Reperfused human cadaver as a new simulation model for colonoscopy: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The reperfused human cadaver is a validated simulator for surgery. We aimed to use it as a colonoscopy simulator. METHODS: Novices, intermediates and skilled participants in gastrointestinal endoscopy were included. They performed one colonoscopy on a reperfused human cadaver and reaching rates, time, and length needed to reach anatomical landmarks were reported for construct validity analysis. We also assessed our model realism (SRS survey), educational content (CVS survey) and task load (NASA-TLX index). Score items were collected and defined as "favorable" when items were rated ≥ 5/7 with an inter-quartile range (IQR) overlapping four, and "very favorable" when rated ≥ 5/7 with an IQR excluding four (neutral). Primary endpoints were the rectosigmoid junction (RSJ) reaching rate and the descending colon (DC) reaching time. Secondary objectives were SRS, CVS and NASA-TLX questionnaire results. RESULTS: A total of 11 skilled participants, 5 intermediates and 8 novices were included. Skilled participants reached RSJ more often than novice and intermediary groups, respectively, 100%, 80% and 75% without differing significantly. They reached DC more frequently (100% for skilled, 80% for intermediates and 50% for novices, p = 0.018). The median time to reach RSJ (59, 272 and 686 s for skilled, intermediates and novices group, respectively) and DC (90, 534 and 1360 s for skilled, intermediates and novices) was significantly shorter for skilled participants (both p < .01). Nineteen out of the 22 items composing the realism survey obtained "very favorable" and "favorable" scores. Educational content was designated as "very favorable". Mental, physical, and technical demands were gradually higher the lower the initial level of experience. CONCLUSIONS: Reperfused human cadaver model has the potential to be valid simulation tool for diagnostic colonoscopy training.

Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC).

Twenty-seven experts under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC) offer this reference system with formalized recommendations concerning the performance of right colectomy by robotic approach (RRC). For RRC, experts suggest patient installation in the so-called "classic" or "suprapubic" setup. For patients undergoing right colectomy for a benign pathology or cancer, RRC provides no significant benefit in terms of intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative complications or conversion rate to laparotomy compared to laparoscopy. At the same time, RRC is associated with significantly longer operating times. Data from the literature are insufficient to define whether the robot facilitates the performance of an intra-abdominal anastomosis, but the robotic approach is more frequently associated with an intra-abdominal anastomosis than the laparoscopic approach. Experts also suggest that RRC offers a benefit in terms of post-operative morbidity compared to right colectomy by laparotomy. No benefit is retained in terms of mortality, duration of hospital stay, histological results, overall survival or disease-free survival in RRC performed for cancer. In addition, RRC should not be performed based on the cost/benefit ratio, since RRC is associated with significantly higher costs than laparoscopy and laparotomy. Future research in the field of RRC should consider the evaluation of patient-targeted parameters such as pain or quality of life and the technical advantages of the robot for complex procedural steps, as well as surgical and oncological results.

Time from first seen in specialist care to surgery does not influence survival outcome in patients with upfront resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of time to surgery (TTS) on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and postoperative complication rate in patients with upfront resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent upfront surgery for PA between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014 from four French centers. TTS was defined as the number of days between the date of the first consultation in specialist care and the date of surgery. DFS for a 14-day TTS was the primary endpoint. We also analyzed survival depending on different delay cut-offs (7, 14, 28, 60 and 75 days). RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were included. 59 patients (35%) underwent an upfront surgery within 14 days. Patients in the higher delay group (> 14 days) had significantly more vein resections and endoscopic biliary drainage. Adjusted OS (p = 0.44), DFS (p = 0.99), fistulas (p = 0.41), hemorrhage (p = 0.59) and severe post-operative complications (p = 0.82) were not different according to TTS (> 14 days). Other delay cut-offs had no impact on OS or DFS. DISCUSSION: TTS seems to have no impact on OS, DFS and 90-day postoperative morbidity.

Development of a program for teaching practical skills in visceral and digestive surgery by simulation.

Up until 2013 in France, practical training for DES/DESC (advanced level) residents in visceral and digestive surgery was not standardized. Since 2017, the third cycle of medical studies has been restructured around three major thematic axes: academic knowledge, and technical and non-technical skills. The curriculum now includes a practical training program by means of simulation outside the operating theater, and it is structured, uniformized and standardized nationwide. Development of this training program is derived from the deliberations of a national consensus panel working under the umbrella of the French college of visceral and digestive surgery, program presenting a training guide to all future surgeons in the specialty. Four consensus conference sessions bringing together an eight-member commission have led to the drafting of a "Resident's manual for practical teaching in visceral and digestive surgery". As a reference document, the manual details in 272 pages the objectives (phase I), the learning resources for each skill (phase II) and, lastly, the means of evaluation for the cornerstone phases as well as the in-depth phases of an advanced degree (DES) in visceral and digestive surgery. As a complement to the manual, we have conducted a review of the structuring and implementation of the program as of November 2017 on a nationwide scale; the conclusions of the review are detailed at the end of this article.

Residency training in robotic surgery: The role of simulation.

