Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 13(1): 35.e1-35.e7, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27746246

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Repair of severe primary and revision hypospadias is a demanding procedure. Debate continues as to whether a two-stage approach or single-stage technique is superior. The two-stage procedure with a free graft involves penile straightening followed by application of a graft for the neourethral plate at stage one; with tubularization at stage two after graft maturation. OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of a single surgeon's experience with the two-stage repair using a free graft for both severe primary and revision hypospadias with long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1998 and January 2010, 301 boys underwent a two-stage reconstruction. The surgical technique is described in the manuscript. Primary repairs (n = 208): indications for a two-stage approach with a free graft included meatal position, presence of corporal chordee, and poor glans development. Median follow-up from completion of the second stage was 75 months. Revision repairs (n = 93): indications included urethral fistula, excessive scarring/meatal stenosis, balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), and residual or untreated chordee. Median follow-up from completion of the second stage was 85 months. RESULTS: For the primary repairs (n = 208), the graft took well in all but one case. Second-stage complications included fistula (7), meatal stenosis (3), partial glans dehiscence (3), and all were re-operated (13). For the revision repairs (n = 93), the graft took well in all but four cases. Second-stage complications included fistula (5), meatal stenosis (3), breakdown (1) and reoperation (8). DISCUSSION: In a systematic review of 20 years of publications on the repair of primary severe hypospadias, the two-stage procedure with a free graft demonstrated an overall complication rate of 22%; this was a distinct overall benefit when compared with the single-stage procedures in terms of lower complication rates (Castagnetti and El-Ghoneimi, 2010). Our results for the severe primary repairs revealed significantly lower complication rates than those in the literature, with an overall re-operation rate of 6.3%, a fistula rate of 3.4%, and meatal stenosis and partial glans dehiscence at 1.4% each. Several papers have documented outcomes following the single-stage tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for re-operative hypospadias, giving overall complication rates ranging from 15.4 to 30%. Our data show a re-operative rate of 8.6%, a fistula rate of 5.3%, breakdown in 1.1%, and meatal stenosis in 3.2%. CONCLUSION: The two-stage repair with a free graft for correction of both severe primary and failed primary hypospadias is a safe, viable, and durable procedure offering low morbidity and excellent cosmetic results. The authors advocate the two-stage repair with a free graft as the technique of choice for treatment of both of these challenging groups of the deformity.


Asunto(s)
Hipospadias/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Uretra/cirugía , Urodinámica/fisiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(2): 54-9, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25819601

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine overall complication rates of the tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair and assess the effects of technical modifications, length of follow-up and geographical location of reported results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken, using Medline and Pubmed, in order to identify relevant articles. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled complication rates. Meta-regression was performed for each outcome by using mixed effects models with type of hypospadias (primary distal, primary proximal and secondary) as predictors. RESULTS: Of the 189 articles that were identified, 49 studies (4675 patients) were included in the analysis. Fistula and re-operation rates were significantly higher in secondary repairs (15.5% and 23.3%) compared to primary proximal (10.3% and 12.2%) and primary distal (5.7% and 4.5%) (P = 0.045 and P < 0.001, respectively). Technical modifications reduced fistula rates from 10.3% to 3.3% (P = 0.003) and re-operation rates from 13.6% to 2.8% (P = 0.001). The rate of meatal stenosis was highest in the secondary repairs, with follow-up >1 year (12.7%). Comparison of geographical location showed that complication rates for all but one variable were significantly lower in North America when compared to Europe and the rest of the world. Mean meatal stenosis rates were 1.8% in North America, 3.4% in Europe and 8.2% in the rest of the world (P = 0.002). This remained significant in a multivariable model incorporating repair technique and length of follow-up (P = 0.046). Mean rates of urethral stricture, fistula and re-operation followed a similar pattern (P = 0.045, P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). Mean follow-up was shortest in the North American group, at 11.9 months, compared to Europe, at 17.8 months, and the rest of the world, at 18.9 months. DISCUSSION: The present meta-analysis has shown that the lowest complication rates for the TIP repair are when it is applied to primary distal hypospadias. Complication rates are higher for all variables when the TIP repair is used for primary proximal hypospadias. Lower complication rates than those reported in this TIP review have been documented in some studies using a staged repair for correction of primary proximal or secondary hypospadias [11,12,68], implying that a staged approach may be superior to the TIP repair in these settings. Documentation of follow-up duration was limited, making assessment of the impact of length of follow-up difficult. Geographical location had a noticeable effect on outcome, with all but one complication being lower in the North American than the other groups. Mean follow-up was shortest in North America and it is suggested that the short follow-up in the North American studies may have led to under-reporting of late complications. CONCLUSION: The TIP repair has evolved to incorporate modifications that have significantly lowered complications. Higher complication rates are seen with secondary and proximal repairs; however, limited, published long-term data impair a true assessment of outcome.


Asunto(s)
Hipospadias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/trasplante , Uretra/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Reoperación/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra/anomalías , Urodinámica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...