Depression is associated with worse outcomes among women undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The causes of depression after breast reconstruction include worse outcomes, longer recovery times, and, sometimes, additional operations. Despite a plethora of data examining the effect of depression after breast reconstruction, there is little information to assess if concurrent depression affects patient outcomes in a similar manner. Thus, we sought to answer this question: Do depressed women undergoing breast reconstruction have worse outcomes? METHODS: The United States National Inpatient Sample was queried during 2010-2013 for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients with a diagnosis of depression at the time of breast reconstruction were compared to those who did not have depression at the time of breast reconstruction; patients who had any of the corresponding ICD-9 procedure codes for breast reconstruction and the single diagnostic code for depression included in their electronic medical record were included in the database sample. Significance testing and risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression were performed with SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 175,508 patients were included in this study, of which 35,473 had depression at the time of breast reconstruction and 140,035 did not. Depression was associated with an increased age, length of stay, greater cost of care, more comorbidities, and higher incidence of pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, infectious, wound, and venous thromboembolic complications, p<0.05. Pulmonary, genitourinary, and hematologic complications, infection, VTE, wound, and transfusion were associated with depression when a multivariate risk-adjusted regression was performed. CONCLUSION: A co-morbid diagnosis at the time of breast reconstruction should prompt the breast reconstruction team to ensure that depressed patients have their depression managed and all co-morbidities optimized and treated prior to undergoing breast reconstruction to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Examining the Role of Antimicrobial Irrigation and Capsular Contracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine if irrigation of breast implant pockets with antibiotics reduces the rate of capsular contracture (CC). Capsular contracture is the most common complication after primary augmentation mammoplasty, yet its etiology remains cryptogenic. METHODS: PubMed was searched for publications from January 1 of 2000 through October of 2015. Studies with the following criteria were included: primary breast augmentation with implants, use of antimicrobial irrigation (AMI), and documentation of CC. The primary outcome studied was incidence of CC. The quality of included studies was assessed independently. Studies were meta-analyzed to obtain a pooled odds ratio (OR) describing the effect of AMI on CC. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 8 studies and 10,923 patients. A total of 5348 patients received AMI, and 5575 patients did not. Our analysis revealed that the combined AMI, the antibiotic irrigation subgroup, and the iodine subgroup were associated with an increased propensity for CC [OR, 2.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3-2.94, I = 97%, P < 0.00001; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.78, I = 89%, P < 0.00001; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24-1.22, P = 0.05; I = 73], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial irrigation of implant pockets fails to reduce the propensity for CC. The authors recommend that further prospective multicenter trials be conducted to further elucidate the role of antibiotic irrigation in CC.