Bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia: clinical outcomes and preliminary results of inflammatory response.

PURPOSE: Further examination of clinical outcomes and inflammatory response of bacteremic pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is of great interest to enhance the care of patients with pneumococcal CAP. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Community Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) to compare the time to clinical stability (TCS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality of hospitalized pneumococcal CAP patients with and without bacteremia. To measure the effect of bacteremia in pneumococcal CAP patients on outcomes, we modeled all-cause in-hospital mortality using a Poisson regression model, and TCS and LOS using Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted multivariate regression models were also used to predict the probability of occurrence of each of the study outcomes. To investigate the inflammatory response, we measured the plasma levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1rα, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10], inflammatory biomarkers [C-reactive protein (CRP), pro-calcitonin (PCT), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)], and peripheral blood neutrophil responses in 10 patients, 4 bacteremic and 6 non-bacteremic pneumococcal CAP, upon admission and every other day during the first 6 days of hospitalization. Functional data were presented as median and standard error of the median (SEM); due to small number of samples no statistical comparisons were performed between groups. RESULTS: From 833 pneumococcal CAP patients, 394 patients (47 %) were bacteremic. Bacteremic pneumococcal CAP were less likely to reach TCS with an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of 0.82 (95 % CI 0.69-0.97; p = 0.02) and had higher in-hospital mortality with an AHR of 1.63 (95 % CI 1.06-2.50, p = 0.026). Bacteremic pneumococcal CAP patients had a longer LOS than non-bacteremic pneumococcal CAP (p < 0.003). Higher plasma levels of CRP, PCT, and BNP were found in bacteremic than in non-bacteremic patients. The bacteremic group had consistently higher plasma levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The blood neutrophil functional responses were similar in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteremic pneumococcal CAP patients were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality, lower TCS, and longer LOS. HIV-infected patients showed a greater mortality which was not statistically significant. Bacteremic pneumococcal CAP patients had higher levels of biomarkers and systemic cytokines.

De-escalation therapy among bacteraemic patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

There is no evidence supporting the use of de-escalation therapy (DET) among patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We assessed the outcomes associated with DET among bacteraemic CAP patients. We performed a secondary analysis of the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database, which contains data on 660 bacteraemic patients hospitalized because of CAP in 35 countries (2001-2013). Exclusion criteria were death within 72 h from admission and an inappropriate empirical antibiotic regimen. DET was defined as changing an appropriate empirical broad-spectrum regimen to a narrower-spectrum regimen according to culture results within 7 days from hospital admission. Two study groups were identified: patients whose antibiotic therapy was de-escalated (the DET group), and patients whose antibiotic therapy was not de-escalated (the N-DET group). The primary study outcome was 30-day mortality. Two hundred and sixty-one bacteraemic CAP patients were included. Gram-positive bacteria were responsible for 88.1% of the cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae, 75.9%). Gram-negative bacteria were responsible for for 7.3% of the cases. DET was performed in 165 patients (63.2%). The N-DET group was characterized by a more severe presentation at admission. After adjustment for confounders, DET was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. DET seems to be safe among bacteraemic patients with CAP. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to further explore these findings.

Cytokines and neutrophils responses in influenza pneumonia.

This case report shows a striking correlation of remarkable brief high levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines coupled with increased neutrophil activation, followed by a sharp decrease in cytokine levels and increased neutrophil apoptosis associated with the favorable clinical outcomes of a patient with severe influenza infection. The host response examined in our case is not complete, given it did not assess the full spectrum of host response. The brief neutrophil and cytokine response seen in our case in the absence of antiviral therapy and in the presence of methotrexate immunosuppressive therapy rise the question as to whether the latter optimally modulated the macrophage function, resulting in a favorable outcome of severe influenza viral infection.

Incidence of respiratory viruses in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit: results from the Severe Influenza Pneumonia Surveillance (SIPS) project.

Few patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU-CAP). However, they represent the most severe form of the disease. An understanding of the etiologic agents of ICU-CAP may lead to better treatment decisions and patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of respiratory viruses in patients with ICU-CAP. This was an observational study conducted in six Kentucky hospitals from December 2008 through October 2011. A case of ICU-CAP was defined as a patient admitted to an ICU with the diagnosis of CAP. The Luminex xTAG multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used for viral identification. A total of 468 adult and pediatric patients with ICU-CAP were enrolled in the study. A total of 92 adult patients (23 %) and 14 pediatric patients (19 %) had a respiratory virus identified. Influenza was the most common virus identified in adults and the second most common in pediatric patients. This study suggests that respiratory viruses may be common etiologic agents of pneumonia in patients with ICU-CAP. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend empiric anti-influenza therapy during the winter for hospitalized patients with CAP. This study supports this recommendation in patients with ICU-CAP.

Empiric therapy directed against MRSA in patients admitted to the intensive care unit does not improve outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia.

