Benefit of primary and secondary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in elderly patients has been questioned. In the present study, we aimed to analyse the outcome of patients of different age groups with ICD implantation. METHODS: We included all patients who received an ICD in our hospital from 2011 to 2020. Primary endpoints were (1) death from any cause and (2) appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing/shock). A "benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as appropriate ICD therapy before death from any cause/or survival. "No benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as death from any cause without prior appropriate ICD therapy. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients received an ICD (primary prophylaxis n = 323, secondary prophylaxis n = 99). At the time of implantation, 35 patients (8%) were >80 years and 106 patients were >75 years (25%). During the study period of 4.2 ± 3 years, benefit of ICD occurred in 89 patients (21%) and no benefit in 84 patients (20%). In primary prevention, the proportion of patients who had a benefit from ICD implantation decreased with increasing age, and there were no patients who benefited from ICD therapy in the group of patients >80 years. In secondary prophylaxis, the proportion of patients with a benefit from ICD implantation ranged from 20% to 30% in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the indication of primary prophylactic ICD in elderly and very old patients should be critically assessed. On the other hand, no patient should be denied secondary prophylactic ICD implantation because of age.

P-wave parameters and their association with thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrial appendage.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of abnormal P-wave parameters in patients with thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrial appendage (LAA), and to identify P-wave parameters particularly associated with thrombus and SEC formation. HYPOTHESIS: We presume a significant relationship of P-wave parameters with thrombi and SEC. METHODS: All patients in whom a thrombus or SEC was detected in the LAA on transoesophageal echocardiography were included in this study. Patients at risk (CHA2DS2-VASc Score ≥3) and routine transoesophageal echocardiography to exclude thrombi served as the control group. A detailed ECG analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of a total of 4062 transoesophageal echocardiographies, thrombi and SEC were detected in 302 patients (7.4%). Of these patients, 27 (8.9%) presented with sinus rhythm. The control group included 79 patients. There was no difference in mean CHA2DS2-VASc score in the two groups (p = .182). A high prevalence of abnormal P-wave parameters was detected in patients with thrombus/SEC. Indicators for the presence of thrombi or SEC in the LAA were P-wave duration >118 ms (Odds ratio (OR) 3.418, Confidence interval (CI) 1.522-7.674, p < .001), P-wave dispersion >40 ms (OR 2.521, CI 1.390-4.571, p < .001) and advanced interatrial block (OR 1.431, CI 1.033-1.984, p = .005). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that several P-wave parameters are associated with thrombi and SEC in the LAA. The results may help identify patients who are at particularly high risk for thromboembolic events (e.g., in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source).

Predictors for the detection of arrhythmia requiring pacemaker/ICD implantation-Results from a loop recorder study.

BACKGROUND: There are few large studies on which factors are associated with the occurrence of arrhythmias. Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are useful in detecting arrhythmia due to prolonged and continuous ECG monitoring. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify and evaluate clinical characteristics and ECG parameters for predicting arrhythmias requiring pacemaker/ICD implantation by analyzing a study cohort with ILR. METHODS: This bicentric study comprised a study cohort of 451 patients (mean age 64 ± 16 years, 209 women) receiving ILR implantation between 2011 and 2021. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval. All arrhythmias with a pacemaker or ICD indication were considered clinically relevant. The primary study endpoint was the detection of clinically relevant arrhythmia. RESULTS: During a follow up of 678 ± 392 days, a clinically relevant arrhythmia was detected in 81 of 451 patients (18%). Multivariate analysis revealed five independent risk factors: coronary artery disease (HR 1.954, CI 1.077-3.546, p = .028), atrial fibrillation (HR 2.253, CI 1.201-4.228, p = .011), previous syncope (HR 6.404, CI 3.202-12.808, p < .001), right bundle branch block (HR 4.370, CI 2.215-8.621, p < .001) and left bundle branch block (HR 2.685, CI 1.116-6.461, p = .028). Our risk model, based on these independent predictors, divided the study cohort into patients with low (2%), intermediate (18%), medium (34%), and high (45%) risk for clinically relevant arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: By the use of ILR, a clinically relevant arrhythmia has been detected in almost one fifth of the study cohort. In addition, clinical and electrocardiographic parameters were shown to be suitable predictors of clinically relevant arrhythmia.

