No correlation between remifentanil blood, cerebrospinal fluid and cerebral extracellular fluid levels and TCI prediction: a pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this paper were to elucidate the difference in concentration among remifentanil blood, cerebrospinal fluid and cerebral extracellular fluid levels, and to verify the presumable existence of a correlation between arterial and cerebral remifentanil. We used brain microdialysis to shed light on this aspect of the pharmacokinetic and to correlate these findings with Minto's model. METHODS: The study population was formed by 9 patients scheduled for elective intracranial surgery for cerebral supratentorial neoplasia. All patients received general anaesthetic; 100 microliters of dialysate were collected. Furthermore, arterial blood samples of 3 mL each were collected, respectively one at the beginning and one at the end of the sampling period. We determined the concentration of remifentanil and its main metabolite, remifentanil acid, in the blood and in the brain. The predictive performance of the Minto pharmacokinetic parameter set was evaluated by examining the performance error. RESULTS: The mean Performance Error was -45.13% (min -21.80, max -88.75) for the first series of arterial samples, -38.29% (min -6.57, max -79.17) for the second one and 67.73% (min 7, max -93.12) for the extra cellular fluid sample. The concentration of remifentanil set pumps was correlated with blood concentration for both series of samples. Neither the set concentration, nor the arterial samples were correlated with extra cellular fluid values. CONCLUSION: There was a wide interindividual variability with regard both to blood and cerebral remifentanil concentration. Moreover, the ratio between arterial blood and cerebral remifentanil was not consistent among our patients in spite of a stable infusion rate of remifentanil; at the end we found a trend of over prediction in the ratio between the various compartments examined.

Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force.

Currently, there are no established definitions or terminology for sedation-related adverse events (AEs). With clear terminology and definitions, sedation events may be accurately identified and tracked, providing a benchmark for defining the occurrence of AEs, ranging from minimal to severe. This terminology could apply to sedation performed in any location and by any provider. We present a consensus document from the International Sedation Task Force (ISTF) of the World Society of Intravenous Anaesthesia (World SIVA). The ISTF is composed of adult and paediatric sedation practitioners from multiple disciplines throughout the world.

Postoperative pain treatment SIAARTI Recommendations 2010. Short version.

The aim of these recommendations is the revision of data published in 2002 in the "SIAARTI Recommendations for acute postoperative pain treatment". In this version, the SIAARTI Study Group for acute and chronic pain decided to grade evidence based on the "modified Delphi" method with 5 levels of recommendation strength. Analgesia is a fundamental right of the patient. The appropriate management of postoperative pain (POP) is known to significantly reduce perioperative morbidity, including the incidence of postoperative complications, hospital stay and costs, especially in high-risk patients (ASA III-V), those undergoing major surgery and those hospitalized in a critical unit (Level A). Therefore, the treatment of POP represents a high-priority institutional objective, as well as an integral part of the treatment plan for "perioperative disease", which includes analgesia, early mobilization, early enteral nutrition and active physiokinesitherapy (Level A). In order to improve an ACUTE PAIN SERVICE organization, we recommend: --a plan for pain management that includes adequate preoperative evaluation, pain measurement, organization of existing resources, identification and training of involved personnel in order to assure multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, early enteral nutrition and active physiokinesitherapy (Level A); --the implementation of an Acute Pain Service, a multidisciplinary structure which includes an anesthetist (team coordinator), surgeons, nurses, physiotherapists and eventually other specialists; --referring to high-quality indicators in establishing an APS and considering the following key points in its organization (Level C): --service adoption; --identifying a referring anesthetist who is on call 24 hours a day; --patient care during the night and weekend; --sharing, drafting and updating written therapeutic protocols; --continuous medical education; --systematic pain assessment; --data collection regarding the efficacy and safety of the implemented protocols; --at least one audit per year. --a preoperative evaluation, including all the necessary information for the management of postoperative analgesia (Level C); --to adequately inform the patient about the risks and benefits of drugs and procedures used to obtain the maximum efficacy from the administered treatments (Level D). We describe pharmacological and loco-regional techniques with special attention to day surgery and difficult populations. Risk management pathways must be the reference for early identification and treatment of adverse events and chronic pain development.