PURPOSE: The Infectious Diseases Society of America has recommended empiric therapy active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for all community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there is sparse data to support this recommendation. The objective of our study was to ascertain if such a practice improves outcomes. METHODS: This study was a secondary, retrospective analysis of the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) international database on CAP. Outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU were compared according to empiric initiation of anti-MRSA therapy (vancomycin or linezolid) with standard ICU CAP therapy (MRSA therapy group) or standard therapy alone for ICU CAP (standard therapy group). RESULTS: A total of 621 patients were identified with ICU pneumonia, of whom 57 patients had been initiated empirically on vancomycin or linezolid (MRSA therapy group). Patients of the MRSA therapy group had more comorbidities and were more severely ill than those of the standard therapy group. However, there were no statistical differences between the MRSA therapy group and standard therapy group for the primary outcomes of in-hospital and 28-day mortality, length of stay and time to clinical stability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that empiric MRSA therapy in all ICU CAP patients may not improve outcomes and argue for clinician review of local epidemiologic trends on MRSA prevalence to ascertain the need for empiric MRSA coverage.

Clinical outcomes of osteomyelitis patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA-300 strains.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) USA-300 strains have emerged as an important cause of community-acquired infections. These strains have been recognized as an etiology of osteomyelitis but data on their incidence and outcomes are limited. We retrospectively studied the incidence and clinical outcomes of MRSA USA-300 osteomyelitis in patients at the University of Louisville Hospital and the Henry Ford Health System between January 2007 and March 2008. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to determine USA type. Clinical outcomes were defined as management success versus failure at 12 months. Chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare patient characteristics on the basis of clinical outcomes and USA type. Of the 50 patients with MRSA osteomyelitis, 27 (54%) had the USA-300 strain. Clinical failure was identified in 22% (6/27) of the patients with MRSA USA-300 and in 30% (7/23) of the patients with MRSA non-USA-300 osteomyelitis (P = .509). Our results showed that MRSA USA-300 is a significant etiology of MRSA osteomyelitis. With current surgical and medical management, outcomes of patients with MRSA USA-300 osteomyelitis are similar to those of patients with MRSA non-USA-300 osteomyelitis.

Computed tomography measurements of parapneumonic effusion indicative of thoracentesis.

Patients with parapneumonic effusions (PPE) measuring <1 cm by lateral decubitus radiograph (LDR) or <5 cm by lateral erect radiograph (LER) do not require thoracentesis. No such data exist for chest computed tomography (CCT). The objective of this study was to identify a PPE measurement by CCT that indicates the need for thoracentesis. A secondary data analysis of two pneumonia databases was conducted to identify patients with PPE. Measurements of PPE using LDR, LER and CCT were correlated by linear regression analysis. The clinical outcome of community-acquired pneumonia patients managed with the newly defined CCT measurement was evaluated. PPE was identified in 419 out of 1,460 patients with possible pneumonia. PPE measurements of 1 cm and 5 cm by LDR and LER, respectively, correlated with a measurement of 2.5 cm by CCT. Out of 95 patients with CCT measurements <2.5 cm, 31 poor clinical outcomes were reported: outcome was PPE related (n = 1); outcome was PPE unrelated (n = 26); and outcome was not evaluable (n = 4). The single case of poor outcome also measured <1 cm by LDR. This study indicates that patients with community-acquired pneumonia and a PPE measuring <2.5 cm by CCT can be managed without the need for thoracentesis.

Predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) severity scores can identify patients at low risk for mortality who may be suitable for ambulatory care. Here, we follow the clinical course of hospitalized patients with CAP due to 2009 H1N1 influenza. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of CAP severity scores as predictors of mortality. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of patients hospitalized with CAP due to 2009 H1N1 influenza confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction enrolled in the CAPO (Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization) international cohort study. CAP severity scores PSI (Pneumonia Severity Index), CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥ 65 years) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥ 65 years) were calculated. Actual and predicted mortality rates were compared. A total of 37 predictor variables were evaluated to define those associated with mortality. RESULTS: Data from 250 patients with CAP due to 2009 H1N1 influenza were analyzed. Patients with low predicted mortality rates (0-1.5%) had actual mortality rates ranging from 2.6% to 17.5%. Obesity and wheezing were the only novel variables associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to hospitalize a patient with CAP due to 2009 H1N1 influenza should not be based on current CAP severity scores, as they underestimate mortality rates in a significant number of patients. Patients with obesity or wheezing should be considered at an increased risk for mortality.

Macrolides versus quinolones in Legionella pneumonia: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization international study.

BACKGROUND: Data supporting a quinolone or a macrolide as preferred therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Legionella pneumophila are not firmly established. Some literature suggests a benefit of quinolones over macrolides. OBJECTIVE: To compare time to clinical stability (TCS) and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients with Legionella pneumonia who were treated with levofloxacin (LVX) compared to those treated with newer macrolides. DESIGN: An analysis of patients with Legionnaires' disease from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database was performed. Patients were diagnosed with CAP using radiographic and clinical criteria, while Legionella was detected by urinary antigen or sputum culture. All patients received a macrolide (azithromycin or clarithromycin) or LVX. TCS was defined as the time from hospital admission to candidacy for switch to oral therapy. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included for analysis. The mean TCS for the macrolide group was 5.1 days vs. 4.3 days for the LVX group (P = 0.43). The mean LOS for the macrolide group was 12.7 days vs. 8.9 days for the quinolone group (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: LOS and TCS were not statistically different between the macrolide and the LVX groups in treating CAP due to Legionella, despite trends in both outcomes favoring LVX.

