Two Myocardial Infarctions and Five 8,000-m Peaks.

We report the case of a male smoker who is overweight and has no leisure time physical activity until a first acute inferolateral myocardial infarction at the age of 44 years, which was treated using coronary stenting of the left circumflex artery. He was discharged with an ejection fraction of 0.45 and the indication to quit smoking and initiate regular aerobic physical activity. After that episode, he started regular mountain hiking in the Alps, Andes, and, finally, in the Himalayas and Karakorum, where, up to the age of 65 years, he climbed 5 peaks of altitude >8,000 m, always solo and without oxygen, despite a recurrent myocardial infarction because of occlusion at the distal edge of the previously implanted stent. This case supports the indication that high-altitude per se is not contraindicated in patients with well-compensated coronary artery disease, even after an acute MI.

[The heart patient at high altitude: not just thin air]. / Il cardiopatico ad alta quota: non solo aria sottile.

The exposure to high altitude, with its inherent hypobaric hypoxia, elicits transient compensatory physiological responses of the cardiovascular and respiratory system which, however, do not preclude a safe sojourn at least up to 3500 m to the vast majority of well compensated patients with heart disease on stable drug therapy. Existing scientific statements of the European and American Societies of Cardiovascular and High-Mountain Medicine have released specific and helpful recommendations, though mostly based on expert consensus rather than solid evidence. The risk of cardiac events has been recorded only during sports activities, does not seem to depend on altitude and is similar to what is observed during intense exercise at sea level. Besides altitude itself, other aspects of the mountain environment should be considered, such as lower temperature, wind and dehydration which all require careful planning and equipment typical of the alpine sports. The distance of most mountain areas from medical centers able to provide effective care in time-dependent emergencies, and the lack in most cases of dedicated protocols, should also be considered as an important, most likely the most important limiting factor in high-risk patients.

Impact of hemoglobin levels at admission on outcomes among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with low-dose Prasugrel or clopidogrel: A sub-study of the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.

Hemoglobin (Hb) levels have emerged as a useful tool for risk stratification and the prediction of outcome after myocardial infarction. We aimed at evaluating the prognostic impact of this parameter among patients in advanced age, where the larger prevalence of anemia and the higher rate of comorbidities could directly impact on the cardiovascular risk. METHODS: All the patients in the ELDERLY-2 trial, were included in this analysis and stratified according to the values of hemoglobin at admission. The primary endpoint of this study was cardiovascular mortality within one year. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, MI, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2-3 or 5 bleeding, any stroke, re-hospitalization for cardiovascular event or stent thrombosis (probable or definite) within 12 months after index admission. RESULTS: We included in our analysis 1364 patients, divided in quartiles of Hb values (<12.2; 12.2-13.39; 13.44-14.49; ≥ 4.5 g/dl). At a mean follow- up of 330.4 ± 99.9 days cardiovascular mortality was increased in patients with lower Hb (HR[95%CI] = 0.76 [0.59-0.97], p = 0.03). Results were no more significant after correction for baseline differences (adjusted HR[95%CI] = 1.22 [0.41-3.6], p = 0.16). Similar results were observed for overall mortality. At subgroup analysis, (according to Hb median values) a significant interaction was observed only with the type of antiplatelet therapy, but not with major high-risk subsets of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome managed invasively, lower hemoglobin at admission is associated with higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and major ischemic events, mainly explained by the higher risk profile.

Association of statin pretreatment with presentation characteristics, infarct size and outcome in older patients with acute coronary syndrome: the Elderly ACS-2 trial.

