Comparison of weight increase in users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and copper IUD up to 5 years.

The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the weight variation in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) compared to users of the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD). A cohort of 206 healthy women allocated in two groups of 103 women according to the contraceptive method used was evaluated through 5 years. Each user of DMPA was paired with an IUD user by age (+/- 1 year) and weight (+/- 1 kg) at the beginning of the study. Weight was evaluated yearly during 5 years. The mean age at the beginning of the study was 33.1 years in both groups, and the mean weight was 59.4 kg in the IUD users and 60.4 kg in the DMPA group. Both cohorts of women presented significant weight increase at the end of the 5 years of observation (p < 0.001). However, DMPA users presented higher weight increase when compared to IUD users from the second through the fifth year of observation. The DMPA users increased weight by 4.3 kg during the 5 years, and IUD users increased 1.8 kg. In conclusion, DMPA users had a significantly higher weight increase when compared to IUD users. In addition, this cohort of women increased weight throughout the 5 years with the use of DMPA or IUD.

Forearm bone density in long-term users of oral combined contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bone mineral density of users of combined oral contraceptives (OC) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (depot-MPA) with women who have never used a hormonal contraceptive method. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 189 women, aged 30 to 34 years old, were allocated to three groups: 63 who had used OC for at least 2 years; 63 who had used depot-MPA for at least 2 years; and 63 control women who had never used hormonal contraceptives. INTERVENTION(S): Each woman's bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at the distal and ultradistal section of the radius of the nondominant forearm by the use of single x-ray absorptiometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We obtained BMD measurements for each participant. RESULT(S): Independent of the period of use and the section of the forearm studied, we found no difference in BMD for OC or depot-MPA users when compared to women who had never used hormonal contraceptive methods. In addition, BMD was similar between OC users and depot-MPA users. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD were weight, number of pregnancies, and the woman's occupation. CONCLUSION(S): Women aged 30 to 34 years who have used OC or depot-MPA have similar BMD as control women. These findings suggest that the use of OC or depot-MPA does not affect the BMD of women in this age group.

Forearm bone density in users of Depo-Provera as a contraceptive method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on bone mineral density when used as a contraceptive method. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Academic tertiary-care hospital. PATIENT(S): Fifty premenopausal women who had used depot MPA as a contraceptive method for > or =1 year and 50 women who had never used hormonal contraceptive methods. INTERVENTION(S): Bone mineral density was evaluated at the midshaft and at the distal radius of the nondominant forearm using single x-ray absorptiometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Bone mineral density. RESULT(S): Bone mineral density at the midshaft of the forearm was lower in depot MPA users than in women who had never used hormonal contraceptive methods, but the difference was not statistically significant. At the distal portion, bone mineral density was significantly lower in the study group. The duration of depot MPA use was not related to bone mineral density. CONCLUSION(S): Women > or =35 years of age presented with a lower bone mineral density only at the distal portion of the forearm after the use of depot MPA for > or =1 year. However, this decrease was not related to the duration of depot MPA use. It is not possible to conclude that women who use depot MPA are at risk of osteoporosis.

PIP: The impact of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use on bone mineral density was assessed in a cross-sectional study of 100 women recruited from a teaching hospital in Campinas, Brazil, during 1996-98. Bone mineral density, as evaluated at the midshaft and distal radius of the nondominant forearm by single x-ray absorptiometry, was compared in 50 women 35-45 years of age who had been using Depo-Provera for contraception for 1 year or more (mean duration, 46.4 +or- 38.6 months) but had never used any other hormonal method and 50 age- and weight-matched women who had never used any form of hormonal contraception. Although mean bone mineral density at the midshaft of the forearm was lower in Depo-Provera users than nonusers of hormonal contraception (0.459 +or- 0.042 vs. 0.474 +or- 0.049 g/sq. cm), the difference was not statistically significant. At the distal portion, bone mineral density was significantly lower in Depo-Provera users than nonusers of hormonal methods (0.362 +or- 0.040 vs. 0.392 +or- 0.049 g/sq. cm, p 0.001). The duration of Depo-Provera use was not related to bone mineral density, even when women had used the method for more than 5 years. Multiple regression analysis indicated that 4 pregnancies, White race, and Depo-Provera use were significantly associated with lower bone mineral density at the midshaft section of the forearm; at the distal section of the forearm, these variables were Depo-Provera use, more than 4 pregnancies, White race, older age at menarche, and habitual coffee drinking. These findings do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that Depo-Provera users are at increased risk of osteoporosis.

The influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration upon the next ovarian cycle.

We examined the influence of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), used as an ovulation inducer and/or for supporting the luteal phase, on the next ovarian cycle. Four women received 10,000 IU of HCG at mid-cycle and another four received the same dose plus 1500 IU on the 17th, 19th and 21st days of the cycle. In the menstrual cycle prior to our experiments, venous blood samples were collected and vaginal ultrasound of the ovaries was performed every other day from day 21-28; the same data were also collected on days 1-10 of the experiment cycle. In such a way, control values were obtained. After the administration of HCG, venous blood samples were collected and ultrasound was performed in the same way and on the same days as in the controls. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone were determined by radioimmunoassay in all blood samples, and HCG only in samples collected after the experiment. The results showed that only FSH was lower in the late luteal phase after the administration of 10,000 IU of HCG. Follicular diameters were higher during the follicular phase than during the previous cycle only in women who received the low dose of HCG. In addition, one woman presented with detectable HCG in the following ovarian cycle. The use of HCG in the preceding cycle may reduce FSH and develop persistent follicles in the subsequent cycle. We suggest that an ultrasound of the ovaries should be performed before starting a new ovulation induction cycle in a woman who has received HCG in the previous cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)