Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spine J ; 24(6): 1001-1014, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A previous cost-effectiveness analysis published in 2022 found that the Total Posterior Spine (TOPSTM) system was dominant over transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This analysis required updating to reflect a more complete dataset and pricing considerations. PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TOPSTM system as compared with TLIF based on an updated and complete FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) data set. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cost-utility analysis of the TOPSTM system compared to TLIF. PATIENT SAMPLE: A multicenter, FDA IDE, randomized control trial (RCT) investigated the efficacy of TOPSTM compared to TLIF with a current population of n=305 enrolled and n=168 with complete 2-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated to determine our primary outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Secondary outcome measures included: net monetary benefit as well at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. METHODS: The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness is determined by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. A Markov model was used to simulate the health outcomes and costs of patients undergoing TOPSTM or TLIF over a 2-year period. alternative scenario sensitivity analysis, one-way sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results. RESULTS: The updated base case result demonstrated that TOPSTM was immediately and longitudinally dominant compared with the control with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -9,637.37 $/QALY. The net monetary benefit was correspondingly $2,237, both from the health system's perspective and at a WTP threshold of 50,000 $/QALY at the 2-year time point. This remained true in all scenarios tested. The Alternative Scenario Sensitivity Analysis suggested cost-effectiveness irrespective of payer type and surgical setting. To remain cost-effective, the cost difference between TOPSTM and TLIF should be no greater than $1,875 and $3,750 at WTP thresholds of $50,000 and 100,000 $/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis confirms that the TOPSTM device is a cost-effective and economically dominant surgical treatment option for patients with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis compared to TLIF in all scenarios examined.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vértebras Lumbares , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Fusión Vertebral , Estenosis Espinal , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Espondilolistesis/economía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/economía , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Artroplastia/economía , Artroplastia/métodos , Anciano
2.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases ; 9(1): 40, 2023 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37532714

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Congenital dermal sinus tract (DST) is a rare spinal dysraphism characterized by a persistent tract lined by epithelial cells, beginning at the epidermis and terminating in deeper tissue layers. With 1% of all congenital DST cases found in the cervical region, only 4% of all cases are diagnosed after the age of 20. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: In this case, a 65-year-old woman with a congenital DST at the cervical level presented with symptoms of neck and some arm pain, suboccipital headaches, and unique external characteristics. Neck Disability Index and visual analog scale were used to assess the patient's preoperative and postoperative pain, and quality of life. Patient underwent an operative intervention, where the DST was surgically removed followed by interlaminar decompression at C1-C2, excision of the epidural component, and biopsy followed by plastic surgical repair. Pathology analysis indicated a squamous epithelial-lined sinus tract interacting with the dura. Most notably, a meningothelial proliferation with associated psammomatous calcifications was identified, similar to a meningioma. CONCLUSION: A review of literature was conducted to further discuss clinical and radiological presentation as well as to document the novel appearance of this congenital DST. As one of the oldest cases of DST, it demonstrated unusual pathological characteristics with a meningothelial proliferation, compatible with meningioma, reported at the epidural level.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Espina Bífida Oculta , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Espina Bífida Oculta/complicaciones , Espina Bífida Oculta/diagnóstico , Espina Bífida Oculta/cirugía , Meningioma/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA