Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 22(7): 437-42, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11583213

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs and savings of a 15-component infection control program that reduced transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in an endemic setting. DESIGN: Evaluation of costs and savings, using historical control data. SETTING: Adult oncology unit of a 650-bed hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumors, excluding bone marrow transplant recipients. METHODS: Costs and savings with estimated ranges were calculated. Excess length of stay (LOS) associated with VRE bloodstream infection (BSI) was determined by matching VRE BSI patients with VRE-negative patients by oncology diagnosis. Differences in LOS between the matched groups were evaluated using a mixed-effect analysis of variance linear-regression model. RESULTS: The cost of enhanced infection control strategies for 1 year was $116,515. VRE BSI was associated with an increased LOS of 13.7 days. The savings associated with fewer VRE BSI ($123,081), fewer patients with VRE colonization ($2,755), and reductions in antimicrobial use ($179,997) totaled $305,833. Estimated ranges of costs and savings for enhanced infection control strategies were $97,939 to $148,883 for costs and $271,531 to $421,461 for savings. CONCLUSION: The net savings due to enhanced infection control strategies for 1 year was $189,318. Estimates suggest that these strategies would be cost-beneficial for hospital units where the number of patients with VRE BSI is at least six to nine patients per year or if the savings from fewer VRE BSI patients in combination with decreased antimicrobial use equalled $100,000 to $150,000 per year.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/economía , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/economía , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/economía , Control de Costos , Ahorro de Costo , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/economía , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , New York , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 131(4): 269-72, 1999 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10454948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are nosocomial pathogens in many U. S. hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether enhanced infection-control strategies reduce transmission of VRE in an endemic setting. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Adult oncology inpatient unit. PATIENTS: 259 patients evaluated during use of enhanced infection-control strategies and 184 patients evaluated during use of standard infection-control practices. INTERVENTIONS: Patient surveillance cultures were taken, patients were assigned to geographic cohorts, nurses were assigned to patient cohorts, gowns and gloves were worn on room entry, compliance with infection-control procedures was monitored, patients were educated about VRE transmission, patients taking antimicrobial agents were evaluated by an infectious disease specialist, and environmental surveillance was performed. MEASUREMENTS: VRE infection rates, VRE colonization rates, and changes in antimicrobial use. RESULTS: During use of enhanced infection-control strategies, incidence of VRE bloodstream infections decreased significantly (0.45 patients per 1000 patient-days compared with 2.1 patients per 1000 patient-days; relative rate ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.92]; P = 0.04), as did VRE colonization (10.3 patients per 1000 patient-days compared with 20.7 patients per 1000 patient-days; relative rate ratio, 0.5 [CI, 0.33 to 0.75]; P < 0.001). Use of all antimicrobial agents except clindamycin and amikacin was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Enhanced infection-control strategies reduced VRE transmission in an oncology unit in which VRE were endemic.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones , Vancomicina/farmacología , Adulto , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Humanos , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA