An Anatomic Study on Whether Femoral Version Originates in the Neck or the Shaft.

BACKGROUND: Femoral anteversion is generally asymptomatic but can result in lower extremity issues like patellofemoral instability and pain. Surgical correction of anteversion can be performed proximal, mid shaft or distal. A better understanding of the specific location of the rotational deformity can help guide the optimal location of the osteotomy. In this study we examine the contribution of the femoral neck and shaft to total femoral version. METHODS: We studied 590 pairs of well-preserved cadaveric femurs. Total femoral version was defined as the axial plane angle between the femoral neck and posterior femoral condyles. Femoral shaft torsion was defined as the axial plane angle between the lesser trochanter and posterior femoral condyles. Neck version was the mathematical difference between total femoral version and shaft version. RESULTS: Neck version (right femur R=0.582; left femur R=0.632) contributed slightly more than shaft version (right femur R=0.505; left femur R=0.480) to overall femoral version, but both were substantial and neither completely predicted overall femoral version. Age was not found to contribute to femoral version, and sex and race had statistically significant but small contributions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that both the femoral neck and femoral shaft substantially contribute to femoral version, and to our knowledge is the first to statistically demonstrate that neither level can be used to predict total femoral version. This suggests that one cannot generalize a single optimal site for correction or prediction of femoral version from an osteological perspective, and that individualized assessment may be beneficial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that methodologies for determining the level of femoral version might be important as the level in any given patient can vary.

An Anatomic Study of the Greater Trochanter Starting Point for Intramedullary Nailing in the Skeletally Immature.

BACKGROUND: Trochanteric entry femoral nails have been increasing in popularity in the pediatric population for stabilization in fractures and osteotomies. The proper position for entry point in the coronal plane has been well studied; however, the sagittal plane in the pediatric population has not yet been well characterized. METHODS: Eighty-eight cadaveric femora aged 8 to 20 years were studied in an apparent neck-shaft angle (ANSA) position, with distal condyles flat on the surface, and a true neck-shaft angle (TNSA) position, with internal rotation to neutralize femoral anteversion. Anterior and lateral offset were measured on lateral and anteroposterior photographs, respectively, as the perpendicular distance from the greater trochanter apex to the center of the intramedullary canal. The effect of rotational position (ANSA vs. TNSA) of the proximal femur was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient for anterior and lateral offset. Correlations between age, demographics, anteversion, and greater trochanter morphology with anterior and lateral offset were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 15.8±3.8 years. The mean anterior displacement of the trochanteric apex was 4.8±3.0 and 4.6±3.2 mm in the ANSA and TNSA positions, respectively. The mean lateral displacement was 10.6±4.2 and 9.7±4.0 mm in the ANSA and TNSA positions, respectively. The intraclass coefficient for anterior offset in the ANSA versus TNSA position was 0.704 and 0.900 for lateral offset. Change was minimal for anterior offset in the ANSA and TNSA positions versus age (standardized beta values 0.240, 0.241, respectively). There was a significant correlation with increasing lateral offset in the ANSA and TNSA positions with increasing age (standardized beta values 0.500, 0.385 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the pediatric population, the tip of the greater trochanter is consistently anterior by approximately 5 mm. The mean lateral displacement was approximately 10 mm and increased with increasing age. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nail entry at the pediatric greater trochanter apex would likely result in anterior placement. We recommend inserting the guidewire 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter and confirming coronal and sagittal position with fluoroscopy.

Peripheral Findings and Retinal Vascular Leakage on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Patients with Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To compare ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) with simulated conventional fluorescein angiography (FA) to evaluate peripheral pathology and leakage and correlate with clinical activity in patients with uveitis. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: All uveitis patients initially evaluated with UWFFA (Optos 200Tx) between May 2012 and December 2013 were included in this study, including follow-up visits through August 2014. METHODS: Uveitis status was deemed as having active or inactive inflammation based on clinical examination. Changes to therapy, influence on management, and clinical diagnosis were also noted. UWFFA images were compared with simulated 50-degree FA images to evaluate for peripheral lesions, and leakage location was also graded. Imaging characteristics were then correlated with clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of leakage on UWFFA with clinical inflammation. RESULTS: An initial set of 243 uveitis patients and a total of 1008 eye images were reviewed. When UWFFA was compared with a simulated 50-degree FA image, UWFFA added additional information regarding the presence of peripheral vascular leakage in 25%, peripheral nonperfusion in 14%, peripheral lesions in 6.6%, and peripheral neovascularization in 3.9% of patients. A total of 600 eye images exhibited fluorescein leakage, of which 21% displayed central leakage only, 11% had central and peripheral leakage, 31% had peripheral leakage only, and 37% had diffuse vascular leakage. Based on peripheral findings on widefield angiography, the treatment was changed in 69 patients (28%). Corresponding eye examinations were reviewed for each imaging session, and of 600 eye images with vascular leakage, 567 eye images were also clinically active, which was 95% sensitive as a surrogate indicator of clinical inflammation. Anterior chamber cell and vitreous haze also significantly correlated with leakage on widefield angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal vascular leakage on UWFFA reveals increased pathology and leakage compared with conventional angiography, which can influence management, and accurately identifies and correlates with active inflammation in patients with uveitis. A more objective measure of inflammation in the form of leakage exhibited on UWFFA may help standardize treatment and care of patients with uveitis.