Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 11(7)2024 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39057621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The transfemoral approach represents the optimal access for TAVI due to its low invasiveness; however, up to 10-15% of TAVI candidates are considered unsuitable for femoral access because of significant peripheral vascular disease and need alternative access. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study including all consecutive adult patients undergoing transcatheter procedures through a TA approach from March 2015 to April 2024. RESULTS: 213 patients underwent transcatheter aortic or mitral valve implantation through a TA approach and were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 79.5 ± 5.7 years, and 54% of the patients were males. The mean Euroscore II was 7.9 ± 6.4%. One-third of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. The overall mean survival time was 5.3 ± 0.3 years. Nine (4%) patients developed infective endocarditis (IE) during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The transapical approach for transcatheter procedures is a safe and effective procedure for patients unsuitable for TF access with low periprocedural mortality and a low rate of post-procedural complications when performed by experienced surgeons and cardiologists.

2.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 40(Suppl 1): 100-109, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827546

RESUMEN

Infective endocarditis represents a challenging and life-threatening clinical condition affecting native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardium, and implanted cardiac devices. Right-sided infective endocarditis account for approximately 5-10% of all infective endocarditis and are often associated with intravenous drug use, intracardiac devices, central venous catheters, and congenital heart disease. The tricuspid valve is involved in 90% of right-side infective endocarditis. The primary treatment of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis is based on long-term intravenous antibiotics. When surgery is required, different interventions have been proposed, ranging from valvectomy to various types of valve repair to complete replacement of the valve. Percutaneous removal of vegetations using the AngioVac system has also been proposed in these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current surgical options and to discuss the results of the different surgical strategies in patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01650-0.

3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(6)2023 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37374264

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the early and long-term results of surgical treatment of isolated mitral native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Materials and Methods: All patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement for infective endocarditis at our institution between January 2001 and December 2021 were included in the study. The preoperative and postoperative characteristics and mortality of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 130 patients, 85 males and 45 females, with a median age of 61 ± 14 years, underwent surgery for isolated mitral valve endocarditis during the study period. There were 111 (85%) native and 19 (15%) prosthetic valve endocarditis cases. Fifty-one (39%) patients died during the follow-up, and the overall mean patient survival time was 11.8 ± 0.9 years. The mean survival time was better in patients with mitral native valve endocarditis compared to patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (12.3 ± 0.9 years vs. 8 ± 1.4 years; p = 0.1), but the difference was not statistically significant. Patients who underwent mitral valve repair had a better survival rate compared to patients who had mitral valve replacement (14.8 ± 1.6 vs. 11.3 ± 1 years; p = 0.06); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis had a significantly better survival rate compared to patients who received a biological prosthesis (15.6 ± 1.6 vs. 8.2 ± 0.8 years; p < 0.001). Patients aged ≤60 years had significantly better survival compared to patients aged >60 years (17.1 ± 1.1 vs. 8.2 ± 0.9; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the patient's age >60 years at the time of surgery was an independent risk factor for mortality, while mitral valve repair was a protective factor. Eight (7%) patients required reintervention. Freedom from reintervention was significantly higher in patients with mitral native valve endocarditis compared to patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (19.3 ± 0.5 vs. 11.5 ± 1.7 years; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Surgery for mitral valve endocarditis is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The patient's age at the time of surgery represents an independent risk factor for mortality. Mitral valve repair should be the preferred choice whenever possible in suitable patients affected by infective endocarditis.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Endocarditis/cirugía
4.
Perfusion ; : 2676591231181849, 2023 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) is adopted as an alternative to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) during aortic arch surgery. However, there is still no preclinical evidence to support the use of SACP associated with moderate hypothermia (28-30°C) instead of DHCA (18-20°C). The present study aims to develop a reliable and reproducible preclinical model of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with SACP applicable for assessing the best temperature management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A central cannulation through the right jugular vein and the left carotid artery was performed, and CPB was instituted.Animals were randomized into two groups: normothermic circulatory arrest without or with cerebral perfusion (NCA vs SACP). EEG monitoring was maintained during CPB. After 10 min of circulatory arrest, rats underwent 60 min of reperfusion. After that, animals were sacrificed, and brains were collected for histology and molecular biology analysis. RESULTS: Power spectral analysis of the EEG signal showed decreased activity in both cortical regions and lateral thalamus in all rats during the circulatory arrest. Only SACP determined complete recovery of brain activity and higher power spectral signal compared to NCA (p < 0.05). Histological damage scores and western blot analysis of inflammatory and apoptotic proteins like caspase-3 and Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) were significantly lower in SACP compared to NCA. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and RNA binding protein 3 (RBM3) involved in cell-protection mechanisms were higher in SACP, showing better neuroprotection (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SACP by cannulation of the left carotid artery guarantees good perfusion of the whole brain in this rat model of CPB with circulatory arrest. The present model of SACP is reliable, repeatable, and not expensive, and it could be used in the future to achieve preclinical evidence for the best temperature management and to define the best cerebral protection strategy during circulatory arrest.

5.
J Clin Med ; 12(5)2023 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36902862

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, the Perimount Magna Ease (PME) bioprosthesis has been implanted worldwide for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Recently, the INSPIRIS Resilia (IR) valve has been introduced as the newest generation of pericardial bioprostheses. However, few data have been reported about patients ≤70 years, and no comparisons in terms of hemodynamic performance between these two bioprostheses have been ever reported. METHODS: Patients aged <70 years undergoing AVR were considered for comparison between PME (n = 238) and IR (n = 192). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed by logistic regression with adjustment for eight key baseline variables. The two prostheses were compared in terms of hemodynamic performances up to 3 years postoperatively. Sub-analysis according to prosthetic size-category was accomplished. RESULTS: A total of 122 pairs with similar baseline characteristics were obtained from the PS-matching. The two prostheses showed comparable hemodynamic performances at one year (Gmean: 11.3 ± 3.5 mmHg vs. 11.9 ± 5.4 mmHg; p = 0.8) and at 3 years postoperatively (Gmean: 12.2 ± 7.9 mmHg vs. 12.8 ± 5.2 mmHg for; p = 0.3). The sub-analysis of size-category confirmed no statistical differences concerning the hemodynamic performances for each annulus size. CONCLUSIONS: This first PS-matched analysis demonstrated that the newly developed IR valve achieves the same safety and efficacy of the PME valve during mid-term follow-up in patients aged <70 years.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA