Comparison of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction Techniques on Mid-Term Pulmonic Valve Fate.

Introduction: The pulmonic valve-sparing technique (PVS) is an emerging approach of right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) correction aimed at reducing the incidence of pulmonic regurgitation (PR) and the need for subsequent reintervention. This study aims to compare the long-term occurrence of moderate to severe PR/stenosis (PR/PS) between three different approaches. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 173 patients who underwent TOF correction at Chiang Mai University hospital between January 2006 and December 2016. The patients were divided into three groups: transannular patch (TAP; n = 88, 50.9%), monocusp insertion (MCI; n = 40, 23.1%), and PVS (n = 45, 26%). The study assessed freedom from moderate to severe PR/PS. Results: The median overall follow-up time was 79.8 months (interquartile range: 50.7-115.5 months. The PVS exhibited larger PV Z-score (-2.6 ± 2.3 mm, P < .001), with predominantly tricuspid morphology (64.4%). The PVS had significantly shorter median ventilator time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and longer median follow-up time. Postoperative moderate-severe PR was lower in the PVS group (P < .001), with no significant difference in PS (P = .356) and complications among the groups. Freedom from moderate-severe PR/PS was longer in the MCI group (2.8, 0.2-42.3 months vs 30.9, 0.2-50.9 months, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed TAP and MCI had a higher risk of developing moderate-severe PR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.13 vs HR 1.41; 95%CI 0.59-3.38) but lower risk of moderate-severe PS (HR 0.14; 95%CI 0.02-0.9 vs HR 0.39; 95%CI 0.05-3.19). Conclusion: Pulmonic valve-sparing reconstruction showed promise in preventing late moderate-severe PR in patients with favorable PV anatomy. However, it should be noted that this technique is associated with a higher incidence of PS.

Open after endovascular repair for previous extra anatomic bypass of adult coarctation.

BACKGROUND: During follow-up, aneurysm formation in adults with coarctation of aorta has been reported after undergoing extra-anatomical aortic bypass grafting. Endovascular repair was a reasonable treatment option but there were still complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old male who underwent extra-anatomical aortic bypass grafting, presented with severe back pain and hemoptysis. He had a diagnosed pseudoaneurysm with concealed rupture at the bypass grafting. He underwent endovascular repair and coil embolization. A postsurgical CT-angiogram showed there was extravasation from stent into the pseudoaneurysm. An open repair with endovascular stent removal instead of restenting was performed.

The outcomes of three different techniques of coronary artery bypass grafting: On-pump arrested heart, on-pump beating heart, and off-pump.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or on-pump arrested heart CABG (ONCAB) is a standard and simple technique. However, adverse effects can occur due to the use of aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass. Performing off-pump CABG (OPCAB) aims to avoid these adverse effects but may result in incomplete revascularization. On-pump beating heart CABG (ONBHCAB) combines the benefits of both ONCAB and OPCAB. This study focuses on comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of different CABG techniques. METHOD: Retrospective observational cohort included 2,028 patients who underwent ONCAB, OPCAB, and ONBHCAB. The short-term outcomes including postoperative ischemic injury, hemodynamic functions, and adverse events were compared. The long-term outcomes were overall survival and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Propensity score matching ensured comparability among the three patient groups. RESULTS: After matching, there were no differences in baseline characteristics. Regarding ischemic injury, OPCAB showed the lowest peak cardiac enzyme levels (all p≤0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the change of hemodynamic function (cardiac index) between the three groups (p = 0.158). Ten-year survival for OPCAB, ONBHCAB, and ONCAB were 80.5%, 75.9%, and 73.7%, respectively. OPCAB was associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk and MACE when compared to others (Mortality HR = 0.33, p = 0.001, MACE HR = 0.52, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: OPCAB implementation resulted in a lower occurrence of postoperative ischemic injury than ONCAB and ONBHCAB. No differences in postoperative hemodynamic function in all three techniques were observed. OPCAB respectively were preferable techniques beneficial for long-term outcomes.

The outcomes of ultrafiltration in on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with renal impairment.

OBJECTIVE: In chronic kidney disease (CKD), using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to renal dysfunction. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is one technique that preserved renal function, but the procedure may not be possible in certain situations. The ultrafiltration (UF) can remove excess fluid and inflammatory mediators that result from exposure to the CPB. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with UF could be an alternative way to preserve renal function. METHOD: A retrospective study of CKD patients who underwent CABG. The renal outcomes were compared between the patients who underwent CABG with UF and OPCAB. A repeated measure adjusted by propensity score was used for comparing the renal outcome. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for acute renal failure (AKI) and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: From January 2009 and June 2020, there were 220 CKD patients, 109 (49.55%) patients underwent CABG with UF, and 111 (50.45%) patients underwent OPCAB. There were statistically significant differences in the change of the average level of creatinine between CABG with UF (increased + 0.09 mg/dl) and OPCAB (decreased - 0.05 mg/dl) (p = 0.043). Also, patients who underwent CABG with UF had a significantly increased risk for AKI (OR 5.38, 95%CI 1.09, 26.5). CONCLUSION: The UF adjunct technique in CABG with CPB tends to provide a lower protective effect for renal function and had a significantly higher incidence of post-cardiac surgery AKI when compared to OPCAB. If technically feasible, OPCAB would be a preferable choice for CKD patients. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: SUR-2562-06607/Research ID: 6607.