Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Vet Res ; 13(1): 314, 2017 Nov 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29115951

RESUMEN

A round table discussion was held during the LAVA-ESLAV-ECLAM conference on Reproducibility of Animal Studies on the 25th of September 2017 in Edinburgh. The aim of the round table was to discuss how to enhance the rate at which the quality of reporting animal research can be improved. This signed statement acknowledges the efforts that participant organizations have made towards improving the reporting of animal studies and confirms an ongoing commitment to drive further improvements, calling upon both academics and laboratory animal veterinarians to help make this cultural change.


Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal/normas , Animales , Difusión de la Información , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación/normas
2.
Vet Rec ; 181(7): 178-179, 2017 08 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801502
3.
Lab Anim ; 51(2): 160-169, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27307423

RESUMEN

Rodent models produce data which underpin biomedical research and non-clinical drug trials, but translation from rodents into successful clinical outcomes is often lacking. There is a growing body of evidence showing that improving experimental design is key to improving the predictive nature of rodent studies and reducing the number of animals used in research. Age, one important factor in experimental design, is often poorly reported and can be overlooked. The authors conducted a survey to assess the age used for a range of models, and the reasoning for age choice. From 297 respondents providing 611 responses, researchers reported using rodents most often in the 6-20 week age range regardless of the biology being studied. The age referred to as 'adult' by respondents varied between six and 20 weeks. Practical reasons for the choice of rodent age were frequently given, with increased cost associated with using older animals and maintenance of historical data comparability being two important limiting factors. These results highlight that choice of age is inconsistent across the research community and often not based on the development or cellular ageing of the system being studied. This could potentially result in decreased scientific validity and increased experimental variability. In some cases the use of older animals may be beneficial. Increased scientific rigour in the choice of the age of rodent may increase the translation of rodent models to humans.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Ratones/fisiología , Ratas/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Animales , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Terminología como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA