Change in Eosinophil Count in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Anakinra.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra leads to a transient increase in eosinophil blood count (eosinophils) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We aimed to investigate the effect of anakinra on changes in eosinophils in patients with heart failure (HF) and their correlation with cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). METHODS: We measured eosinophils in 64 patients with HF (50% females), 55 (51-63) years of age, before and after treatment, and, in a subset of 41 patients, also after treatment cessation. We also evaluated CRF, measuring peak oxygen consumption (VO2) with a treadmill test. RESULTS: Treatment with anakinra significantly and transiently increased eosinophils, from 0.2 [0.1-0.3] to 0.3 [0.1-0.4] × 103 cells/µL (p < 0.001) and from 0.3 [0.2-0.5] to 0.2 [0.1-0.3] × 103 cells/µL, with suspension (p < 0.001). Changes in eosinophils correlated with the changes in peak VO2 (Spearman's Rho = +0.228, p = 0.020). Eosinophils were higher in patients with injection site reactions (ISR) (n = 8, 13%; 0.5 [0.4-0.6] vs. 0.2 [0.1-0.4] × 103 cells/µL, p = 0.023), who also showed a greater increase in peak VO2 (3.0 [0.9-4.3] vs. 0.3 [-0.6-1.8] mLO2·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients with HF treated with anakinra experience a transient increase in eosinophils, which is associated with ISR and a greater improvement in peak VO2.

Evaluación del Orbit Bleeding Risk Score como predictor de sangrado mayor en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo / Evaluation of the Orbit Bleeding Risk Score as Predictor of Major Bleeding in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

RESUMEN Introducción: El sangrado mayor es la complicación más importante del tratamiento antitrombótico en el síndrome coronario agudo (SCA), y se asocia a mayor mortalidad. Evaluar el riesgo de sangrado es un desafío. La utilidad del Orbit Bleeding score (ORBIT) para evaluar el riesgo de sangrado en SCA ha sido poco estudiada. Objetivo: Evaluar al ORBIT como predictor de sangrado mayor en pacientes internados por SCA en los que se decide la anticoagulación como parte de la estrategia antitrombótica. Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron en forma retrospectiva pacientes internados en dos unidades coronarias con diagnóstico de SCA que recibieron anticoagulación como parte de la terapia antitrombótica. A todos se les calcularon los scores CRUSADE, ACTION-GWTG y ORBIT con los datos clínicos del ingreso. Se analizo el punto primario de sangrado mayor, definido como una clasificación de BARC 3 o 5. Resultados: Se incluyeron 762 pacientes. El sangrado mayor se presentó en el 3.4%. En el análisis univariado los tres scores fueron predictores de sangrado mayor, mientras que en el multivariado sólo el ORBIT fue predictor independiente de sangrado mayor, con OR 2,46, IC95% 1,61-3,97, p <0,001. El área bajo la curva ROC fue de 0,70, 0,68 y 0,80 para los scores ACTIONGWTG, CRUSADE y ORBIT, respectivamente. El ORBIT presento una mayor área bajo la curva que el CRUSADE (p = 0,03) sin diferencias significativas con el ACTION-GWTG (p = 0,06) Conclusiones: El ORBIT fue el único predictor independiente de sangrado mayor, con una mejor capacidad de discriminación que el CRUSADE, y tendencia a mejor capacidad que el ACTION-GWTG.

ABSTRACT Background: Major bleeding is the most important complication of antithrombotic treatment in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with higher mortality. Assessing the risk of bleeding is a challenge. The usefulness of the Orbit Bleeding Score (ORBIT) to assess the risk of bleeding in ACS has been scarcely studied. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ORBIT score as a predictor of major bleeding in patients hospitalized for ACS in whom anticoagulation is decided as part of the antithrombotic strategy. Methods: Patients admitted to two coronary care units with diagnosis of ACS who received anticoagulation as part of the antithrombotic therapy were retrospectively included in the study. The CRUSADE, ACTION-GWTG and ORBIT scores were calculated using the admission clinical data. The primary endpoint was major bleeding, defined as BARC 3 or 5 classification. Results: The study included 762 patients. Major bleeding occurred in 3.4% of cases. In the univariate analysis, the three scores were predictors of major bleeding, while in the multivariate analysis only the ORBIT score was an independent predictor of major bleeding (OR: 2.46, 95% CI 1.61-3.97, p <0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.70, 0.68 and 0.80 for the ACTION-GWTG, CRUSADE and ORBIT scores, respectively. The ORBIT score presented a higher area under the curve than the CRUSADE score (p=0.03) but without significant difference with the ACTION-GWTG score (p=0.06) Conclusions: The ORBIT score was the only independent predictor of major bleeding, presenting a better discrimination capacity than the CRUSADE score and a tendency to better capacity than the ACTION-GWTG score.