BACKGROUND: prior statin treatment has been shown to have favourable effects on short- and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There are limited data in older patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of previous statin therapy and presentation characteristics, infarct size and clinical outcome in older patients, with or without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial. METHODS: data on statin use pre-admission were available for 1,192 of the 1,443 patients enrolled in the original trial. Of these, 531 (44.5%) were already taking statins. Patients were stratified based on established ASCVD and statin therapy. ACS was classified as non-ST elevation or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Infarct size was measured by peak creatine kinase MB (CK-MB). All-cause death in-hospital and within 1 year were the major end points. RESULTS: there was a significantly lower frequency of STEMI in statin patients, in both ASCVD and No-ASCVD groups. Peak CK-MB levels were lower in statin users (10 versus 25 ng/ml, P < 0.0001). There was lower all-cause death in-hospital and within 1 year for subjects with ASCVD already on statins independent of other baseline variables. There were no differences in all-cause death for No-ASCVD patients whether or not on statins. CONCLUSIONS: statin pretreatment was associated with more favourable ACS presentation and lower myocardial damage in older ACS patients both ASCVD and No-ASCVD. The incidence of all-cause death (in-hospital and within 1 year) was significantly lower in the statin treated ASCVD patients.

Association of Sex with Outcome in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Worse outcomes have been reported for women, compared with men, after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether this difference persists in elderly patients undergoing similar invasive treatment has not been studied. We investigated sex-related differences in 1-year outcome of elderly acute coronary syndrome patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Patients 75 years and older successfully treated with PCI were selected among those enrolled in 3 Italian multicenter studies. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the independent predictive value of sex on outcome at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 2035 patients (44% women) were included. Women were older and most likely to present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), diabetes, hypertension, and renal dysfunction; men were more frequently overweight, with multivessel coronary disease, prior myocardial infarction, and revascularizations. Overall, no sex disparity was found about all-cause (8.3% vs 7%, P = .305) and cardiovascular mortality (5.7% vs 4.1%, P = .113). Higher cardiovascular mortality was observed in women after STEMI (8.8%) vs 5%, P = .041), but not after non ST-elevation-ACS (3.5% vs 3.7%, P = .999). A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with prior coronary events (N = 1324, 48% women) showed a significantly higher cardiovascular death in women (5.4% vs 2.9%, P = .025). After adjustment for baseline clinical variables, female sex did not predict adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly men and women with ACS show different clinical presentation and baseline risk profile. After successful PCI, unadjusted 1-year cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in women with STEMI and in those with a first coronary event. However, female sex did not predict cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for the different baseline variables.

Bleeding risk prediction in elderly patients managed invasively for acute coronary syndromes: External validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS scores.

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess and compare the prediction power of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS risk scores with regards to bleeding events in elderly patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing invasive management. METHODS: Our external validation cohort included 1883 patients older >74 years admitted for ACS and treated with PCI from 3 prospective, multicenter trials. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 365 days, patients in the high-risk categories according to the PRECISE-DAPT score experienced a higher rate of BARC 3-5 bleedings (p = 0.002) while this was not observed for those in the high-risk category according to the PARIS risk score (p = 0.3). Both scores had a moderate discriminative power (c-statistics 0.70 and 0.64, respectively) and calibration was accurate for both risk scores (all χ2 > 0.05), but PARIS risk score was associated to a greater overestimation of the risk (p = 0.02). Decision curve analysis was in favor of the PRECISE-DAPT score up to a risk threshold of 2%. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of older adults managed invasively for ACS both the PARIS and the PRECISE-DAPT scores were moderately accurate in predicting bleeding risk. However, the use of the PRECISE-DAPT is associated with better performance.

Management of acute coronary syndromes during the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy: The "macro-hub" experience.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare Authorities of Lombardy modified the regional network concerning time-dependent emergencies. Specifically, 13 Macro-Hubs were identified to deliver timely optimal care to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aim of this paper is to present the results of this experience. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a multicenter, observational study. A total of 953 patients were included, presenting with STEMI in 57.7% of the cases. About 98% of patients received coronary angiography with a median since first medical contact to angiography of 79 (IQR 45-124) minutes for STEMI and 1262 (IQR 643-2481) minutes for NSTEMI.A total of 107 patients (11.2%) had SARS-CoV2 infection, mostly with STEMI (74.8%). The time interval from first medical contact to cath-lab was significant shorter in patients with COVID-19, both in the overall population and in STEMI patients (87 (IQR 41-310) versus 160 (IQR 67-1220) minutes, P = 0.001, and 61 (IQR 23-98) versus 80 (IQR 47-126) minutes, P = 0.01, respectively). In-hospital mortality and cardiogenic shock rates were higher among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without (32% vs 6%, P < 0.0001, and 16.8% vs 6.7%, P < 0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, the redefinition of ACS network according to enlarged Macro-Hubs allowed to continue with timely ACS management, while reserving a high number of intensive care beds for the pandemic. Patients with ACS and COVID-19 presented a worst outcome, particularly in case of STEMI.

