Assessing the value of pharmacists' health-systemwide services: clinical pathways and treatment guidelines.

Practice guidelines and clinical pathways are increasingly being used as tools to enhance the quality of health care services and to manage costs better. This article reviews the role of guidelines and clinical pathways in health care as defined within the broader concept of practice policies. The factors that increase the effectiveness of practice policies are examined. These include the origin of development, dissemination technique, and implementation strategy. Policies that are internally developed and implemented with concurrent reminder systems are the most effective. Clinical pathways fit these criteria and are therefore highly effective policy types. The roles that pharmacists within health systems can undertake in policy development are described. These include writing the policy document, providing expert review, providing education, and most important, facilitating the desired outcomes by implementing pharmacy services that promote compliance with the guidelines. Examples of pharmacy-based guideline and pathway implementation from the Henry Ford Health System are described for inpatient anticoagulation, outpatient preferred drug formulary policy, and outpatient lipid therapy management.

Economic evaluation of three methods of treating urogenital chlamydial infections in the emergency department.

We attempted to determine the economic impact of three alternatives for the treatment of chlamydial infections in the emergency department: a written prescription for 7 days of doxycycline therapy (D-RX); a prepacked 7-day supply of doxycycline (D-ED); or a single 1-g dose of azithromycin (AZI). Data inputs for the model were obtained from both patient experience and literature sources. Primary health outcomes of the model were number of infection relapses. Economic outcomes were costs for initial treatment, treatment of relapses, and treatment of complications of relapse. For every 1000 patients, D-ED and AZI resulted in 21.6 (-10 to -41) and 36.2 (-25 to -63) fewer relapses than D-RX, respectively; AZI resulted in 14.6 (-35 to -4) fewer relapses than D-ED. Total costs were decreased for D-ED and AZI versus D-RX by $18,879 (-$39,000 to -$8000) and $24,039 (-$59,000 to -$10,000), respectively, and AZI resulted in a total cost decrease of $5160 (-$35,000 to +$6000) versus D-ED. Both D-ER and AZI decreased infection relapses and overall health care costs compared with D-RX. Also, AZI resulted in additional decreases in relapses versus D-ED, although the incremental impact on cost was inconclusive.

Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus low-dose heparin for prophylaxis against venous thrombosis after major trauma.

We attempted to determine health and economic outcomes from the perspective of an integrated health system of administering enoxaparin 30 mg twice/day versus heparin 5000 U twice/day for prophylaxis against venous thrombosis after major trauma. A decision-analytic model was developed from best literature evidence, institutional data, and expert opinion. We assumed that 40% of proximal deep vein thromboses (DVTs) and 5% of distal DVTs are diagnosed and confirmed with initial or repeat duplex scanning; 50% of undiagnosed proximal DVTs result in pulmonary embolism; 2% and 1% of undiagnosed proximal DVTs will lead to readmission for DVT and pulmonary embolism, respectively, and pulmonary embolism-related mortality rates range from 8-30%. Length of hospital stay data and 1996 institutional drug use and acquisition cost data were used to estimate the cost of enoxaparin and heparin therapy. Diagnosis and treatment costs for DVT and pulmonary embolism were derived from institutional charge data using cost:charge ratios. A second analysis of patients with lower extremity fractures was completed. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were performed. For 1000 mixed trauma patients receiving enoxaparin versus heparin, our model showed that 62.2 (95% CI -113 to -12) DVTs or pulmonary emboli would be avoided, resulting in 67.6 (8 to 130) life-years saved at a net cost increase of $104,764 (-$329,300 to $159,600). Enoxaparin versus heparin resulted in a cost of $1684 (-$3600 to $9800) for each DVT or pulmonary embolus avoided and a discounted cost/life-year saved of $2303 (-$8100 to $19,000). For 1000 patients with lower extremity fractures, enoxaparin versus heparin resulted in a cost of $751 (-$4200 to $3300) for each DVT or pulmonary embolus avoided and a discounted cost/life-year saved of $1017 (-$10,200 to $6300). Although enoxaparin increases overall health care costs, it is associated with a cost/additional life-year saved of only $2300, which is generally lower than the commonly used hurdle rate of $30,000/life-year saved. The cost-effectiveness ratio is more favorable in patients with lower extremity fractures than in the general mixed trauma population.

Cost-effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group.

Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been shown to improve 3-month outcome in stroke patients treated within 3 hours of symptom onset. The costs associated with this new treatment will be a factor in determining the extent of its utilization. Data from the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial and the medical literature were used to estimate the health and economic outcomes associated with using tPA in acute stroke patients. A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs per 1,000 patients eligible for treatment with tPA compared with the costs per 1,000 untreated patients. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses (using Monte Carlo simulation) were performed to estimate the overall uncertainty of the model results. In the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial, the average length of stay was significantly shorter in tPA-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (10.9 versus 12.4 days; p = 0.02) and more tPA patients were discharged to home than to inpatient rehabilitation or a nursing home (48% versus 36%; p = 0.002). The Markov model estimated an increase in hospitalization costs of $1.7 million and a decrease in rehabilitation costs of $1.4 million and nursing home cost of $4.8 million per 1,000 eligible treated patients for a health care system that includes acute through long-term care facilities. Multiway sensitivity analysis revealed a greater than 90% probability of cost savings. The estimated impact on long-term health outcomes was 564 (3 to 850) quality-adjusted life-years saved over 30 years of the model per 1,000 patients. Treating acute ischemic stroke patients with tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset improves functional outcome at 3 months and is likely to result in a net cost savings to the health care system.

Retrospective pharmacoeconomic evaluation of dosing vecuronium by peripheral nerve stimulation versus standard clinical assessment in critically ill patients.

