RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenic obesity and muscle attenuation have been associated with survival in patients with borderline resectable and advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA); however, these relationships are unknown for patients with resectable PDA. This study examined the associations between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue as measured on baseline computed tomography (CT) and the overall survival (OS) of participants with resectable PDA in a secondary analysis of the Southwest Oncology Group S1505 clinical trial (identifier: NCT02562716). METHODS: The S1505 phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with resectable PDA who were randomized to receive modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel as perioperative chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection. Baseline axial CT images at the L3 level were analyzed with externally validated software, and measurements were recorded for skeletal muscle area and skeletal muscle density, visceral adipose tissue area (VATA) and density, and subcutaneous adipose tissue area and density. The relationships between CT metrics and OS were analyzed using Cox regression models, with adjustment for baseline participant characteristics. RESULTS: Of 98 eligible participants with available baseline abdominal CT, 8 were excluded because of imaging quality (eg, orthopedic hardware), resulting in 90 evaluable cases: 51 men (57.0%; mean age, 63.2 years [SD, 8.5]; mean body mass index [BMI], 29.3 kg/m2 [SD, 6.4]), 80 White (89.0%), 6 Black (7.0%), and 4 unknown race (4.0%). Sarcopenia was present in 32 participants (35.9%), and sarcopenic obesity was present in 10 participants (11.2%). Univariable analyses for the 6 variables of interest indicated that the standardized mean difference (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98; P = .04) was statistically significantly associated with OS. In models adjusted for sex, race, age, BMI, performance score, contrast use, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity, VATA was statistically significantly associated with OS (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.00-2.51; P = .05). No difference was observed in OS between participants according to sarcopenic obesity or sarcopenia categories. The median OS estimates were 25.1 months for participants without sarcopenic obesity, 18.6 months for participants with sarcopenic obesity, 23.6 months for participants without sarcopenia, and 27.9 months for participants with sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to systematically evaluate body composition parameters in a prospective multicenter trial of patients with resectable PDA who received perioperative chemotherapy. Visceral adipose tissue was associated with survival; however, there was no association between OS and sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. Further studies should evaluate these findings in more detail.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Composición Corporal , Obesidad/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a highly lethal disease characterized by a spatially heterogeneous tumor microenvironment. Within the PDA microenvironment, cells organize into communities where cell fate is influenced by neighboring cells of diverse ontogeny and function. However, it remains unclear how cell neighborhoods in the tumor microenvironment evolve with treatment and impact clinical outcomes. METHODS: Here, using automated chromogenic multiplex immunohistochemistry and unsupervised computational image analysis of human PDA tumors, we investigated cell neighborhoods in surgically resected tumors from patients with chemotherapy-naïve PDA (n = 59) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated PDA (n = 57). Single cells were defined by lineage markers (CD3, CD8, Foxp3, CD68, CK19), proliferation (Ki67), and neighboring cells. RESULTS: Distinct intratumoral immune and tumor cell subsets were defined by neighboring cells. Higher content of stromal-associated macrophages was seen in chemotherapy-naïve tumors from long-term survivors (overall survival >3 years) compared with short-term survivors (overall survival <1 year), whereas immune-excluded tumor cells were higher in short-term survivors. Chemotherapy-treated vs -naïve tumors showed lower content of tumor-associated T cells and macrophages but similar densities of stromal-associated immune cells. However, proliferating tumor cell subsets with immune-rich neighborhoods were higher in chemotherapy-treated tumors. In a blinded analysis of tumors from patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a composite index comprising lower quantities of immune-excluded tumor cells and higher spatially distinct immune cell subsets was associated with prolonged survival. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data provide new insights into discrete cell communities in PDA and show their clinical relevance.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/inmunología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/inmunología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Macrófagos Asociados a Tumores/inmunología , Macrófagos Asociados a Tumores/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Proliferación Celular , InmunohistoquímicaRESUMEN