Residual SYNTAX Score and One-Year Outcome in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The residual burden of coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with worse ischemic outcome. However, data are conflicting in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to verify the incremental value of the residual Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (rSS) over clinical variables and baseline SYNTAX score (bSS) in predicting 1-year mortality or cardiovascular events. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of data collected in the Elderly-ACS 2 multicenter randomized trial was performed. We included 630 patients aged > 75 years with multivessel coronary disease undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The primary outcome was a composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stroke at 1-year follow up. Change in c-statistic and standardized net benefit were used to evaluate the incremental value of the rSS. RESULTS: Event rates were significantly higher in patients with incomplete revascularization (rSS > 8). When the rSS was included in a core Cox regression model containing age, previous myocardial infarction, and ACS type, the hazard ratio for patients with score values > 8 was 2.47 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-4.06). However, the core model with rSS did not increase the c-statistic compared with the core model with the bSS (from 0.69 to 0.70) and gave little incremental value in the standardized net benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with ACS with multivessel disease undergoing PCI, incomplete revascularization was associated with worse outcome at 1-year follow-up. However, there was no clear incremental value of the rSS in the prediction of 1-year adverse outcome compared with a model including clinical variables and bSS.

CONTEXTE: Le fardeau résiduel de la coronaropathie après une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) a été associé à de moins bons résultats sur le plan ischémique. Les données recueillies chez les patients âgés sont toutefois contradictoires. Cette étude avait donc pour objectif de valider la valeur ajoutée du score SYNTAX (SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery) résiduel (SSr) par rapport aux paramètres cliniques et au score SYNTAX initial (SSi) pour prédire la mortalité à 1 an et les manifestations cardiovasculaires. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Une analyse a posteriori des données de l'étude multicentrique avec répartition aléatoire Elderly-ACS 2 a été effectuée. Pour ce faire, 630 patients âgés de plus de 75 ans, atteints d'une coronaropathie multitronculaire et ayant subi une ICP pour traiter un syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) ont été retenus. Le critère d'évaluation principal était composé du décès, de l'infarctus du myocarde récurrent et de l'accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) au moment du suivi à 1 an. La variation de la statistique C et le bénéfice net normalisé ont servi à évaluer la valeur ajoutée du SSr. RÉSULTATS: Les manifestations étaient significativement plus fréquentes chez les patients dont la revascularisation était incomplète (SSr > 8). Lorsque le SSr a été pris en compte dans un modèle de régression de Cox de base ayant pour facteurs l'âge, les antécédents d'infarctus du myocarde et le type de SCA, le rapport des risques instantanés pour les patients ayant un score > 8 était de 2,47 (intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,51-4,06). L'intégration du SSr dans le modèle de base n'a toutefois pas donné lieu à une statistique C plus élevée que celle du SSi (0,70 vs 0,69) et conférait peu de valeur ajoutée sur le plan du bénéfice net normalisé. CONCLUSIONS: Chez les patients âgés présentant un SCA et une atteinte multitronculaire, et subissant une ICP, la revascularisation incomplète a été associée à de moins bons résultats au moment du suivi à 1 an. Le SSr n'a toutefois pas été clairement associé à une valeur ajoutée pour prédire une issue défavorable à 1 an comparativement à un modèle reposant sur des paramètres cliniques et le SSi.