Simulation has become increasingly important in surgical teaching in recent years and the French National Authority for Health (HAS) recently underlined the goal and ethical priority: "never the first time on the patient". Simulation programs have been tested and validated for laparotomy and for laparoscopy, but there is not yet a validated program specific for robotic surgery. Due to substantial advances in this new technology, we have developed a program in Nancy dedicated to outside-the-operating room (OR) teaching of robotic surgery using the Da Vinci robot. This teaching is based on a combined program of theoretical teaching (e-learning) and learning of practical skills using virtual simulators (DV-Trainer®, Robotic Mentor®, DVSS®), mechanical simulators (Dome, Applied® abdominal simulators), microsurgery and wet lab using ex vivo animal organs, anesthetized animals, and cadavers. This program also emphasizes team training. The course is intended for residents in surgical training and is integrated into the specialized study diploma (DES) program for Visceral and Digestive Surgery; it also can be used by qualified surgeons who can integrate it with the Inter-University Diploma (DIU) in General Robotic Surgery for basic techniques and also for DIUs in other surgical specialties (digestive and gynecologic surgery) for robotic uses within their specialty. These courses are based on the concept of step-by-step skills acquisition and verification allowing a transition to safe clinical activity.

Surgical apprenticeship in the era of simulation.

The new tools for transmission of knowledge and skills (simulation, surgery broadcast, virtual reality, augmented reality…) offer novel opportunities for training through mentoring. The peer network is widened; the dissemination of knowledge is accelerated. The new ways of teaching bring benefit to each aspect of the surgical profession: clinical reasoning, performance of technical procedures, stress management, communication and management of severe or exceptional adverse events. Previously, confined to surgical teams, mentoring has been extended to simulation centers, which are becoming virtual hospitals, and it has been prolonged on the Internet via social networks. In the sphere of digital mentoring, objectives are henceforth more structured, skills assessment is more standardized, phases of apprenticeship are redefined, and individualized training contracts are formalized.

[EyeSi surgical simulator: Construct validity of capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification and irrigation and aspiration modules]. / Simulateur de chirurgie de cataracte EyeSi : validité de construction des modules capsulorhexis, phacoémulsification et aspiration des masses cristalliniennes.

PURPOSE: To compare performance on the EyeSi surgical simulator in 3 training modules by users with different levels of experience in ophthalmology. METHODS: We included 18 surgeons (6 residents with no cataract experience, 6 residents with little experience (1 to 10 cases) and 6 experienced cataract surgeons (over 500 cases). Three modules were selected (capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification-cracking and irrigation and aspiration). All subjects completed 12 levels of increasing difficulty twice, and the results of the second trial were analyzed according to the surgeon's experience. RESULTS: For the capsulorhexis module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores than the other 2 groups in exercise 1 (P=0.0102). For the phaco-cracking module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores in exercise 8 (P=0.0495) and a tendency toward significance in exercises 3 (P=0.0934) and 5 (P=0.0938). Participants with greater experience had lower total task time in exercises 1 (P=0.0444), 4 (P=0.06) and 5 (P=0.0189). CONCLUSION: Experienced surgeons outperformed residents with regard to overall score in 4 exercises of the capsulorhexis and phaco-cracking modules. Our results confirm previously demonstrated construct validity for these modules on the EyeSi simulator. These findings will help in the development of relevant training programs that could potentially be applied to the standard ophthalmological curriculum.

Construct, Face, and Content Validation on Voxel-Man® Simulator for Otologic Surgical Training.

Objective. To assess the face, content, and construct validity of the Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator. Participants and Methods. 74 ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons participated. They were assigned to one of two groups according to their level of expertise: the expert group (n = 16) and the novice group (n = 58). The participants performed four temporal bone dissection tasks on the simulator. Performances were assessed by a global score and then compared to assess the construct validity of the simulator. Finally, the expert group assessed the face and content validity by means of a five-point Likert-type scale. Results. experienced surgeons performed better (p < .01) and faster (p < .001) than the novices. However, the groups did not differ in terms of bone volume removed (p = .11) or number of injuries (p = .37). 93.7% of experienced surgeons stated they would recommend this simulator for anatomical learning. Most (87.5%) also thought that it could be integrated into surgical training. Conclusion. The Voxel-Man TempoSurg Virtual Reality simulator constitutes an interesting complementary tool to traditional teaching methods for training in otologic surgery.

A new system for evaluation of armrest use in robotic surgery and validation of a new ergonomic concept - armrest load.

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci robot provides a sitting position and an armrest to decrease workload and increase dexterity. We investigated the surgeon's ergonomic behaviour by installing force sensors on the dV-Trainer® simulator's armrest to measure the 'armrest load' during the performance of simulated exercises. METHODS: Five experts and 48 novices performed two robotic simulation exercises on the dV-Trainer. We calculated the armrest load and evaluated their armrest-using habits. Overall score and workspace range were evaluated automatically by the simulator and compared with armrest load. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences exist for overall score, workspace range and armrest load between novices and experts. CONCLUSION: The armrest load score is a direct, sensitive measure for the ergonomic evaluation of a simulator's armrest use. This experience-dependent ergonomic difference between experts and novices (p = 0.007) highlights the importance of ergonomic training for novice robot users. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients.

AIM: Full-thickness rectal prolapse is common in the elderly, but there are no particular practice guidelines for its surgical management. We evaluated retrospectively the perioperative and long-term clinical results and function in elderly and younger patients with complete rectal prolapse after robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy (RALR). METHOD: Seventy-seven patients who underwent RALR between 2002 and 2010 were divided into Group A (age < 75 years, n = 59) and Group B (age > 75 years, n = 18). Operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, short-term and long-term outcomes, recurrence rate and degree of satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding operation time, conversion, morbidity or length of hospital stay. At a median follow-up of 51.8 (5-115) months, there was no difference in the improvement of faecal incontinence, recurrence and the degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy is safe in patients aged over 75 years and gives similar results to those in patients aged < 75 years.