Rate of atrial fibrillation and flutter induced tachycardiomyopathy in a cohort of hospitalized patients with heart failure and detection of indicators for improved diagnosis.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) induced tachycardiomyopathy (TCM) has been known to cause reversible heart failure (HF) for many years. However, the prevalence of the disease is unknown, and diagnosis is challenging. Therefore, the aim of the present study was (1) to assess the rate of AF/AFL induced TCM and (2) to identify indicators for diagnosis. Methods: Consecutively, all patients with a diagnosis of HF who were hospitalized in our department within 12 months were reviewed. For the main analysis, all patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and AF or AFL were included. AF/AFL induced TCM was diagnosed when there was at least a 10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction under rhythm or rate control within 3 months. Patients with HFrEF with AF/AFL but without TCM served as control group. Results: A total of 480 patients were included. AF/AFL induced TCM occurred in 26 patients (5.4%) and HFrEF with AF/AFL in 53 patients (11%). Independent indicators of AF/AFL induced TCM were age<79 years [Odds ratio 5.887, confidence interval (CI) 1.999-17.339, p < 0.001], NT-pro-BNP <5,419 pg/mL (Odds ratio 2.327, CI 1.141-4.746, p = 0.004), and a resting heart rate >112 bpm (Odds ratio 2.503, CI 1.288-4.864, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Approximately 5% of all patients hospitalized for HF suffer from AF/AFL induced TCM. Improved discrimination of AF/AFL induced TCM to HFrEF with AF/AFL is possible considering age, NT-pro-BNP level, and resting heart rate >112 beats/minute. Based on these parameters, an earlier diagnosis and improved therapy might be possible.

Short- and long-term outcome of patients with spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in the left atrial appendage in the era of the direct acting anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Thrombi and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrial appendage (LAA) are associated with thromboembolic events and poor prognosis. There are very few data on long-term outcome, especially with the use of direct acting anticoagulants (DOAC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, all transoesophageal echocardiographies performed at a tertiary care university hospital from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed. All patients with thrombus or SEC in the LAA were included. Medical history, laboratory, echocardiographic parameters and medication at discharge were documented. The primary endpoint of the study was a composite endpoint (all-cause mortality, non-fatal stroke or transient ischaemic attack [TIA], non-fatal systemic embolization, non-fatal major bleeding and non-fatal myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Of a total of 4062 transoesophageal echocardiographies, thrombi were detected in 51 patients (1.2%) and SEC in 251 patients (6.2%). These patients formed the final study cohort (n = 302). During a mean follow-up period of 956 ± 663 days, 87 patients (29%) suffered the primary point. The following baseline characteristics predicted the primary endpoint: age, haemoglobin, a previous coronary artery bypass grafting, dialysis and choice of anticoagulation. Prescription of apixaban at discharge was associated with lower rate of adverse events (hazard ratio 0.564, confidence interval 0.331-0.960; p = 0.035) while prescription of dabigatran was associated with higher rate of adverse events (hazard ratio 3.091, confidence interval 1.506-6.347; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Even in the DOAC era, the occurrence of thrombus or SEC in the LAA is associated with a high rate of MACCE. Our study suggests that the choice of DOAC therapy may have an impact on long-term survival.

Impact of P-wave indices in prediction of atrial fibrillation-Insight from loop recorder analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several P-wave indices are associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, previous studies have been limited in their ability to reliably diagnose episodes of AF. Implantable loop recorders allow long-term, continuous, and therefore more reliable detection of AF. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate ECG parameters for predicting AF by analyzing patients with loop recorders. METHODS: This study included 366 patients (mean age 62 ± 16 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 6%, 175 women) without AF who underwent loop recorder implantation between 2010-2020. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 627 ± 409 days, 75 patients (20%) reached the primary study end point (first detection of AF). Independent predictors of AF were as follows: age ≥68 years (hazard risk [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.668-4.235; p < .001), P-wave amplitude in II <0.1 mV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.298-3.441; p = .003), P-wave terminal force in V1  ≤ -4000 µV × ms (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.249-8.636; p < .001, and advanced interatrial block (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.638-9.528; p < .001). Our risk stratification model based on these independent predictors separated patients into 4 groups with high (70%), intermediate high (41%), intermediate low (18%), and low (4%) rates of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that P-wave indices are suitable for predicting AF episodes. Furthermore, it is possible to stratify patients into risk groups for AF using simple ECG parameters, which is particularly important for patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Risk stratification in patients undergoing interventional left atrial appendage occlusion-Prognostic impact of EuroSCORE II.

BACKGROUND: Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an alternative option to stroke prophylaxis, particularly in multimorbid patients with a high risk of bleeding under oral anticoagulation. Due to the multiple comorbidities, the prognosis of patients is reduced, and the clinical benefit of the procedure is therefore questionable in the individual patient. HYPOTHESIS: The present study aims to identify independent preprocedural risk factors to improve risk stratification in these highly selected patients. METHODS: This study consecutively included 128 patients who received an interventional LAA occlusion with Amplatzer device (St Jude Medical, St Paul, Minnesota). The preinterventional risk assessment was performed with the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were thromboembolic events and severe bleeding. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 781 ± 498 days the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality) was reached in 35 patients (27%). The only independent predictor of mid-term mortality was a logistic EuroSCORE II > 2% (Hazard risk [HR] 4.55, confidence interval [CI] 1.599-12.966, P = .005). In our study, 33 patients (26%) suffered from end-stage renal disease which was not associated with increased mortality (P = .371), increased thromboembolic events (P = .475), or severe bleeding (P = .613). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing interventional LAA occlusion, preprocedural assessment of logistic EuroSCORE II provide independent prognostic information. This parameter might help to improve risk stratification in these highly selected patients. In contrast, terminal renal failure was not associated with a significantly worse outcome.