Characteristics of hospitalised patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in Chile.

As the pandemic of 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus progressed, more patients required hospitalisation. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and clinical course of hospitalised patients with 2009 H1N1 virus infection in Chile. This was a prospective, observational study of 100 consecutive hospitalised patients with RT-PCR-confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza A, admitted to Puerto Montt General Hospital (Puerto Montt, Chile). Information was obtained regarding contact history, demographics, laboratory values and clinical course. The primary reason for hospitalisation was pneumonia, in 75% of patients. Rapid influenza A test was positive in 51% of patients. Prior exposure to 2009 H1N1 virus was documented in 21% of patients. Clinical failure, documented in 18% of cases, was characterised by respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Failure was more common in patients with obesity, tachypnoea, confusion and multilobar infiltrates. When evaluating a patient hospitalised with influenza-like illness, a negative rapid test for influenza A or negative contact with a suspected case should not alter physicians' considerations regarding the likelihood of 2009 H1N1 virus infection. Patients with 2009 H1N1 virus infection with obesity, tachypnoea, confusion and multilobar infiltrates should be closely monitored since they are at high risk for clinical failure.

Duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Recent guidelines suggest that duration of antibiotic therapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) can be reduced by individualising treatment based on patient's clinical response. However, the degree of application of this principle in clinical practice is unknown. Duration of therapy was analysed in patients identified from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database and evaluated with respect to severity of the disease on admission and time to clinical stability (TCS). Among the 2,003 patients enrolled, mean duration of total antibiotic therapy was 11 days. Neither the pneumonia severity index (r(2) = 0.005) nor the CRB-65 (r(2) = 0.004) scores were related to total duration of therapy. Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was related to TCS (r(2) = 0.198). Conversely, TCS was not related to duration of either oral (r(2) = 0.014) or total (r(2) = 0.02) antibiotic therapy. Neither TCS nor other characteristics were found to be significantly associated with duration of total therapy by logistic regression analysis (r(2)<0.09). The individualised approach suggested by recent guidelines has not been adopted in current clinical practice. Duration of therapy is not influenced by either the severity of disease at the time of hospitalisation or the clinical response to therapy.

The pneumonia severity index and the CRB-65 in cancer patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

SETTING: The ability of the pneumonia severity index (PSI) and the CRB-65 to identify patients with low vs. high risk for mortality among cancer patients with CAP has not been evaluated. DESIGN: Subjects with cancer, CAP/Ca(+), and without cancer, CAP/Ca(-), were identified from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database. Mortality for both groups was analyzed by comparing low vs. high risk for mortality for the PSI (Risk Class I, II and III vs. IV and V) and the CRB-65 score (scores 0 and 1 vs. 2, 3 and 4). RESULTS: A total of 2621 patients were included in the CAP/Ca(-) group and 280 in the CAP/Ca(+) group. In the CAP/Ca(+) group, no significant difference in mortality was detected in low vs. high risk populations, either for the PSI (P = 0.288) or for the CRB-65 score (P = 0.281). Analyzing the receiver operator characteristic curves, the concordance indexes for the CAP/Ca(+) group were respectively 0.53 and 0.54 for PSI and CRB-65. By fitting a multivariable logistic regression model, a significantly different trend in mortality was found between the CAP/Ca(-) and CAP/Ca(+) groups for both scoring systems. CONCLUSION: Clinical judgment will continue to be the physicians' primary tool in defining the site of care for cancer patients with CAP.

The role of neutropenia on outcomes of cancer patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Although the presence of neutropenia may predispose cancer patients to develop community-acquired pneumonia, the role of neutropenia on their outcomes has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of cancer community-acquired pneumonia patients with and without neutropenia. Patients with cancer, identified in the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database, were divided into two groups according to the type of cancer and the presence of neutropenia: patients with solid cancer without neutropenia versus those with functional or absolute neutropenia. Among the 3,106 community-acquired pneumonia patients enrolled, 135 had cancer without neutropenia and 75 had cancer with neutropenia. No significant difference was found between patients with and without neutropenia regarding mean time to clinical stability (5.4+/-2.7 versus 4.9+/-2.7 days, respectively), mean length of hospital stay (9.2+/-7.7 versus 9.9+/-9.6 days) and in-hospital mortality (18 versus 15%, respectively). Using a multiple logistic regression model, neutropenia was not associated with mortality in cancer patients when adjusting for significant covariates (odds ratio 1.30). Lack of neutropenia, during the initial evaluation of a cancer community-acquired pneumonia patient, should not be considered an indicator of better clinical outcome.