Background: With recent improvements in survival of cancer patients and common use of high-value care at end of life, the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with cancer is increasingly important. To our knowledge, there are no current U.S. data examining how the presence and extent of cancer influence cardiologists' decision making for common cardiovascular conditions. Methods: An anonymous online vignette-based survey of cardiologists was conducted at five U.S. institutions investigating how the extent of gastrointestinal and thoracic malignancies (prior/localized, metastatic) would influence treatment recommendations for atrial fibrillation (AF), aortic stenosis, unstable angina (UA), and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Results: Thirty-three percent (86/259) of cardiologists completed the survey between September and November 2019. Participants were 67% male, 51% below age 40, and 58% had five or more years of clinical experience. Majority of cardiologists practiced at teaching hospitals (72%) and were noninterventional (63%). Cardiologists were more likely to recommend procedural interventions for patients with localized cancer than for those with metastatic disease: AF (left atrial appendage occlusion: 20% vs. 8%), atrial stenosis (aortic valve repair: 83% vs. 11%), UA (left heart catheter: 70% vs. 27%), and obstructive CAD (percutaneous coronary intervention: 81% vs. 38%). In patients with metastatic cancer, most cardiologists sought an oncology (82%) or a palliative care (69%) consultation. However, a persistent trend of undertreatment in patients with localized cancers and overtreatment in patients with end-of-life disease was apparent. Conclusions: Cardiologists were less likely to recommend invasive cardiovascular therapies to patients with metastatic cancer. This preference pattern likely reflects the influence of comorbidities and quality of life expectation on cardiologists' treatment recommendations but may also be related to the stigma of advanced cancer. Better communication between cardiologists and oncologists is necessary to provide a personalized care of patients with cancer and CVD that would maximize treatment benefit with least morbidity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This trial explores SM-88 used with methoxsalen, phenytoin, and sirolimus (MPS) in pretreated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) METHODS: Forty-nine patients were randomized to daily 460 or 920 mg oral SM-88 with MPS (SM-88 Regimen). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (RECIST 1.1). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed ≥ one cycle of SM-88 Regimen (response evaluable population). Disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between dose levels. Stable disease was achieved in 9/37 patients (DCR, 24.3%); there were no complete or partial responses. Quality-of-life (QOL) was maintained and trended in favor of 920 mg. SM-88 Regimen was well tolerated; a single patient (1/49) had related grade 3 and 4 adverse events, which later resolved. In the intention-to-treat population of 49 patients, the median overall survival (mOS) was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.9 months). Those treated in the second line had an mOS of 8.1 months and a median PFS of 3.8 months. Survival was higher for patients with stable versus progressive disease (any line; mOS: 10.6 months vs. 3.9 months; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SM-88 Regimen has a favorable safety profile with encouraging QOL effects, disease control, and survival trends. This regimen should be explored in the second-line treatment of patients with mPDAC. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03512756.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Metoxaleno/uso terapéutico , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
Introduction: Genomic instability resulting from DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies is a hallmark of cancer and offers treatment opportunities. Homologous recombination DDR defect is a result of multiple critical gene mutations, including BRCA1/2. Targeting DNA DDR defects in pancreatic cancer (PC) is emerging as a potential treatment strategy with current focus on BRCA mutations.Areas covered: Challenges in treating patients with PC are explained. We review DDR defects as a treatment target in PC, specifically, germline BRCA mutation and sensitivity to platinum compounds and exploiting the strategy of synthetic lethality using poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. Literature review was undertaken through PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov website.Expert opinion: DDR defects are promising targets for novel therapies in PC. Early application of such strategy is in patient subgroup with BRCA germline mutation, which is seen in only 5-7% of the PC population. The oral PARP inhibitor olaparib in the maintenance setting represents the first targeted therapy in metastatic PC based on a phase 3 study. There is a very modest benefit for patients with PC using PARP inhibitors. Future work must improve our understanding of mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to PARP inhibitors in PC and enhance the molecular selection of patients for such therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Reparación del ADN/genética , Humanos , Mutación , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are known to be the second most common epithelial malignancy of the pancreas. PNETs can be listed among the slowest growing as well as the fastest growing human cancers. The prevalence of PNETs is deceptively low; however, its incidence has significantly increased over the past decades. According to the American Cancer Society's estimate, about 4032 (> 7% of all pancreatic malignancies) individuals will be diagnosed with PNETs in 2020. PNETs often cause severe morbidity due to excessive secretion of hormones (such as serotonin) and/or overall tumor mass. Patients can live for many years (except for those patients with poorly differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors); thus, the prevalence of the tumors that is the number of patients actually dealing with the disease at any given time is fairly high because the survival is much longer than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Due to significant heterogeneity, the management of PNETs is very complex and remains an unmet clinical challenge. In terms of research studies, modest improvements have been made over the