Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Activity of Hybrid Thiosemicarbazone-Alkylthiocarbamate Metal Complexes.

A series of hybrid ligands (H2L1-H2L3) derived from 4-methyl-3-thiosemicarbazide and hydrazinecarbothioic acid O-alkyl esters were synthesized and characterized by NMR. The ligands were chelated with copper (4-6), nickel (7-9), and zinc (10-12) and characterized by spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray crystallography. The chelated metals displayed substantial anodic shifts in the CuII/I reduction potential of ∼160 mV relative to their bis(thiosemicarbazone) analogues. The metal chelates 4-12 were evaluated for potential anticancer activity by MTT assays, and selected results were confirmed by clonogenic and trypan blue assays. The copper derivatives 4 and 6 were found to have potent and cancer-selective antiproliferative effects, with GI50 values less than 100 nM in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells compared with at least 20-fold less activity in IMR90 nonmalignant lung fibroblasts. In comparison, the nickel complexes were much less active and had little cancer-selectivity. Varying by ligand, the zinc complexes were less potent or had comparable activity compared to that of the corresponding copper complex. UV-visible spectroscopy indicated that zinc complex 10 was transmetalated in the presence of equimolar copper, whereas nickel complex 7 was not. Copper complexes 4 and 6 were also assessed in the NCI60 screen and were found to have cytotoxic activity against most solid tumor cell lines. In MTT assays, 4 and 6 were substantially more active against A549 cancer cells than Cu(ATSM) and were more cancer-selective (for A549 compared to IMR-90) than Cu(GTSM). Our results suggest that hybrid thiosemicarbazone-alkylthiocarbamate copper complexes have potential for development as new anticancer agents.

A corepressor participates in LexA-independent regulation of error-prone polymerases in Acinetobacter.

The DNA damage response of the multidrug-resistant pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii, which induces mutagenic UmuD'2C error-prone polymerases, differs from that of many bacteria. Acinetobacter species lack a LexA repressor, but induce gene transcription after DNA damage. One regulator, UmuDAb, binds to and represses the promoters of the multiple A. baumannii ATCC 17978 umuDC alleles and the divergently transcribed umuDAb and ddrR genes. ddrR is unique to the genus Acinetobacter and of unknown function. 5' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) PCR mapping of the umuDAb and ddrR transcriptional start sites revealed that their -35 promoter elements overlapped the UmuDAb binding site, suggesting that UmuDAb simultaneously repressed expression of both genes by blocking polymerase access. This coordinated control of ddrR and umuDAb suggested that ddrR might also regulate DNA damage-inducible gene transcription. RNA-sequencing experiments in 17 978 ddrR- cells showed that ddrR regulated approximately 25 % (n=39) of the mitomycin C-induced regulon, with umuDAb coregulating 17 of these ddrR-regulated genes. Eight genes (the umuDC polymerases, umuDAb and ddrR) were de-repressed in the absence of DNA damage, and nine genes were uninduced in the presence of DNA damage, in both ddrR and umuDAb mutant strains. These data suggest ddrR has multiple roles, both as a co-repressor and as a positive regulator of DNA damage-inducible gene transcription. Additionally, 57 genes were induced by mitomycin C in the ddrR mutant but not in wild-type cells. This regulon contained multiple genes for DNA replication, recombination and repair, transcriptional regulators, RND efflux, and transport. This study uncovered another regulator of the atypical DNA damage response of this genus, to help describe how this pathogen acquires drug resistance through its expression of the error-prone polymerases under DdrR and UmuDAb control.

UmuDAb: An Error-Prone Polymerase Accessory Homolog Whose N-Terminal Domain Is Required for Repression of DNA Damage Inducible Gene Expression in Acinetobacter baylyi.

In many bacteria, the DNA damage response induces genes (SOS genes) that were repressed by LexA. LexA represses transcription by binding to SOS promoters via a helix-turn-helix motif in its N-terminal domain (NTD). Upon DNA damage, LexA cleaves itself and allows induction of transcription. In Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter baylyi, multiple genes are induced by DNA damage, and although the Acinetobacter genus lacks LexA, a homolog of the error-prone polymerase subunit UmuD, called UmuDAb, regulates some DNA damage-induced genes. The mechanism of UmuDAb regulation has not been determined. We constructed UmuDAb mutant strains of A. baylyi to test whether UmuDAb mediates gene regulation through LexA-like repressor actions consisting of relief of repression through self-cleavage after DNA damage. Real-time quantitative PCR experiments in both a null umuDAb mutant and an NTD mutant showed that the DNA damage-inducible, UmuDAb-regulated gene ddrR was highly expressed even in the absence of DNA damage. Protein modeling identified a potential LexA-like helix-turn-helix structure in the UmuDAb NTD, which when disrupted, also relieved ddrR and umuDAb repression under non-inducing conditions. Mutations in a putative SOS box in the shared umuDAb-ddrR promoter region similarly relieved these genes' repression under non-inducing conditions. Conversely, cells possessing a cleavage-deficient UmuDAb were unable to induce gene expression after MMC-mediated DNA damage. This evidence of a UmuDAb repressor mechanism was contrasted with the failure of umuDAb to complement an Escherichia coli umuD mutant for UmuD error-prone DNA replication activity. Similarly, A. baumannii null umuDAb mutant cells did not have a reduced UmuD'2UmuC-mediated mutation rate after DNA damage, suggesting that although this UmuDAb protein may have evolved from a umuDC operon in this genus, it now performs a LexA-like repressor function for a sub-set of DNA damage-induced genes.