Clinical Impact of Valvular Heart Disease in Elderly Patients Admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the Elderly-ACS 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials and registries, and a gap of evidence exists for clinical decision making in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to assess the prevalence and independent prognostic impact of valvular heart disease (VHD) diagnosed during the index hospitalization on clinical outcomes among elderly patients with ACS. Included VHDs were moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis (AS), or both combined. METHODS: We explored the Elderly-ACS 2 dataset, which includes patients older than 74 years of age diagnosed with ACS and managed invasively. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for heart failure at 1 year; the secondary endpoint was death for cardiovascular causes. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: no VHD, moderate-to-severe MR, moderate-to-severe AS, and both moderate-to-severe MR and AS. RESULTS: Of the 1443 subjects enrolled, 190 (13.2%) had moderate-to-severe MR, 26 (1.8%) had moderate-to-severe AS, and 13 (0.9%) had both moderate-to-severe MR and AS. When compared with those with no VHD, patients with moderate-to-severe MR had hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary endpoint of 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-3.07], those with moderate-to-severe AS had HRs of 3.10 (95% CI, 1.39-6.93), and those with both moderate-to-severe MR and AS had HRs of 4.00 (95% CI, 1.65-9.73] (all P < 0.01). Patients with moderate-to-severe MR also had increased risks of cardiovascular death (HR 3.17; 95% CI, 1.57-6.42; P < 0.01), whereas in those with moderate-to-severe AS or both moderate-to-severe MR and AS, a nonsignificant increased risk was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of elderly patients admitted for ACS, VHD was found in 1 of 5 subjects and had an independent, consistent impact on prognosis.

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent improvements in percutaneous coronary revascularization and antithrombotic therapies for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, the outcome is still unsatisfactory in high-risk patients, such as the elderly and patients with diabetes. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prognostic impact of diabetes on clinical outcome among patients included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial, a randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study carried out at 32 centers in Italy. METHODS: Our population is represented by 1443 patients included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial. Diabetes was defined as known history of diabetes at admission. The primary endpoint of this analysis was cardiovascular mortality, while secondary endpoints were all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or 3 bleeding, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular event or stent thrombosis within 12 months after index admission. RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 419 (29%) out of 1443 patients. Diabetic status was significantly associated with major cardiovascular risk factors and history of previous coronary disease, presentation with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.01) more extensive coronary disease (P = 0.02), more advanced Killip class at presentation (P = 0.003), use at admission of statins (P = 0.004) and diuretics at discharge (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 367 days (interquartile range: 337-378 days). Diabetic status was associated with an absolute increase in the rate of cardiovascular mortality as compared with patients without diabetes [5.5 vs. 3.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.7 (0.99-2.8), P = 0.054], particularly among those treated with clopidogrel [HR (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 1.89 (0.93-3.87), P = 0.08]. However, this difference disappeared after correction for baseline differences [Adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.1(0.4-2.9), P = 0.86]. Similar findings were observed for other secondary endpoints, except for bleeding complications, significantly more frequent in diabetic patients [HR (95% CI) 2.02 (1.14-3.6), P = 0.02; adjusted HR (95% CI) = 2.1 (1.01-4.3), P = 0.05]. No significant interaction was observed between type of dual antiplatelet therapy, diabetic status and outcome. CONCLUSION: Among elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes, diabetic status was associated with higher rates of comorbidities, more severe cardiovascular risk profile and major bleeding complications fully accounting for the absolute increase in mortality. In fact, diabetes mellitus did not emerge as an independent predictor of survival in advanced age.

Impact of renal dysfunction and acute kidney injury on outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is common in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and its prevalence dramatically increases with age. Understanding the determinants of adverse outcomes in this extremely high-risk population may be useful for the development of specific treatment strategies and planning of secondary prevention modalities. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline renal function and acute kidney injury on one-year outcome of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Patients aged 75 years and older with acute coronary syndrome undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention were selected among those enrolled in three Italian multicentre studies. Based on the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula ([(140-age) × body weight × 0.85 if female]/(72 × serum creatinine)* 1.73 m2 of body surface area), patients were classified as having none or mild (eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2), moderate (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2) or severe (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2) renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalisation for cardiovascular causes, stroke and type 2, 3 and 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleedings were analysed up to 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1904 patients were included. Of these, 57% had moderate and 11% severe renal dysfunction. At 12 months, patients with renal dysfunction had higher rates (P < 0.001) of all-cause (4.5%, 7.5% and 17.8% in patients with none or mild, moderate and severe renal dysfunction, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (2.8%, 5.2% and 10.2%, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, severe renal dysfunction was associated with a higher risk of all-cause (hazard ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-5.37, P = 0.001) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.41-6.83, P = 0.005), whereas non-fatal events were unaffected. Acute kidney injury incidence was significantly higher in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients (11.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.036) and in those with reduced baseline renal function (P < 0.001), and it was associated with increased mortality independently from baseline renal function and clinical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline renal dysfunction is highly prevalent and is associated with higher mortality in elderly acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute kidney injury occurs more frequently among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and those with pre-existing renal dysfunction and is independently associated with one-year mortality.