past decades in the identification of potential oncogenic drivers in order to enhance the quality of life and increase survival for this growing population of patients. Unfortunately, the majority of systematic therapies approved for the management of advanced stage PNETs lack objective response or at most result in modest benefits in survival. In this review, we aim to discuss the broad challenges associated with the management and the study of PNETs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/epidemiología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Páncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We examined cabazitaxel, a novel next-generation taxoid, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in a multicenter phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who have progressed on one or more prior therapies for locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease were eligible, and prior taxane therapy was allowed. Taxane-naïve and pretreated cohorts were analyzed independently for efficacy. The primary endpoint for both cohorts was progression-free survival (PFS) using RECIST 1.1, using a Simon's two-stage design (10% significance and 80% power) for both cohorts. Comprehensive molecular annotation included whole exome and bulk RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients enrolled in the taxane-naïve cohort (Arm A) and 23 patients in the prior-taxane cohort (Arm B), from January 8, 2013, to April 8, 2015: median age 61.7 years (range, 35.5-91.8 years), 66% male, 66% Caucasian. The most common adverse events included neutropenia (17% Arm A and 39% Arm B), fatigue/muscle weakness (13%), and hematuria (12%). In Arm A, the 3-month PFS rate was 28% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17%-42%] and did not meet the prespecified efficacy target. The 3-month PFS rate in Arm B was 35% (95% CI, 16%-57%) and surpassed its efficacy target. HER2 amplification or overexpression was associated with improved disease control (P = 0.003), PFS (P = 0.04), and overall survival (P = 0.002). An M2 macrophage signature was also associated with improved survival (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Cabazitaxel has modest activity in advanced gastric cancer, including in patients previously treated with taxanes. Her2 amplification/overexpression and M2 high macrophage signature are potential biomarkers for taxane efficacy that warrant further evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Macrófagos Asociados a Tumores/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Femenino , Amplificación de Genes , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Receptor ErbB-2/análisis , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Taxoides/efectos adversosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. RESULTS: Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02558894.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Protein kinase C (PKC) plays an important role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The interaction between the PKC modulator bryostatin 1 (BRYO), and gemcitabine in human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells and in the non-transformed MCF-10A human breast epithelial cells was investigated. METHODS: Immunoblotting was used to determine the expression of PKC isoenzymes and proteins involved in the cell cycle and apoptosis. MTT, ELISA and flow cytometry assays were used to determine cell survival. RESULTS: Treatment of cells with BRYO 200 n M resulted in a significant downregulation of cytoplasmic PKC in all three cell lines. However, the expression of membranous PKC was differentially affected in these cells. BRYO (1-200 n M) had no significant effects on cell viability in any of the cell lines. Nevertheless, BRYO significantly enhanced the antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of gemcitabine in the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in the MCF-10A cells. This was associated with significant reduction in the bcl-2/bax ratio. There was a significant upregulation of p53, p21(waf1), and p27 in MCF7 and MCF-10A cells treated with the combination of gemcitabine and BRYO compared to gemcitabine-treated cells. CONCLUSIONS: The potentiation of the effect of gemcitabine by BRYO was demonstrated in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells and was associated with a specific pattern of PKC modulation. Further investigation of the role of specific isoforms of PKC in the downstream molecular events of gemcitabine-induced cytotoxicity is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Lactonas/uso terapéutico , Proteína Quinasa C/efectos de los fármacos , Células Tumorales Cultivadas/efectos de los fármacos , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias de la Mama/enzimología , Brioestatinas , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Citosol/enzimología , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Isoenzimas , Macrólidos , Células Tumorales Cultivadas/enzimología , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
Progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer in the past several decades has been very modest. Several new agents with activity against this disease have been identified. Of these, gemcitabine appears to be the most promising when used in combination with other drugs. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combinations have been tested in several studies. The major toxicity reported to occur with the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is myelosuppression, which is greater than that encountered with single-agent gemcitabine. However, episodes of neutropenic fever or spontaneous bleeding are reported to be very infrequent. Pilot Phase II studies combining gemcitabine with cisplatin have shown improved outcomes in objective response rates and survival; however, these findings must be confirmed in larger randomized studies.