were approximately 29% and 17% lower in participants with severe hepatic impairment compared with healthy participants; values for Tmax, and t1/2 were similar between groups. Diarrhea was experienced by more participants with hepatic impairment than controls (10 vs. 5, respectively), and vomiting (4 participants) occurred only in participants with severe hepatic impairment; other adverse events were roughly equivalent between groups. Following a single, 20-mg oral dose of vilazodone, pharmacokinetics were similar in participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment and healthy controls. No dose adjustment is needed for patients with major depressive disorder who have mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment.

Influence of CYP3A4 induction/inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Vilazodone is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Vilazodone seems to be metabolized primarily by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and non-CYP-mediated pathways; concomitant use of drugs that affect CYP3A4 activity could potentially alter systemic exposure to vilazodone. The present studies evaluated whether CYP3A4 inhibition (study 1) or induction (study 2) affected the pharmacokinetics of vilazodone. METHODS: Participants were healthy adult volunteers. Study 1 was conducted in 2 parts and evaluated the pharmacokinetics of single-dose vilazodone administered with multiple-dose (200 mg once daily) ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Part 1 was an open-label pharmacokinetic assessment of a single 5-mg vilazodone dose with or without ketoconazole. Part 2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing vilazodone pharmacokinetics after a single 10-mg dose alone or co-administered with ketoconazole or placebo. Study 2 was an open-label, multiple-dose, single-sequence study evaluating the effect of steady-state carbamazepine, a CYP3A4 substrate and inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of steady-state vilazodone (40 mg once daily). Primary pharmacokinetic parameters for both studies were AUC and Cmax for vilazodone. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction was concluded if the 90% CIs of the ratio of vilazodone plus the CYP3A4 inhibitor/inducer relative to vilazodone alone (or plus placebo) for AUC and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range. Subject-reported and investigator-identified adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG parameters were recorded. FINDINGS: In study 1/parts 1 and 2 (n = 15 and 22 enrolled, respectively), mean vilazodone AUC increased 42% and 51%, respectively, in the presence of ketoconazole (expected to be at steady state) versus vilazodone alone (part 1) or with placebo (part 2). The upper limit of the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios exceeded 125%. In study 2 (n = 30 enrolled), co-administration of vilazodone and the carbamazepine extended-release formulation decreased mean steady-state vilazodone exposure ~45%, and the 90% CIs for the vilazodone AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios were not within the range of 80% to 125%. In both studies, most AEs were of mild intensity, and gastrointestinal AEs predominated. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that up to a 50% decrease of vilazodone dosage should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors; conversely, increasing the vilazodone dosage up to a maximum of 80 mg/d should be considered when it is given in combination with strong CYP3A4 inducers. (Study registration numbers: SB-659746/029; VLZ-PK-02.).

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran following a single oral dose of a levomilnacipran extended-release capsule in human participants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Levomilnacipran is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with greater potency for the reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine than of serotonin, approved in the USA for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. METHODS: A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of levomilnacipran in adults with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment and normal controls receiving a 40 mg levomilnacipran extended-release (ER) capsule. The concentrations of levomilnacipran and its inactive metabolite, N-desethyl levomilnacipran, in plasma and urine were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters of levomilnacipran and N-desethyl levomilnacipran were derived and assessed. Safety parameters were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: No deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. The maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) of levomilnacipran were 28 and 32 % higher, respectively, in participants with severe hepatic impairment than in healthy participants without a notable change in the terminal elimination half-life, whereas the C(max) and AUC(∞) of N-desethyl levomilnacipran were 66 and 85 % lower, respectively, suggesting liver function has minimal impact on the overall exposure of levomilnacipran but plays a significant role in the formation of the metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of levomilnacipran ER 40 mg was generally well-tolerated in participants with varying degrees of hepatic impairment and healthy controls. Therefore, dose adjustment for levomilnacipran is not necessary in adult MDD patients with impaired liver function.

Effects of milnacipran on cardiac repolarization in healthy participants.

Milnacipran is approved for management of fibromyalgia in the United States. In this double-blind, placebo- and active drug-controlled study (N = 100), effects of supratherapeutic doses of milnacipran on cardiac repolarization were evaluated in healthy volunteers. The primary outcome was the largest mean difference between milnacipran and placebo in time-matched baseline-adjusted QT interval corrected for heart rate using an individual correction formula (QTcNi). In addition, data were analyzed using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and a post hoc piecewise QTcNi analysis based on a dichotomous cut of RR interval data at 800 ms. Moxifloxacin (400 mg single dose) was used to establish assay sensitivity. Using the QTcNi method, the largest difference in baseline-adjusted QTcNi between milnacipran 300 mg bid and placebo was -4.7 ms (90% confidence interval [CI]: -9.4 to -0.1), indicating no QT prolongation. Analysis using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) showed a maximum adjusted mean change of +7.7 ms, but QTcF versus RR interval plots indicated overcorrection with this method. The piecewise QTcNi correction method demonstrated a more accurate correction for drug-induced heart rate increase; mean baseline-adjusted between-group difference was +0.9 ms (90% CI: -6.6 to 8.3). The results suggest that milnacipran would not significantly affect cardiac repolarization at clinically relevant therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations.