Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 22512, 2022 12 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581706

RESUMEN

Vietnam has high rates of antibiotic use and resistance. Measuring resistance in commensal bacteria could provide an objective indicator for evaluating the impact of interventions to reduce antibiotic use and resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and bacterial recovery for different sampling strategies. We conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study in a rural community in Ha Nam Province, northern Vietnam, and collected structured interviews, samples, and in-depth interviews from households. Out of 389 households invited, 324 participated (83%), representing 1502 individuals. Samples were collected from these individuals (1498 stool, 1002 self-administered nasal swabs, and 496 HW-administered nasopharyngeal swabs). Pneumococci were recovered from 11.1% (128/1149) of the total population and 26.2% (48/183) of those under 5-years. Recovery was higher for health-worker (HW)-administered swabs (13.7%, 48/350) than self-administered swabs (10.0%, 80/799) (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.07-3.96). Cost per swab was cheaper for self-administered ($7.26) than HW-administered ($8.63) swabs, but the overall cost for 100 positive samples was higher ($7260 and $6300 respectively). Qualitative interviews revealed that HW-administered nasopharyngeal swabs took longer to collect, caused more discomfort, and were more difficult to take from children. Factors affecting participation included sense of contribution, perceived trade-offs between benefits and effort, and peer influence. Reluctance was related to stool sampling and negative perceptions of research. This study provides important evidence for planning community-based carriage studies, including cost, logistics, and acceptability. Self-administered swabs had lower recovery, and though cheaper and quicker, this would translate to higher costs for large population-based studies. Recovery might be improved by swab-type, transport medium, and better cold-chain to lab.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Nariz , Niño , Humanos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios Transversales , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 60(4): 106659, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35988665

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a leading cause of sepsis, which is a life-threatening condition that significantly contributes to the mortality of bacterial infections. Aminoglycoside antibiotics such as gentamicin or amikacin are essential medicines in the treatment of BSIs, but their clinical efficacy is increasingly being compromised by antimicrobial resistance. The aminoglycoside apramycin has demonstrated preclinical efficacy against aminoglycoside-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and is currently in clinical development for the treatment of critical systemic infections. METHODS: This study collected a panel of 470 MDR GNB isolates from healthcare facilities in Cambodia, Laos, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam for a multicentre assessment of their antimicrobial susceptibility to apramycin in comparison with other aminoglycosides and colistin by broth microdilution assays. RESULTS: Apramycin and amikacin MICs ≤ 16 µg/mL were found for 462 (98.3%) and 408 (86.8%) GNB isolates, respectively. Susceptibility to gentamicin and tobramycin (MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL) was significantly lower at 122 (26.0%) and 101 (21.5%) susceptible isolates, respectively. Of note, all carbapenem and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, all Acinetobacter baumannii and all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates tested in this study appeared to be susceptible to apramycin. Of the 65 colistin-resistant isolates tested, four (6.2%) had an apramycin MIC > 16 µg/mL. CONCLUSION: Apramycin demonstrated best-in-class activity against a panel of GNB isolates with resistances to other aminoglycosides, carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins and colistin, warranting continued consideration of apramycin as a drug candidate for the treatment of MDR BSIs.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina , Colistina , Aminoglicósidos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Asia Sudoriental , Cultivo de Sangre , Carbapenémicos , Cefalosporinas , Colistina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Gentamicinas , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Nebramicina/análogos & derivados , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Tobramicina
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 107(1): 65-71, 2022 07 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35895375

RESUMEN

Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance 1 (mcr-1) was first reported in 2015 and is a great concern to human health. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of mcr-1 and mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli (MCRPEC) and the association in infection status among various reservoirs connected to livestock. The study was conducted in 70 poultry and swine farms in a commune in Ha Nam province, northern Vietnam. Samples were collected from farmers, food animals, domestic animals, and farm environments (flies and wastewater) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening for mcr-1 gene and species identification of PCR positive isolates. Among 379 obtained mcr-1 positives isolates, Escherichia coli was the major identified, varying from 50% (2/4) in dog feces to 100% (31/31) in humans feces isolates. The prevalence of MCRPEC was 14.4% (20/139), 49.7% (96/193), 31.3% (25/80), 36.7% (40/109), 26.9% (18/67), and 3.9% (2/51) in humans, chickens, pigs, flies, wastewater, and dogs, respectively. The study identified association between MCRPEC infection status in humans and flies (OR = 3.4), between flies and chickens (OR = 5.3), and between flies and pigs (OR = 9.0). Farmers' age and farm livestock unit were also associated factors of MCRPEC infection status in humans (OR = 5.1 and 1.05, respectively). These findings bring new knowledge on antibiotic resistance in livestock setting and important suggestions on potential role of flies in the transmission of mcr-1 resistance gene.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pollos , Colistina/farmacología , Perros , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Escherichia coli/genética , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Granjas , Humanos , Ganado , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Plásmidos/genética , Porcinos , Vietnam/epidemiología , Aguas Residuales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...