Primary care access to radiology: Characteristics of trauma patients referred to the emergency department.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Low-urgent Emergency Department (ED) attendances are a known contributing factor to ED crowding. In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) have direct access to radiology facilities during office hours. Patients with radiographically confirmed traumatic injuries are subsequently referred to the ED. We analysed these ED trauma patients' characteristics, provided treatments and ED discharge diagnoses to identify the possibility of alternative care pathways. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective observational study of trauma patients referred to the ED by the radiology department during office hours (January 2017-December 2017). Data were obtained from patient records. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the extracted data. RESULTS: A total of 662 patients were included. The median age was 42 years (range: 1-100, interquartile range (IQR): 15-63) and patients presented to the ED with a median delay of 1 day (range: 0-112 days, IQR: 0-5). Most patients were referred for injuries involving the upper extremities (61.5%) and lower extremities (30%). A total of 48 additional diagnoses were made in the ED. The majority of injuries was classified as 'minor' (29.5%) or 'moderate' (68.3%) on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The median length of stay in the ED was 65 min (range: 7-297 min, IQR: 43-102). CONCLUSION: Most patients presented with low acuity injuries and often with a notable delay to the ED. This suggests that the majority of these patients do not necessarily need ED treatment, which may provide an opportunity to counter ED crowding.

Simultaneous interfacility transfer of multiple non-critically ill COVID-19 patients using a single vehicle: the ambulance bus experience.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital capacity in the Netherlands has been pushed to its limits. In order to prevent hospitals from collapse due to capacity issues, hospitalized COVID-19 patients were redistributed throughout the country. The numerous individual interfacility transfers further increased the pressure on emergency medical services (EMS), which simultaneously had to serve the community during the pandemic. In this report, we evaluate the interfacility transport of multiple non-critically ill COVID-19 patients using one single vehicle: a coach converted into an ambulance bus. DISCUSSION: Between March 28, 2020, and July 17, 2021, the ambulance bus was dispatched 22 times. In total, 102 patients were transferred over a mean distance of 79.6 km. No technical or patient-related adverse events were reported. The primary benefits of the ambulance bus were its time and staff reducing potential, as well as the ability to provide relief to overwhelmed hospitals. Furthermore, it could be assembled from existing equipment in a relatively short time span. However, the efficiency of dispatches and matching between hospitals could be improved. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous interfacility transfer of multiple non-critically ill COVID-19 patients using an ambulance bus was feasible. No technical or patient-related adverse events were reported during 22 dispatches, involving a total of 102 patients. This mode of transport may also be useful in non-pandemic situations, such as hospital and nursing home evacuations.

A Swift and Dynamic Strategy to Expand Emergency Department Capacity for COVID-19.

Emergency departments (EDs) worldwide struggled to prepare for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient surge and to simultaneously preserve sufficient capacity for "regular" emergency care. While many hospitals used costly shelter facilities, it was decided to merge the acute medical unit (AMU) and the ED. The conjoined AMU-ED was segregated into a high-risk and a low-risk area to maintain continuity of emergency care. This strategy allowed for a feasible, swift, and dynamic expansion of ED capacity without the need for external tent facilities. This report details on the technical execution and discusses the pearls and potential pitfalls of this expansion strategy. Although ED preparedness for pandemics may be determined by local factors, such as hospital size, ED census, and primary health-care efficacy, the conjoined AMU-ED strategy may be a potential model for other EDs.

When disasters strike the emergency department: a case series and narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) are reasonably well prepared for external disasters, such as natural disasters, mass casualty incidents, and terrorist attacks. However, crises and disasters that emerge and unfold within hospitals appear to be more common than external events. EDs are often affected. Internal hospital crises and disasters (IHCDs) have the potential to endanger patients, staff, and visitors, and to undermine the integrity of the facility as a steward of public health and safety. Furthermore, ED patient safety and logistics may be seriously hampered. METHODS: Case series of 3 disasters within EDs. Narrative overview of the current IHCD-related literature retrieved from searches of PubMed databases, hand searches, and authoritative texts. DISCUSSION: The causes of IHCDs are multifaceted and an internal disaster is often the result of a cascade of events. They may or may not be associated with a community-wide event. Examples include fires, floods, power outages, structural damage, information and communication technology (ICT) failures, and cyberattacks. EDs are particularly at-risk. While acute-onset disasters have immediate consequences for acute care services, epidemics and pandemics are threats that can have long-term sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals and their EDs are at-risk for crises and their potential escalation to hospital disasters. Emerging risks due to climate-related emergencies, infectious disease outbreaks, terrorism, and cyberattacks pose particular threats. If a hospital is not prepared for IHCDs, it undermines the capacity of administration and staff to safeguard the safety of patients. Therefore, hospitals and their EDs must check and where necessary enhance their preparedness for these contingencies.

A scoping review of internal hospital crises and disasters in the Netherlands, 2000-2020.

BACKGROUND: Internal hospital crises and disasters (IHCDs) are events that disrupt the routine functioning of a hospital while threatening the well-being of patients and staff. IHCDs may cause hospital closure, evacuations of patients and loss of healthcare capacity. The consequences may be ruinous for local communities. Although IHCDs occur with regularity, information on the frequency and types of these events is scarcely published in the medical literature. However, gray literature and popular media reports are widely available. We therefore conducted a scoping review of these literature sources to identify and characterize the IHCDs that occurred in Dutch hospitals from 2000 to 2020. The aim is to develop a systematic understanding of the frequency of the various types of IHCDs occurring in a prosperous nation such as the Netherlands. METHODS: A systematic scoping review of news articles retrieved from the LexisNexis database, Google, Google News, PubMed and EMBASE between 2000 and 2020. All articles mentioning the closure of a hospital department in the Netherlands were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 IHCDs were identified in a 20-year time period. Of these IHCDs, there were 96 (71.6%) emergency department closures, 76 (56.7%) operation room closures, 56 (41.8%) evacuations, 26 (17.9%) reports of injured persons, and 2 (1.5%) reported casualties. Cascading events of multiple failures transpired in 39 (29.1%) IHCDs. The primary causes of IHCDs (as reported) were information and communication technology (ICT) failures, technical failures, fires, power failures, and hazardous material warnings. An average of 6.7 IHCDs occurred per year. From 2000-2009 there were 32 IHCDs, of which one concerned a primary ICT failure. Of the 102 IHCDs between 2010-2019, 32 were primary ICT failures. CONCLUSIONS: IHCDs occur with some regularity in the Netherlands and have marked effects on hospital critical care departments, particularly emergency departments. Cascading events of multiple failures transpire nearly a third of the time, limiting the ability of a hospital to stave off closure due to failure. Emergency managers should therefore prioritize the risk of ICT failures and cascading events and train hospital staff accordingly.

Utility of Shock Index for Suspected Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: A ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a life-threatening condition, with high mortality rates. The Shock Index (SI) is an easy tool and a useful predictor of hemodynamic instability in trauma patients. We aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic value of the SI for patients with a suspected rAAA in the prehospital and hospital setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study. Patients >18 years old who visited the emergency department with a suspected rAAA between January 2009 and December 2018 were included. Prehospital and hospital SI were calculated and analyzed for its predictive value on the presence of a rAAA, need for packed cells (PCs) and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 71 patients (22.6%) presented with a rAAA. Prehospital and hospital SI were significantly increased in the rAAA group. A SI ≥ 1.0 was estimated as an optimal cutoff point for the presence of a rAAA (AUROC 0.74, 95% CI 0.67-0.82; p < 0.001) with an adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) of 5.3 (95% CI 2.13-13.39) for the prehospital SI and an adjusted OR of 18.2 (95% CI 5.83-56.73) for the hospital SI. Both prehospital and hospital SI ≥ 1.0 were associated with a higher need for PCs and amount of PCs (p < 0.05). A hospital SI ≥ 1.0 was associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates (39.0% vs 68.0%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The prehospital and hospital SI were significantly elevated in the rAAA group. As such, the SI showed promising results as a predictive and prognostic tool, with SI ≥ 1.0 as cutoff point.

