The measurement of enamel wear by four toothpastes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the enamel abrasivity of three whitening toothpastes and a silica toothpaste and to measure the brushing forces used. METHODS: Polished human enamel blocks were indented with a Knoop diamond and attached to dentures of adult volunteers. The blocks were brushed ex vivo, twice per day with either a whitening toothpaste containing Perlite (White System), a commercial whitening toothpaste (A and B) or a silica toothpaste. After four and twelve-weeks, one block per subject was removed and the Knoop indent remeasured. From the changes in the indent length, the amount of enamel wear was calculated. RESULTS: The mean enamel wear (sd) for White System, silica toothpaste, whitening toothpaste A and B after four-weeks was 0.14 (0.15), 0.09 (0.16), 0.14 (0.12) and 0.89 (0.93) and after twelve-weeks was 0.24 (0.21), 0.37 (0.73), 0.36 (0.52) and 1.04 (0.98) microm respectively. After four-weeks, the differences in enamel wear between whitening toothpaste B and all other toothpastes were of statistical significance (p < 0.003), but not after twelve-weeks. The mean ex vivo normal brushing force (sd) was 2.67 (1.33) N. CONCLUSIONS: All three whitening toothpastes did not give significantly more enamel wear than a silica toothpaste after twelve-weeks in situ with ex vivo brushing.

Abrasion of human enamel and dentine caused by toothpastes of differing abrasivity determined using an in situ wear model.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of enamel and dentine wear in situ during tooth brushing with a range of five toothpastes of differing RDA and REA values. METHODS: Enamel/dentine inserts were placed in the buccal aspects of full upper dentures of human volunteers. Enamel wear was determined by change in Knoop indent length and dentine wear was determined from the enamel-dentine step height, measured using optical profilometry. RESULTS: Significant differences between the test products were found for both enamel and dentine (p < 0.05). However for the conventional toothpastes the rate of wear was similar and differences between the products were not generally statistically significant for either enamel or dentine, despite the fact that their RDA values differed by more than a factor of two. The rate of wear was found to decrease throughout the duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the methodology used is capable of assessing enamel and dentine wear in situ within a relatively short period of time. The data suggest that whilst in vitro tests have value in understanding differences in abrasivity between products, they cannot be used to predict in vivo effects.

The measurement of enamel and dentine abrasion by tooth whitening products using an in situ model.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the enamel and dentine wear of two whitening toothpastes using an in situ model with ex vivo brushing. METHODS: Human enamel/dentine (approximately 50:50) blocks (approximately 4 x 4mm) were placed in the upper buccal aspects of full or partial dentures of a group of 25 subjects. Subjects brushed the specimens ex vivo with either a calcium carbonate/perlite or silica containing whitening toothpaste under exaggerated conditions as compared to normal for 30 s, twice per day. Specimens were removed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks and the wear to the enamel and dentine was determined. Enamel wear was determined by change in Knoop indent length and dentine wear was determined from the enamel-dentine step height, measured using optical profilometry. RESULTS: The mean wear after 12 weeks was for enamel 0.27 and 0.19 microns, and for dentine 34.3 and 61.1 microns, for the calcium carbonate/perlite and silica toothpastes respectively. There were no significant differences between products after 12 weeks. The rate of wear was found to decrease throughout the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between the two whitening toothpastes in terms of enamel and dentine wear after 12 weeks brushing.

In vitro efficacy of a whitening toothpaste containing calcium carbonate and perlite.