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients ≥75 Years of Age With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Admitted for an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The prognostic role of previous coronary artery bypass (CABG) in elderly patients admitted to hospital for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of patients aged ≥75 years admitted for an ACS with or without previous history of CABG. The primary outcome of the study was a composite of overall mortality, recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and rehospitalization for heart failure at 1-year follow-up. We included 2,253 ACS patients, aged 81 (78 to 85) years enrolled in 3 multicenter studies (the Italian Elderly ACS study, the LADIES ACS study, and the Elderly ACS 2 randomised trial) - 178 (7.9%) with previous CABG, 2,075 (92.1%) without. Patients with previous CABG had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, lower ejection fraction, and higher creatinine values on admission. However, both at univariate analysis and after adjustment for the most relevant covariates (sex, age, previous myocardial infarction, type of ACS, left ventricular ejection fraction, and serum creatinine on admission), previous CABG did not show any statistically significant association with 1-year outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 0.85; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.19; p = 0.353). In conclusion, our study suggests that elderly ACS patients with previous CABG have worse basal clinical characteristics. Nevertheless, in a broad cohort of patients mostly treated with percutaneous coronary intervention during the index event, previous CABG did not confer independent additional risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1-year follow-up.

Impact of body mass index on clinical outcome among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Elderly patients are at increased risk of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Frailty, comorbidities and low body weight have emerged as conditioning the prognostic impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) on clinical outcome among patients included in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial, a randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study comparing low-dose (5 mg) prasugrel vs clopidogrel among elderly patients with ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our population is represented by 1408 patients enrolled in the Elderly-ACS 2 trial. BMI was calculated at admission. The primary endpoint of this analysis was cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, recurrent MI, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 or 3 bleeding, and re-hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons or stent thrombosis within 12 months after index admission. Patients were grouped according to median values of BMI (

Impact of renal dysfunction and acute kidney injury on outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is common in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and its prevalence dramatically increases with age. Understanding the determinants of adverse outcomes in this extremely high-risk population may be useful for the development of specific treatment strategies and planning of secondary prevention modalities. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline renal function and acute kidney injury on one-year outcome of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Patients aged 75 years and older with acute coronary syndrome undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention were selected among those enrolled in three Italian multicentre studies. Based on the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula ([(140-age) × body weight × 0.85 if female]/(72 × serum creatinine)* 1.73 m2 of body surface area), patients were classified as having none or mild (eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2), moderate (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2) or severe (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2) renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network classification. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalisation for cardiovascular causes, stroke and type 2, 3 and 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleedings were analysed up to 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1904 patients were included. Of these, 57% had moderate and 11% severe renal dysfunction. At 12 months, patients with renal dysfunction had higher rates (P < 0.001) of all-cause (4.5%, 7.5% and 17.8% in patients with none or mild, moderate and severe renal dysfunction, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (2.8%, 5.2% and 10.2%, respectively). After multivariable adjustment, severe renal dysfunction was associated with a higher risk of all-cause (hazard ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-5.37, P = 0.001) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.41-6.83, P = 0.005), whereas non-fatal events were unaffected. Acute kidney injury incidence was significantly higher in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients (11.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.036) and in those with reduced baseline renal function (P < 0.001), and it was associated with increased mortality independently from baseline renal function and clinical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline renal dysfunction is highly prevalent and is associated with higher mortality in elderly acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute kidney injury occurs more frequently among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and those with pre-existing renal dysfunction and is independently associated with one-year mortality.

