RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Follicular cholecystitis (FC) is a rare entity found, it is found in 0.1-1 % of patients with chronic cholecystitis. 1,2 This pathologic finding has been associated with extrahepatic biliary obstruction distal to the gallbladder, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, choledocholithiasis, and distal biliary strictures. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient is a 32-year-old female with a past medical history significant for obesity presented with symptoms of postprandial nausea and spasmodic abdominal pain. An abdominal ultrasound was performed with findings adenomyosis and possible gallbladder polyps or adherent stones. The patient was referred to surgery and a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy with liver biopsy was performed. On pathology, the gallbladder was found to have chronic, active follicular cholecystitis with cholelithiasis. Percutaneous needle liver biopsy revealed the following: focal, mild periductal fibrosis, mild portal fibrosis with minimal mixed micro- and macrovesicular steatosis, and no significant steatohepatitis. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of follicular cholecystitis with associated hepatic findings on pathology. Follicular cholecystitis is strongly associated with extrahepatic biliary obstruction distal to the gallbladder, but it has not been previously associated with liver fibrosis. We hope to bring awareness to this rare but significant pathology. CONCLUSION: Our case is unusual due to the findings of hepatic periductal fibrosis with follicular cholecystitis. Follicular cholecystitis is strongly associated with extrahepatic biliary obstruction distal to the gallbladder but it has not been documented it to be associated with any hepatic findings or pathology.
RESUMEN
Arterial dissections are a common cause of stroke in young patients. Dissection occurs when the structure of the arterial wall is compromised, allowing blood to collect between layers as an intramural hematoma. Symptoms of cervical artery dissection may include pain, Horner syndrome, cranial and cervical neuropathies, and pulsatile tinnitus. Treatment varies depending on the severity of symptoms but generally includes anticoagulation with surgical therapy reserved for patients with progressive neurologic symptoms or symptom recurrence while on maximum medical therapy. Here, we present the case of a traumatic internal carotid artery dissection with significant narrowing of the artery in a healthy 26-year-old female after self-manipulation of the neck. She developed Horner syndrome secondary to her dissection. Our patient was initially treated with anticoagulation and transitioned to clopidogrel and atorvastatin for outpatient treatment. Six-month follow-up computed tomography angiography showed complete resolution of her dissection. She had overall significant improvement in her symptoms with only mild residual ptosis on the follow-up examination. While the presentation of a patient with neurologic sequelae from a cervical artery dissection causing stroke is a well-known phenomenon, the mechanical cause in this particular case is rare. There have been several case reports in the literature detailing cervical artery dissections following cervical manipulative therapy by trained professionals (i.e. chiropractors, physical therapists, osteopathic physicians) but none occurring from self-manipulation of the neck. This case report details successful treatment of a rare case of internal carotid dissection following self-manipulation with appropriate medical therapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Screening blood work after minor injuries is common in pediatric trauma. The risk of missed injuries versus diagnostic necessity in an asymptomatic patient remains an ongoing debate. We evaluated the clinical utility of screening blood work in carefully selected asymptomatic children after minor trauma. METHODS: Patients seen at a level 1 pediatric center with "minor trauma" for blunt trauma between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were age <4 of >18 years, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15, penetrating trauma, nonaccidental trauma, hemodynamic instability, abdominal findings (pain, distension, bruising, tenderness), hematuria, pelvic/femur fracture, multiple fractures, and operative intervention. Data abstraction included demographics, blood work, interventions, and disposition. RESULT: A total of 1308 patients were treated during the study period. Four hundred thirty-three (33%) met inclusion criteria. Mean ± SD age was 12.7 ± 4 years (range, 4-18 years), and 59% were male. Seventy-eight percent were discharged home from the emergency department. All patients had blood work. Twenty-eight percent had at least one abnormal laboratory value. The most common abnormal blood work was leukocytosis (16%). Thirty percent had an intervention, and none prompted by abnormal blood work. One patient had an intra-abdominal finding (psoas hematoma). CONCLUSION: When appropriately selected, screening laboratory testing in asymptomatic minor pediatric blunt trauma patients leads to unnecessary needle sticks without significant advantage.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between open versus laparoscopic gastrostomies in children aged ≤1 y. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database was reviewed between 2012 and 2017. Chi-square analysis was performed on children aged ≤1 y to compare complication rates between open and laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 7940 patients were aged ≤1 y. Of which, 20% underwent open gastrostomy (OGT), and 80% received laparoscopic gastrostomy (LGT). There were no differences in sex or race. However, OGT patients were younger (119 d versus 134 d; P = 0.0001), smaller at birth (1.84 kg versus 1.85 kg; P = 0.03), and were smaller at operation (4.6 kg versus 5 kg; P = 0.0001). Also, patients were more likely to be inpatient at the time of surgery and had more congenital malformations. Complications (OGT 6% versus LGT 4%; P = 0.001) and mortality were significantly higher in the open group (OGT 2.3% versus LGT 0.6%; P = 0.001). However, matched control analysis demonstrated OGT patients have more complications. CONCLUSIONS: OGT patients are smaller and with more significant comorbidities in this data set. In fact, even after matched control analysis, these patients experience more complications.
Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a known complication in patients with solid organ transplant. It can present as localized or disseminated tumor. The cornerstone of management consists of reduced immunosuppression (RI). In select cases, localized disease can potentially be curative with surgical excision. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here we present a case of a 19-year-old female with orthotopic heart transplant with two episodes of recurrent PTLD. After the second episode she was found to have asymptomatic splenic lesions which were refractory to RI and chemotherapy. She subsequently underwent splenectomy that showed sterile necrotizing and non-necrotizing granulomas with no evidence of PTLD. DISCUSSION: Based on our literature search this is the first ever reported case of sterile granulomas in a patient with recurrent PTLD which could potentially be diagnosed with minimally invasive biopsy rather than diagnostic splenectomy. CONCLUSION: This report is an attempt to create awareness regarding potential for presence of sterile granulomas in patients with recurrent PTLD and discuss the use of percutaneous biopsy before splenectomy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes for complicated appendicitis treated with early versus interval appendectomy and to identify which patients would likely benefit from early appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of complicated appendicitis was performed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into early (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA) groups. We compared demographics, complications and outcomes. Pearson's Chi square analysis and Student's T test analysis were performed. RESULTS: We identified 316 patients (EA group 53% vs. IA group 47%). Interval appendectomy group had longer symptom duration [IA 3.8 vs. EA 2.3 days (p = 0.0001)], increased leukocytosis [IA 18.7 vs. EA 17.2 (p = 0.008)], more initial abscesses [IA 35% vs. EA 13% (p = 0.0001)], more complications [IA 30% vs. EA 19%, (p = 0.013) and prolonged total length of stay [(LOS), p = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis of all patients revealed 80% of patients presented with ≤3 cm abscess and duration of symptoms (DOS) ≤5 days. Interval appendectomy patients with DOS ≤5 days and or ≤3 cm abscess on admission had no differences in clinical presentation. However, these patients had prolonged total LOS (IA 7.7 vs. EA 6.3 days, p = 0.01) and increased complications (IA 29% vs. EA 19%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with complicated appendicitis in children present with small abscess (≤3 cm) and short symptom duration (≤5 days). This subset of patients might benefit from early appendectomy due to decreased LOS, resource utilization and reduced complications.
Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso/patología , Algoritmos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding duration of antibiotic therapy for complicated appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy. We hypothesized that more than two weeks of antibiotic therapy does not decrease complication rates in asymptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with complicated appendicitis treated with interval appendectomy from 2010-2015 was performed. We divided the patients in two groups (group 1, ≤2 weeks of antibiotics; group 2: >2 weeks of antibiotics). Demographics, antibiotic agents, and complications were collected. Pearson χ analysis and Student t-test analysis was performed with significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Total of 158 patients met inclusion criteria (group 1 [47.4%] vs. group 2 [52.5%]). Mean length of stay was 7.5 days. Abscess on admission was 26% (n = 41). The groups were demographically similar. Total complication rate was 39.2% (abscess development, n = 19; re-admissions, n = 16; interval appendectomy <28 days, n = 13; unplanned emergency department visits, n = 7; fistula, n = 4, wound infection/dehiscence, n = 3; and conversion to open surgery, n = 4). All fistulas and conversions occurred in the less than two-week group. Mean course of antibiotics was 4.1 weeks. There was no significant difference in the complication rates based on duration or type of antibiotics (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Treatment with more than two weeks of antibiotic therapy for complicated appendicitis does not confer any clinical benefit prior to interval appendectomy. Complications were not reduced by a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Adolescente , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure is the reason for the decreased utilization of computed tomography (CT) in pediatric centers (PCs). We sought to compare the radiation dose exposure of CT imaging performed at outside hospitals (OH) versus PC in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis (AA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients managed at our PC for AA from January 2011 to March 2016 was performed. Patients who had CT imaging for AA at OH were compared to those who underwent CT for appendicitis at our PC. Radiation dosing was compared using the dose index (CTDI [mGY]) and dose length product (DLP [mGYcm]). Independent t-test samples were used to compare means for radiation dose. RESULTS: 379 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 59.4% (225) patients imaged at our PC and 40.6% (154) patients were transferred from an OH. When performed at OH, 6.5% of CTs were considered inadequate as they were done without intravenous contrast compared to 1.3% in our PC. Mean CTDI was 6.9 at our PC and 11.8 at OH (P < 0.0001). Mean DLP at PC was 296.2 versus 456.8 at OH (P < 0.0001). An excess radiation dose of 4.9 mGY and 160.5 mGYcm was noted when CT scan was performed at OH versus PC. CONCLUSIONS: Using DLP as a gauge of radiation exposure, CT imaging performed at OH has a 44% higher radiation rate relative to the exposure at PC. In cases of suspected AA at a facility without pediatric surgeons, early transfer to PC prior to imaging is advocated.