RESUMEN
Background: Previous studies identified a rapid decrease in valproate serum concentrations when coadministered with a carbapenem; however, the specific consequences and subsequent therapy adjustments are not well described. We aimed to investigate the clinical and therapeutic implications of the carbapenem-valproate drug-drug interaction. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from 2 large academic medical centers during January 2017 to June 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of seizures or behavioral events stratified by valproate indication. All adult patient encounters with concomitant administration of any carbapenem antimicrobial and valproate were included. Patients without prolonged exposure to valproate prior to hospitalization, without valproate levels pre- and post-carbapenem administration, with an admitting diagnosis of seizure, with exposure to other agents that decrease valproate concentrations, or who had a seizure during the hospitalization prior to carbapenem exposure were excluded. Results: Two hundred fifty-eight episodes of concomitant use among 78 unique adult patients were included. Valproate was used for seizure control in 41 patients (52.6%) and for mood-related disorders in 37 (47.4%). In those prescribed valproate for its antiepileptic properties, seizures occurred following carbapenem administration in 46.3% of encounters. In those taking valproate for mood-related disorders, 50.8% met the primary endpoint of behavioral disturbance. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates significant clinical implications of the carbapenem-valproate interaction. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and consider alternative antimicrobial and/or antiepileptic agents whenever possible. Adding or increasing doses of antiepileptic agents and/or consultation with a neurologist prior to concomitant use should be considered when this combination cannot be avoided.
RESUMEN
Background and Purpose: In patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), worsening of symptoms poses a risk of respiratory failure which can be precipitated by medication use. Although purported, the risks associated with administration of certain medications are not fully elucidated. Thus, clinical decision support involving a best practice alert was executed to caution providers of drug-disease interactions when ordering a potentially harmful medication. We performed an analysis of the alert overrides with subsequent medication exposure to determine the incidence of MG exacerbations. Methods: This retrospective chart-review evaluated adult patients with MG at 2 large academic medical centers via electronic health records between November-2019 and November-2021 who received a medication following override of the clinical decision support tool. The primary outcome was proportion of patient encounters complicated by myasthenic exacerbations after potentially harmful medication administration. Secondary outcomes included changes in motor strength, length of stay, discharge disposition, unplanned level-of-care escalations, and changes to immunosuppressant therapy following medication administration. Results: A total of 70 orders were assessed in 38 patients across 55 encounters. Medications administered during these encounters included macrolides, fluoroquinolones, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and magnesium sulfate. Exacerbation of disease occurred in 7 patient encounters (12.7%) and occurred after intravenous magnesium or intravenous labetalol. In 5/7 events, at least 1 other risk factor associated with a myasthenic exacerbation was present. Conclusions: Of the medications reported to potentially worsen MG, intravenous labetalol and intravenous magnesium were the 2 agents associated with myasthenic exacerbations with a higher incidence in patients harboring additional risk factors.