[Acute coronary syndrome with unusual finding of double coronary occlusion, acute and chronic, of the left anterior descending coronary artery]. / Sindrome coronarica acuta con inusuale riscontro di duplice occlusione, acuta e cronica, dell'arteria discendente anteriore.

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, total chronic occlusion of a non-culprit vessel is a frequent angiographic finding (10-30%) and it is associated with increased mortality. The effective treatment of these lesions results in better outcomes, and procedural success depends partly on the anatomical features of the lesion. As indicated by current guidelines, the treatment of non-infarct-related artery lesions is not recommended in the acute setting, even in case of hemodynamic instability. We here report the case of a 57-year-old patient suffering from an acute coronary syndrome with double occlusion, acute and chronic, of the left anterior descending artery, both treated in the acute setting with good angiographic and clinical results.

Time Course of Ischemic and Bleeding Burden in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Randomized to Low-Dose Prasugrel or Clopidogrel.

Background Elderly patients have high ischemic and bleeding rates after acute coronary syndrome; however, the occurrence of these complications over time has never been studied. This study sought to characterize average daily ischemic rates ( ADIRs ) and average daily bleeding rates ( ADBRs ) over 1 year in patients aged >74 years with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who were randomized in the Elderly ACS 2 trial, comparing low-dose prasugrel (5 mg daily) with clopidogrel (75 mg daily). Methods and Results ADIRs and ADBRs were calculated as the total number of events, including recurrent events, divided by the number of patient-days of follow-up and assessed within different clinical phases: acute (0-3 days), subacute (4-30 days), and late (31-365 days). Generalized estimating equations were used to test the least squares mean differences for the pairwise comparisons of ADIRs and ADBRs and the pairwise comparison of clopidogrel versus prasugrel effects. Globally, ADIRs were 2.6 times (95% CI, 2.4-2.9) higher than ADBRs . ADIRs were significantly higher in the clopidogrel arm than in the low-dose prasugrel arm in the subacute phase ( Padj<0.001) without a difference in ADBRs ( Padj=0.35). In the late phase, ADIRs remained significantly higher with clopidogrel ( Padj<0.001), whereas ADBRs were significantly higher with low-dose prasugrel ( Padj<0.001). Conclusions Ischemic burden was greater than bleeding burden in all clinical phases of 1-year follow-up of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Low-dose prasugrel reduced ischemic events in the subacute and chronic phases compared with clopidogrel, whereas bleeding burden was lower with clopidogrel in the late phase. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01777503.

Outcomes of Elderly Patients with ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have been classified according to the finding of ST-segment elevation on the presenting electrocardiogram, with different treatment strategies and practice guidelines. However, a comparative description of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention during index admission has not been published so far. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Elderly ACS-2 multicenter randomized trial. Main outcome measures were crude cumulative incidence and cause-specific hazard ratio (cHR) of cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, reinfarction, and stroke. RESULTS: Of 1443 ACS patients aged >75 years (median age 80 years, interquartile range 77-84), 41% were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and 59% had non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS) (48% NSTEMI and 11% unstable angina). As compared with those with NSTEACS, STEMI patients had more favorable baseline risk factors, fewer prior cardiovascular events, and less severe coronary disease, but lower ejection fraction (45% vs 50%, P < .001). At a median follow-up of 12 months, 51 (8.6%) STEMI patients had died, vs 39 (4.6%) NSTEACS patients. After adjusting for sex, age, and previous myocardial infarction, the hazard among the STEMI group was significantly higher for cardiovascular death (cHR 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.36), noncardiovascular death (cHR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.01-4.38), and stroke (cHR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.7-13.7). CONCLUSIONS: Despite more favorable baseline characteristics, elderly STEMI patients have worse survival and a higher risk of stroke compared with NSTEACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

[Therapeutic strategies in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes]. / Strategie terapeutiche nel paziente anziano con sindrome coronarica acuta.

