Coronal, Sagittal, and Horizontal Classification of the Chest Shape and Its Role in Selection of Proper Implants.

Background: The number of female breast correction procedures has been steadily increasing. Despite extensive literature being available on these procedures, few authors have discussed the role of preoperative chest wall analysis in relation to postoperative outcomes. To date, no comprehensive classification of chest shape has been introduced in the literature. The aim of this study was to present a novel classification of chest shapes, based on three basic planes: coronal (C), sagittal (S), and horizontal (H), hence the proposed name "CSH classification." Method: In this study, a retrospective analysis of 1000 randomly selected chest and breast images was conducted by three independent nonmedical evaluators, using standardized digital images captured with the Vectra 3D body scanner. All examined patients were qualified for breast augmentation surgery. Results: Among 1000 randomly examined patients, 923 were classified in the coronal plane, 920 in the sagittal plane, and 627 in the horizontal plane. Other patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient quality of the images. A notable 43.2% of women have shoulder height asymmetries. A relationship between shoulder height asymmetry and chest width was confirmed by the chi-square Pearson test (P = 0.04), indicating that a higher shoulder is associated with a greater chest width on the same side. Furthermore, 84.7% of women displayed excessive upper chest projection, whereas 28.4% showed excessive lower chest projection. Additionally, 84.4% of women had chest projection asymmetries. Conclusions: The vast majority of the women had natural asymmetries of the breast or and chest wall. The CSH classification allows systematizing the chest shape assessment. The chest shape has a significant impact on breast implant selection and the choice of the breast surgery technique.

A Randomized Study Comparing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains the most common nonskin cancer among women. Prophylactic methods for reducing surgical-site complications after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) are crucial to prevent acellular dermal matrices or prosthesis exposure and loss. The authors assessed the impact of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) versus standard dressings (ST) after IBR on surgical-site complications, superficial skin temperature (SST), skin elasticity, and subjective scar quality, to determine the potential benefit of prophylactic ciNPWT application. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled study of 60 adult female patients was conducted between January of 2019 and July of 2021. All patients had oncologic indications for IBR using implants or expanders. RESULTS: Application of ciNPWT correlated with a significant decrease in surgical-site complications within 1 year of surgery (total, 40%; ST, 60%; ciNPWT, 20%; P = 0.003) and resulted in more elastic scar tissue as measured with a Cutometer (average coefficient of elasticity, 0.74; ST, 0.7; ciNPWT, 0.9; P < 0.001). The SST of each scar 1 week after surgery was significantly higher in the ciNPWT group (average SST, 31.5; ST SST, 31.2; ciNPWT SST, 32.3; P = 0.006). According to the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0, subjective scar outcomes in both groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized controlled study that demonstrated a significant decrease in surgical-site wound complications within 1 year of surgery in IBR patients receiving ciNPWT. A high probability of postoperative radiotherapy should be a relative indication for the use of ciNPWT. . CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

A Retrospective Study Assessing the Outcomes of Immediate Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant and Mesh-Based Breast Reconstruction.

(1) Introduction: In response to patient concerns about breast cancer recurrence, increased use of breast magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing, and advancements in breast reconstruction techniques, mastectomy rates have been observed to rise over the last decade. The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral implants and long-term, dual-stage resorbable mesh-based breast reconstructions in mutation carriers (prophylactic surgery) and breast cancer patients. (2) Patients and methods: This retrospective, two-center study included 170 consecutive patients after 232 procedures: Prepectoral surgery was performed in 156 cases and subpectoral was performed in 76. (3) Results: Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with more frequent minor late complications (p < 0.001), but not major ones (p = 0.101), while postoperative chemotherapy was related to more frequent serious (p = 0.005) postoperative complications. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of minor complications (31.03%) than no-radiotherapy (12.21%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression found complications to be significantly associated with an expander (OR = 4.43), skin-reducing mastectomy (OR = 9.97), therapeutic mastectomy vs. risk-reducing mastectomy (OR = 4.08), and postoperative chemotherapy (OR = 12.89). Patients in whom prepectoral surgeries were performed demonstrated significantly shorter median hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and lower minor complication rates (5.77% vs. 26.32% p < 0.001), but similar major late complication rates (p = 0.915). (4) Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction with the use of long-term, dual-stage resorbable, synthetic mesh is a safe and effective method of breast restoration, associated with low morbidity and good cosmesis. Nevertheless, prospective, multicenter, and long-term outcome data studies are needed to further evaluate the benefits of such treatments.