Adjusting the dosage of vecuronium by peripheral nerve stimulation versus standard clinical dosing in critically ill patients reduces drug requirements to maintain a desired depth of paralysis and, on average, produces faster recovery of neuromuscular function. We retrospectively analyzed the health and economic outcomes of using train-of-four (TOF) end points by peripheral nerve stimulation in dosing neuromuscular blocking agents during continuous infusion in a medical intensive care unit (ICU). A decision-analytic model was used to calculate outcomes and costs of treatment using and not using TOF end points of dosing vecuronium. Data from our TOF trial provided the difference in neuromuscular and functional recovery time. Charges billed by the Patient Financial Services Department were used to determine hourly costs of ICU stay for recovery from neuromuscular blockade using costs:charges ratios estimated from a sample of 20 patients. The cost of vecuronium was determined using the hospital acquisition cost and the actual number of milligrams of drug given to each patient in the TOF trial. The cost of performing one TOF event was determined by timing six events performed by six pharmacists, and randomly selecting 60% of these to calculate a mean time/TOF event. The economic impact of dosing by TOF was determined by calculating the cost savings/patient dosed by TOF compared with those who had doses individualized by standard clinical assessment. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty. The mean drug cost was $286 in the TOF group versus $580 in the standard dosing group. With a mean time/TOF assessment of 5.8 +/- 1.6 minutes, each episode cost $2.92 for a total TOF cost/patient of $23. At $54/hour of recovery time in the ICU, the estimated cost of ICU care for the TOF group was $34,214 versus $118,681 for the standard group. The estimated costs/patient were $459 and $1197, respectively, for a total cost savings/patient of $738. Sensitivity analyses showed the model to be robust. Estimated annual savings of $146,103 are projected by using TOF to individualize vecuronium doses in patients in the ICU. Individualizing vecuronium doses to TOF end points has both therapeutic and economic advantages. When considering costs of drug, TOF monitoring, and ICU, the total cost/patient was 40% of that in the control group.

Bar code documentation of pharmacotherapy services in intensive care units.

Bar code technology has been used for 5 years to improve the efficiency of identifying and documenting clinical pharmacy services at our institution. Data for an entire year (1993) were analyzed to quantify the nature and magnitude of pharmacy services provided for critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU). Patients in the medical (MICU), respiratory (RICU), intermediate (IMU), and surgical (SICU) units (3234/3743 patients, 86%) were reviewed. Clinical interventions and expected outcomes were documented by pharmacists using an automated bar code system. There were 11,628 pharmacotherapy interventions, 3.6/patient; 12/pharmacist work day. Of patients whose drug therapy was reviewed at least once, 50% (1610/3234) received at least one intervention. The mean number of interventions/patient was 7.2 in the MICU, 6.1 in RICU, 3.4 in IMU, and 2.4 in the SICU, corresponding to APACHE III scores of 71.2, 66.2, 42.8, and 43.3, respectively. The majority of interventions were to modify dosages of antimicrobial agents, and were performed to achieve optimum efficacy (42%) and to minimize toxicity (46.2%). These data support the necessity for pharmacists to provide individualized care to critically ill patients.

The transition to medication system performance indicators.

Economic and competitive pressures in the health care market are causing hospitals and other health care providers to seek more effective ways to improve the quality of care and to decrease costs. Integrating total quality management and continuous quality improvement techniques into traditional drug use evaluation methodology allows for the development of critical performance indicators. These indicators integrate the selection, use, delivery methods, and outcomes of drug therapy with other operational therapeutic modalities. The article describes the development of medication system performance indicators using heparin dosing as a model.

Pharmacy technicians and computer technology to support clinical pharmacy services.

Use of pharmacy technicians, computer-assisted patient-selection algorithms, and bar-code technology to increase efficiency of clinical pharmacy staff is described. Workload assessment showed that clinical pharmacists at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit) were spending two thirds of their time with data collection, patient selection, and documentation and only one third of their time intervening to improve drug therapy. To increase pharmacist efficiency, two technicians were hired to perform the clerical functions associated with clinical pharmacy services. Also, a bar-code data-collection system was implemented to help pharmacists document their clinical activity. Computerized algorithms helped pharmacists target patients whose therapy should be most carefully reviewed. Reports generated by the system summarized workload distribution and provided information about the types of problems identified and corrected. After these changes were implemented, the fraction of time that pharmacists spent intervening to improve drug therapy increased to one half. Use of technicians to perform clerical tasks, computerized algorithms to help identify patients in need of pharmacist assistance, and bar-code technology to facilitate data collection has helped clinical pharmacists improve their time management.

Bar-code technology applied to drug-use evaluation.

Bar-code technology was used to determine: (1) patterns in histamine H2-receptor antagonist use and (2) the occurrence of adverse drug effects and drug interactions associated with the use of these agents in critically ill patients. Patients at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit) receiving histamine H2-receptor antagonists over a two-month period were evaluated. Clinical information was collected in the intensive care units by using a bar-code system. The data-capture menu was based on drug-use-evaluation criteria for H2-receptor antagonists. Data collected in the scanning wands were uploaded into a computer database and were analyzed at the end of the study. Data were collected for 207 patients. Cimetidine was the predominant H2-receptor antagonist used, and the predominant indication was stress-ulcer prophylaxis. Dosing trends followed accepted guidelines for cimetidine dosage adjustment in renal and hepatic failure. Two drug interactions and six adverse drug reactions occurred. Pharmacists made 92 recommendations to the medical staff regarding modification in therapy, involving 32% of the patients. Data collection required an average of 10 minutes per day each for three pharmacists. H2-receptor antagonist use patterns were evaluated in intensive care units through the application of bar-code technology. The speed and efficiency of this automated tool facilitated collection of a large amount of data.