Because of the aging of the population, the proportion of elderly patients admitted to the coronary care unit for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is increasing. Until a decade ago, treatment of elderly patients was based on poor scientific evidence, as older patients were commonly excluded from randomized controlled trials. In the last years, real-world registries and randomized controlled trials specifically addressing the older population have been published and provided clear evidence. Primary percutaneous angioplasty has become the standard of care for the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction also in the elderly population, whereas the Italian Elderly ACS and the After Eighty randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of an invasive strategy over an initial conservative strategy also in elderly patients affected by non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Moreover, real-world registries have shown that an increased use of early revascularization was associated with a progressive reduction in mortality after ACS: these findings have been confirmed also in a clinical context characterized by high mortality rates such as that of cardiogenic shock. As 80% of deaths after an ACS have been shown to be due to cardiovascular causes also in the elderly, the focus has been shifted to secondary prevention. Data regarding the use of both ticagrelor or low-dose prasugrel, as compared to clopidogrel, showed that a reduction of ischemic events was counterbalanced by an increase in bleeding events. In perspective, it might be interesting to explore the superiority of a strategy that limits the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy to a short period after an ACS (when the ischemic event rate is higher) in elderly patients, and to explore other endpoints such as mid-term quality of life outcome after ACS in elderly patients.

Comparison of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are at elevated risk of both ischemic and bleeding complications after an acute coronary syndrome and display higher on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity compared with younger patients. Prasugrel 5 mg provides more predictable platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel in the elderly, suggesting the possibility of reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial, we compared a once-daily maintenance dose of prasugrel 5 mg with the standard clopidogrel 75 mg in patients >74 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes or bleeding within 1 year. The study was designed to demonstrate superiority of prasugrel 5 mg over clopidogrel 75 mg. RESULTS: Enrollment was interrupted, according to prespecified criteria, after a planned interim analysis, when 1443 patients (40% women; mean age, 80 years) had been enrolled with a median follow-up of 12 months, because of futility for efficacy. The primary end point occurred in 121 patients (17%) with prasugrel and 121 (16.6%) with clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.007; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.30; P=0.955). Definite/probable stent thrombosis rates were 0.7% with prasugrel versus 1.9% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.00; P=0.06). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2 and greater rates were 4.1% with prasugrel versus 2.7% with clopidogrel (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.16; P=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: The present study in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes showed no difference in the primary end point between reduced-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel. However, the study should be interpreted in light of the premature termination of the trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01777503.

Clinical outcomes of overlapping versus non-overlapping everolimus-eluting absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: An analysis from the multicentre prospective RAI registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02298413).

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping versus non-overlapping Absorb BVS. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the clinical impact of stent overlap with the Absorb BVS bioresorbable stent. METHODS: We compared outcomes of patients receiving overlapping or non-overlapping Absorb BVS in the multicenter prospective RAI Registry. RESULTS: Out of 1,505 consecutive patients treated with Absorb BVS, 1,384 were eligible for this analysis. Of these, 377 (27%) were in the overlap group, and 1,007 (73%) in the non-overlap group. The most frequent overlap configuration was the marker-to-marker type (48%), followed by marker-over-marker (46%) and marker-inside-marker (6%) types. Patients of the overlap group had higher prevalence of multivessel disease and higher SYNTAX score, and required more frequently the use of intravascular imaging. At a median follow-up of 368 days, no difference was observed between overlap and non-overlap groups in terms of a device-related composite endpoint (cardiac death, TV-MI, ID-TLR) (5.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.20) or of a patient-related composite endpoint (any death, any MI, any revascularization) (15.4% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.18). Cardiac death (1.0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.54), MI (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.51), TVR (4.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.51) and stent thrombosis (1.1 vs. 1.5%, P = 1.00) were also comparable between groups. When assessing outcomes of the overlap population according to overlap configurations used, no difference was observed in terms of the device- or patient-related composite endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of patients with or without overlapping BVS were comparable at mid-term follow-up despite higher angiographic complexity of the overlap subset. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.