Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3).

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a probably benign assessment of non-palpable breast lesions (BI-RADS category 3) at mammography and/or ultrasound with immediate histological work-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stereotactic or ultrasound guided core needle breast biopsy (NBB) was performed to evaluate 288 lesions, which were prospectively assessed as BI-RADS category 3. Imaging findings included 195 masses, 73 calcification cases, 16 focal asymmetries, and four architectural distortion cases. After NBB, patients underwent either open surgical biopsy (OSB) (n=204) or mammographic follow-up (n=84) for at least 24 months. Histological results of NBB were compared with those of OSB. RESULTS: Three of the 288 lesions (1.0%) proved to be malignant at histological work-up, two of them were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and one of them was an invasive carcinoma. NBB revealed invasive carcinoma in 1/288 (0.35%) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in 13/288 (4.5%) lesions. OSB revealed DCIS in 2/204 (1%) and invasive carcinoma in 1/204 (0.5%) lesions. The two DCIS were underestimated as ADH by NBB. The remaining 285 (99%) lesions proved to be benign at OSB or remained stable during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Confirmed by tissue diagnosis, the low likelihood of malignancy of prospectively assessed probably benign lesions is below the 2% threshold established for BI-RADS category 3. Imaging follow-up is a safe and effective alternative to immediate histological work-up for such lesions.

[Value of 14-gauge ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of breast lesions: own results in comparison with the literature]. / Die Wertigkeit der 14-Gauge Ultraschall-gezielten Stanzbiopsie bei Brustläsionen: Eigene Resultate im Vergleich mit der Literatur.

PURPOSE: To report the false-negative rate, sensitivity, and specificity of 14-gauge ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy (14-G USSB) performed on breast lesions at our institution and, furthermore, to compare and discuss our own results with those reported in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes 399 lesions examined by 14-G USSB. The results of the 14-G USSB were compared with the results of the surgical biopsy or, in cases of benign histology, were followed clinically. A key word search in two medical databases was undertaken to compare our data with those reported in the literature. The search was limited to the period from January 1990 to February 2002 and only original investigations published in English and German were included in our comparison. RESULTS: At our institution, 238 (59.6 %) benign and 161 (40.4 %) malignant lesions were diagnosed by 14-G USSB. The 14-G USSB was false-negative in 5 (1.25 %) of 399 cases. It has a sensitivity of 95.7 %, and specificity 100%. The literature reports false-negative rates between 0 % and 1.26 %, sensitivities between 86% and 100%, and specificities between 99.7 % and 100 %. On the basis of 3880 results from seven selected original papers and our own study, the false-negative rate for 14-G USSB was calculated to be 0.4 % (16 of 3880). CONCLUSION: Based on our results and those reported in the literature, 14-G USSB can be considered safe and reliable in the assessment of breast lesions.

[Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology]. / Elektrische Impedanzmessung in der Abklärung von Brustläsionen: Vergleich mit Mammographie, Sonographie und Histopathologie.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of Electrical Impedance Scanning (EIS) in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions in comparison to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US). METHODS: In 95 female patients (median 53.1 ys) 95 suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS TM III - V) in MG or US underwent targeted EIS (TransScan TS 2000(R); TransScan Medical, Israel; Siemens Elema, Sweden). Histopathologic proof (vacuum-assisted biopsy or surgical biopsy) was obtained in all cases. MG, US and EIS were independently assessed by two radiologists in consensus. Chi-square tests as well as variance-analysis for ROC-statistics were performed. RESULTS: Of 95 lesions, 44 were benign, 51 malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were, respectively for MG 95.3 %, 23.5 %, 51.3 % and 85.7 %, for US 86.5 %, 44.2 %, 57.1 % and 79.1 %, for EIS 77.3 %, 82.3 %, 79.1 % and 80.8 %. The ROC-analysis revealed a significant greater area under the curve for EIS than for MG and US. The sensitivity for EIS was higher in lesions < 10 mm (n = 26; 100 %) and in invasive cancers (n = 31; 80.6 %). The negative predictive value of EIS was higher in BI-RADS TM-IV-lesions (83.9 %) as well as in dense breast parenchyma on the mammogram (86.7 %). CONCLUSION: EIS shows potential adjunctive value to MG and US in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions.

[Comparison of wire versus carbon localization of non-palpable breast lesions]. / Vergleich Häkchen versus Kohlefarbstoff bei präoperativer Markierung von nicht-tastbaren Brustläsionen.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of wire and carbon localization in stereotactically localized open breast biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1995 to December 1997, a total of 725 stereotactic wire or carbon dye localizations were performed in 698 female patients. Success of localization was evaluated either by a malignant histopathological diagnosis or by mammographic follow-up. A lesion was considered to be missed if it could be still seen on follow-up mammography. RESULTS: In 703 of 725 cases, the success of localization could be evaluated with 427 (61 %) lesions localized with a wire and 276 (39 %) with carbon. Seven (1 %) out of 703 lesions were missed at open biopsy. Three lesions of these had been localized with wire and three lesions with carbon. The miss rates were 0.9 % and 1.1 %, respectively (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Both wire and carbon localization are reliable and accurate in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Concerning efficiency and costs, carbon dye seems to offer a promising compromise.

[Stereotactic needle breast biopsy: Diagnostic reliability of various biopsy systems and needle sizes]. / Stereotaktische Nadelbiopsie der Brust: Diagnosesicherheit verschiedener Biopsie-Systeme und Nadelkaliber.

OBJECTIVES: To compare quality of harvested tissue, false-negative rate, and complication rate of large-core needle breast biopsy (LCNBB) and directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (DVABB) in non-palpable breast lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 1999, in 580 non-palpable breast lesions a stereotactically-guided breast biopsy was performed. 14-G LCNBB was used in 168 lesions (29 %). DVABB was used in 412 lesions (71 %; 11-G DVABB: 134 lesions 32.5 %, 14-G DVABB: 278 lesions 67.5 %). Following biopsy, patients underwent either surgical excision (n = 533; 93.8 %) or mammographical follow-up (n = 36; 6.2 %). Histological results of LCNBB, DVABB, surgical breast biopsy and follow-up results were compared and scored for their tissue quality on a three-point scale (1 = disagreement between biopsy and surgery; 2 = partial agreement; 3 = complete agreement). In addition, we determined the false negative and complication rate for both systems. RESULTS: Histological examination after surgery and follow-up proved 262 (45.2 %) to be benign, 15 (2.6 %) to be high-risk lesions and 303 (52.5 %) to be malignant. In the tissue quality there was no significant difference between 14-G LCNBB (score = 2.94), 11-G DVABB (score = 2.92) and 14-G DVABB (score = 2.91) (p > 0.05). Particularly, in calcifications 11-G DVABB scored better (score = 2.92) than 14-G DVABB (score = 2.88) (p > 0.05). 14-G LCNBB had a lower false negative rate (1.8 %) than 11-G DVABB (3 %) and 14-G DVABB (3.2 %) (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the complication rate between the different needle types. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that both LCNBB and DVABB are reliable and safe techniques in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions. However, the use of 14-G LCNBB seems to be advantageous in masses, the use of 11-G DVABB seems to be advantageous in asymmetric densities and calcifications.