Costs and quality in loco-regional anesthesia.

Quality can be considered to be a strategic element in the political process of planning and implementation of health and social care, resulting in a form of guarantee for the public through encouraging constructive competition between providers and reducing wasting and poor management. This should also be applied to managing loco-regional anesthesia. Competition is constant between treatments currently available together with a focus on quality and costs. This brings about strict controls on health care costs which should then be based on the evaluation of the results obtained in terms of health. It is obvious that costs for materials, time spent for an intervention, staff employed and structures required to carry it out are unavoidable. Quality is that treatment which maximises the patient's well-being following evaluation of the expected risks and benefits involved in the overall treatment. Acute pain is suffered by surgical patients either due to pre-existing disease, surgical intervention or due to a combination of both these situations. There is a high incidence of postoperative pain. In fact, more than 75% of postoperative patients report to have suffered moderate to severe pain. The same results have been reported in pediatrics and oncology: these results should always encourage the application of clinical quality, taking into consideration the costs involved when carrying out loco-regional anesthesia which aims at improving patient's outcome when undergoing surgical intervention.

[Plasma substitutes: strategies for use in intensive therapy to maintain a correct ratio between therapeutic efficacy and costs]. / I sostituti di volume plasmatico: strategie di impiego in terapia intensiva per il mantenimento di un corretto rapporto tra efficacia terapeutica e costi.

BACKGROUND: The coice of one product rather than another in clinical practice is based on two main criteria: therapeutic efficacy and the cost of the product in question. However, if therapeutic efficacy is equal, the choice of a less expensive product is not necessarily the right option. We compared the costs and therapeutic efficacy of two products used in plasma replacement therapy in order to identify which would be the most advantageous. METHODS: A total of 126 patients due to undergo major abdominal surgery were recruited and, having been duly informed, they were divided into two random groups. One group was treated with a solution of hydroxyethylamide 6% with an intermediate molecular weight (MW 200 kDa SD 0.5), and the other was treated with a solution of modified fluid gelatine (MFG) at 4% (MW 30 kDa). The solutions were administered to patients at the start of surgery until the morning of the first postoperative day in order to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) greater than 60 mmHg and central venous pressure (CVP) between 10 and 14 mmHg. Moreover, the costs of the two products and their additional charges were taken into consideration, taken from the supply lists provided by the pharmacy in the hospital where the study was carried out. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of therapeutic efficacy. In economic terms, the cost of the entire infusion treatment was comparable between the two groups in spite of the higher cost of hydroxyethylamide. CONCLUSIONS: The higher cost of hydroxyethylamide was compensated by the fact that a smaller amount of the solution is required to obtain the same hemodynamic parameters guaranteed by gelatine. Moreover, no adverse reactions were reported in this study to either compound. In the international literature, gelatine is associated with adverse reactions in a greater number of cases than hydroxyethylamide. This study shows that when proposing strategies of use, a simple cost analysis of the products used is not sufficient for a correct decision.

[Clinical pathways and case management in anesthesiology]. / Le Clinical Pathways ed il Case Management in anestesiologia.

Clinical Pathways and the Case Management represent clinical and management tools for organizing patient care. These tools focus on results and use a multi-disciplinary approach, with the goal of providing high quality, cost effective care. Both systems require the care providers to interact with the institution or the health care network. As health care is part of a refund system, the specialist must cooperate with personnel of other disciplines as a member of a team which works together to improve the quality of health care, while containing the costs. The Clinical Pathways and the Case Management are two tools for achieving these goals. The most important limit of a cost control system is the division split of health care into single components instead of considering the entire diagnostic course. Without doubt, the Disease Management appears to be the most effective control system of health care costs now available.