Emergency Department Ceiling Collapse: Response to an Internal Emergency.

Hospital disaster resilience is often conceived as the ability to respond to external disasters. However, internal disasters appear to be more common events in hospitals than external events. This report describes the aftermath of a ceiling collapse in the emergency department of VieCuri Medical Center in Venlo, the Netherlands, on May 18, 2017. By designating the acute medical unit as a temporary emergency department, standard emergency care could be resumed within 8 hours. This unique approach might be transferrable to other hospitals in the developed world. In general, it is vital that hospital disaster plans focus on both external and internal disasters, including specific scenarios that disrupt vital hospital departments such as the emergency department. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:829-830).

Prospective evaluation of the added value of imaging within the Dutch National Diagnostic Appendicitis Guideline--do we forget our clinical eye?

BACKGROUND: Annually 16,000 appendectomies are performed in the Netherlands, of which 15-20% are negative. In 2010, to reduce this unacceptable percentage of superfluous appendectomies, the Dutch Association for Surgery introduced the 'Appendicitis Guideline'. This guideline recommends the use of imaging. In this observational prospective study the added value of imaging in everyday clinical practice is evaluated. METHODS: All patients with suspected appendicitis were included at the emergency department of a Dutch teaching hospital during the period from September 2011 to May 2012 (n = 350; 237 adults and 113 children under 18 years). Adherence to the guideline was evaluated. RESULTS: 75 Patients (21%) were not referred for imaging because of a low suspicion or alternative diagnosis. In 16 patients (5%) the guideline was not followed. Of the 259 patients (74%) who underwent ultrasonography, 105 (30%) also underwent computed tomography (CT). 127 appendectomies were performed, showing appendicitis in 112 patients (88%); 15 appendectomies (12%) were negative. In the latter group, 12 were performed after false positive imaging results, and 3 following inconclusive imaging results. CONCLUSION: When using imaging in the diagnosis of appendicitis, the percentage of negative appendectomies remains close to the percentage declared as unacceptable by the publishers of the guideline.

Low vacuum and discard tubes reduce hemolysis in samples drawn from intravenous catheters.

OBJECTIVES: In-vitro hemolysis is a great challenge to emergency departments where blood is drawn from intravenous catheters (IVCs). Although high quality samples can be obtained by straight needle venipuncture, IVCs are preferred for various reasons. The aim of this study was to identify blood collection practices that reduce hemolysis while using IVC. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was conducted at an emergency department where blood is drawn in ≥ 90% of patients from IVC. Hemolysis, measured spectrophotometrically, was compared between syringe and vacuum tubes. The following practices were tested in combination with vacuum collection; a Luer-slip adapter, a Luer-lock adapter, discard tubes and low vacuum tubes. Each intervention lasted 1 week and retrieved 154 to 297 samples. As reference, hemolysis was also measured in vacuum tubes retrieved from departments where only straight needle venipuncture is performed. RESULTS: Vacuum collection led to more hemolytic samples compared with syringe tubes (24% versus 16% respectively, p=0.008). No difference in hemolysis was observed between the Luer-slip and the Luer-lock adapter. The use of discard (17% hemolytic, p=0.045) and low vacuum tubes (12% hemolytic, p<0.001) substantially decreased hemolysis. None of the interventions reduced the hemolysis rate to the level observed when drawing blood by straight needle venipuncture (3%, p<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, both discard and low vacuum tubes reduce hemolysis while drawing blood from IVC. Of these practices the use of a low vacuum tube is preferred considering the less volume of blood and the amount of tubes drawn.