Evaluation of the nonradioactive inducible magnetic seed system Magseed for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions - initial clinical experience.

INTRODUCTION: Many early-stage breast cancers are not palpable and thus must be localized before surgery. Detecting these lesions is crucial before they become clinically symptomatic to avoid morbidity and mortality. Nowadays, there are several new alternative techniques to traditional needle/wire localization available. These methods allow for better surgical margins, decreased costs and operating room delays, as well as improved patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nonradioactive inducible magnetic seed system Magseed (Endomagnetics Ltd, Cambridge, UK) for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. To our knowledge, this report documents the first clinical experience with Magseed in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-institution case report of 10 women with nonpalpable breast lesions localized and excised by using the Magseed surgical guidance system between November 2017 and May 2018. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Magseed is an easy, sensitive and effective localization method. It is beneficial for oncoplastic outcomes and for scheduling efficiency, which overcomes many limitations of other localization methods. Surgical specimen margins were evaluated in 90% of cases as negative, with no additional re-excision. Only one patient with ductal carcinoma in situ had a positive tumor margin at the axillary side.

Is negative-pressure wound therapy beneficial in modern-day breast surgery?

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used to treat many different types of wounds, but there is still a lack of large studies describing its effectiveness in breast surgery. Enhanced recovery, reduction of complications, and good scar quality might be improved by the application of NPWT. Existing data show that vacuumassisted closure (VAC) application after expander-based breast reconstruction may be beneficial because of decreasing overall complications in comparison with standard wound treatment. There are few cases in which the use of negative pressure resulted in healing of complicated breast wounds after implant insertion - most breasts achieved healing, wherein duration of NPWT ranged from seven to 21 days. The use of NPWT leads to a decrease of seroma formation (from 70% to 15%), the mean percutaneous aspirated volume (from 193 ml to 26 ml) and the numbers of percutaneous aspirations (from three to one) in latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Furthermore, a prospective, within-patient, randomised study with 200 participants showed that treating closed incisional wounds after reduction mammoplasty with a VAC system resulted in a decrease of overall complications and protected against wound dehiscence. In the literature, there are cases showing that NPWT may be useful for the successful treatment of chronic and non-healing wounds, included non-puerperal mastitis and surgical sites affected by radiation therapy due to breast cancer. There is still a need for evidence confirming the effectiveness of NPWT in breast surgery because of the deficiency of large prospective studies that compare NPWT with standard treatment.

Predicting Long-Term Mortality after Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Machine Learning Techniques and Hematological Markers.

INTRODUCTION: Hematological indices including red cell distribution width and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio are proven to be associated with outcomes of acute coronary syndrome. The usefulness of machine learning techniques in predicting mortality after acute coronary syndrome based on such features has not been studied before. OBJECTIVE: We aim to create an alternative risk assessment tool, which is based on easily obtainable features, including hematological indices and inflammation markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We obtained the study data from the electronic medical records of 5053 patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome during a 5-year period. The time of follow-up ranged from 12 to 72 months. A machine learning classifier was trained to predict death during hospitalization and within 180 and 365 days from admission. Our method was compared with the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Score 2.0 on a test dataset. RESULTS: For in-hospital mortality, our model achieved a c-statistic of 0.89 while the GRACE score 2.0 achieved 0.90. For six-month mortality, the results of our model and the GRACE score on the test set were 0.77 and 0.73, respectively. Red cell distribution width (HR 1.23; 95% CL 1.16-1.30; P < 0.001) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (HR 1.08; 95% CL 1.05-1.10; P < 0.001) showed independent association with all-cause mortality in multivariable Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: Hematological markers, such as neutrophil count and red cell distribution width have a strong association with all-cause mortality after acute coronary syndrome. A machine-learned model which uses the abovementioned parameters can provide long-term predictions of accuracy comparable or superior to well-validated risk scores.