OBJECTIVES: The studies described in this paper aimed to assess the stain removal efficacy, fluoride efficacy and abrasivity to enamel and dentine of a new whitening toothpaste containing calcium carbonate and perlite, using appropriate in vitro models. METHODS: Stain removal efficacy was assessed using the pellicle cleaning ratio (PCR) method. Fluoride efficacy was assessed using remineralisation, demineralisation and fluoride-uptake methods. Abrasivity was assessed using an enamel and dentine wear method. RESULTS: The results showed that the new whitening toothpaste was able to remove extrinsic tooth stain more effectively than three commercially available toothpaste formulations. The fluoride efficacy was superior to a non-fluoridated control and was not significantly different to a clinically tested fluoride-containing toothpaste. The abrasivity data showed that the calcium carbonate/perlite toothpaste is no more abrasive to enamel or dentine than two other commercially available whitening toothpastes. CONCLUSIONS: The studies show that the new whitening toothpaste is effective in extrinsic stain removal, has an efficacious fluoride source and does not have an undue degree of abrasivity to enamel or dentine compared to other relevant commercially available products.

Investigation of erosion and abrasion on enamel and dentine: a model in situ using toothpastes of different abrasivity.

BACKGROUND: Studies in vitro suggest that abrasion and erosion may act synergistically to produce wear of enamel and dentine. Methods in situ are recently available to study separately erosion and abrasion of dental tissues. The aim of this study was to combine two in situ protocols to study the interplay between erosion and abrasion of enamel and dentine. METHOD: The study was a single-blind, randomised, five-treatment cross-over design involving 15 healthy volunteers. During each 10-day study period, subjects wore from 0900 to 1700 h an upper removable acrylic appliance holding one polished enamel and one polished dentine specimen. The specimen treatment regimens were: 1. Drinking water and brushing with toothpaste A. 2. Drinking water and brushing with toothpaste B. 3. Drinking orange juice. 4. Drinking orange juice and brushing with toothpaste A. 5. Drinking orange juice and brushing with toothpaste B. Drinking and brushing times were around 0900, 1100, 1300 and 1500 h. Drinks were consumed as 250 ml over 10 min and brushing ex vivo for 1 min to each specimen. Measurement of tissue loss was made on days 5 and 10 of each period using a profilometer. RESULTS: All treatments produced increasing tissue loss over time, which was considerably greater for dentine than enamel. For enamel, the data at days 5 and 10 showed a significant effect for erosion (i.e. orange juice was significantly more erosive than water), but no significant effect for abrasion (i.e. no significant difference between the two toothpaste treatments). The combined orange juice and toothpaste effects were directional for synergy but did not reach significance. For dentine at day 10, many specimens exceeded the 50 microm set limit of the profilometer and only day 5 data were considered. There were significant effects for erosion (orange juice produced significantly more erosion than water) and for abrasion (paste A was significantly more abrasive to dentine than paste B). The synergy effect could not be examined for dentine due to the truncation effect as the set limit of the profilometer was exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Erosion increases the susceptibility of enamel to toothpaste abrasion. Dentine is considerably more susceptible than enamel to erosion and abrasion alone or combined. Dentine loss appears to correlate with toothpaste abrasivity (RDA value).

Development of a method in situ to study toothpaste abrasion of dentine. Comparison of 2 products.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The abrasivity of toothpastes is usually determined using in vitro methods; as such, the clinical significance of the findings is uncertain. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a method in situ to study abrasion of dentine by two toothpastes of different Relative Dentine Abrasivity (RDA). METHOD: The study was a single blind, randomised, 2 way cross over design involving 10 healthy dentate volunteers. Subjects wore an maxillary removable acrylic appliance containing two flat human dentine specimens, taped to expose a window of tissue, from 9 am to 4 pm during the two 10 working day study periods. No food or drink was consumed when the appliance was in place. On five occasions each day, the appliances were removed and the dentine windows brushed ex vivo with the allocated paste for 60 s each. Dentine abrasion at days 5 and 10 was measured using a profilometer. RESULTS: Both toothpastes produced measurable abrasion in all subjects and the depth increased in most subjects between 5 and 10 days. There was significant subject and specimen variation both within and between toothpastes. There was significantly increased abrasion by the toothpaste with the higher RDA value and in mean terms the ratio of abrasion between the two pastes was similar to the ratio of the RDA values. CONCLUSION: The method in situ, already used to study dental hard tissue erosion, appears ideally suitable to study dental abrasion alone and the interaction between aetiological factors involved in tooth wear.