Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 139: 240-248, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37392869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel molecular diagnostic methods are being evaluated in order to expedite pathogen identification in patients with bacteraemia. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of the T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) assays - T2 Bacteria (T2B) and T2 Resistance (T2R) - as point-of-care tests in the intensive care unit compared with blood-culture-based tests. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study of consecutive patients with suspected bacteraemia. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using blood culture as the reference method. FINDINGS: In total, 208 cases were included in the study. The mean time from sampling to report was lower for the T2MR assays compared with blood-culture-based methods (P<0.001). The rate of invalid reports was 6.73% for the T2B assay and 9.9% for the T2R assay. For the T2B assay, overall positive percentage agreement (PPA) was 84.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 71.9-93.1%], negative percentage agreement (NPA) was 64.3% (95% CI 55.4-72.6%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 48.9% (95% CI 42.5-55.3%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 91.2% (95% CI 84.4-95.2%). Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.402. For the T2R assay, overall PPA was 80% (95% CI 51.9-95.7%), NPA was 69.2% (95% CI 54.9-81.3%), PPV was 42.9% (95% CI 31.7-54.8%) and NPV was 92.3% (95% CI 81.1-97.1%). Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.376. CONCLUSION: T2MR assays have high NPV for rapid exclusion of bacteraemia, and could potentially assist with antimicrobial stewardship when applied as point-of-care diagnostic tests in the intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Euro Surveill ; 25(2)2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31964461

RESUMEN

Two ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-positive K. pneumoniae strains, including one pandrug resistant, were isolated in 2019 from two Greek hospitals. The strains were sequence types (ST)s 258 and 147 and both harboured similar self-transmissible IncA/C2 plasmids encoding a novel Lys234Arg variant of the Vietnamese extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (VEB)-1, not inhibited by AVI (VEB-25). Conjugal transfer of VEB-25-encoding plasmids to Escherichia coli yielded CAZ-AVI-resistant clones, supporting that VEB-25 is directly linked to the derived phenotype.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Ceftazidima , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Genoma Bacteriano , Grecia , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutación/genética , Plásmidos , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , beta-Lactamasas/genética
4.
Transplant Proc ; 46(9): 3191-3, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25420856

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bacteremias among renal transplant recipients are more frequent as a result of immunosuppression. They are considered extremely high-risk because they are correlated with decreased allograft and recipient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All episodes of bacteremia among renal transplant recipients were documented following review of medical records, from January 2010 to May 2013. RESULTS: In total 26 episodes of bacteremia were observed in 22 patients. Gram negative bacteremia was identified in 73% (19/26) cases. Pathogens according to their frequency were the following Escherichia coli (6/26, 23%), Klebsiella pneumonia (5/26, 19%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3/26, 11%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (3/26, 11%), Acinetobacter baumanni (2/26, 7.7%), Enterococcus faecalis (2/26, 7.7%). The first trimester post renal transplantation 18 episodes (69%) of bacteremia were presented that were not correlated to indwelling urinary catheter or stent. Positive urinary culture with the same pathogen was recognized in 13 patients. All recipients manifested fever, eight recipients had leucocytosis and three cases were complicated by septic shock. Immediate resuscitation with intravenous fluids and non-nephrotoxic antibiotic regimen was initiated. Acute renal allograft dysfunction (defined as an increase in serum creatinine more than 0.5 mg/dL from baseline) was observed in five patients and was restored following infection resolution. CONCLUSION: Increased prevalence of bacteremia in renal transplant recipients is attributed to immunosuppression and usually bacteremic episodes follow urinary tract infection. The commonest pathogens are Gram negative bacteria with E. coli the most frequent. Early detection and proper management are important as bacteremia affects renal allograft and recipient survival.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Riñón , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA